. She earned her BS in chemical engineering from The Ohio State University in Columbus, OH in 2002 and her MS and PhD from NC State in 2008 and 2010. Dr. Melvin held a number of positions in industry with companies such as Dow Corning (now Dow), Johns Manville, and Hospira. Her passion is helping students succeed in engineering and getting the next generation of students interested in pursuing engineering degrees. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Preparing Resilient Individuals to Succeed in EngineeringIntroductionThe Louisiana State University College of Engineering has implemented an NSF S-STEMprogram focusing on the retention and success of underprepared students in
Session 3233 The Use of a Semester Long Theme Problem in a Senior Level Thermal Engineering Course Laura J. Genik, Craig W. Somerton University of Portland/Michigan State UniversityAbstractFormerly, a senior level capstone course in thermal engineering (ME 411 Applied ThermalScience) was a required part of the curriculum in mechanical engineering at Michigan StateUniversity. The intent of the course was to culminate several aspects of thermodynamics andheat transfer together in a single course with an emphasis on the design component of the topics.Among the topics covered
ETD 515 The Effectiveness of Virtual Environments for Increasing Engagement in Engineering Technology Courses Ghazal Barari, Brian Sanders Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University- WorldwideAbstractThe paper describes a learning activity design and data gathering methodology for use inforecasting student achievement via a survival analysis approach. Survival analysis is amethodology to predict the probability of survival based on a medical treatment procedure. Inthis paper, it is tailored for an academic program by defining learning activities, treatments, andmeasuring the
AC 2009-1689: PEER REVIEW FROM A STUDENT PERSPECTIVETeresa Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education in the Department of Physics at American University. She also serves as Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program. Dr. Larkin received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Physics from South Dakota State University in Brookings, SD in 1982 and 1985, respectively. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with special emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University in Manhattan, KS in 1997. Dr. Larkin’s research interests primarily involve the assessment of student learning in introductory
maneuverable and aesthetic concrete canoe.The design/build process required to create a competitive concrete canoe provides civilengineering students with an opportunity to gain hands-on practical experience and leadershipskills that will enhance their engineering education. They learn the importance of effectiveproject management and teamwork, including communication, organization, quality and costcontrol and safety. The technical challenges of the project are quite similar to thoseencountered in a high-quality undergraduate research project.Students who participate on a concrete canoe team gain valuable skills that they would notnecessarily learn in a standard engineering undergraduate curriculum. The concrete canoecompetition is a program that
delivery is an ongoing process. Whilethe proposed workshop is targeted towards the development of a set of vetted learning outcomes,it is understood that the underlying core concepts and supporting pedagogies will need to beupdated in response to classroom feedback as well as evolution in the field of transportationengineering itself. One of the most important impacts of this course development effort may bethe establishment of a community of transportation educators who actively share course designs,curriculum materials, teaching methods, and assessment instruments.Bibliography1. Turochy, R.E. (2006) Determining the Content of the First Course in Transportation Engineering. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and
and evaluation problems. Ashighlighted by Bloom, the taxonomy aids teachers in defining and exchanging information abouteducational goals, facilitating curriculum development, and planning learning experiences andevaluation devices. It aligns with the historical context, originating from a 1948 meeting of collegeexaminers at the American Psychological Association Convention, emphasizing the need for atheoretical framework to enhance communication among examiners and stimulate research onexamining and education.Background on Constructivist Theory of LearningWhen receiving an education in engineering, students are not passive recipients of information butrather active participants in their own learning process. Constructivist Theory of
a course curriculum improvementcase study involving an introductory geotechnical engineering course where an inquiry-basedapproach is used. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to describe how the inquiry-basedapproach is used in the classroom including student perspectives of the use of this approach; and(2) to examine the relationships between student performance on the final exam with studentself-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory behaviors. The inquiry-based pedagogy model is based on Bloom and Krathwohl’s Taxonomy andBloom’s Revised Taxonomy2, which focuses on student-centered learning activities andinteractive skills. Bloom’s taxonomy is used in education as a valid benchmark to measure astudent’s level of understanding
