undergraduate program. There are fourlearning objectives defined in this course: After successful completion of the course, studentsshould be able to: 1) Differentiate and explain the concept, framework, and techniques of the supply chain design, planning, operation, and strategic management. (ASAC j) 2) Apply analytic methodologies, utilizing practical managerial levers, to design a supply chain for defined conditions, and to achieve competitive advantage in the supply chain. (ASAC l) 3) Analyze contemporary issues in SCM and to propose solutions to the identified issues. (ASAC m) 4) Demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively and use information from a variety of sources. (ASAC g)The notation of (ASAC x
property protection protocols is important. If there isany risk involved in the study, it should be made clear at this point. Furthermore, number ofparticipants, and type of participants should be made clear. Information regarding incentivesoffered to participate in the study should be communicated. Fixing an appointment to meet basedon availability of the interviewee. This process can take up to few weeks to a few months,followed with multiple email or call exchange. It is better to keep account of delays due toestablishing contact. Page 26.753.7Travel Plans All the researchers travelling for data collection need to get a specific visa
peer evaluations, and leading teamwork training sessions. She is currently conducting research on team learning processes in engineering student project teams. Additionally, she has co-developed a framework for measuring and in- terpreting an array of team dynamics. An online assessment tool has been created based on this framework which allows teams to diagnose and improve the ”health” of their team. She is passionate about her area of research and plans to continue conducting research on factors that contribute to effective teamwork.Dr. Tom O’Neill, University of Calgary Tom is a Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology and leading expert in the areas of team dy- namics, virtual teams, conflict management
Page 26.1186.5enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Groups of multinational engineering students fromthe two schools carried out a project of developing an executable ERP system using variousdistributed collaboration tools. Findings from this experience are discussed and other on-goingefforts are described in this paper.Dorneich, et al. 10 report on "The design and implementation of a learning collaboratory, thework focuses on collaborative learning processes, and the idea of a collaboratory as a virtualspace for work. The paper describes a design process to support the development and use ofcollaborative learning technologies. It integrates methods and concepts from cognitive systemsengineering, theories of learning and instruction
practices in science.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for fac- ulty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, and Technical Communi- cation Quarterly, among others.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant
development and training opportunities for faculty and staff across SUNY’s 64- campus system. CPD programs and services are targeted toward campus administration and leadership, faculty and instructional support staff, and IT staff. As Director, Kim provides overall leadership for the center, including strategic planning, new program development, campus relationship management, and partnership development with training vendors. At SUNY Kim is also leading the Campus Partnerships for the implementation of Open SUNY in support of SUNY’s Strategic Plan, The Power of SUNY. Prior to joining the SUNY in 2009, Kim spent 18 years at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, her last po- sition as Director of Academic Outreach Programs
students to the different demos presented by the companies,Suffolk staff and students, and to in general help run the event. Evaluations of the event wereobtained from both the companies and the student participants, who were overall satisfied with italthough they had a few suggestions for its improvement, such as having more hands-onactivities and having more contact time between the high school students and Suffolk EEstudents as well as more contact time with the industry exhibitors.IntroductionThis paper discusses Power Engineering Day run by Suffolk University’s ABET-accreditedElectrical Engineering (EE) program, which was held the day after final exams in the spring of2014, and which is planned to be an annual event. In it, we will discuss
,implement, and communicate solutions to their problems. This synthesis of skills is a criticallearning outcome of the capstone course, as it provides students with an understanding of thework they will be doing when they graduate.There are a variety resources that describe the topics covered and desired outcomes of capstonedesign courses. Surveys of capstone instructors 1-3 show that instructors teach a wide range ofsubjects, including oral communications, teamwork, project planning, and ethics, among manyother aspects of engineering design. Moreover, the Engineering Profile 4, developed using datafrom both industry practitioners and design faculty, highlights the importance of bothprofessional and technical skills, describing engineering roles
? a. What science content do they integrate into engineering units? b. What adaptations do they make to the engineering curricula? c. What factors influence teachers’ choices for making these adaptations? Methods This exploratory case study examined the ways in which teachers implementedan engineering curriculum in their classroom. The study occurred in a large, urbanschool district in the beginning stages of a STEM initiative with future plans to open amiddle-level STEAM Academy (STEM + Art). The initial step in this vision was theadoption and piloting of new science (Science and Technology Concepts [STC] and FullOption Science System [FOSS]) and engineering
in engineering. She has developed and taught a wide variety of engineering courses in First Year Engineering and Mechanical En- gineering at Ohio State. She has received four teaching awards in the last three years at both the College and the Departmental level at OSU.Suzanne Grassel Shoger, The Ohio State University Suzanne Shoger, M.A., is a Ph.D. student in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University. Her areas of expertise include strategic planning, gender equity and women’s leadership development, and social justice education. Her research focus is centered on gender equity among under- graduate and graduate engineering students, specifically related to ways men as a majority population
