Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Women in Engineering
A gendered wage gap exists in academia whereby men are consistently paid more than women, even when factors such as productivity are controlled for. One popular explanation for the wage gap is that women are less likely than men to negotiate their salaries. Negotiating one’s salary is critical not only for starting salary, but also for lifetime earnings, as future raises and promotions are based on initial salary. Moreover, in addition to salary, faculty members must decide if and how to negotiate for a wide range of items, including start-up funds, lab space and equipment, relocation expenses, and course reduction. While we know the wage gap exists, and that women faculty members often have less lab space (as one example), we know very little about how negotiation processes actually play out and what factors affect the outcomes.
In order to begin to explore those processes and factors, this paper addresses the following research questions:
1. Are women faculty members less likely to negotiate than men? 2. Do gender differences exist in the outcomes of negotiations? 3. Can any institutional factors be identified that have an effect on negotiations?
Data were collected via an online survey with both close-ended and open-ended questions. The survey was distributed to tenured and tenure-track faculty members in five disciplines, with the vast majority of responses coming from engineering professors. In total, over 300 responses were received. The findings presented in this paper focus on the quantitative items with results of ten different Chi-square analyses conducted using SPSS presented.
We found that women were as likely as men to negotiate their salaries, but men were more likely to receive a greater increase in salary from negotiating, and that men who negotiated with men were more likely to receive a greater salary increase than women who negotiated with women. Other institutional factors were largely not significant in decisions and outcomes related to negotiations. These findings add new insights into the persistent wage gap in academia and raise critical questions about the dominant discourses that are used to explain and intervene in the wage gap. Analysis of our dataset is on-going, with current efforts focused on examining tensions and paradoxes that exist in the data. We will also begin collecting qualitative data via storytelling circles in 2018.
Panther, G., & Beddoes, K., & Llewellyn, C. (2018, June), Salary Negotiations and Gender in Engineering Education Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30948
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015