funded initiatives; the Pathways to Innovation in 2015 and the PIPELINENetwork; an NSF collaborative research grant in 2016. One of the outcomes of these efforts is anew course on Technical Innovation and Entrepreneurship, a cross listed course by Physics,Computer Science, and engineering. In this course students are introduced to innovation andentrepreneurial mindset through “User Innovation” concept, which is the focus of this report.Physics, computer science, and engineering students, as well as those majoring incommunication, business, chemistry, biology, and psychology often take this as an electivecourse.The “User Innovation” module introduces Innovation and Entrepreneurship (I&E) concepts incontext of students’ passion and their
these kits in the classroom allows for a range of contemporary learning approaches to beapplied including inductive learning approaches, Kolb’s experiential learning cycle and problem-based learning.IntroductionIn most engineering courses and curriculum the classroom and the laboratory are separated inboth time and space. Even when the laboratory is part of an individual course, it is still generallyseparate from the classroom portion of the class. This separation is usually necessary due to thedifference in resources and time required for the various laboratory vs. classroom courseactivities. In addition, this separation has often resulted in excellent classes and laboratories.However an opportunity is being missed. As many of us seek to teach
, sanitarians, and nurses promoting the practice the sustainable development, local to global. Dan is a Past President of the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists. He is a Diplomate Laureate of the American Academy of Sanitarians. Dan is a lifetime honorary Fellow of the American Academy of Nursing. Professor Oerther’s awards as an educator include lifetime honorary Fellowship in the National League for Nursing’s Academy of Nursing Educators and the Robert G. Quinn Award from the American Society for Engineering Education.Sarah Oerther ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Essentials of the Nurse+Engineer: Qualitative Methodology Applied to Food
. Animesh is dedicated to facilitating the transition of STEM students into the workforce and advocates for a learning environment enriched with diversity and fairness. He identifies with the pronouns ”He/They” and is known for his creativity, positivity, and outgoing personality.Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, ThatStatsGirl Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Research Scientist. She employs innovative and ethical mixed-methods research approaches to uncover insights about the 21st century workforce. Sreyoshi has a doctorate in Engineering Education, and Masters degrees in Applied Statistics (M.A.) and Mechanical Engineering (M.S.), from Virginia Tech. She earned her Bachelors degree in Mechatronics
- ticipants involved in the reforms. She is involved in several research projects focusing on competencies- based curriculum redesign and implementation aimed to integration across curricula; increasing the re- tention rate of early engineering students; providing opportunities for STEM graduate students to have mentored teaching experiences.Mr. Theodore Demetrius Caldwell M.Ed., Diversity Programs Office/College of Engineering/Michigan StateUniversity BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES THEODORE D. CALDWELL, DIVERSITY DIRECTOR Contact Information Michigan State University Cell: (517) 614-3528 Diversity Programs Office Office: (517) 355-8310 College of Engineering Facsimile: (517) 355-2293 1108 Engineering Building E-mail: tc
in the engineering department by a mechanical engineering faculty member, who’sresearch background is in computational fluid dynamics. The curriculum employs many of thenewer pedagogical approaches including a pseudo flipped classroom4, Process-Oriented GuidedInquiry Learning (POGIL) method5, clicker questions, and kinesthetic lectures6. In addition,traditional techniques are still used such as an abbreviated, concise board lectures and hand-written exams.Aside from the peer learning methods implemented and discussed in this paper, the othersignificant change that was made from Spring 2013 to Spring 2014 is the total amount of in-classcontact hours. As of Spring 2014, the course meets twice per week for 1 hour and 50 minutes,which is an
understanding of and the appropriate use of mathematical modeling breadth and depth of study.As a result of JQUS’ acceptance as an IB school, math teachers felt the need toincorporate projects that teach these skills, emphasizing critical thinking andinternational-mindedness in keeping with the IB learner profile and Common Corestandards [5-7]. Adjusting to a new curriculum while meeting district and staterequirements, the adherence of all standards poses considerable challenges to JQUS forteaching project-based learning, writing, mathematical content and technology content.EBL via the CAPSULE program was chosen as an approach for transitioning the school’sSTEM curriculum into the IB Diploma Programme.With every teacher limited by physical and
experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is also an area in which she holds a patent. She currently has research focused on student learning in virtual laboratories and the diffusion of educational interventions and practices.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering
tools for teaching and learning”6. Oneconsideration here is the role of training in academia, and how this isintegrated with a university’s role as an educator. LASP’s experience hasshown that the combination of education with training enables the student tomore quickly become productive in the design and problem solvingexperience. A student coming to us with specific trained skills relevant todesign almost immediately integrates into our process. It is also the case thattraining acquired from outside of the university experience is relevant, eitherthrough a hobby, interaction with a parent, or a high school experience. TheNAE study notes that attempts to change the basic engineering curriculum toinclude features like additional training “have
solely totraditional classroom environment. Therefore students need to be prepared by exposing them toinformal cooperative learning, where students are to work together to achieve a joint learninggoal in temporary, ad-hoc groups that may last from a few minutes to one class period (32).Informal cooperative learning groups also ensure that misconceptions, incorrect understanding,and gaps in understanding are identified and corrected.. Using procedures such as informalcooperative learning guarantees that students have been exposed to some active and interactivemethods prior to engaging in PBL.B. Infusing PBL in the Curriculum: There are several strategies that may be utilized to infusePBL in an engineering curriculum. The selected strategy depends
