section 2, were launched between 2009 and2014.2. Identifying the needs of graduate students and facultyThe 2009 assessment, performed by the Professional Enrichment Center, in collaboration withthe Office of Graduate Studies, surveyed 214 graduate students and organized various focusgroups with eight graduate program coordinators. The participants reported deficiencies in a)technical writing and communication skills, b) search strategies, and c) research integrity. Theassessments also exposed unsatisfactory and inadequate laboratory facilities for graduateresearch, as well as the lack of accommodations for collaborative learning. These findings agreewith the literature regarding support services for graduate students [3-6].In 2012, the Research
(1989), and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering (1993) from Texas A&M University. His areas of interest in research and education include product development, analog/RF electronics, instrumentation, and entrepreneurship.Dr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
. Martínez, F., Herrero, L. C., & De Pablo, S. (2011). Project-based learning and rubrics in the teaching of power supplies and photovoltaic electricity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(1), 87- 96.7. Lanning, D., Lestari, W., & Waterhouse, S. (2010). A unique undergraduate laboratory-based course in engineering failure. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.8. Chen, R., Goodman, D., Izadian, A., & Cooney, E. (2010). Teaching renewable energy through hands-on project-based learning for engineering technology students. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.9. Echempati, R., & Dippery, R. (2010). Teaching and
atCCSU program. A prototype helicopter simulator was developed and built by a faculty memberand his students at the host university through a National Aeronautics and Space Administration(NASA) research grant. Program participants, who are interested in operating a helicopter, aresupervised to "fly a helicopter" in a laboratory environment. Material testing instrument includesa series of demonstrations on steel and concrete mechanical property testing: a concretecompassion test, a steel impact test of, a steel fatigue test, and a steel tension test. Students aresplit into small groups and can operate testing apparatus to their comfort levels. Buildingexercise and competition is applied multiple times in the curriculum: a balsa wood bridge
, and comprehensive engineering program requirements for learningtechnical topics limits the amount of coursework for explicitly developing technical writingability. To assess strategies to improve technical writing among upper divisions students, wereport the response of three cohorts of engineering students to modifications of a fluid mechanicscourse with a hands-on fluid mechanics laboratory project assignment that involves thepreparation of a technical report. We find that group format instruction on report preparation,with specific examples of good and bad writing styles and a clear standard for the expected levelof performance, is equally effective as small group meetings with more personalized feedbackand is substantially less resource
research experiences were based on Lopatto’s criteria for “good research projects”:reasonable scope, feasible, generate data that students can present, not “cookbook” experiments,built-in difficulties, and multifaceted [8]. For the Spring 2018 semester, the CURE wasimplemented as four different manufacturing and service laboratory-type exercises and onegroup project.Preliminary results were collected in the form of pre- and post-surveys from the students. Duringthe third week of class, after which there were no drops or changes in enrollment, students wereinformed about their option to voluntarily participate in the data collection process. Two papersurveys were used: one in week 4 and one in week 15 of the semester. No reward of any kindwas
. Experimental Design and Data Collection3.1. Participants43 participants gave informed consent to take part in the study. 22 participants were engineeringstudents of various majors; the remaining 21 participants did not have formal education inengineering. 7 participants were excluded from the analyses due to technical problems duringEEG data recording, or excessive noise in the recorded data. In total, 36 participants (19engineering, 17 nonengineering) were included in the analyses.3.2. ProcedureUpon arriving to the laboratory participants were introduced to the research team, screened foreligibility criteria and asked to read the consent form and decide whether or not they agreed toparticipate in the study. Participants were next taken to the
hybrid energy systems and investigation of the structure-property relationships in ferroelectric, dielectric and piezoelectric materials in the form of thin films and bulk composites for sensing/actuation and energy storage/harvesting applications. Dr. Cook-Chennault’s research group, the Hybrid Energy Systems and Materials Laboratory, conducts work towards understanding the fundamental mechanisms and processing parameters that allow for the control of physical material characteristics. In addition to this work, Dr. Cook-Chennault is the director of the Green Energy Undergraduate Program (GET UP) program which is funded through the National Science Foundation and the Student Learn and Achievent in Aerospace and
across multiple course formats (e.g., face-to-face, online, and laboratory). An ad-hoc SETreview committee was formed in April 2017, consisting of faculty members across colleges andmembers from the faculty development, online learning, and institutional research offices. Thiscommittee embarked on a process that included discussions around many aspects of the SETsuch as implementation issues and use of the SET data from the faculty’s perspective. However,after one year, the ad-hoc committee had not conducted a systematic review of the existing SETquestions or drafted revisions. A more focused effort was needed, and thus a two-day workingmeeting of the committee convened in May 2018 with the goal of developing recommendationsfor revised SET
projects.Systems engineering program assessment includes assessment of student outcomes that mirrorthe ABET a-k outcomes. These outcomes are assessed in the system engineering core courses(see Appendix: Table 1). The achievement of each of the 11 SYEN student outcomes (SOs) is tobe demonstrated by a primary core course and often by one supporting course. The assessment ofeach SO is based on quantitative performance measures that directly assess the SO. Assessmentmethodology is based on the student work, such as assignments, exams, projects, presentations,laboratory experiments, etc. Samples of student work supporting assessment of SOs are retainedand placed in the course binders maintained in the department office.The student outcomes are assessed as per
