education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.[4] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1997.[5] R. W. Lent, S. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 36–49, Jan. 2000.[6] R. W. Lent, S. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 79–122, Aug. 1994.[7] R. W. Lent, F. G. Lopez, H. Sheu, H., and A. M. Lopez, “Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of
in Davao City, Philippines, where she previously held appointments as Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering. She also previously served as Director for Communications and International Engagement at the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, Lecturer at the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University, and Assistant Professor at the Department of Inte- grated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 S-STEM: Iron Range Engineering Academic Scholarships for Co-Op Based
secretary ofthe CE program and assumed the role of observer and assistant to oversee the recordings,logistics and provision of materials, as well as to take notes on participant input. We hosted threeseparate sessions, having each of the groups participating separately. Sessions that involvedGroups S and F were conducted face-to-face, while the Group A session was held via Zoom Ⓡ.For the face-to-face session, we provided coffee, biscuits and other food for the attendees. Inboth formats, participants were formally welcomed and then we introduced the dynamics andobjectives of the sessions. Then we proceed to ask them to read and sign the informed consentdocument as part of the ethical framework of the research, which included consent to have
. 65-73, Fall 2005.[7] S. O. Wallace and B. A. Wallace, “The faculty advisor: Institutional and external information and knowledge” in The new adviser guidebook: Mastering the art of academic advising (2nd ed), P. Folsom, F. Yoder, & J.E. Joslin, Eds., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2015, pp. 125- 142.[8] A. Duberstein, “Building student-faculty relationships,” Academic Advising Today, vol. 3, no.1, March 2009. [Online]. Available: https://nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic- Advising-Today/View-Articles/Building-Student-Faculty-Relationships.aspx. [Accessed November 22, 2022].[9] C. Potter, “Why faculty advising matters,” Inside Higher Ed, June 10, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/views
simulators.The authors feel that this project did help introduce students to a modern process simulator that isused in industry so there is a plan to continue such a project in the next course offering. References[1] S. Brunhaver, et al. Bridging the Gaps between Engineering Education and Practice. Us Engineering in a Global Economy. University of Chicago Press, 2017. 129-63. Print.[2] A. Elshorbagy and DJ Schonwetter. Engineer Morphing: Bridging the Gap between Classroom Teaching and the Engineering Profession. International Journal of Engineering Education 18.3 (2002): 295-300. Print.[3] K. Volkov, Thermofluids Virtual Learning Environment for Inquiry-Based Engineering Education
(3), 285–301. Cabrera, A. F., & La Nasa, S. M. (2000). Mentoring minority students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 441–476. Campbell, Toni A., and David E. Campbell. "Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention." Research in higher education 38 (1997): 727-742. Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161
arestill in progress and continuing to grow, the synergy of the two create a whole that is greater thanthe sum of their parts for campus change.AcknowledgementsThe Empower Grant is funded by NSF ADVANCE Grant EES 2121601. The opinions andconclusions in this paper are those of the authors, only.References 1. https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/advance-organizational-change-gender-equity- stem, last visited Feb 28, 2023 2. Bilen-Green, C., & Carpenter, J. P., & Doore, S., & Green, R. A., & Horton, K. J., & Jellison, K. L., & Latimer, S. M., & Levine, M. J., & O'Neal, D. P. (2015, June), Implementation of Advocates and Allies Programs to Support and Promote Gender Equity in Academia Paper
, Alexandra Hatfield et al. "Adaptable platform for interactive swarm robotics (apis): a human-swarm interaction research testbed." In 2019 19th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), pp. 720-726. IEEE, 2019.12. Farnham, T., Jones, S., Aijaz, A., Jin, Y., Mavromatis, I., Raza, U., ... & Sooriyabandara, M. (2021, January). Umbrella collaborative robotics testbed and iot platform. In 2021 IEEE 18th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.13. Ospina, Nestor I., Eduardo Mojica-Nava, Luis G. Jaimes, and Juan M. Calderón. "Argrohbots: An affordable and replicable ground homogeneous robot swarm testbed." IFAC-PapersOnLine 54, no. 13 (2021): 256-261.14. Rubenstein, Michael
, Arizona. https://peer.asee.org/29208, 2017[9] R. Zaurin, & S. D. Tirtha, & N. Eluru, N. “A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to-Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for Engineering Analysis: Statics.” Paper presented at2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line. 10.18260/1-2—33985,2020[10] P. Panindre, & R. S. Thorsen, “Assessment of Learning Effectiveness in Online and Face-to-Face Learning Environment for Engineering Education” Paper presented at 2020 ASEEVirtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2—34190, 2020
