]. Thetraditional engineering courses are enriched by trips to Michael Faraday’s Laboratory, KewBridge Steam Museum, Bletchley Park (where the earliest computers were developed),Greenwich Maritime Museum and Royal Observatory (home of the zero meridian), amongothers. Group travel facilitates scheduling a large number of contact hours within a short timeframe; the trade-off is fewer recreational hours for the students to experience the travel locationunsupervised. The Engineering in London program remedies this by remaining in one locationwhere the students have easy access to experience city life.Not all global seminar descriptions explained how the travel component enriched the course.Some descriptions were general, for example: • CES Faculty-Led
Embedded Systems: Using Microcon- trollers and the MSP430 (Springer 2014). From 2013 to 2018 served as Associate Dean of engineering at UPRM. He currently directs the Engineering PEARLS program at UPRM, a College-wide NSF funded initiative, and coordinates the Rapid Systems Prototyping and the Electronic Testing and Characterization Laboratories at UPRM. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Luisa Guillemard is a psychology professor at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus. She has a M.S. in Clinical Psychology from the Caribbean Center of Advanced Studies in Puerto Rico [today the Carlos Albizu University] and a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from
Lu, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Mingyu Lu received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Bei- jing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Virginia University Institute of Technology in 2012, and he is
some time in the university laboratories,contribute their real-life industrial experience and also take some refresher courses. This is also anotherway of technology transfer within a country – between the industries and academia – where both gainvalue: a win-win situation!In knowledge transfer from preceptor to disciple, from mentor to mentee (Guru to Sishya, in Sanskrit),the transmitting and the receiving ends of knowledge and the knowledge itself have to be in unison. Thesame is true in the domain of arts: the artist, the art work and the observer must be in unison. John Deweyemphasized this point particularly in the realm of art education [6]. In technology, the closest that comesto the arts is architecture. In engineering we are just one
Paper ID #29171Cyber-Physical Systems Security Introductory Course for STEM StudentsProf. Sin Ming Loo, Boise State University Sin Ming Loo is a professor at Boise State University with interests in sensor systems and cyber-physical systems security research and education. He is responsible for Hartman Systems Integration and Cyber Lab for Industrial Control Systems laboratories. He holds a joint appointment with Idaho National Lab. He is a member of IEEE/CS, ISSA, Tau Beta Pi, and amateur radio (KI4AKS). nLiljana Babinkostova c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Cyber-Physical
attitudinal barriers. For example, students withphysical disabilities often face architectural barriers such as laboratory table height, inaccessibleequipment or instrument, and lack of elevators to reach facilities [17]. A non-inclusive schoolculture and negative faculty attitudes toward disabilities greatly impact students’ commitment tothe engineering major and career. Efforts to increase retention of students with disabilities andother marginalized students include curriculum redesign and greater diversity when hiringfaculty [21] [22].Self-Efficacy: Self-efficacy, the belief in one’s ability to succeed, has been found to be a criticalskill for students with disabilities. STEM fields, especially, attract a higher concentration ofstudents with
Undergraduate Studies in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and Associate Director in the Honors College at the Univer- sity of Missouri in Columbia. Triplett has won awards for his research, teaching, and service. He directs the Precision Imaging Research Laboratory (PIRL), which focuses on the development and integration of nanomaterials and their applications in biomedical, energy, and physical science. He currently focuses on the capture of signal transduction mechanisms in real time, specifically interactions between amino acid functional groups of proteins with donor molecules and protein kinase using photonic technology integration. He graduated from Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Florida State
education and/orresearch-based careers. These experiences can take a variety of forms, from a structured REUprogram with a specific cohort to an individually designed experience. Typically the researchexperience occurs in a school’s research lab, however students may also participate in researchinternships in industry or national laboratories as well.In a survey of 651 alumni from the College of Engineering at the University of Delaware, [12]showed that engineering alumni who participated in undergraduate research were much morelikely to pursue a graduate degree. Of the students who participated in the university’s structuredundergraduate research program, over 80% of the respondents had completed or were currentlyenrolled in graduate school
the students’own experiences.Research activityThe greatest change proposed and eventually implemented relates to the teaching process andhow the teacher-facilitator presents the physics concept. In the pre-existing paradigm, teachersintroduce the theory of a new concept prior to running an experiment or discussing contextualapplications of the theory. The physics laboratory objective is solely to verify or support thepresented theory. Teachers then encourage students to extrapolate implementation contextsthrough discussions that follow the lab experiment. The focus of the student lab report is ontheory, procedures, data collection and applying that data to the theoretical equations. Reportconclusions recount how well the experiment matched