Surrey since 2014. Incidentally, the ArchiVision Company from Iranassisted the design of the structural components of this full-scale teaching kit and the tubularelements were manufactured in the University Workshops. Each group of students has todesign a configuration using (all or part of) the available structural components and check thepracticality of their design in the laboratory, Figure 4. To facilitate the design process, a set ofmagnetic bars together with steel balls are available for making small scale models. Also, thefull-scale structural components are available to the students for assembling the structure, orparts of it, in the lab. This would give them confidence about the practicality of the design.After the group meeting in the
, research experiences with faculty and outside laboratories, professionaldevelopment activities, academic support, social integration, and mentoring.15 As adult learnersmake up an increasing portion of enrollment at universities, understanding how to increase theperformance and retention of this subpopulation is a significant issue facing institutions of highereducation. Research on student retention has started to address the unique characteristics andchallenges of adult learners, but there are still open questions about the effectiveness of programproposals.14, 16 There has been significant research related to retention of other minority groups,which may be instructive to future research and program proposals to address adult learnerretention.15
University of Minnesota Duluth faculty, he spent four years at the Natural Resources Research Institute as a Research Fellow in the Center for Water and the Environment engaged in computational toxicology research. His current research interests include inquiry-based laboratory activities and the flipped classroom.Dr. Joshua W. Hamilton, University of Minnesota DuluthProf. Elizabeth M. Hill, University of Minnesota Duluth Dr. Hill is focused on active learning teaching methods and research for engineering education. After receiving her Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Dr. Hill spent several years working on polymer processing research and advanced materials manufacturing. She has an extensive background in
first part, the model development, students are guided (usuallythrough carefully crafted laboratory experiences) to develop concepts and gain familiarity withthe associated representations for those concepts. The students become accustomed to referringto their laboratory data as the authority on scientific relationships. In the deployment phase thatfollows, students apply the model to a variety of situations and test the limits of the model, oftenthrough problem solving and sometimes via lab practica. Incorporating engineering applicationsin the deployment provides the ideal structure for seeing the relationship between fundamentalscientific understanding and well-planned engineering.The Ohio State University has offered a series of Modeling
laboratory settings.The multi-disciplinary nature of ergonomics and its broad application in many domains (e.g.,transportation, manufacturing, aviation, medicine, product design, software development) meansthat potential course topics are numerous and therefore the instructor usually has much latitude indesigning course coverage and types of assignments.In practice, the broad range of topics within ergonomics can be included in a variety of IEundergraduate courses. Typical course names include Ergonomics, Human Factors, MethodsEngineering, Safety Engineering, Cognitive Engineering and Work Design, among others.6 In a2015 review of the 94 ABET accredited IE programs, Jane Fraser7 states that 90% of thoseprograms require work methods, human factors or
, the heat transfercourse is taught in the junior year over a 10-week quarter with three 65-minute classes and a 90-minute laboratory session per week.In 2015, heat transfer was taught in an Inverted Classroom (IC). IC promotes students’ self-directed learning in fundamental heat transfer principles using online videos, quizzes, andinteractive problems outside of class time. Class time was used, in part, for mini-lectures,demonstrations, questions/answer sessions to correct student misconceptions, and exams toensure attainment of engineering fundamentals. However, the majority of class time was freedfor students to work on authentic engineering problems (AEP). These problems are key to theinstructional framework. The problems were developed by
includes hands-on re-configurableelectronics laboratories, we will be able to provide students in these programs state-of-the-arttraining tools that match the expectations of industry.FPGAsFPGAs were created approximately 15 years ago by the Xilinx Corporation [3]. Xilinx is still thelargest manufacturer of this technology in the world [4]. FPGAs are not only programmedthrough a traditional schematic fashion, they are also programmed using HDL. HDL is used todescribe the behavior of the circuits that are being created. Although HDLs describe nearly alladvanced circuits, certain circuits can be automatically synthesized, meaning that HDL code canbe rendered from a computer directly into a working design. This is particularly true of“reconfigurable
environment suggesting thatnontraditional students may find active learning more disruptive. This preliminary study suggeststhat using classroom response systems (clickers) in the 1st year curriculum with large class sizesmay lead students to feel that the class was disruptive and that active learning was not as positiveof an experience as active learning environments later in the curriculum.Introduction The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology recommends increasingthe number of STEM students by 34% annually using classroom approaches engaging studentsactively and replacing standard laboratory courses with discovery-based courses1. The number ofSTEM students in higher education is expected to rise over the next decade
Paper ID #16519Research and Instructional Strategies for Engineering RetentionDr. Claudia J Rawn, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Claudia Rawn is an Associate Professor in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She is also the Director of the Center for Materials Processing. Prior to joining the University of Tennessee full time she was a Senior Research Staff Member in the Materials Science and Technology Division at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and a Joint Faculty Member in the University of Tennessee’s Materials Science and Engineering Department. She received her
