major.IntroductionPartnership between an Educational Institution and Secondary Schools is not a new concept infostering learning among students. There are many universities that work closely with highschools to develop a relationship to help fit students’ needs. Universities and high schoolstraditionally maintained collaborations by including student job shadowing, outreach activities,faculty exchanges, and recruiting. The purpose of these partnerships is to expose high schoolstudents to the major so they can plan ahead to meet the needs of industries, governments,national laboratories, and the training need. The goal of any university engineering technology curriculum is to provide theinformation and skills so each student so they can be successful in their
their three years of courseworktogether was an engineering course called Toying With TechnologySM.Toying With TechnologySM: The CourseThe Toying With TechnologySM course was initially offered during the 1996-1997academic year at Iowa State University by two engineering professors: Dr. Larry Genaloand the late Dr. Charles Wright. This engineering course was unique in that it was onlyoffered to education majors. According to Genalo (1998), the course encouraged andassisted students in designing and conducting hands-on laboratory exercises, whichwere based upon real world problems constructed out of LEGOs®. The courseexpounded upon technological innovations and assisted the preservice teachers inincorporating these activities into classroom
Skills • Stage One: Building up knowledge and skills from scratch to a “preset” level Two semesters • Stage Two: Addressing writing skills, comprehension, and technical English One semester Math and Science One or two semesters • “Prep” Math: To link high school math with first year college math • “Prep” Science: General physics and/or general chemistry at high school One or two semesters level with hands-on laboratory experiments Practical Training
Format The teaching experiment described herein was carried out in the “Mechanical SystemsDesign” course taught at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville (UWP). This is a junior/seniorlevel course that serves as a precursor to Senior Design. Key elements of the course include acomprehensive “design and build” project, and a lecture focus on developing the completedesign process. In the semester studied, students in the course were required to design and build alaboratory experiment to demonstrate the functioning of a mechanical system. The premisewas that the experiment would become part of a “lab kit” to be used in conjunction with an on-line presentation of the Mechanical Systems Laboratory course taught at UWP. Students worked on
, teacherswere to gather knowledge from collaborative learning, lectures, and laboratory activities at theinstitute. Then they would apply the knowledge to solve the design project [5].Daily activities in the institute would consist of the following three interrelated components:1) Lectures: The purpose was to provide the background knowledge for conducting engineeringdesign, and illustrate how mathematics and science are used to solve real world problems.2) Experiments: Participants were to conduct an inquiry-based learning that combinedobservation with hands-on activities. Some commonly available devices were used as theexperimental objects to learn how mathematics and science were involved in making thesedevices. This type of experiments did not
Description of the TX-0 Computer,” Memorandum 6M-4789-1, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lincoln, MA, October 1958. On-line (retrieved 8 July 2004) at http://bitsavers.org/pdf/mit/tx- 0/6M-4789-1_TX0_funcDescr.pdf 3. Bell, C. Gordon, J. Craig Mudge, and John E. McNamara, Computer Engineering: A DEC View of Hardware Design, Digital Press, Bedford MA, 1978. 4. Osborne, Hugh, "The Postroom Computer," Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, Volume 1, Issue 4 (December 2001), pp. 81 - 110.
