are emphasized. Students are givengroup and individual assignments, all of which are graded and returned with additional feedback.Besides providing a detailed overview of the course, the observations made and lessons learnedfrom teaching the redesigned course for one semester are presented and discussed.IntroductionOver the past three decades, many undergraduate engineering programs have sought to introducestudents to their chosen disciplines as early as possible, e.g., first semester of first year. There aremany reasons for this growing trend. The principal motivation is usually to keep studentsengaged and interested in their selected majors with the long-term goal of improving bothretention and graduation rates [1-3].A limited survey of the
-Fields-With-Applications/Mandrekar-Gawarecki/9781498707817 Gawarecki L., Mandrekar V. (2011) ”Stochastic Differential Equations in Infinite Dimensions with Appli- cations to Stochastic Partial Differential Equations” Springer. http://www.springerlink.com/content/u040lr/#section=823672&page Gawarecki, L.; Mandrekar, V. (2010) ”On the existence of weak variational solutions to stochastic dif- ferential equations”, Commun. Stoch. Anal. 4, no. 1, 1–20. Gawarecki, L.; Mandrekar, V., Rajeev, B. (2009) ”The monotonicity inequality for linear tial differential equations”, Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics, 3 Vol. 12, No. 4 , 1–17. Gawarecki, L.; Mandrekar, V. Rajeev, B. (2008) ”Linear
severalreports [1], [2], [3], on Calculus curriculum renewal across the first two years in college. Theleading trends are clustered in three areas: • Calculus re-sequencing [4], [5] • Active learning methods [2], [6], [7], [8] • Applications from Engineering & Sciences [9], [10], [11], [12].Based on these suggestions, our goal is to create three “Engineering Math” tracks, each tailoredto different skill levels. The hope is that careful customization will enable all students tocomplete the calculus sequence (including both single-variable and multivariable) in twosemesters. These tracks are named Core Engineering Math I and II, Engineering Math I and II,and Honors Engineering Math I and II.The Honors track was launched in 2016-2017, and
student bloggerhave also covered NEET favorably in the short space of eight months.The ContextChuck Vest who served as president of MIT and of the National Academy of Engineering hassaid that much of what we view as engineering fundamentals was shaped by what is commonlytermed “engineering science”1. This approach evolved through World War II and continued afterthat since scientists were increasingly coming to the forefront as inventors. The pendulum swunga bit too far from practical engineering, and it is now time to find the right balance. According toVest, “Students must learn how to conceive, design, implement and operate (CDIO) complexengineering systems of appropriate complexity.”1The last two-three decades have seen exponentially rapid
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Refining Concept Maps as a Method to Assess Learning Outcomes among Engineering Students1.0 Introduction Concept mapping activities have been used extensively in over 500 educational researchprojects with the goal of developing curricula, assessment, and testing knowledge acquisition [1].This suite of methods, many shared among ASEE members, are proven to perform in a variety ofsettings and learning communities. Concept maps (CMs) are most often used to link courselearning goals to individual student’s knowledge integration of course material, especially wherethere are defined concepts and linkages between concepts that should be replicable by
joined the faculty at SDSU in 2009. He teaches courses in thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, and energy systems. His main research interests lie in the areas of thermal management of electronics and two-phase heat transfer.Dr. Ross Peder Abraham, South Dakota State UniversityDr. Richard Reid P.E., South Dakota State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 1 Reflections of CSEMS and S-STEM Faculty Mentors Suzette R. Burckhard Joanita M. Kant Gregory
with four one-week sessions of 160 participants each (Figure 1). EPIC wasdeveloped with the goal of exposing middle and high school students to engineering, so that theymight consider pursuing engineering in college (1, 2). As a residential camp, EPIC providesstudents with the opportunity to experience campus life so that they can begin envisioningthemselves as college students. Counselors are current college engineering students that are rolemodels for the camp participants. 1 Figure 1: EPIC students at final day of camp.During EPIC, students participate in eight 2-hour engineering labs over the course of the week.The
implementation of bothconventional and regenerative brake systems on both cars and bikes. Before the initial design(Figure 1) of the RE-Brake system was considered, calculations were made based on bikingstatistics and other energy data to determine how much energy could be gained from such a device.These calculations were done using a few pieces of information, primarily the energy lost when a73-kg person is riding a 10-kg bike at 4.4 m/s. The calculation was done using, 1 𝐸 = 𝑚𝑣 2 2where the mass would be the total of mass of the rider and the bike. The energy of this system wasfound to be about 803 joules, if