as possible. This paper is organized as follows. We initially provide an overview of the SoftwareFactory approach that is used with selected K-12 students. We then provide an overview of thecase study, followed by descriptions of the case study phases –selection, instruction andimplementation. We then describe the outreach component and the legal considerations whenworking with external partners. We conclude with outcomes, address threats to validity, andaddress future improvements to include additional K-12 students.The Software Factory The Software Factory is a pedagogical laboratory under the Software EngineeringLaboratory in the Computer Science (CS) Department at MSU, and is an educational facility forundergraduate
Paper ID #15935An International Study of the Teaching and Learning of Communication:Investigating Changes in Self-Efficacy in Four Undergraduate EngineeringProgramsDr. Lori Breslow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lori Breslow is the founding director emeritus of the Teaching & Learning Laboratory (TLL) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. An internationally recognized expert in teaching and learning in higher education, she conducts research on the development, diffusion, and assessment of educational innovation, particularly in science and engineering.Dr. Christina Kay White, Massachusetts Institute of
, ourapproach uses small reflective exercises distributed throughout the coop/internship period thatfocus on a set of professional competencies. Students complete Kolb’s cycle using the keyprocess steps of project management as a laboratory of generalization and experimentation withprofessional skills. It was concluded that students accelerated their professional developmentwith periodic reflection and experimentation along with timely assessment and feedback fromthe instructor.IntroductionAn online course was designed to promote professional development for chemical engineeringstudents during cooperative education and internships with industry. The mutual benefits ofindustrial cooperative education and internships for both engineering students and
. WCU FacilitiesManagement division has sought help in designing a project that will accomplish these goals. A10 kW grid-tied PV system has been proposed that will be centrally located on campus. Thesystem will serve as a living, learning laboratory for the campus community. The solar panels forthe system will be mounted on three structures approximately 10 to 14 feet off the ground, whichwill also provide shade and shelter from the elements. Underneath the solar panels will bebenches, tables, electrical outlets, and special hooks for students to hang hammocks. A smallgarden featuring native plant life will be planted around the solar panel structure. Smallinformational signage will be displayed throughout the garden informing visitors about
experience as a bridge construction project engineer for a construction contractor and as a research engineer for the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory in Port Hueneme California. His teaching interests include construction equipment, cost estimating and construction process design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods, innovations in construction process administration, engineering education, hybrid learning and online learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Transportation EngineeringAbstract: The flipped classroom approach has gained increasing popularity in higher
, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program7. The use of theresearch-to-practice cycles, while an encouraging development, has not made a large enoughchange in the ways engineering education researchers think about framing their results for useacross the broad varieties of practices. We posit that the common understanding of the research-to-practice model is one of impeding factors and that resituating the research-to-practice model isa necessary, though not sufficient, step towards transforming engineering education practice. Theobjective of this paper is to examine the limitations of the current research to practice cycle andexpand the conversation to include a broader and more nuanced understanding of whysustainable change in
based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE Fellow and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three
low cost and exceptionally high value. They consume a polymer filament,typically polylactic acid (PLA) or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), converting itinto a physical object by depositing it in thin, sequential layers. The entire technology,both hardware and software, is open-source and freely available.University students, faculty and research staff at the Michigan Tech Open SustainabilityTechnology (MOST) laboratory have been researching, designing, building, testing anddocumenting versions of RepRap printers since 2010. Nearly everyone taking part in theresearch became caught up in the process of designing, printing, evaluating andmodifying parts that were used for a variety of different purposes. Researchers working
options, we decided to work withan external training organization (ETO), a corporation known world-wide as a leader increativity and innovation. Page 26.748.3A significant amount of discussion was undertaken to decide if the fieldtrip should be offered forcredit or non-credit. Upon a recommendation by the Dean of the College of Engineering, thecourse was offered for one credit. There were two reasons for this decision. First, students wererequired to participate in approximately twenty hours of lecture and laboratory activities over thefour-day trip. Second, offering the course for credit allowed the students’ participation to appearon their
experience that emphasized the interdependency of manufacturing and design with a focus in business development.2-‐3 The Learning Factory was originally developed jointly by Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University of Washington (UW), and University of Puerto Rice-‐Mayaguez (UPR-‐M) in collaboration with Sandia National Laboratories through the Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership (MEEP) funded from the ARPA TRP. This approach to manufacturing engineering education provides balance between engineering science, engineering practice and hands-‐on experiences. Furthermore, the National Academy of Engineering published their attempts to answer the
, genuinely open-minded and interested in growing as a leader.Student-centered approach Page 26.906.10Engineering students face a demanding course load. In the design of this program, the directorswere sensitive to academic load, and as a result, created a concentration in engineeringleadership rather than a minor. Classes are all offered late Friday afternoons at a time whenthere no other engineering classes are scheduled, ensuring that accepted students will be able tocomplete the three-year program by graduation.In addition, the classroom and indeed, the entire program is treated as a laboratory, where allinvolved (participants and instructors alike