to embark upon development of an integrated set of material for the course(s) inclassical control systems. Our engineering background predisposed us to design these Page 4.414.1courses using what we knew of what was available about how students learn and theirvarious learning styles. In other words, as engineers we wanted to base the design of thelessons on the best available design principles in this area. There is a large amount of pedagogical research that supports differentapproaches to course organization and presentation of material. We were particularlyfamiliar with the Kolb cycle (1,2,3,4), and decided to base the design of the
Fischer, "The Color War," American Heritage of Invention and Technology, winter 1997, pp. 8-18. 15. Franklin, Benjamin. Experiments and observations on electricity, made at Philadelphia in America, London: Francis Newberry, 1769. 16. Frey, William J. et.al. “Ethics Across the Curriculum: An Effective Response to ABET 2000.” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 0461. 17. Hong, Sungook. "Marconi and the Maxwellians: The Origins of Wireless Telegraphy Revisited," Technology and Culture, 35 (Oct. 1994): 717-749. 18. Hounshell, David A. "Bell and Gray: Contrasts in Style, Politics, and Etiquette," IEEE Proceedings, 64 (1976
national and international conferences, scientific journals, and books. Stan serves as a reviewer and a member of program committees for a number of national and international conferences. During his academic career, Stan received over seven million dollars in funding from private and federal sources. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Using Agile Principles for Cohort Building in a Graduate Software Engineering ProgramAbstractThis report describes an approach to building a cohort of students in a graduate softwareengineering program supported by the Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S-STEM) Program of the National
) providing students who are traditionally underrepresented in environmental scienceand engineering with an opportunity to conduct independent research that is mentored by anexperienced scientist or engineer; (2) teaching these students how to conduct meaningfulenvironmental research and communicate the results of that research to professional colleaguesand the general public; (3) communicating to students the importance of graduate school as anintegral part of the educational pipeline leading to successful careers in science and engineering;(4) demonstrating why synthetic, integrative research is necessary for understanding and solvingcomplex environmental problems, and therefore why multidisciplinary and interdisciplinaryapproaches to environmental
, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the MyEngineeringLab system. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 (PREP)ARE: A student-centered approach to provide scaffolding in a flipped classroom environmentAbstractThis complete
concepts,experimental concepts and skills, and give them experience in system level design andintegration.Imagine mobile hands-on learning activities that involve both thestudent and the faculty member in the learning process withoutconsiderable time or effort by the instructor. And, suppose thatthere are freely available resources to assist a faculty member,educated under the old lecture system, to introduce hands-onlearning modules and rapidly develop his or her own modulesusing validated procedures. Now, let’s consider what wouldhappen if this pedagogical approach is integrated throughout aSTEM curriculum so that students see how concepts from onecourse can be applied in other course to build a system-levelunderstanding of their discipline and
thatappropriate topics were being covered and appropriate feedback was being given tostudents regarding their work.Under the new criteria, it is expected that all faculty are integrally involved in an on-going process of improvement that results in graduates that are prepared for the currentand ever-changing work place. Therefore, it is now impossible to simply write a reportonce every six years to show to ABET evaluators and expect this effort to result in anaccredited program. Instead, all faculty must now start by being aware of theirinstitution’s guiding principles (its mission, goals, and objectives) as well as those of theindividual programs and divisions of which they are part within the institution. Inaddition to being “aware” of these guiding
: Redesigning an ESL programto meet the needs of both L2 and L1 graduate students," Simpson et al.(Eds.), Supporting graduatestudent writers, pp.139-158, 2016.[23] M.B.B. Magolda, Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students'intellectual development, Jossey-Bass, 1992.[24] J.A. Moon, A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice.Routledge, 2013.[25] P.C. Wankat, "Reflective analysis of student learning in a sophomore engineering course,"Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), pp.195-203, 1999.[26] N. Barr, "Starting from scratch: Incorporating communication instruction in a revisedMechanical Engineering curriculum," In 2017 IEEE International Professional CommunicationConference (ProComm), pp. 1-5
mechanical curriculum. There have also been comments from students inthe required course evaluations that there is a disconnect from the lecture and the lab. The beliefof the instructor is that the students are not making the connections from the written text to thehands on activities. One example is a diagram of a water closet carrier that was labeled as part ofan in class assignment in lecture, Figure 2. Figure 2: Water Closet Carrier and Fitting 2Upon testing the students about this diagram on an exam, many failed to identify the parts. Thesame exercise was done with a valve shown in Figure 3, but the valve was also viewed in lab andthe students were given the opportunity to look inside the valve and each one
andeducation of an engineer is now compared to that of an engineering technologist and othertechnologists (e.g., in terms of math/theory in the education, in terms of ability to work hands-on,and in terms of job roles in a interdisciplinary team). Students are now better exposed totechnology-related degree options other than engineering.Second, a technology professor joined the EGR120 teaching team. The course has since beenbroken into four curriculum blocks, taught “round-robin” by four professors: an EE section, anME section, a general engineering profession and projects section, and a hands-on/laboratory(technology-professor) section. The hope is that students who are dissatisfied with engineeringwill now have a contact and familiarity elsewhere in
