futurechallenges in their academic and professional careers. By actively involving students in the project, theinitiative not only advances their technical and conceptual understanding but also contributes to thedevelopment of an innovative educational resource that aligns with the objectives of engineeringpedagogy.VII. Preliminary ResultsAs part of an undergraduate Statics course, students were assigned a project to design, build, and analyzea crane using the PASCO Advanced Structures Kit. The project aimed to strengthen their understanding offundamental statics concepts, including force analysis, equilibrium, and internal forces. Students wererequired to submit a comprehensive design report, deliver a presentation, and provide an
success inengineering undergraduate programs. 7References[1] A. E. Slaton, “Body? What body? Considering ability and disability in STEM disciplines,” inProc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Atlanta, GA, USA, Jun. 2013.[2] K. Sang, T. Calvard, and J. Remnant, “Disability and academic careers: Using the socialrelationship model to reveal the role of human resource management practices in creatingdisability,” Work Employ. Soc., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 722–740, 2022.[3] R. Figard, S. Brunhaver, and J. Bekki, “‘It is so exhausting to constantly have to explain topeople’: Exploring the effects of faculty interactions on disabled students,” in Proc. ASEE Annu.Conf. Expo
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J.-G. Naud, “A history of benchmarking faculty salaries at RIT,” Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA, May 2007. [Online]. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/19TsA1nrYIY6rVwVgQeLGCPSLqmZEFm6T/view[2] M. Bailey, S. Baum, S. Mason, J. Mozrall, and M. Valentine, “RIT EFFORT career life survey. Establishing the foundation for future organizational reform and transformation: ADVANCE EFFORT@RIT,” Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA, October 2009. [Online]. Available: https://drive.google.com
that can serve as a foundation forcreating an undergraduate engineering curriculum tailored to different engineering programs. Theproposed content can also be used to define a sequence of courses for a minor in Cyber-InformedEngineering, applicable to various engineering fields. As previously mentioned, the focus will beon undergraduate engineering fields that deal with software or physical machinery, such assoftware, computer, electrical, mechanical, and aerospace engineering, among others.IntroductionWith advances in technology and the increasing integration of the Internet into more aspects ofour daily lives, cybersecurity has become an important topic that should be taught in every career,regardless of the field of work. Attackers are
multifaceted design project thisassignment was also used to help assess the junior level students’ progress towards meeting theABET program outcomes.Introduction Engineers seek to design new things. To help train upcoming engineers to successfullyaccomplish this, engineering faculty are always looking for new ways to invigorate their studentsand let them see how the material they are learning in class will be applied to their future careers,as discussed by Svensson [1]. While taking an idea from initial concept to a finished workingprototype is ultimately the goal, this is not always practical or feasible. This would requireintegrating material learned in most of the courses in the engineering curriculum to fullyaccomplish. This culmination of
more analytical perspective, AE studentsmust apply mechanics within the constraints of architectural design, safety regulations, andsustainability goals. Therefore, aligning OBA with these unique educational needs ensures thatAE students can bridge the gap between conceptual understanding and real-world application.Outcomes-based assessment (OBA) in higher education aims to enhance student learning,engagement, and teaching by focusing on developing key competencies, skills, and knowledgerelevant to future careers. It emphasizes outcomes and provides students with practicalexperience that prepares them to succeed in workplace environments. OBA focuses onevaluating whether students have achieved predetermined learning outcomes
business. Before that, he was at Dell Technologies, where he led cross functional teams developing cutting-edge hardware and automation products for large fortune 500 companies and drove technology acceleration through merger and acquisition. Glen started his career at Verizon, where he played a key role in product steering, new technology adoption, technical design and automation of global network systems.William Ray Freeman ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Democratizing Generative AI Quiz Creation: Accelerating Assessment Development in Engineering Education John Hassell Christopher Freeze Ahmed Butt
do.It should have an action or outcome for the students to achieve. Measurable: The objectiveshould include measurable indicators of success. This means identifying how students' progressor achievement will be tracked or assessed. Achievable: The objective should be realistic andachievable, given the students' existing knowledge level and the time available for the course.Relevant: The objective should be meaningful and connected to the student's overall goals,career aspirations, or the course's long-term objectives. Time-bound: The objective should havea clear timeline or deadline, specifying when students are expected to complete or achieve theobjective.An example of a LO for an introductory class that teaches to program using MATLAB would