Ada, Ohio 45810 Email: j-estell@onu.edu, s-coffman-wolph@onu.eduIntroductionFemale representation has been - and continues to be - an issue within computing, includingcomputer gaming. It spans the gamut from exclusion via being forced to play the role of a maleprotagonist,1 to a “surface equity” where women are present but their gender is notacknowledged,2 to where women are objectified in a hypersexualized manner. 3 Even softwarethat at first glance appears benign can have underlying issues. As an example, for over 50 yearsThe Oregon Trail computer game4 has been used in social studies classrooms across the UnitedStates to teach about Westward Expansion, allowing students to outfit a wagon for a 2000-miletrek where
in Engineering Fast Facts—Society of Women Engineers. (2022). Retrieved January 11, 2023, from https://swe.org/research/2021/women-in-engineering-fast-facts/3. Jarvis, A. (2017). Educators step up to build assessment literacy. 38(6).4. Home—TimeMapper—Make Timelines and TimeMaps fast! - From the Open Knowledge Foundation Labs. (n.d.). Retrieved January 10, 2023, from https://timemapper.okfnlabs.org/5. Interactive presentation software. (n.d.). Mentimeter. Retrieved January 10, 2023, from https://www.mentimeter.com/6. Ledlow, S. (2001). Using Think-Pair-Share in the College Classroom.7. DeFrank-Cole, L., & Tan, S. J. (2022). Women and leadership: Journey toward equity. SAGE.8. Career-Related Classroom Assignments | Career & Co
Center for Education Statistics, 2021. [2] D. P. Banks and S. M. Vergez, “Online and in-person learning preferences during the covid-19 pandemic among students attending the city university of new york,” Journal of Microbiology &; Biology Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. e00 012–22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/jmbe.00012-22 [3] J. H. Corpus, K. A. Robinson, and Z. Liu, “Comparing college students’ motivation trajectories before and during covid-19: A self-determination theory approach,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.848643 [4] E. R. Wester, L. L. Walsh, S. Arango-Caro, and K. L. Callis-Duehl
ETD 335 University-Industry Partnerships to Enhance Engineering Education Maged B. Mikhail and Hassan S. Hayajneh Purdue University NorthwestAbstractEngineering education is facing a lot of challenges nowadays due to the COVID-19 pandemicand low enrollment issues that caused lowered funding opportunities and administrative budgetreductions. Engineering educators are required to play vital leadership roles to face thesechallenges. Combining efforts and collaborating with other programs and external partners,including community colleges, industry personnel
Framework for the Elderly Healthcare Services Using Digital Twin,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 49088–49101, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909828.[3] C. Boje, A. Guerriero, S. Kubicki, and Y. Rezgui, “Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research,” Automation in Construction, vol. 114. Elsevier B.V., Jun. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179.[4] F. Tao, J. Cheng, Q. Qi, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, and F. Sui, “Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 94, no. 9–12, pp. 3563–3576, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1.[5] G. Garg, V. Kuts, and G. Anbarjafari, “Digital twin for
ETD 365 Innovation and Design in Academic Work through Industry Partnership Maged B. Mikhail and Hassan S. Hayajneh Purdue University NorthwestAbstractThere are many benefits of university-industry partnerships and collaborations (UIPC). Thestrength of university programs depends on staying relevant to innovative technology and currentmarket trends, not only regionally but globally. Having strong industry partnerships allowsstudents and university stakeholders to learn about current and future technology. Thecollaboration between LinMot Inc. USA and Purdue University Northwest (PNW
in first semester classes. Further investigation willdemonstrate the longer-term retention outcomes of these cohorts.ReferencesDahl, Laura S.; Duran, Antonio; Hooten, Zachary J.; Stipeck, Christopher J.; Youngerman, EthanLearning Communities: Research & Practice, v8 n1 Article 6 2020. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
. Table 4: Capstone Design Final Report RubricName(s): Included? Quality Weight ScoreElement (Y or N) (1 to 5)Title page Y 0%Abstract Y 3%Acknowledgements Y 0%Table of Contents Y 0%Tables of Symbols, Figures, Y 0%EquationsIntroduction Y 3%Technical
, 2022).[7] S. Jennings, J. G. McIntyre, & S. E. Butler, “What young adolescents think about engineering: Immediate and longer lasting impressions of a video intervention,” Journal of Career Development, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 3-18, 2015.[8] N. Dasgupta, & J. G. Stout, “Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers,” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21-29, 2014.[9] M. Ohland, C. Brawner, M. Camacho, R. Layton, R. Long, S. Lord, & M. Wasburn, “Race, gender, and measures of success in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 225-252
Cognitive,Intrapersonal, and Interpersonal are designed to capture different constructs related to globalperspectives, especially with consideration for the experiences that can shape these areas forstudents, such as curriculum, co-curriculum, and community [6]. The GPI instrument has beenvalidated and has shown to be reliable. The full survey instrument and items can be found fromBraskamp et al.’s work [6].3. Methods 3.1 Sampling and Data Collection First-year engineering students participating in the RSAP program completed apre-course survey in January 2022 at the beginning of the semester-long ENGE 1644 - GlobalSTEM Practice: Leadership and Culture course at VT. A total number of n=83 studentscompleted the pre-course survey, which