and system level modeling using HDL, and application of embedded microcontroller hardware and software as they related to education and laboratory environments.Deepak Anand Mr. Deepak Anand received a Bachelor’s degree in Electronics and Communication from Uttar Pradesh Technical University in India in 2006. He also received a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from California State University Fresno in 2008. His research interests include nanotechnology, embedded system, and control Systems Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference
. Fig. 9. Rating scheme.AcknowledgementThis work was supported in part by the CONACYT under Grant No. 91013.References1.T. C. Hutchinson, F. Kuester, „ Hardware Architecture for a Visualization Classroom: VizClass, 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Comput appl Eng Educ 12:232-241.2. Fuller D.A. and Moreno A.F. (2004). Experimenting With a Computer-Mediated Collaborative Interaction Model to Support Engineering Courses, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 12 (3), 175-187.3. Li, S. G. and Lie, Q.(2004). Interactive Groundwater (IGW): An Innovative Digital Laboratory for Groundwater Education and Research, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 11 (4), 179-203.4. Fu, T.T. (2003). Applications of Computer Simulation in
Flexible Pavements, Transportation Research Record No. 1307, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.(5) Robert Brooks (a/k/a: James Matthews) and Carl Monismith, Direct Tension and Simple Stiffness Tests---Tools for the Fatigue Design of Asphalt Concrete Layers, Transportation Research Record No. 1388, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.(6) Robert Brooks (a/k/a: James Matthews), Investigation of Laboratory Fatigue testing Procedures for Asphalt Aggregate Mixtures, Journal of Transportation Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 119, No.4, 1993.(7) Robert Brooks (a/k/a: James Matthews), The Effect of Aggregate Gradation on the
® tape, scalpel, 65°C oven, glass slides, commercial uncuredsilicone—poly(dimethylsiloxane) or PDMS1,—and polystyrene Petri dishes). We believe thatthis technique will circumvent the limited access to cleanroom facilities that most high schooland colleges have and provide them with a fabrication technique that students can use in standardteaching laboratories. As a demonstrator of the method, we present the fabrication of amicrofluidic device consisting of three individually-addressable microchannels.Microfluidic devices have at least one of their dimensions (height, width, and/or length) smallerthan 1 mm. As a result, flow in microfluidic devices is governed by viscous and capillaryforces2-3. Low Reynolds numbers (corresponding to the
and teach them the concepts, emphasizing the language. 3. Ask all faculty and advisors to use the language and concepts when dealing with students, for example, in advising sessions. (In a business that expects to improve, personnel would be told to do so.)It is not complicated. Perhaps in a few years an entire upper-class student body of a college will act asmentors when they shoot back, “Change your process.”David A. Gray, following retirement from AT&T Bell Telephone Laboratories, has been an assistantprofessor of engineering at Messiah College since 2000. 51 Craig Gygi, Neil DeCarlo, and Bruce Williams, Six Sigma for Dummies, Wiley Publishing, Inc
AC 2011-2270: ACCLIMATING MECHANICAL DESIGNERS TO MANU-FACTURING TOLERANCES IN THE FRESHMAN YEARJulia L Morse, Kansas State University, Salina Julia Morse is Associate Professor and Program Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering Technology at Kansas State University, K-State Salina. She teaches lecture and laboratory courses in the areas of computer-aided design, manufacturing and automation. Ms. Morse earned a B.S.I.E. from the Univer- sity of Tennessee-Knoxville and an M.S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from Auburn University, where she also worked with Auburn Industrial Extension Service. Her work in industry includes engi- neering experience in quality control, industrial engineering, and design and
AC 2011-5: AN INSTRUCTIONAL PROCESSOR DESIGN USING VHDLAND AN FPGARonald J. Hayne, The Citadel Ronald J. Hayne, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at The Citadel. His professional areas of interest are digital systems and hardware description languages. He is a retired Army Colonel with experience in academics and Defense laboratories. Page 22.182.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 An Instructional Processor Design using VHDL and an FPGAAbstractMost modern processors are too complex to be used as an
=4263. Blummer, B. A., & Kritskaya, O. (2009). Best practices for creating an online tutorial: A literature review.Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 199-216. doi:10.1080/193229009030507993. Ganster, L. A., & Walsh, T. R. (2008). Enhancing library instruction to undergraduates: Incorporating onlinetutorials into the curriculum. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 15(3), 314-333.doi:10.1080/106913108022582324. Kearns, K., & Hybl, T. T. (2005). A collaboration between faculty and librarians to develop and assess a scienceliteracy laboratory module. Science & Technology Libraries, 25(4), 39-56. doi:10.1300/J122v25n04•045. Maness, J. (2006). Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology, 3(2), article