Mines c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: Regional Innovation Cluster: The Role of Entrepreneurship as a Tool for Closing the Gap BetweenEngineering Education and the Challenges of Local Communities.1. IntroductionTodays education is facing the challenge of preparing students and professionals to thrive in afast-changing world. To this gold, students should develop abilities like critical thinking,problem solving, persistence and collaborative work, beside science, math and language.However, a lot of countries are not working to develop these abilities [1].In order to strengthen the connection between what students need to learn and what theyactually do in the classroom, is
an unquestioned assumption that certain ways of knowing -- explicitly dominantepistemologies that involve specific mathematical procedures and scientific processes -- arerace-, gender-, and culture-free. In reality, education inherently prioritizes and privileges certainbodies of knowledge while marginalizing and excluding others. Within engineering, colonial,White, heterosexual, and male knowledge has historically been privileged over other ways ofknowing. Little recognition appears to exist that the ethnocentricity and masculinity of theengineering curricula affects problem definition and accepted methods of problem solving,teaching, and assessment [1]. This dominant approach undervalues and ignores the livedrealities, perspectives, and
rubric measuring the information fluency skills demonstrated. The datafrom the skills assessment showed improvement in search strategies in the test group ascompared to the control group. The data from the writing assessment showed significantimprovement in the quality of sources used in the test group as compared to the control group.The results support the hypothesis that the instructional activity produced measurableimprovements in some of the areas of information fluency examined in this study.IntroductionInformation fluency skills that are required of engineers look different than that of otherdisciplines. As a profession, engineers rely on information sources, such as colleagues, that areless formal than other disciplines [1], [2
A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods for studying plasma turbulence and plasma jets. His research has also included fluid physics and electric propulsion using Lattice-Boltzmann methods, spectral element methods, Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO), etc. Past research includes modeling single and multi-species plasma flows through ion thruster optics and the discharge cathode assembly; computer simulations of blood flow interacting with blood vessels; modeling ocean-air interaction; reacting flow systems; modeling jet engine turbomachinery going unstable at NASA for 6 years (received NASA Per- formance Cash awards). Dr
representations of “the public,” our selection, as we discuss below, was based precisely on thedocuments’ representational value. In other words, the 14 documents we studied were allproduced by institutions or individuals perceived as “authoritative voices” of the engineeringprofession or LTS.1 Although we do not suggest that other documents representing LTS and“mainstream” engineering do not exist, we focused on these documents because they provideofficially sanctioned or authoritative depictions of the “essence” of the engineering professionand LTS, as well as of the nature of the boundary that separates these fields from society. Assuch, we posit that they have a defining impact on LTS’s and “mainstream” engineering’simaginaries of “the public.”Data
45 Analog Discovery from 2010-2017. Essentially all of these papers report learninggains through the use of these powerful and generally inexpensive platforms. A sampling of thebest of these papers is found in the references [1-18, 21]. One of the most elegant studies hasbeen reported in a series of papers by Ferri et al [7] from Georgia Tech where they added hands-on modules using myDAQs in a variety of courses that previously had no experimentalcomponent. Student performance was compared between the topics addressed this way and thosedone more traditionally without experiments. Students consistently did better on topics in whichexperimentation played a key role. This is the approach that has come to be called ExperimentCentric Pedagogy
- and Long-term Education Reform and Development Plan(2010-2020)’ has identified ‘adhering to the people-centered approach and promoting quality-oriented education’ as the ‘strategic theme’ of China’s educational reform and development[1].” “‘Quality’ refers to the relatively stable psychological quality gradually formed byinternalization of knowledge through influences of education and social environment on thebasis of human nature [2].” “Quality-oriented education is designed to promote students’comprehensive development and improve China’s national educational level by enhancing thequality of each educated person, who would accept education in ideology, morality, culture,science, professional skills, as well as physical and mental quality [2
PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University in South Carolina, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College.Dr. Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego Dr. Odesma Dalrymple is an Assistant Professor in the Shiley Marcos School of Engineering at University of San Diego. She conducts research on tools and techniques that can be readily applied in real engineer- ing learning environments to improve student learning and teaching. In this respect her two prominent research contributions are with: 1) artefact-inspired discovery–based pedagogy, i.e., learning activities where students’ exploration of STEM knowledge is self-directed and motivated by interactions or manip- ulations of artefacts; and 2
engineering education in the US, these KSA frameworksare plentiful (e.g., ABET Criteria 3; NAE Engineer of 2020 list of student attributes; ASEE’sTUEE report). In contrast, such frameworks are much less common in graduate engineeringeducation. Yet as the call for change in the undergraduate engineering outcomes brought aboutthe KSA frameworks for undergraduate engineering educators, similar calls for change acrossthe globe are now being issued for graduate student outcomes. Thus far, there has not been thewidespread development of graduate engineering KSA frameworks. The major exception is thevery comprehensive Vitae Research Development Framework [1] developed in the UK, which issimilar to the undergraduate KSA frameworks and has interesting
(ASCE) launched the Body ofKnowledge 3 Task Committee (BOK3TC), and in 2017 an update on the task committee’s workwas reported at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition in Columbus, OH [1]. Thatpresentation and paper provided a summary of the findings of the committee followingcritical reviews of published literature and an initial survey of constituents. Based on thesefindings, the BOK3TC determined that a Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body ofKnowledge (BOK3) was justified and warranted, and outlined a series of next steps todevelop the BOK3.Part of the process for BOK3 included developing revised rubrics for the outcomes and thisinvolved revisiting the cognitive domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The purpose of this paperis to discuss
engagement and participation, facilitation of learning, and favorablestudent feedback.IntroductionA brief history of Flipped Classroom. Flipped Classroom, is a teaching methodology in whichinstead of learning the material in class and doing homework at home, the students watchpremade videos of the topics at home and spend the class time on working problems. Theconcept of a flipped classroom was inspired by teachers Jonathan Bergman and Aaron Sams.They developed “reversed instruction” by offering PowerPoint presentations online for studentswho had missed class [1].Since then, the concept has been developed into a teaching methodology, interpreted and appliedin various ways. Variations take two separate routes. One category of variations focusses on
programs.Literature ReviewOne of the current challenges facing the engineering community is the both finding and keepingqualified students. Over the last few decades, significant research has been done on thegraduation rates of engineering programs in the United States amidst concerns that we will nothave enough engineers to meet the ever-growing need [1] [2] [3]. Increasing the number ofgraduates from engineering programs will depend both on increasing the number of studentsenrolling in engineering programs, as well as increasing the year-to-year retention rate so thatthese students graduate [3].Studies have shown that a student’s motivation for studying engineering are tied to theirexposure to the activities that engineers engage in [4]. With the goal of
quality of life of the communities. Finally, the risks, challenges, and problemsevidenced by the community are exposed as well as the opportunities that can be used by thePEAMA in the future. The main results highlight the community's feeling of perceiving theuniversity and the PEAMA program as a key player in the territory, beyond just the academicdimension, the community's interest in increasing the careers offered by the program, alsoexpresses the need for the community to be informed about the projects developed inside theUniversity.Keywords: Humanitarian Engineering, Sustainability, Community Development, SustainableHuman Development, 1. IntroductionHigher quality education in Colombia has historically been concentrated in big
, qualitative outcomes are also discussed: results fromcompetitions, interaction with industry, accreditation, and external recognition. The paperconcludes with a summary of lessons learned and recommendations for future actions to furtherrobotics education.1. INTRODUCTIONRobotics—the combination of sensing, computation and actuation in the real world—hasexperienced phenomenally rapid growth. In academia, recruiting of robotics faculty is at an all-time high and the number of robotics-related conferences and workshops is exploding. Inindustry, new companies and products appear at an accelerating rate. Public awareness ofrobotics has also increased dramatically, as concerns over loss of jobs and privacy contrast withexcitement over the coolest