or collaborative Legobuilds that span an entire day or two engage many people and promote social interactionacross grade years. Individual activities such as coloring or origami promote mindfulness.Having one or more graduate or undergraduate student assistant(s) that work with a faculty orstaff organizer for the wellness programming is beneficial to not only assist with overseeingprogramming content, but they also serve as a friendly face to welcome and encourage otherstudents to engage in the activities. When faculty and staff engage in the activities itdemonstrates to the students the value of making time for wellness, which helps to integrate itinto the organizational culture.Offering food, especially pre-packaged snacks, is a great way
interactions among team members vs. task-related activities [13]. Theserelationships are shown in Table II below: TABLE II Interpersonal Factors Related to Task Factors in Tuckman’s Model Interpersonal Interactions Task-Related Activities Testing and Dependence of/on Team Members Recognition of Task(s) Conflict within the Team Emotional Responses to Task Demands Team Cohesion Develops Open Exchange of Interpretations Interdependence of Roles on the Team Emergence of Solutions to the Problem(s)Adapted from [13]Although the original model contained the four stages shown above, Tuckman added a fifthstage, “termination
. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009. [7] C. P. Liew, S. H. Hamzah, M. Puteh, S. Mohammad, and W. H. W. Badaruzzaman, “A Systematic Approach to Implementing Complex Problem Solving in Engineering Curriculum,” in The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education, M. E. Auer, H. Hortsch, and P. Sethakul, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 880–891. [8] A. R. Fernando, J. G. U. Vergara, and C. A. D. Canlapan, “Work in Progress: Perception of complex engineering problem among capstone design students,” in 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2022, pp. 14–16. [9] F. A. Phang, A. N. Anuar, A. A. Aziz, K. Mohd Yusof, S. A. H. Syed Hassan, and Y. Ahmad, “Perception of
Access.Hafferty, F.W., & Gaufberg, E.H. (2017) The hidden curriculum. In A Practical Guide forMedical Teachers, 5th ed., Elsevier Health Sciences, 35-41.Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachersexplain their career decisions. American educational research journal, 40(3), 581-617.Lucas, K. B., & Roth, W. M. (1996). The nature of scientific knowledge and student learning:Two longitudinal case studies. Research in Science Education, 26, 103-127.Polmear, M., Bielefeldt, A., Knight, D., Swan, C., & Canney, N. (2019, June 1). HiddenCurriculum Perspective on the Importance of Ethics and Societal Impacts in EngineeringEducation. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32887Martin, A. M., & Hand, B. (2009
. 161–171, May 2015, doi:10.1037/aca0000008.[6] E. Sola, R. Hoekstra, S. Fiore, and P. McCauley, “An investigation of the state of creativityand critical thinking in engineering undergraduates,” Creative Education, vol. 08, no. 09, Art.no. 09, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.4236/ce.2017.89105.[7] S. A. Atwood and J. E. Pretz, “Creativity as a factor in persistence and academic achievementof engineering undergraduates,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 540–559,2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20130.[8] A. Valentine, I. Belski, M. Hamilton, and S. Adams, “Creativity in electrical engineeringdegree programs: Where Is the content?,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 4, pp.288–296, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TE.2019.2912834
IMIT-TO ( SRCTYPE , "j" ) )Clarivate – Web of 6/17/2020 170 TOPIC: (librar* AND engineer* ANDScience Core (academic OR “higher education” ORCollection college OR university OR post*secondary)) Refined by: LANGUAGES: (ENGLISH) AND DOCUMBER TYPES : (ARTICLE) Timespan: 2015-2019 Indexes: SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, BKCI-S, BKCI-SSH
sequence. Again, forvarious reasons, students might be out of sequence, or received transfer credit for some of thesecourses. Since each course utilizes the M2K in different ways, it would have been interesting togroup the responses by course(s) taken; however, the sample size was already small so allresponses were considered as a single group regardless of course(s) taken. Figure 1. Circuits courses completed by survey respondents.Table 1 shows the types of activities for which students reported using the M2K. From this data,it is clear that the M2K is a valuable tool for completing in-class lab activities outside of classdue to inadequate time (100%) or absence (55%). Not all courses require post-lab exercises, soonly some of
justi cation Researchers take R e s e a rc h e r s n d the union of the set, quartiles for ranked Researchers analyze eliminate duplicates, topics, remove the data categorize unselected topics fi fi fi fi fi fi Figure 1: Phases of the Delphi method in this
Foundation under Grant No.(2221638).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C.J. and Shuman, L.J. (1997), Characteristics of FreshmanEngineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering. Journal ofEngineering Education, 86: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x[2] Veenstra, C. P., Dey, E.L., Herrin, G.D.. "A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention."Advances in Engineering Education 1, no. 3 (2009): n3.[3] Nelavai, N., & Ramesh, S. (2020). An Insight into the challenges faced by First Year EngineeringStudents