which was established at the University of Oregon. The program is designed to help communities advance long- term community development goals by leveraging university scholarship and community collaboration towards sustainable, equitable, research-based planning solutions. In 2014 UT adopted the SCI as the feature program for their new Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP), Experience Learning. The Office of Service-Learning is now preparing for expansion as the QEP moves into implementation. Mrs. Ellenburg is also the founder and chair of the University’s Service-Learning Steering Committee, composed of des- ignated faculty from each academic college working to build the profile and capacity of service-learning across
Excellence in STEM at The University ofTexas Pan-AM as part of a grant funded by the US department of Defense. The 2-day workshopaimed at presenting hands-on experience on designing effective instruction. The first part of theworkshop emphasized the 5-stage/task backwards design (modified framework from Wiggins &McTighe, Understanding by Design,1999) used to guide the content modules for the courses thatwill use the CBI modules [6] . The model is shown in Figure 1. We were asked to keep in mindthe following general objectives to emulate as we went through the 5-tasks planning stage: Promote conducting fundamental research on learning and instruction research issues and opportunities related to designing learning environments that
Technology. Besides her responsibilities in developing strategic partnerships that support the mission of the School of Engineering and Computing Sciences, Panero serves as a resource to faculty and students on economics and market plans, including student design projects and special topics courses; developing strategic partnerships with industry and promoting partnerships for applied research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15313 and joint industry and academic projects. Panero received her Ph.D. in economics from the New School for Social Research with a concentration in
removing unknowns through research, I was able to move down to a direct and effective question.”3.2 Course Outcomes: Student Preparation for the Summer Research ExperienceDuring the first week of the summer research program, the five recipients participated in a groupinterview with an external evaluator. The purpose was to discuss their perceptions of theresearch course and their proposed work plans for the summer. This section summarizes thestudent responses.In describing the course, the first item mentioned was a process of defining the meaning ofresearch, and, over several weeks, refining their definition. One student said, As a class, we decided on what a 20-word definition of what research was the first day, and then at two
utilitarian goals supportingcareer development and professionalism to more holistic goals of citizenship and broadliberal education. The goal of this work is to support ongoing conversations in highereducation about integrative and interdisciplinary education efforts by providing a sharedlanguage and classification system for understanding these efforts.Higher education wrestles with the balance of what Kwame Appiah has called its“utopian” and the “utilitarian” instincts: the “utopian” motivation to educate citizensbroadly, regardless of their future plans; and the “utilitarian” goal of burnishing theircredentials for the job market. Stewart-Gambino and Rossmann (2015), surveyingevidence of the effectiveness of integration efforts both historically
manufacturing equipment to safeguard the machine operator from moving robotic equipment traveling at above‐head level. The company provided the project specs. The students set to design and simulate cages design using SolidWorks CAD/CAM software. Students, the faculty advisor, and the graduate student visited the company during the project execution and had regular contact with the company advisor, during the semester, to seek feedback and test their designs. By the end of the project, the students were able to successfully design new cages to meet the company requirements. This paper describes the project in more detail, how team members worked together, the company’s feedback, guidance to students, and the company’s plans to implement the final
checks; helps toschedule and staff the build sessions; and plans and runs the capstone events. Makers receive anhonorarium, project materials, a capstone event budget, and a small travel stipend. Theseexpenses are partially funded by a small grant from the Parents Council and other donors.The first MIR was an amateur astronomer who led students in the fabrication of a telescope.Using this telescope, more than 500 students and community members have been able to viewthe moon, planets and stars during the capstone event as well as other events both off campusand at the planetarium on campus. The second MIR was a local engineering professional who ledworkshops in the fabrication of Arduino-based musical circuits. Students played their
also be used for the purpose. We plan organizing narration of life stories ofsuccessful and not successful entrepreneurs, which could be through in-person interactions, overvideo calls, or through audio visual recordings. This could also take care of the motivation ofprospective student entrepreneurs.Facilitating idea selection Once students develop proper understanding of entrepreneurship and commit to followthat path, we need to help them select proper ideas. We need to make them aware of thenecessity of first choosing a challenge domain and then developing a technological solution for aproblem in that domain, and not the other way around. Towards that, we need to organizebrainstorming sessions on challenges in different domains to
experience was as expected, impacted their career plans, and impactedtheir ability to further their educational goals. Over sixty percent presented their research results.Students self image and employment plans are presented in Figure 6. Half of the students indicated thatthe experience changed how they envisioned themselves as scientists. Seventy-five percent indicatedplans to seek employment in industry prior to the summer experience, while only twenty-five percentremained with those plans after the summer experience. Responses moved to going to graduate school,other plans, and unsure. Figure 7 shows fifty percent of respondents indicated a 5 out of 5 overall ratingof the experience with nearly 40 percent of respondents indicating a 4 out of 5
. Pereira et al. [6] integrated UAVs and photogrammetry into a buildinginformation modeling (BIM) course, part of a construction engineering program, where studentspiloted UAVs and used photos to create three dimensional models of objects located indoors.Autodesk software was used in that project: Recap was used to generate the point cloud that wasthen imported into Revit [6]. Sharma and Hulsey [7] used a UAV for aerial photogrammetry asan exploratory task to investigate its potential in the university setting although it did not appearthat they were integrating UAVs into teaching. Other faculty reported plans to use UAVs formapping in a Construction Surveying course as part of a Civil and Construction EngineeringTechnology program [8]. Opfer and