foundations, industrial and government sources. His teaching, research, service, and publishing interests are in the areas of Automation, Robotics, Rapid Prototyping, Reverse Engineering, Process Monitoring & Control, and Computer Integrated Manufacturing.Jennifer Parsons, Robert Morris University Jennifer Parsons is the Director of STEM Outreach Programs within the School of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. She previously served as the SEMS Outreach Programs Specialist and PRIME Business Manager and is an integral part of all grants from Pittsburgh area foundations, the SME Education Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and the US Department of Labor. She continues to work
Science Department at Forman Christian College (A Chartered University) at Pakistan for eight years and was recognized for outstanding teaching with the year 2013 teaching award. Saira was also the recipient of ”President of Pakistan Merit and Talent Scholarship” for her undergraduate studies.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette Muhsin Menekse is an assistant professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research focus is on students’ learning of complex tasks and concepts in STEM domains. Specifically, he investigates how classroom activities and learning environments affect
artifact destined to become an attractive monument to misplaced priorities. I use my personal funds to pursue professional development activities. In addition to faculty technical currency, faculty should be exposed to pedagogy of teaching and learning. The relationship, between faculty technical/professional currency and student learning, needs to be investigated in all engineering and technology programs. Especially for the upper-division classes in a 4-year Engineering Technology (ET) curriculum, I personally have been moving from the “sage on the stage” lecture model of ET courses to laboratory-based “Design/Prototype/Build” individual &/or team-based experiences. These open-ended, student directed projects
Paper ID #8505People Matter: The Role of Peers and Faculty in Students’ Academic En-gagementDr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific UniversityDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, in 1988 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Tech- nology, Atlanta, in 1989 and 1995, respectively. She received the M.Ed. from the University of Wash- ington in 2008. She is currently an Associate Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, and she
Display in Engineering Lobby – 1st floor Page 12.122.4 Figure 1. Locations of the seven PV assemblies and display.A disadvantage of a horizontal array is that the power output will be slightly reduced whencompared to an array that is tilted at the optimum angle. That said, amorphous silicontechnology is less sensitive to tilt angle than crystalline photovoltaic technology. United SolarOvonic cites data1 showing that horizontal amorphous arrays delivered a time-integrated power(energy) that was comparable to that of the competing tilted crystalline glass-framed modules(the same study also demonstrated that amorphous arrays delivered more
discuss what can be done in an electronics course to possibly retain students in ECEprograms.Microprocessors, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and microcontrollers are all essentialcomponents in electronic systems. The electronics course offers two levels of design experiencesto students: 1) circuits and electronics and 2) PCB designs for manufacturability. These twoexperiences incorporate microcontroller and environmental sensor interfaces, in addition toBluetooth connectivity and motor driver integration. As a result, this allows students to use thecircuit interfaces on their PCB to build complex systems for smart home, automation, mobile,and industrial applications.Herein, we detail the incorporation of PCB development in the
experience in working with off-the-shelf parts and systems. Acapstone project may require integration with a solar panel, motion sensor, or electronic keypad.But nowhere in the curriculum are students taught how to research parts, read data sheets, andverify operations, all necessary considerations before the design can progress.To address these challenges, a series of open-ended laboratory experiences were designed forfirst-semester seniors. These experiences were designed to be completed in two weeks (includingsix hours of lab time). With only a basic understanding of the functionality, and perhaps adatasheet, the students spend the first week tinkering with a part or system that they have notused before. They must learn how it responds to various
