professional career covers: teaching at undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate level; planning, developing and managing project in the areas of Educational Systems. My research interest include the foreign educational programs, dual degree, project training, foreign industrial practice. I am a member of Russian Academy of Natural Science and Academy of Social Education.Mr. Roman V. Kupriyanov, Kazan National Research Technological University I am an Assistant Professor of Kazan National Research Technological University. I received my specialty of chemical technology of high-molecular compounds in 1997. At the same time, I studied at the Faculty of additional education of KNRTU on specialty Psychology. I was a post- graduate
of the project they were working on. Figure 4 shows these locations. Theinstructor was able to use this information to improve the discussion in this case to includediscussions involving international topics and applications relevant to those areas. Figure 4. Descriptive QuestioningAs a part of the classroom experience, and in anticipation of this paper, participants were askedabout their experience using this form of questioning. Figure 5 gives the results of this survey.The majority of the participants felt that using the interactive questioning improved learning.Thirty-four percent, however, did not think it improved learning. Some of the reasons for this arediscussed later in the paper
-year doctoral student studying educational psychology at Texas A&M University. She currently works as a graduate assistant for curriculum redesign projects for the Center for Teaching Excellence. Her areas of interest include curriculum design and redesign, professional development of faculty, creativity in higher education, and the impact of curricular alignment on long-term student outcomes. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 ASEE 2016 Impact of curriculum transformation committee experience on faculty perspectives of their teaching and its influence on student learningI. IntroductionTexas A&M University’s civil
, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com
, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Presentacion Rivera-Reyes is currently a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He formerly held a position of teaching assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. He also held a position as Professor of Telecommunication Engineering at Technological University of Honduras teaching courses of Transmission System to senior students. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Na- tional Autonomous University of Honduras. He has experience in the telecommunication industry where he worked as a Project Manager developing solutions of high-speed transmission
assessment and evaluation of engi- neering education research projects and initiatives. She has most recently worked for Walgreens as a Sr. Data Analyst and General Motors/Delphi Automotive as a Sr. Applications Programmer and Manufactur- ing Quality Engineer. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western while working for Delphi. She completed her postdoctoral studies in engineering education at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Clark has published articles in the Journal of Engineering Education, Advances in Engineering Education, and Risk Analysis.Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott C. Streiner is a full-time
obtain feedback on the design of each lab, which will be used to improve the lab design. Wedeploy the labs to cloud computing and a number of related courses such as distributed computingsystems, computer networking, operating systems, databases, and mobile computing.The third stage is evaluation, in which we evaluate how effective our approach is in enhancingstudent learning in cloud computing education. However, this project does not focus on developingnovel evaluation tools. We will use existing tools and processes for evaluation. An advisorycommittee oversees the evaluation procedure. Lab Development Lab Deployment Evaluation - Lab description - Implementation and
department. In this role he has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on project- and lab-based instruction and learning. His research interests are in the areas of engineering education, semiconductor device characterization, design and simulation, signal integrity and THz sensors. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE.Mr. Phillip Wong, Portland State University Phillip Wong received an M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 1990. Since then, he has been with Portland State University, Oregon, USA, where he is currently the ECE Lab Coordinator and an instructor. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Exploring Proficiency Testing
dataset for this paper comes from the MOOCKnowledge project data collection,which provides an opportunity to work with real-world data from hundreds of people. K-Means and SOM algorithms are performed with a subset of participants' features as inputdata. The clustering evaluation, meanwhile, is achieved with a selection of indices, an intra-cluster measure and an overall quality criterion for K-Means, and two measures related totopological ordering for SOM.The comparison of internal structure of both clustering (set of profiles) shows that there aresimilarities between them on the one hand and some pinpointed differences that can not beevaluated in advance without the opinion of an expert familiarized with the specifications ofthe MOOC on the
program.Prof. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and
, and emotional intelligence emerge.1. Introduction1.1 Teamwork in Engineering EducationEffective teamwork is a common theme in engineering education. Teamwork skills frequentlyrank at the top of desired engineering skills lists, along with analysis, problem solving, design,and communication,3 and the ability to work well in teams appears in the current and proposedfuture set of ABET Student Outcomes for programs accredited by the Engineering AccreditationCommission.4 Team projects are a hallmark of engineering curricula, especially in laboratorycourses and capstone design courses. Many engineering educators discuss strategies for teachingteamwork skills to their students, especially through collaborative and cooperative learningapproaches.5
