identity,development and socialization, especially among underrepresented minorities and women. Wehave also aimed to identify key characteristics of academic or non-academic spaces, structuredby the program, that foster STEM identity development.References[1] U. Ghosh-Dastidar, D. Samaroo, A. Solis, and S. Han, “S-STEM: An Educational Model for Retention at an Urban Institution,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[2] Institutional Description [Online] Available: https://facultycommons.citytech.cuny.edu/sponsored-programs/institutional-description/ . [Accessed: 28 Feb. 2023].[3] U.S. News and World Report [Online] Available: https://www.usnews.com/best- colleges/cuny-tech-2696 [Accessed 28 Feb
," 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S3G-1-S3G-6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673256. 2. Rahman, F., & Andrews, C., & Wendell, K. B., & Batrouny, N. A., & Dalvi, T. S. (2019, June), Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32699 3. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 4. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond
Covid-19 on Applied MathematicsCourses for Engineering Students. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[2] Besser, A. et al. (2020) ‘Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students.’, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning inPsychology. doi:10.1037/stl0000198.[3] Faulkner, B., Earl, K. and Herman, G. (2019) ‘Mathematical Maturity for Engineering Students’,International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), pp. 97–128.doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00083-8.[4] Jamalpur, B. et al. (2021) ‘A comprehensive overview of online education – Impact on engineeringstudents during COVID-19’, Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.749
, “Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Undergraduate Engineering Students: Perspectives, Resiliency, and Suggestions for Improving Engineering Education.” Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2021.[3] S. James, J. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, and M. Anafi, “The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey,” National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016.[4] G. Beemyn, “Campus Pride Trans Policy,” Clearinghouse, 2021, Available: www.campuspride.org/tpc[5] R. Figard, M. Dalal, J. Roarty, S. Nieto, and A. Carberry, “Understanding High School Student Experiences in an Engineering Course Designed For All (Fundamental, Diversity),” In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022
conference papers and book chapters.Mr. Ryan Hare, Rowan University Ryan Hare received his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Rowan University in 2019. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University. His current research focus is applying artificial intelligence methods to create enhanced educational systems and improve student learning. Further interests include serious games, intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive or intelligent educational systems, and leveraging student data to enhance learning. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Evaluation of an AI-assisted Adaptive Educational
Classroom in the Online Environment of Covid? Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022. 30(2): p. 517-531.5. Morgan, J., E. Lindsay, C. Howlin, and M. Bogaard, Pathways of Students' Progress through an on-Demand Online Curriculum, in ASEE Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.6. Tsai, Y.-S., D. Rates, P.M. Moreno-Marcos, P.J. Muñoz-Merino, I. Jivet, M. Scheffel, H. Drachsler, C.D. Kloos, and D. Gašević, Learning Analytics in European Higher Education—Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education, 2020. 155: p. 103933.7. Mavroudi, A., M. Giannakos, and J. Krogstie, Supporting Adaptive Learning Pathways through the Use of Learning Analytics: Developments, Challenges and Future
.1742-1241.2011.02659.x.[8] S. M. Van Anders, “Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors,” Sex Roles, vol. 51, no. 9–10, pp. 511–521, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1007/S11199-004-5461-9/METRICS.[9] R. Ysseldyk et al., “A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. JUN, p. 1297, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01297/BIBTEX.[10] N. D. Jackson, K. I. Tyler, Y. Li, W. T. Chen, C. Liu, and R. Bhargava, “Keeping current: An update on the structure and evaluation of a program for graduate women interested in engineering Academia,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
technique that is not often applied in a person-centered manner (Godwin et al.,2021). PCA is one of the most frequently used dimension reduction methods, which aims toidentify a subset of variables to represent a dataset in a lower dimension without losingsignificant information (Kherif & Latypova, 2020). In this example, Martin & Sorhaindo (2019)compared intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors as predictors of academic achievement forcivil engineering students. They employed PCA to consolidate motivational factors into intrinsicand extrinsic groups. The original twenty-two motivation variables were ultimately grouped intofive principal components, which accounted for 66% percent of the variance. Thisimplementation of PCA to aggregate
-doctoral fellowship at Lawrence National Laboratory focusing on com- putational analysis for nonlinear seismic analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. After joining SFSU in 2016, she established an active research lab at SFSU with a diverse group of under- graduate and Master’s level students. For her engineering education research, she is interested in exploring how to use technology such as virtual reality and 3D printing to enhance student engagement. She is an active member of ASCE, ASEE, and SEAONC.Shah Rukh Humayoun, San Francisco State UniversityKhanh NguyenYongjian Pan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reinforcing Human-Technology Interaction Theory