justice and behavioral ethicsresearch are concerned with questions of right and wrong, until recently, the study of ethicalbehavior at work has focused on them as two distinct scholarly traditions. Discussing theimportance of linking the two, they stated [7]: The process theories of justice offer an important avenue for integrating behavioural ethics research. If fairness decisions are made through a series of cognitive steps, then there are a number of stages in which ethical considerations could intervene. (p. 891)In the case of engineering education, Rottmann and Reeve [6] identified “a long-lasting divisionbetween ethics and equity in engineering education” (p. 146) and framed it as the micro/macrodivide. While micro-ethics
Nevada, Reno Tara C. Langus is a Ph.D. student pursuing her degree in STEM Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. Her research interests include the integration of socioscientific and sociopolitical issues in the college STEM classroom and increasing the representation and retention of underrepresented minorities in STEM. Prior to graduate school, she completed Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Biology in which she studied insect immunology and chemical ecology.Mr. Nelson S Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno Nelson Pearson is an Ph.D. student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research interest includes, social networks and the integration of diverse populations, engineering culture as well as engineering
degree in Engineering Education in UConn’s College of Engineering.Dr. Christa L. Taylor, University of Connecticut Christa L. Taylor, Ph.D., is an Independent Research Consultant and Research Affiliate with the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Connecticut. Her research is focused on issues in creativity, social cognition, and neurodiversity. She received a Ph.D. in Social-Personality Psychology from the University at Albany, State University of New York before completing postdoctoral work at Yale University and Universit´e catholique du Louvain in Belgium. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Positive Predictors of Neurodiverse Students' Sense of Belonging
R EFERENCEShands-on understanding: [1] F.P. Deek and J. McHugh. Problem solving and cognitive foundations for • “A lot of code for thought assignments were given that program development: An integrated model. In Proc. of International helped reinforce understanding of concepts covered in Conference on Computer Based Learning in Science (CBLIS), pages 266–271, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2003. class.” [2] Chan E. Y. K. Lee V. C. S. Lam, M. S. W. and Y. T. Yu. Designing an • “Code for thought
., vol. 12, no. 17, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12177039.[35] E. K. Marler et al., “The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being.,” Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. Psychol., 2021, doi: 10.1037/stl0000294.[36] D. R. Johnson, “Campus Racial Climate Perceptions and Overall Sense of Belonging Among Racially Diverse Women in STEM Majors,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 336–346, 2012, doi: 10.1353/CSD.2012.0028.[37] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, “Compassionate flexibility and self-discipline: Student adaptation to emergency remote teaching in an integrated engineering energy course during covid-19
communitydevelopment. Using artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) as an area of application forengineering students involved in community development, the paper first describes thecharacteristics that communities should exhibit and what they should expect of engineers inorder to achieve community resiliency. Second, it outlines criteria that engineering studentsshould adopt as behavioral guidelines in order to act in a socially responsible way. Third, itdescribes criteria that engineering projects should have in order to contribute to sustainablecommunity development. Fourth, it describes the integration of these two set of criteria in theengineering curriculum in order to develop conceptual understanding and practical skills thatengineering students
Paper ID #49482Summer Pre-Engineering Program Builds Student Confidence and MotivatesInterest in STEMDr. Araceli Martinez Ortiz, The University of Texas at San Antonio Araceli Martinez Ortiz, PhD., is the Microsoft President’s Endowed Professor of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering and Integrated Design at the University of Texas at San Antonio. She leads a comprehensive research agenda related to integrated STEM learning, pre-college engineering engagement, engineering faculty professional development and culturally relevant engineering curriculum and instruction.Gabriela Gomez, The University of Texas at
the discipline of EER. We also aimto analyze the transformations that ANT has experienced in EER spaces. To do this, we conducted anarrative literature review and used ANT itself as our approach to interpreting the literature, as we aimto understand how interpretations of ANT develop and travel within the EER field. In the next sections,we first briefly present some of what we consider be the main arguments and concepts of the theory,then we explain our methodology, and follow by discussing our analysis of the EER literature.2. BackgroundActor-network theory was first developed in the 1980s at the Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation at theÉcole nationale supérieure des mines de Paris, an engineering school and research university that is