added benefit of borrowing demosfrom different research labs is that the high school students are exposed to the breadth oftechnologies that are being developed across the country. Additionally, some manufacturers andfaculty have donated materials to be consumed during the hands-on activity. An added advantageof using faculty donated materials is that it stimulates investment in the project, whichencourages faculty and their graduate students to invest time volunteering to support theworkshop.Volunteer support is recruited through several different approaches. Six to ten graduate studentvolunteers are required to lead various activities throughout the workshop. Several monthsbefore the conference, conference organizers suggest individual
engineering programs, math education, K-12 STEM curriculum and accreditation, and retention and recruitment of STEM ma- jors. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Longitudinal Success of Calculus I ReformAbstractThis paper describes the second year of an ongoing project to transform calculus instruction atBoise State University. Over the past several years, Calculus I has undergone a completeoverhaul that has involved a movement from a collection of independent, uncoordinated,personalized, lecture-based sections, into a single coherent multi-section course with an active-learning pedagogical approach. The overhaul also significantly impacted the course content andlearning
in writing, to both technical and non-technical audiences.There are no quizzes or exams. Every effort is made to create an atmosphere in which studentsand the instructor work together to improve communications skills. The students do a semester-long project that requires a written report and a final oral presentation. Throughout the course,students are assigned a series of short essays and presentations, receive detailed feedback, revisethe written assignments, and use comments on oral presentations to improve their performancethe next time.Since this paper is about peer review of oral presentations, the focus will be on two of the oralpresentations assigned in NUCL 580 and peer review of those presentations. The followingparagraphs will
case study to measure the learning outcomes of engineering students in the new Bachelor’s of Science degree at UTEP, Engineering Education & Leadership.Mr. Leonardo Orea-Amador, University of Texas - El Paso Leonardo is a research student dedicated to design, engineering, and entrepreneurship. He is an investi- gator for the Empathic Design Studio at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) since August 2015. Leonardo is working to obtain his master’s degree in Systems Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso where he also obtained his bachelors of science in Mechanical Engineering. In 2014 he and his team were awarded first place with project, ProductivityPod, at the Paso del Norte Venture
specific and complex challenges.8,10Inductive teaching methods truly cover a large variety of instructional methods, from inquirylearning, problem-based learning, and project based learning. Often, these methods are deemed“student centered”, as the mastery of the concepts falls on the students to understand theimportance of the material from the problems or projects.11 Overall, inductive teaching styleshave more student benefits than deductive teaching methods. Inductive teaching methods offermore combinations to reach the learning style needs of the classroom and engage students moreactively in the subject matter.Student Perceptions in the ClassroomSatisfaction, self-efficacy, motivation, and classroom environment are the main factors in
-Computer Interaction, and the Psychology of Interaction Design. In addition, he has taught one- day professional development courses at both national and international conferences, and has participated in post-academic training for software engineers. Tom has worked on the design and development of sev- eral software projects and several pieces of commercial courseware. Some research papers have focused on the evaluation of interactive computing systems and the impact of evaluation on design. Other research papers have explored some of the pedagogical and institutional implications of universal student access to personal computers. In addition, he has given invited plenary addresses at international conferences. Tom
Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system technology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach
implementation project, the stress was building within the group, and the quality of our work was beginning to suffer. You noticed that we were not doing our best work and challenged us to rethink our approach. You reminded us of what we were capable of doing if we worked more together and this caused all of us to pause. No one else would have thought to intervene like you did and it made a real difference. In the end, we were all very proud of what we accomplished together and you played a big part in us getting there.The originators of the RBS exercise recommend that students receive stories from at least 10respondents and in my experience, most students
University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Angela Harris, Stanford University Angela is currently a Fellow with the Thinking Matters program at Stanford University. Angela received her PhD in Stanford’s Environmental Engineering and Science Program (Spring 2015). Angela completed her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology prior to coming to Stanford for her M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Angela conducts research related to water, sanitation, and child health in developing countries. Angela has extensive experience in developing survey questionnaires