Foundation engineering education grant to develop a culture of and tools for iterative experimentation and continuous improvement in curriculum development.Dr. Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University Astrid Layton is an assistant professor and Donna Walker Faculty Fellow at Texas A&M University in Mechanical Engineering. She received her Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia. She is interested in bio-inspired system design problems and was a 2024 NSF CAREER award winner based on this work. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in progress: Examining the network growth strategies of early-stage
labs, students are typically restricted by two to threehours of lab time, often leaving insufficient time to explore beyond the core lab assignments.With the Remote FPGA Lab, students can experiment with course concepts at their own pace,ensuring equitable access to hands-on FPGA experience regardless of geographic location. Thissystem enhances students’ technical skills and better prepares them for careers in fields requiringcustom hardware solutions. The initial evaluation of the system has shown promising results. Apilot study with a group of students is conducted with valuable feedback, which is used toenhance the system’s design. In the current semester, students in the digital systems course usethe Remote FPGA Lab, and their feedback is
AG, where the NanoFrazor is developed and supported. She has many years of experience in nanofabrication, through her research and product development work throughout her career. She is enthusiastic about making nanofabrication accessible to students and researchers of many backgrounds.Brett Michael Mann, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Brett Mann is currently pursuing a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), with concentrations in Computer Engineering and RF Engineering. As part of his studies, Brett has worked on several projects, including a research collaboration with Heidelberg Instruments Nano AG, aimed at demystifying nanofabrication and
single institution so results may not be generalizable tocivil engineering students more broadly. Future research in this area could help to further refineour understanding of civil engineering students’ perceptions of engineering design. Conductinglongitudinal studies or similar studies of midcareer students would provide a more detailedpicture of the ways in which definitions of design change across a students’ course career. Doingso with additional attention dedicated to past and concurrent course work as well as co-op andinternship experience might help to surface and solidify connections between student responsesand educational and work experiences. Finally, the definition of engineering design in the ABETcriteria is one of several that
, greatly enriched my learning experience and made this research journey ameaningful one.ReferencesCapital One Tech. (2025, April 3). Advancing AI research: industry & academia collaborations. Capital One. https://www.capitalone.com/tech/ai/ai-research-industry-academia/Allen, L. K., & Kendeou, P. (2023). ED-AI Lit: An Interdisciplinary Framework for AI Literacy in Education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322231220339Cadaret, M. C., Hartung, P. J., Subich, L. M., & Weigold, I. K. (2016). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb
Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Transition Services. In 2024, Dr. McCall received a National Science Foundation CAREER grant to identify systemic opportunities for increasing the participation of people with disabilities in engineering. Her award-winning publications have been recognized by leading engineering education research journals at both national and international levels. Dr. McCall has led several workshops promoting the inclusion of people with disabilities and other minoritized groups in STEM. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering with a structural engineering emphasis.Daniel Kane, Utah State University Daniel Kane is a third-year Ph.D. student in the department of
sector is experiencing a revival in interest toward nuclear power as an attractivecompromise between fossil fuels and renewables, particularly to address concerns about energyindependence and carbon emissions. Conceptually, nuclear engineering fundamentals arechallenging to teach to undergraduates as it requires a multi-disciplinary approach. Yet, it is afield that continues to power much of the world. Therefore, there is a continued need to educateengineering students in the field of nuclear power; and this paper presents a software emulationtool for nuclear power plant design. Engineering undergraduates can use the platform to explorefundamental nuclear engineering concepts and better prepare themselves for careers in andaround nuclear power