evaluation of a Real-Time Text Display with Speaker-Identification, whichdisplays the location of a speaker in a group (RTTD-ID). RTTD-ID aims to reduce frustration inidentifying and following an active speaker when there are multiple speakers, e.g., in a lab. It hasthree different display schemes to identify the location of the active speaker, which helps deafstudents in viewing both the speaker’s words and the speaker’s expression and actions.We evaluated three RTTD speaker identification methods: 1) traditional: captions stay in oneplace and viewers search for the speaker, 2) pointer: captions stay in one place, and a pointer tothe speaker is displayed, and 3) pop-up: captions “pop-up” next to the speaker. We gathered bothquantitative and
LinkedIn accounts, for instance) and through their participation in variousresearch activities, we also observe student growth in establishing their professional STEMidentity.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM program [1] provides scholarships to highachieving financially needy students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. TheCity Tech’s S-STEM project “Advancing Student Futures in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics” supports students in five associates and baccalaureate majors (Applied Math,Computer Science, Biomedical Informatics, Chemical Technology, and Applied Chemistry).This work-in-progress project provides comprehensive support in multifaceted ways: (1)financial support through
referred to as the OSHA 10-Hour card.The minimum required content for the construction-based OSHA 10-Hour Course is containedbelow in Table 1. OSHA has recently changed the training requirements by reducing theminimum time for covering “Introduction to OSHA” from two hours to one hour, and the timefor “Optional Subjects” was increased from one hour to two hours. However, at the time thetraining was conducted for the Honors College, the minimum content requirements in Table 1were still in effect. Table 1. Minimum content for OSHA 10-Hour Course Mandatory Subjects (7 Hours) Minimum Time (Hours) Introduction to OSHA 2.0 Focus Four Hazards
Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech, along with graduate certificates in Women’s and Gender Studies and Engineering Education. Dr. Beddoes serves as Deputy Editor of the journal Engineering Studies. Further information can be found on her website: www.sociologyofengineering.orgDr. Cheryl Llewellyn, University of Massachusetts Lowell c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Salary Negotiations and Gender in Engineering EducationIntroductionA gendered wage gap persists in academia whereby men are consistently paid more than women,even when factors such as discipline and productivity are controlled for [1]. For instance, in onestudy, women were found to earn 21
that gradesmust represent something meaningful to students if grades are to be satisfying extrinsicmotivators. We conclude by providing practical ideas for educators that are suggested by ourdata.IntroductionAn engineer’s professional duties typically demand a substantial amount of technical writing [1],[2], and writing plays a role in hire, promotion, and long-term success [3]–[5]. In both industryand academia, writing provides an engineer access to his or her discourse community [6].While employers, educators, and ABET agree that today’s engineer needs to write well, oftenundergraduate students don’t seem to be on the same page. Engineering students are reported tobe resistant to writing and technical communication education, demotivated by
study of teaching and learning as socially,culturally, and historically situated phenomena (Penuel & O’Connor, 2010). We focus inparticular on implications of a curricular innovation directed towards an institution’s goal tobroaden engineering participation and promote success for all students, regardless of incomingmathematics preparation levels, within a selective undergraduate engineering program.The Wright State Model is a semester-long math course that teaches fundamental concepts ofCalculus 1, 2, and 3, and Differential Equations in an engineering context through hands-onlaboratory experiences and application-rich problems. The WSM is designed to disrupt thetraditional rigid sequencing of undergraduate engineering curricula by de
the research instruments, and the results froman online survey and a focus group interview of the first cohort of VTAB scholars.IntroductionThe shortage of STEM workers with advanced degrees in the U.S. is not new. In the 1990s, therules for H-1B visas given to foreigners to work in the U.S. were liberalized to accommodate theneeds of the U.S. industry. Then, in 2001, in response to concerns about the adverse impact of H-1B on the U.S. labor force [1], the U.S. Congress allocated additional funds to the ComputerScience, Engineering, and Mathematics Scholarship (CSEMS) program at the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) by making significant changes to the H1-B Visa allocations and fees [2].Since then, CSEMS [3] and its replacement program
(F.RSA) and a Fellow of the Royal Society for Public Health (F.RSPH). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math (STEAM) Diplomacy: Preliminary Results from an Initial Pilot CourseAbstractA new course, “Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math (STEAM) Diplomacy,” hasbeen developed at the Missouri University of Science and Technology to introduce engineeringstudents to the field of foreign relations and the tripartite objectives of: 1) science in diplomacy;2) science for diplomacy; and 3) diplomacy for science. The course employs an availablescholarly monograph as a text and integrates materials created by the Center for