forthe students to review and to reinforce topics from throughout the semester, as well as to ensurethat the students retain the topics they have learned.ALEKS provides a personalized, time-efficient environment in which each student is able towork through the Precalculus curriculum at his or her own pace. If a student begins the coursealready having mastered certain topics, and demonstrates this mastery on an assessment, ALEKSdoes not require the student to work through problems from that type. Rather, the student is freeto move on and spend time working on topics that they have not yet mastered. Many studentsinformally commented throughout the semester that they appreciated this feature of ALEKS.Working problems using ALEKS also has
courseenrollment is usually around 25 students. While most students are PhD students in chemicalengineering, there are sometimes a small number of MS or PhD students from allied disciplines inthe course. Since 2012, the course has included modules on course design, teaching methods,assessment of student learning, evaluation of teaching effectiveness, ABET accreditation,facilitating groupwork, and preventing and reporting academic integrity violations.In early 2019, the course instructor was awarded an Instructional Improvement Grant through theUC Berkeley Center for Teaching and Learning. The instructional improvement project, titled,“Inclusive Teaching and Active Learning Upgrades to Chemical Engineering Pedagogy Course,”centered on general updates to
, offering subjects in science with a decided practical, professional focus. This makesKTH Sweden’s oldest technical university. It is also the largest; approximately one-third ofSweden’s technical research and engineering education capacity at university level is providedby KTH. Currently, 13,400 first and second level students and 1,900 doctoral students study atKTH.KTH has remained a leading-edge institution since its inception. Recently, KTH created a Vision2027 strategy: “Information technology as an integral part of everyday life has altered conditions Page 26.764.5for university studies fundamentally by 2027. Competition is becoming global
Paper ID #7552Workshops for the Engineering Faculty Engagement in Learning ThroughService (EFELTS) Project: Development and Initial FindingsDr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Christopher Swan is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Curriculum Development in the School of En- gineering and an associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at Tufts University. He has additional appointments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. He has also served as chair of Tufts CEE depart- ment (2002-2007). Dr. Swan’s current research
, the theoretical foundation for design thinking is rooted in a varietyof disciplines, including engineering and social sciences, which enables complex problem-solvingthrough alternative, creative, and innovative ways (Foster, 2021; Buchanan, 1992; Dam & Siang,2018; Huppatz, 2015, Razouk & Shoute, 2012). The integration of multiple viewpoints and thesynergy of collective creativity are essential components that significantly enhance theeffectiveness of Design Thinking (IDEO, 2012). Design thinking continues to evolve with thewidely accepted approach, which follows the order of empathize, define, ideate, prototype, andtest. This process is cyclic and continues until an efficient solution is achieved. Jain (2015) positedthat advocates for
9:39 AM Page 23.1233.14 Perhaps develop an example of how the standards can be integrated into a typical Mon, Oct73. curriculum that teaches Software Engineering or the like... 22, 2012 9:34 AM Mon, Oct74. provide open access to standards from *.edu addresses 22, 2012 9:31 AM
teaching core undergraduate courses, Jennifer is aimed at integrat- ing engineering design principles and hands-on experiences throughout the curriculum, and playing an active role in the senior design course. She has interests in engineering education, curricular innovation, as well as impacting the community through increased K-12 STEM awareness and education. Prior to joining UC Davis, Jennifer taught in the BME Department at Rutgers University, and was a postdoctoral fellow at Advanced Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, LLC. She received her doctoral degree in Biomedical Engineering from Tufts University, M.S. degree from Syracuse University, and B.S. degree from Cornell University
STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Her interests also include evaluation of K-12 STEM initiatives that target low income and minority students. Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluating programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Department of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU).Dr. Tris Utschig, Kennesaw State University Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is Associate Director for Learning
: Learning Gains, Student Attitudes, and the Impacts of Multiple Effective Reforms,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 790, no. 1, p. 137, 2005. [8] S. J. Pollock, “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Curriculum on Conceptual Understanding in electricity and magnetism,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 951, no. 1, p. 172, 2007. [9] E. W. Close, J. Conn, and H. G. Close, “Becoming physics people: Development of integrated physics identity through the learning assistant experience,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 12, p. 010109, Feb 2016.[10] V. Otero, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, “A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model,” American Journal of Physics, vol
engineering faculty’s communication pedagogy in theengineering classroom. We have surveyed engineering faculty at a variety of institutions todetermine to what degree they incorporate communication into their technical classes. Theproject included the development of an electronic survey instrument that collected responsesfrom engineering faculty at programs and departments in the United States. In addition to thesurvey results, we conducted focus groups with small groups of faculty, both at our institutionand at the site of the 2008 Frontiers in Education Conference, in order to dig deeper into the datacollected. The conclusions we draw from analysis of the survey and focus group results indicatethat engineering faculty have incorporated