trainees will register for this seminar course, which will be co-taught by the corefaculty and by guest speakers with expertise in different areas and which will be open to allSTEM graduate students. Training will be offered for the development of each skill both duringthe seminar and beyond (through practical training in subsequent years); however, beyond theseminar course trainees will only be required to participate in a manageable number of activitiesmost directly relevant to their individual development plan (vide infra).Completing the interdisciplinary and seminar courses described above will give students 6 of the12 credit hours needed to attain a topical certificate established through this NRT. Trainees willearn the other 6 credits by
Fall 2019, as well as performance inofferings of the same estimating course before OER implementation.BackgroundConstruction Management involves the study of courses in areas of practice such as plan readingand production, cost estimating, safety, scheduling, and project management. Students are oftenrequired to purchase textbooks, equipment, and software for these courses at great expense. Theauthor has previously considered [1] the high level of expenses for engineering and technology,in general, and Construction Management, in particular, and the high rate of increase in the costof these over time through a number of sources. These included costs of over $300 for individualtextbooks [2] and over $1200 a year [3], and a rate of increase of
needs within realistic constraints 5. Describe introductory concepts of disability studies and how they relate to engineering practice 6. Engage in and evaluate the co‐design process with community members with disabilities 7. Identify the principles of inclusive design and how they benefit diverse communities 8. Devise an action plan to promote inclusivity and accessibility in engineering practiceCourse topics include: (1) disability studies, (2) universal design, (3) participatory design, (4) thehuman centered design process, and (5) prototyping. (See Table I describing course content andsyllabus in Appendix A.) Table I. HuskyADAPT Accessible Design Course Topics and Assignments Topic
areprovided novel lesson plans and materials for two hands-on activities that can be used in their K-12 classrooms. Graduate students from eleven engineering and science departments collaborate todevelop these materials and ensure they meet the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).Teachers earn continuing education credits for attending. REACT is an opportunity not only forteachers to learn about the cutting-edge research happening at University of Michigan, but alsoserves as a professional development tool for graduate students, giving them the opportunity towork on science communication skills as well as participate in curricula development. Theprogram has also developed a unique funding model, where university professors and departmentssponsor
Faculty Mentor Frequency of interaction 2-3 times a semester Once a semester Responsibilities • Degree planning and • Selection of upper-level course requirements engineering and science • Academic success electives coaching • Guidance on career • Academic forms and pathways and experiential procedures learning • Referral and engagement with campus support
development of women, considering their skills andknowledge. [8] The most important thing is the collaborative construction where men andwomen jointly carry out equity initiatives, which ultimately enrich institutions, organizations,and families. Finally, being part of networks inspires the development of plans and projects inthe same institutions or organizations that the members are part of. [9]In this context of gender gap in STEM areas and in a time of complexity due to the pandemicthat generates a setback in the reality of women in society, an initiative of three organizationswith presence in Latin America is born: the Latin American Open Chair Matilda and Womenin engineering, and the organizations behind it are: • The Latin American and
materials[5]: 1) a lesson plan for using the Worldin K-12 classrooms or higher education outreach activities, 2) instructions and video clips onhow to download, host, and play the game and how to use the example source code, and 3)source code for creating architecture examples in the World.EvaluationTo investigate the effectiveness of the World on increasing K-12 students' interests incomputing, we first invited three high school students to play a prototype of the Lafayette ParkWorld game and asked for their feedback. After refining it according to their suggestions, weoffered a programming workshop to K-12 students, using the World, and collected survey andinterview data. The workshop was one and a half hours long and was implemented following
Huffman, North Central Texas College Debbie Huffman, Dean of Instruction for Career & Technical Education (CTE) at North Central Texas College, holds a Master of Science in Computer Education & Cognitive Systems and a Bachelor of Applied Arts & Sciences in Applied Technology & Performance Improvement from the University of North Texas. She is dedicated to providing students the opportunity to positively change their lives through workforce education. Dean Huffman has over 25 years of experience in higher education where she has provided leadership in the planning, implementation and assessment of curriculum and programs within the CTE Division. She has served on the Texas Association of College
this to be an iterative research project wherein the curriculum design project isoffered in future summer offerings of MoM with integrated lessons learned from previousofferings. Identifying themes from this first round of five participants and subsequentparticipants will help inform how to continuously improve implementing such a project with thegoal that some of these lessons learned are informative for other educators wishing to offerstudent-led curriculum development projects in their engineering courses and contexts.Results As a work in progress, the plan is to continue collecting data from future MoM summerstudents to provide a richer description of the student experience with this project and toiteratively improve the
engaged with course content.IntroductionAssessment is a cornerstone of the educational process, deriving from defined learning objectivesthat outline how students should engage with course material. The importance of assessment tolearning is underscored by the recognition that it serves as a guiding force for both educators andstudents. The clear definition of learning objectives, as discussed in the literature [1-2], aidsinstructors in selecting appropriate course content, planning lectures, designing assignments, andwriting tests. The relevance of assessment to engineering education is further highlighted by therole of accreditation, particularly through the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET). ABET, as detailed in the