“socialaspect of learning” in librarianship and as librarians advance in their careers they become moreinvolved in communities beyond their institution and will readily connect with colleaguesoutside of their institution, informally building a community. “[T]hese communities can be veryvaluable sources of learning” [2]. This shared expertise, according to Belzowski, Ladwig &Miller [5] and Spicer [7], encourages collaboration amongst the group members and allows forreflection on their practice that can spur on new ideas and deepen subject expertise. This is whatBelzowski et al. [5] mean when they suggest that a CoP develops and sustains a “professionalidentity.”There is no template for CoPs. Each CoP should determine their own goals and objectives
and the developmental networks of early career engineers working in industry inspired by her time working in industry as a mechanical design and analysis engineer.Ms. Oluwakemi Johnson, University of Michigan Oluwakemi (Oh-LOO-wah-keh-me) Johnson is a second-year PhD student in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She is advised by Dr. Aaron Johnson and works as a research assistant on projects focusing on engineering judgment and open-ended modeling problems.Katelyn Churakos, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Katelyn Churakos is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She is majoring in
Engineering Living Learning Community (LLC) is another unique programfeature to enhance community among the SEED scholars. A general description of the programand preliminary results from the students’ self-reported sense of belonging in engineering,engineering design self-efficacy, and engineering identity are presented in this paper.Description of the SEED ProgramThe main goal of the Scholars of Excellence in Engineering Design (SEED) program at TexasState University (TXST) is to support two cohorts of talented, low-income, first-time-in-college(FTIC) domestic engineering students with unmet financial need by providing them scholarships;individual mentoring by a faculty member in their chosen major; and a suite of academicenrichment, career
Technological Institute (INTEC) and a M.Eng. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez (UPRM) as well as a M.Ed. degree in School Leadership from Southern Methodist University (SMU). Her current research interests are located at the intersection of science and engineering education, multilingualism and emerging technologies. Prior to starting her career in education, Greses was a project manager for engineering projects and hydrologic and hydraulic studies.Ms. Fatima Rahman, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach STEM Education graduate student at Tufts UniversityL. Clara Mabour, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Clara Mabour is a first year STEM Education
, severalparticipants mentioned "giving back" to those who helped them excel in their career paths.Interestingly, their "giving back" is achieved by empowering other students like them to keeppursuing their degrees and use all the opportunities LSAMP has provided them. The fact thatLSAMP's structure is based on Tinto's theoretical framework gives us a better understanding ofhow it empowers Hispanic students to complete their STEM studies, thus improving their SES.Future work might consider expanding the population to include other research areas and not belimited to Hispanics in STEM fields.Similarly, in Study 2, quantitative data of student transcripts reported that students that graduatedat or in less than 4 years transferred on average more credit hours
longer-term program impacts with an alumnistudy, surveying program alumni 1-3 years after their participation in the program. This surveywill assess the degree to which the internship experience influenced interns’ interests, plans, andpersistence in pursuing engineering or STEM in higher education and/or their career, as well asany enduring impacts on their awareness and understanding of issues related to accessibility.AcknowledgementsThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, award #2049109.References[1] National Science Board, National Science Foundation, “Science and Engineering Indicators2022: The State of U.S. Science and Engineering,” Alexandria, VA. NSB-2022-1, 2022.[2] M. Hynes, C. Joslyn, A. Hira, J
undergraduate students andhelping them to excel in their respective future careers in petroleum companies.9 Conclusion: Wind Speed variations and effects on propylene leak and later dispersions with blast forcewere simulated using Aloha software. The simulations indicated propylene toxic as well asexplosion-affected areas. Results from these simulations can help identifying neighborhoodcitizens who will be susceptible for the effects of propylene leak in different directions anddistances for varying wind speed. This analysis will help to identify the neighborhoods in termsof distance who are susceptible to quick evacuation and who can evacuate later. That meansevacuation level and preferences can be decided by this analysis. This analysis will
. (2016). Closing the gaps and filling the STEM pipeline: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 25(4), 682-695. Retrieved from https://doi-org/10.1007/s10956-016- 9622-8Domingo, M. R. S., Sharp, S., Freeman, A., Freeman, T., Jr., Harmon, K., Wiggs, M., Summers, M. F. (2019). Replicating Meyerhoff for inclusive excellence in STEM. Science, 364(6438), 335-337. Retrieved from https://doi-org/10.1126/science.aar5540Garcia, G. A., Ramirez, J. J., & Patrón, O. E. (2020). Rethinking Weidman’s models of socialization for Latinxs along the postsecondary educational pipeline. In Weidman, J. C., & DeAngelo, L. (Eds.), Socialization in higher education and the early career