enlightening and enjoyed theinteraction and exchange of ideas between the instructors and attendees. The engineers gainedbetter insight into the issues that need to be addressed in taking an idea from the laboratory to acommercial enterprise through examining case studies and group-interactive projects. Thebusiness instructors gained a greater appreciation for the fact that researchers from the businessschool think very differently from the Medical and Engineering Schools. A survey wasconducted to obtain feedback and a number of suggestions were made to strengthen the program, Page 15.336.4some of which will be implemented in future series. A
, Brazilian government concerned with the teaching for engineeringsponsored a project named PRODENGE – Program for Engineering Development. Thisprogram that aimed to support engineering programs at universities and the basic subjectssuch as Physics, Chemistry, Computing and Mathematics promoted the restructuring andmodernizing of teaching and research in Engineering (Longo, Rocha and Loureiro2). Itwas a partnership of the Coordination for Improving University Education Staff(CAPES), the Secretariat of University Education (SESU) and the National Council ofScientific and Technological Development (CNPq). The results of this effort, accordingto Longo3, should be measured not only by products generated by laboratories,educational material available
staff LASER (Leadership & Assistance for Science Education Reform) is a Washington statewideeffort co-led by Pacific Science Center and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (operated byBattelle) in partnership with the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI). For 15years, LASER has catalyzed and supported sustainable innovation and improvement in K-12science education. LASER is accomplishing two goals: 1) to facilitate the successful adoption ofthe Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) across Washington state through professionaldevelopment and a science/engineering notebook tool to integrate NGSS and Common CoreState Standards (CCSS); and 2) to build leadership capacity for high quality STEM education inWashington
President for Research and Development at Smith & Nephew PLC, a global provider of orthopedic and otolaryngology implants. He began his engineering career at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory after serving with the U.S. Army 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment in Europe. Professor Jamison received the B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Engineering Science and Mechanics and Ma- terials Science Engineering respectively from Virginia Tech and the M.S. degree in Engineering Physics from the University of Virginia. He was Senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath, UK. He lives in Richmond, Virginia
landing mechanism for the Mars Science Laboratory Rover Mission AKA Curiosity. Mechanism design work for Hubble Robotics and on Global Precipitation Measurement Instrument Missions. Additionally, Professor Brown has worked at the National Institute of Standards and Technology designing test equipment to measure stress-strain relationships to superconductor perfor- mance. His past work on the tethering landing mechanism used to lower the Mars rover Curiosity to the Red Planet’s surface is part of a $2.5 billion program NASA says will assess whether the Gale Crater area of Mars has ever had the potential to support a habitable environment. Professor Brown runs the NASA Space Grant program at MSU Denver. His current
capstone design projects are performed at industrial sites andgovernment laboratories, including geographically diverse locations.Geographically distributed capstone project teams – Geographically distributed designprojects offers the opportunity to engage as students in the kinds of global engineering activitiesthat are expected of practicing engineers. The challenges and some methods to optimize idea Page 21.20.4generation in distributed settings are described in [10].Institutional exchange programs – Many institutions of higher education have exchangeprograms in place whereby students from one university spend a semester or year at
Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia; and a PhD in Systems Engineering from the Stevens Institute of Technol- ogy in Hoboken, New Jersey. Current research areas include systems thinking, competency framework development, and engineering education.Dr. Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Massood Towhidnejad is the director of NExtGeneration Applied Research Laboratory (NEAR), and a tenure full professor of software engineering in the department of Electrical, Computer, Software and System Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. His teaching interests include autonomous systems, and software and systems engineering with emphasis on quality assurance. He has been in
textbooks),demonstrations of effective teaching, laboratory exercises requiring the participants to teachlessons followed by group assessment, and discussions on how to apply the presented techniques COURSE SCHEDULE SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift 8:00 Demo Interpersonal Class I Lab III Rapport Principles of