projects (course related and capstone), student designcompetitions, and internships. Durham, S. A., & Marshall, W. E.16 advocate “that studentorganizations are shown to have benefits realized though student leadership within theseorganizations and organizational activities.” They note that there are “opportunities for students,who fill the leadership roles, to learn non-technical skills such as people, time management, andmost importantly, people management.” Yu, R., & Simmons, D. R.17 reported that “studentinvolvement in out-of-class activities promoted the development of leadership skills, groupskills, and engagement.” Fisher, D. R., & Bagiati, A., & Sarma, S. 18 posed a “student skilldevelopment framework”, which included
Paper ID #17346Engineering Uncertainty: A qualitative study on the way middle school teach-ers incorporate, manage and leverage the uncertainty of engineering designtaskMr. Beau Vezino, University of Arizona Beau R. Vezino is a Ph.D. student at the University of Arizona’s College of Education. His focus is engineering and science education. Beau currently teaches the science/engineering methods course for pre-service teachers and works on several related research projects. Beau is certified teacher and holds a MS in Education in Curriculum and Instruction (2009) and a BS in Mechanical Engineering (2005). Beau’s research
expense ofinvolving himself in other extracurricular activities.Kimmy was initially a first year materials science engineering major, but decided to switch intocivil engineering due to her interest in project management, or more importantly due to herdisinterest in the micro-scale and research heavy world of materials science. Kimmy is part of aliving and learning program designed to provide support for incoming freshmen girls inengineering. Kimmy seems to work hard, but suggests that her grades are not as high as shewould hope them to be. In addition to focusing on her classes, Kimmy also seems to be interested in participating in non-engineering related social extracurricular activities. Professor X is a relatively young professor that
affective outcomes related tosustainable engineering. This project was aimed at beginning to fill this gap.Research QuestionsThis research explored the following questions: (1) At the beginning of the courses, to what extent did students vary in their motivation toward sustainable engineering, appreciation for interdisciplinary skills, consideration of others in the context of engineering, and interest in global work? a. Were there differences between institutions? b. Were there differences between the students enrolled in different courses at the same institution? (2) Did student attitudes on these issues change over the course of a semester when taking courses that included
. Figure 3: OHC ModelRequired skills for this project: • advanced SMD soldering and reflow techniques. • basic C or C++ programming. • basic knowledge of Atmel products. • basic knowledge of 3D printing and modeling.Required equipment for this project: • Windows PC. • soldering iron suited for small components. • reflow oven. • 3D Printer.Design MaterialsThe documents and software used in this procedure have been compiled from two sources: theoriginal Kilobot documents made available by Harvard University athttp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/ssr/projects/progSA/kilobot.html andupdates later released at https://www.kilobotics.com/.The first source of information is the Kilobot documents folder that contains most of the relevantinformation
project looking at non-normative engineering students and how they may have differing paths to success. His education includes a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nevada, Reno.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada - Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in
Paper ID #14907Neuroscience 101: Might Your Teaching and Their Learning Benefit?Dr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, and F.NSPE (stuwalesh@comcast.net, www.helpingyouengineeryourfuture.com) is an author; teacher; and an independent consultant providing leadership, management, and engineering services. Prior to beginning his consultancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a project engineer and manager, department head, discipline manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and dean of an engineering college. Walesh’s technical
contemporary issues and realism for therelevance that produces passion to learn. One needs multidisciplinarity and educational breadthto develop intellectual power and critical thinking. 42Perhaps the most unsurprising change to Criterion 3 is the removal of the word “political” and itsreplacement with the more palatable idea “policy.” Of course the two are not interchangeable.Political processes produce, enact, sustain, mediate, and change policies. 43 Political is the broaderterm, encompassing policy-making processes. By shifting to the term policy instead of political,ABET is shrinking the intended domain of action for engineers. Understanding the politicalcontexts that give rise to engineering projects, and analyzing potential political
, since the participants were at different stages of their lives, adolescence as opposed tocollege students, there was divergence in the focus and types of data collected. The study on thethree adolescent boys created a scenario centered on engineering design, for which funds ofknowledge was drawn upon, while the study on college students pulled from their existingengineering-related experiences to elicit funds of knowledge. However, both studies supportedcommunity-based design projects as valuable methods for drawing on students’ funds ofknowledge.Referring back to our research question—How is the funds of knowledge framework being utilizedto understand engineering concepts at the secondary and post-secondary level? —both examplescentered on the
ConferenceSetting theStageWhy DoEmployersHire ForeignStudentsInstead ofAmericans?DataRemedies (andNon-Remedies)ConclusionsForeign TechWorkers in the U.S.: Failures and The Immobility Factor RemediesNorm MatloffUniversity ofCalifornia at Davis ASEE • Employers don’t want engineers to leave for another firm EngineeringDeans Council in the midst of an urgent project. ConferenceSetting theStageWhy DoEmployersHire ForeignStudentsInstead ofAmericans?DataRemedies (andNon-Remedies)ConclusionsForeign TechWorkers in the U.S.: Failures and The Immobility Factor RemediesNorm MatloffUniversity ofCalifornia at Davis ASEE