semester First-Year Seminar, and a second semester STEM-PersistenceSeminar. Co-curricular activities focus on professional communication skills, financial literacy,career readiness, undergraduate research, and community engagement.The purpose of this paper is to describe the impact that two rounds of accelerator grants from theNSF Research Hub on inter- and intra-institutional partnerships at Virginia Tech University havehad on our S-STEM project. These accelerator grants have helped to create Sprouting Researchfrom Year 1, in which each LION STEM Scholars (n=4) was paired with an engineering facultymember who served as their formal research mentor during their first year of college. Whatfollows are the insights and responses to suggestions from
Paper ID #48772BOARD # 44: WiP: Empowering TAs through Metacognitive and CommunicationSkills DevelopmentProf. Jennifer Fiegel, The University of Iowa Dr. Jennifer Fiegel is a professor of chemical and biochemical engineering at the University of Iowa. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and her Ph.D. in chemical and biomolecular engineering from the Johns Hopkins University. She started her faculty career at the University of Iowa in 2006. During her time at Iowa, she has built a research program focused on developing better drug delivery systems to treat infections in
educational equity and researchinitiatives of Latinx college students. The ROLE program seeks to reduce such inequalities,providing Latinx students with the opportunity to excel in highly demanding programs and buildtheir education and career path, acquiring the needed technical skills, as confident scientists andoutstanding leaders in the engineering field. Students spend two semesters in the ROLE program.In the first semester, students learn about the Linux OS, Robot Operating System (ROS), and thePython programming language. In addition, students learn to operate a motion capture system,providing them with knowledge about indoor GPS capabilities. In the second semester, studentswork in teams to develop specific projects. In this phase, students
’ engineering identity development and critical incidents related to thetransfer process.The participants arrived at community college at various life stages. Approximately three-fourthswere recent high school graduates, while the others had pursued careers that did not require aformal degree such as military service or construction. Those older students were more uncertainabout starting a STEM degree program which would require considerable math.About half of the participants identified as first-generation college students and had limitedexposure to the engineering profession beyond related high school coursework. They may havecompleted technical courses such as CAD or a pre-engineering program such as Project Lead theWay in high school. Other
University ‘MTM Engineering Camp for Girls:’ Generating Under-Represented Pathway Prospects Through A Diversity-Rich Pre-College Outreach Project,” Women in Engineering ProActive Network, Jan. 2005.[4] J. Rodriguez, S. Butt, and T. Fredericks, “Pre-college activities to promote positive perception of engineering and engineering technology careers,” In 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 715-719). Dec. 2014. IEEE.[5] P. Kotlikoff, A. S. Rahman, and K. A. Smith, “Minding the gap: academic outcomes from pre-college programs”. Education Economics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 3–28, 2021.[6] B. Zhou, "Effectiveness of a Precollege STEM Outreach Program." Journal of Higher
. (1970). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership. 2. McClellan, Jeffrey L. (2013). Contributing to the development of student leadership through academic advising. Journal of Leadership Education, 12(1), 207-233. 3. Darroch, B. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on student engagement in STEM disciplines: A critical analysis. Journal of Higher Education, 94(1), 112-138. 4. Douglas, H. M., Settles, I. H., Cech, E. A., Montgomery, G. M., Nadolsky, L. R., Hawkins, A. K., Ma, G., Davis, T. M., Elliott, K. C., Cheruvelil, K. S., & Grundy, Q. (2022). Disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on marginalized and minoritized early- career academic scientists. PloS One, 17(9
Studies: A Systematic Literature Review.46. Board 150: Systematic Review of the Design Fixation Phenomenon at the K-12 Engineering Education (Other).47. Board 165: K-12 STEM Teachers’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: A PRISMA-tic Approach (Work-in-Progress).48. An Ecosystem Analysis of Engineering Thriving with Emergent Properties at the Micro, Meso, and Macro Levels.49. Unmasking Cognitive Engagement: A Systematized Literature Review of the Relationships Between Students’ Facial Expressions and Learning Outcomes.50. A Systematized Literature Review on Workforce Development Programs for Engineering Graduate Students.51. A Systematized Literature Review of Mental Health and Racial Battle Fatigue in Early- Career Black