wind power systems: - The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is a Department of Energy lab involved in wind, solar, and other renewable energy field. Their web site has excellent information regarding the various renewable energy sources and an educational resource page at http://www.nrel.gov/education. - The DOE’s Energy Smart Schools program (http://www.eere.energy.gov/energysmartschools) lists guidelines for building energy smart schools and is also an excellent source of information and curriculum building resources. - Interstate Renewable Energy Council’s Schools Going Solar program contains information on other schools installing solar systems
produced 102 Because the system had to dealprocedures covering all operations at with more than 600 staff members andthe departmental level and the Faculty 5,000 students among 12 departments,(Central Administration) levels such as the implementation was divided intostrategic planning, budgeting, two phases; Phase 1 on system setupcurriculum development, teaching and (2001-2002), and Phase 2 on selfevaluation, laboratory maintenance, quality assessment (2003). Theresearch management, etc. [3, 4]. implementation of quality system setup The assessment based on the started at the Central AdministrativeUniversity criteria (34 indexes) can be units and followed with thegrouped into 5
of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Conference and Exposition.5. “Know your Lab Styff: Laboratory Proficiency Exam for an Introductory Circuits Class” by Ian M.Nauhaus and Susan M. Lord University of San Diego Proceedings of the 2002 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.6. “Computer Aided Design of Interally Compensated CMOS Operational Amplifiers” b M.G. GuvenchUniversity of Southern Main, Gorham, ME 04038 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.7. “A Versatile Experiment in Electrical Engineering Technology”, Ahmad M. Farhoud, EngineeringTechnology Department University of Toledo, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for
0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 0 0.5 1 1.5Bibliography 1. Berglund, G.D., A Guided Tour of the Fast Fourier Transform, IEEE Spectrum, (July 1969), 41- 52. 2. Budrikis, Z. L., & Hatomian, M., Moment Calculations by Digital Filters, AT&T Laboratories Technical Journal, 63, No.2, (February 1984), 217-229. 3. Cochran, W. T., & Cooley, J., W., & Favin, D., L., What is the Fast Fourier Transform? Proceedings of the IEEE, 55, No. 10, (October 1967), 1664-1674. 4. Gabel, R. A., & Roberts, R. A., Signals and Linear Systems, Wiley, NY (1980). 5. Harris, F
quarter with three 1-hour lectures and one 3-hourlaboratory each week. The laboratory content of the course is dominated by learning howto use the Handy Board microcontroller and a variety of sensors and actuators. Thelaboratory sessions are currently devoted to hands-on exercises that provide them withexperience using different sensors and controlling several types of output device with themicrocontroller. The students complete six or seven weeks of canned lab exercises toacquaint themselves with the programming skills and capabilities of the microcontrollerand sensors. They spend three to four weeks designing, programming, and building aproject that requires the microcontroller be used to sense, control, and respond to somedesign problem of the
number of requests per minute successfully served bythe database engine. Results of the testing are compiled and interpreted, showing performancetrends and comparisons of the database implementations.IntroductionIn 2003, Brigham Young University’s School of Technology began building a laboratory forhardware and software testing and performance analysis. The lab contains 20 workstationcomputers, a few high-speed machines and switches, and one Itanium 64-bit computer. Thepurpose of this lab is to provide students and faculty with a means to perform research that canbe used to characterize the performance of a system. This experimental environment is ideal forcreating and performing benchmarking tests to scientifically describe the performance of
systems.4. Develop regulatory documentation (standard operating procedure and batch record)for a given process.5. Develop and critique a peer’s written validation plan for a given process and carry outthe plan in the laboratory. Synthesize the results into a final validation document.6. Define the roles and describe the differences between Quality Assurance and QualityControl groups. Select analytical methods and quality tools appropriate for qualitycontrol of a biopharmaceutical process or medical devices manufacturing process andexplain the fundamental basis for the methods.7. Describe the purpose and components control strategies, including change controlsystems, process deviations, and quality investigations.Table 2. Required readingsParts of
their ownpersonal desires. The course and laboratory work is rigorous, consisting of 192 quarter-creditsover a 5 year period. Additionally the students are required to participate in a co-operativeeducation experience that totals a minimum of 50 weeks over the last three years of the program.The co-operative education requirement normally consists of two 6-month blocks and one 3-month block, but the exact configuration may vary from student to student. While on co-op,students are not required to pay tuition, and often make reasonable salaries. Recent salaryfigures have been in the range of $7.50 – $23.00 per hour with an average of $13.34 per hour.Typically students with one or two co-op experience under their belts command a higher salarythan