review of empirical studies,” Computers & Education, vol. 148, Apr., 2020.[9] Computer Science Teachers Association, “Code.org Advocacy Coalition & Expanding Computing Education Pathways Alliance,” 2019 State of Computer Science Education. Available: https://advocacy.code.org/. [Accessed Dec. 14, 2020][10] J. Margolis, R. Estrella, J. Goode, J. Holme, and K. Nao, Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.[11] J. Margolis, J. and A. Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.[12] V. Barr and C. Stephenson, “Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer
student groupwork: A protocol for peer evaluation of individual contributions. Management Education, 30(4):570, 2006. [3] Keith Topping. Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity, and utility. Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, 1:55, 2003. [4] Robert Thompson. Reliability, validity, and bias in peer evaluations of self-directed interdependent work teams. ASEE Annual Conference, 2001. [5] Peter Ostafichuk and Jim Sibley. Self-bias and gender-bias in student peer evaluation: An expanded study. Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA-ACEG19) Conference, 2019. [6] Jacklin Stonewall, Michael Dorneich, and
Paper ID #28823The transition from STEM to STEAMDr. Jayanta K. Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Jayanta Banerjee is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez campus. Dr. Banerjee received Ph.D. from the University of Waterloo and M.Ed. from Queen’s University, both in Canada. He has worked in industries and taught at the universities in Germany, Canada, USA and Latin America. He has over hundred publications in refereed journals and conference proceedings and a few books to his credit. Jayanta is a member of ASEE, ASME and VDI (Germany
highlighted how the citizen scientists engaged incritical analysis of their rainwater harvesting designs with their cultural contexts.Data AnalysisAll audio recordings were transcribed and coded by the research team consisting of a sociologist,a civil engineer, and an environmental engineer. The analysts used a domain analysis approach[14]. Predefined codes obtained from the literature review served as the basis for initial dataanalysis, but addition rounds included new codes based on Saldaña, 2013 [15]; Mejia et al., 2017[11]; Grubbs et al., 2018 [16]; and Hsiao, 2019 [17]. The final round of coding included eight“Sustainability Mindset” domains: 1) Financial feasibility, 2) Social impacts, 3) Environmentalimpacts, 4) Resiliency, 5) Empathy, 6
components of classroomacademic performance,” Journal of educational psychology, vol. 82 no. 1, pp. 33, Mar 1990.[8] M. Morris, R. Hensel, and J. Dygert, "Why Do Students Leave? An Investigation Into WhyWell-Supported Students Leave a First-Year Engineering Program." ASEE annual conference &exposition proceedings. Jan. 2019.
. He has work experiences in automotive electronics (Delphi Automotive Systems) and consumer products (International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Gender differences in the functionality of regret on academic performanceIntroductionDespite increases in female enrollment levels in engineering programs, the gender gap is stillsignificant. Women accounted for approximately 23% of first-year students who desire to majorin engineering programs in 2014 in the U.S. [1], and the actual female
Paper ID #32203What’s Next? From Analysis to ActionDr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Agnieszka Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washing- ton, and MSEE and BSEE from Florida Atlantic University in 1996 and 1994. Dr. Miguel’s professional interests involve image processing, machine learning, and engineering education especially active learn- ing, diversity, equity, and inclusion, retention, and recruitment. Her teaching interests include MATLAB, circuits, linear systems, and digital image processing. She is an ASEE Fellow and a member of the IEEE, SWE, and Tau
. 3, pp. 203–215, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1469787411415081.[2]K. Meyers, C. Pieronek, and L. McWilliams, “Engineering Student Involvement: Comparison of Two DissimilarInstitutions,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, doi: 10.18260/1-2--19533.[3]R. Yu and D. Simmons, “Synthesis of Engineering Undergraduate Students’ Out-of-Class Involvement,”presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, doi: 10.18260/p.24787.[4] E. Massoni, “Positive Effects of Extra Curricular Activities on Students,” (2011) ESSAI: Vol. 9 , Article 27.[5] D. Simmons, E. Creamer, and R. Yu, “Involvement in Out-of-Class Activities: A Mixed Research SynthesisExamining Outcomes with a Focus on Engineering Students” Journal of STEM
Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Seeking Wa:k Community Perceptions in Engineering 1Work in Progress: Seeking Wa:k Community Perceptions in Engineering Ieshya Anderson
Instruction: A Case Study.” Alternation 18 (2), 59 – 77. 2011.11. V. Tinto, “Dropout from Higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.” Review of Educational Research 45 (1), 89 -125. 1975.12. K.B. Coletti, et al, “Correlating Freshman Engineers’ Performance in a General Chemistry Course to Their Use of Supplemental Instruction.” Presented at 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. June 15-18, 2014. American Society for Engineering Education. Paper ID #9436. 2014.13. D. Ewing, et al, “Supplemental Instruction and Just-in-Time Tutoring: The Who, When, and Why Students Attend in a First Year Engineering Course”, Presented at ASEE GSW Annual Conference, Tyler, TX, 2019.