content vocabulary in studentdiscourse to see if students are developing a “correct” model.Engineering builds in disciplinary literacy within engineering habits of mind6, 13-14, 16, and as aprofessional practice within a Kolb Cycle as part of the process of experiential learning, where reflectiveobservation activities and abstract conceptualization activities create sense making for concepts 6. Kolbwrites in part6; “they must be able to create concepts that integrate their observations into logically soundtheories…and use these theories to make decisions and solve problems.” Through disciplinary literacypractices, students make an explicit connection between the definition of the concept, and the applicationand practice of the concept
instruments (HPLC, UV,TOC,GC, KF—etc.) and also monitoring drug shelf life through both accelerated and shelf life stability programs. After which started at GlaxoSmithKline Beecham Egypt in which i was a laboratory senior analyst an- alyzing all dosage forms as finished products dealing with all laboratory instruments with very good experience on HPLC and GC in addition of GLP and GMP knowledge, SOP writing and audits carry out internally then i was promoted to a section head of validation and quality assurance for the pharmaceuti- cal industry for both Lactam and non-Lactam areas in which i was responsible for sterile and non-sterile areas qualification, validation and periodic verification dealing with process
tacklethe “messiness” of open-ended design problems.[1] Particularly in large first-year courses,implementing and assessing these open-ended design problems is difficult due to resource(space, staffing, time, financial, etc.) constraints. Finding an appropriate balance betweenconcrete and open-ended design projects is critical to maximizing students’ learning.ENGGEN 115: Principles of Engineering Design is a required first-year course in the Faculty ofEngineering at the University of Auckland. The course was re-designed in 2022 to emphasizedesign process over technical engineering, promote creative problem solving, and to test aconcrete/open-ended balance that might work for the combination of curriculum, student cohort,and faculty arrangement in
, April 1998, pp. 81–88. 3. Clark, R. E., “Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media,” Review of Educational Research, Winter, 1983, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 445-459.4. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K., “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineering Education 78(7), pp. 674-681, April 1988.5. Jensen, E. (1998). “Teaching with the Brain in Mind,” Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.6. Krauss, R., Ali, A., & Lenz, A., “Teaching Dynamic Systems and Control without Dynamics,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.7. Lee, K.-M., Daley, W., and McKlin, T., “An interactive learning tool for dynamic systems and control,” International
Paper ID #26457Assessment of Active and Team-based Learning Techniques in a Transporta-tion Engineering Introductory CourseDr. Alexandra Kondyli, University of Kansas Dr. Alexandra Kondyli is an Assistant Professor of Transportation Engineering in Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of Kansas since August 2014. Dr. Kondyli’s research interests include traffic operations and management, highway capacity, ITS, microsimulation, driver be- havior, and traffic flow theory. Prior to her appointment at the University of Kansas, Dr. Kondyli was a postdoctoral associate at the University of Florida
framework found it useful and they have been thinking about the questions actively in theirprofessional life. I had not collected data when this course was taught with the formalized framework but intend todo so in the future and report on the results. As it stands, this paper is an experience report and anintroduction to the framework that other instructors can utilize. Because of the simple underpinning of the baseline questions, this framework can also be used inindividual modules in coursework throughout the curriculum. At Saint Mary’s ethics module start atthe very �irst course in the CS sequence, and culminates in applying the question-directed frameworkin the capstone course, reiterating the importance of applying the framework to
applications.This paper will present the development and assessment of a PCB layout and manufacturinglaboratory module that has been used in introductory electric circuits laboratories for EE andnon-EE majors. The feasibility of integrating the new PCB layout and manufacturing moduleinto the electric circuit course will be discussed. An experiment has been designed andconducted to assess the impact of the PCB module. A survey with questions from the MotivatedStrategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) supplemented with additional questions was usedto measure students’ motivation and the impact of the PCB module on student learning. InWinter quarter of 2009 at Cal Poly, two lab sessions for sophomore and junior non-EEengineering majors were taught by an