Transformation Institute, earned a doctoral degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from Elizabethtown College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University, eleven years of experience in industry as a software engineer. Her research focus is on broadening participation in engineering and computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity and 2) computer science education research in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in
. Journal of Engineering Education, (89)3, 2000, 301–7.[9] Metz, S. and Sorby, S., “Implementing ENGAGE strategies to improve retention: focus on spatial skills engineering schools discuss successes and challenges.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 2011.[10] Guay, R.B., Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations. West Lafayette, In: Purdue Research Foundation, 1976.[11] Segil, J., Myers, B., Sullivan, J. and Reamon, D., “Efficacy of various spatial visualization implementation approaches in a first-year engineering projects course,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2015.[12] De Rosa, A. J., & Fontaine, M., “Implementation and First-Year Results of an
touchscreen,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, 2018.[19] C. A. Bodnar, D. Anastasio, J. A. Enszer, and D. D. Burkey, “Engineers at play: Games as teaching tools for undergraduate engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 147–200, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20106.[20] H. Grieves, N. D. Pickens, T. Young, and T. M. Smith, “The effect of instructor-produced videos as supplemental material for training visual screening procedures in occupational therapy education,” Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, vol. 3, no. 4, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.26681/jote.2019.030402.
NativeEducation, 25(2), 175–179.[12] H. M. Matusovich, H. Murzi, D. Gray, B. D. Chambers, and M. B. James. (June 2020). Aautoethnography: Outcomes from faculty engagement in course development in a large first yearengineering program. Presented at the 2020 ASEE Annu. Conf. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/34109[13] Carroll, T., Gordon, B., Hancock, P. I., Stenger, K., & Turner, S. S. (2022). Cultivating solidarity foraction on social justice in engineering: A collaborative autoethnography. International Journal ofEngineering, Social Justice and Peace, 9(1), 62-91. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijesjp.v9i1.15216.[14] Haverkamp, A., & Butler, A., & Pelzl, N. S., & Bothwell, M. K., & Montfort, D., & Driskill, Q.(2019, April
Visually Impaired’, ACM Trans. Access. Comput., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 17:1-17:34, Jul. 2022 [Online]. Available: 10.1145/3508364.[2] A. Stangl et al., ‘Defining Problems of Practices to Advance Inclusive Tactile Media Consumption and Production’, in Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, New York, NY, USA, 2019, pp. 329–341 [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3308561.3353778.[3] A. Stangl et al., ‘Transcribing Across the Senses: Community Efforts to Create 3D Printable Accessible Tactile Pictures for Young Children with Visual Impairments’, in Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, New York, NY
. She has also developed and ran 9 faculty-led, international programs to Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy. She has won several teaching awards including ChE Sioui Award for Excellence in Teaching, COE Essigmann Outstanding Teaching Award, and AIChE Innovation in ChE Education Award. She also won best paper at the Annual ASEE conference in both Design in Engineering Education Division and the Professional Interest Council 5 (PIC V) for her research in Inclusive Team-based learning. In 2023, she won the Northeastern Inaugural Global Educator Award for her impactful work developing and running international educational programs.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan Lord is Professor and Chair of
: Perceptions of teachers and students,” Diagnostique, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 218–225, 1984.[13] C. Wallwey, Geary, Carol, and Soledad, Michelle, “What do grades mean? A Scoping Literature Review on Students’ Perceptions of Grades and Grading Practices,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2024, Portland, OR: ASEE, Under Review.[14] C. S. Hulleman, K. E. Barron, J. J. Kosovich, and R. A. Lazowski, “Student motivation: Current theories, constructs, and interventions within an expectancy-value framework,” Psychosoc. Ski. Sch. Syst. 21st Century Theory Res. Pract., pp. 241–278, 2016.[15] N. Arduini-Van Hoose, “Expectency-Value Theory,” in Educational Psychology, Online: Pressbooks, 2020. Accessed: Jan. 27, 2024
), creates adisconnect between students and the desire of librarians or faculty to teach traditionalresearch and information seeking skills.A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley modified framework.Six databases focusing on information, education, and engineering research weresearched (LISA, ERIC full-text, ASEE, ScienceDirect, EducationSource, and Scopus).Papers were included if they addressed engineering student information seekingbehaviors or needs. Studies that focused on social science or humanities students wereexcluded. The data were examined to find methodological trends, research areas, gaps inknowledge, and key findings. This review included 44 articles in the final review.Analysis grouped research into four emerging
for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Pub- lication Award by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award
undergraduate engineering education have been studied by ajoint research group spanning University of San Diego, Purdue University, Clemson University,and Research Triangle Educational Consultants. A summary of these works is discussed here andare also referenced in the Results section alongside quotes from the interview with S34.Main et al. suggest a research design focused on studying veteran integration and transition intoundergraduate engineering as a basis for in-depth semi-structured interviews with studentveterans [17]. A 2019 paper by the same group reviews and analyzes 12 of the interviewsconsidering leadership as the primary framework [18]. Further, a 2021 paper examined thestudent veterans’ perspectives of transition from military to
participation in engineering. Dr. Abraham is a member of the IEEE and ASEE, and she serves in leadership roles within both organizations. She also serves on the board of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC). Dr. Abraham received the B.E. degree in Telecommunication Engineering from Visveswaraiah Technological University (VTU), India in 2007 and Ph.D. from Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA in 2012.Dr. Mehmet Vurkac, Seattle University Mehmet Vurkac is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University.Dr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Dr. Miguel is Professor and Department Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University. Dr. Miguel