an introduction to microcontroller architecture, instruction sets, C languagecompilers, microcontroller interfacing, microcontroller peripherals, and embedded system design.Case studies examined microcontroller-controlled systems as well as simulation and emulation ofspecific families of microcontrollers.Hardware and Software Development Environment: For this project, laboratories were builton an Altium Designerand NanoBoard 3000 [4] aplatform equipped withXilinx Spartan-3AN chip,with Xilinx ISE, andAltium Designer 10software development.Figure 1 shows both aNanoBoard 3000 and an Figure 1 Hardware and Software PlatformAltium Designer. TheNanoBoard 3000XN is an FPGA prototyping board with an integrated color TFT LCD
. While these courses differ bydiscipline, all are similar in that they are lecture sections of the course (i.e., no laboratory ordiscussion sections), they are one of the first courses taken in the disciplinary sequence (i.e., asophomore-level gateway course), they typically enroll only students of sophomore status (afterstudents have declared their major), and they enroll a large number of students. Each section hadenrollments of between 73 and 148 students, with an average enrollment of 108 students. Thetotal population sampled was 539 students. No students were enrolled in more than one courseduring the survey administration. I employed a series of two student surveys, which were based on the Student Response toInstructional Practices
Earth and Environment Sciences and CREATE for STEM Institute for Research on Science and Mathe- matics Education. Currently, her research focuses on cognition, assessment of student learning, validity and reliability in research, curriculum and visual design, and discipline-based education research.Miss Anastasia Katharine Ostrowski, University of Michigan Anastasia Ostrowski graduated from the University of Michigan with a degree in Biomedical Engineering where she worked with the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group and Transforming Engineering Education Laboratory. Her research focused on entrepreneurship self-efficacy and under- standing how biomedical engineering students engage in idea generation
students into engineeringprograms. Hoit and Ohland showed, with statistically significant evidence, that presenting the realengineering content, in the first-year itself, helps retain women students31. They changed theintroduction to engineering course to a laboratory format, where they employed active learningwith smaller class sizes, and rotated students through laboratories in each undergraduateengineering department. They studied three different cohorts, wherein students could chooseeither the new laboratory format, which 42 women students did; or traditional lecture basedformat, which 92 women students did. The authors found women retention (remaining in theprogram till the third year of study) in the lecture-based format was at 16
decode theconcepts or terms used and apply them correctly to the problem or question. Depending on theobjectives and content area, a question or task may require integrating content knowledge,problems solving ability, laboratory experience and ability to apply information (Patz, 2006). Ifthese concepts and vocabulary are not fully captured, students are likely to do poorly.Most mathematics course knowledge is tacit, so only a fraction can be verbalized or signedduring a lecture. Often students pick this up by integrating lecture material within their mentalschema by discussion and practice with their peers. In mainstream classrooms, deaf studentshave fewer opportunities to integrate academic knowledge, including reflection on experience.Given
serve as a Teaching Fellow for the National Effective Teaching Institute; and more.Dr. Patricia Brackin P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patricia Brackin is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, where she teaches design throughout the curriculum. She is particularly interested in human-centered design. Her B.S. and M.S. are from the University of Tennessee in Nuclear Engineering and her Ph.D. is from Georgia Institute of Technology in Mechanical Engineering. Her industrial experience includes Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Chicago Bridge and Iron, and a sabbatical at Eli Lilly. She is a registered Profes- sional Engineer in the State of Tennessee and a Fellow of ASME.Dr
knowledge on the application of computerscience and engineering to UAV technologies and were able to acquire some of the skillsnecessary to conduct meaningful research in UAV technologies, understand research process, andlearn laboratory techniques. Most of the projects described below are highly interdisciplinary.Each REU student had a primary mentor. However, the students were co-supervised by othermentors depending on the nature of the projects.A. Autonomous Collision Avoidance of UAVs Utilizing ADS-B TranspondersFor the UAVs to be successfully integrated into the U.S. national airspace, the ability to detect andavoid both manned and unmanned aircraft is a necessity. This project involved the students indeveloping a method for collision
cohorts provided visual insights into learners'research pathways from online to laboratory work. 1IntroductionThe pathways to STEM careers are diverse and varied. It is well known that early exposure toSTEM environments can inculcate and reinforce interests in technical fields at key decisionpoints when individuals choose career pathways [1]–[3]. Given the importance of a strong STEMtalent-base to global economic competitiveness and prosperity, there exists a need to cultivate apre-college landscape gives all students broad, authentic exposure to STEM fields earlier in theireducation [4]. In the framework of cognitive career theory, individuals choose careers based oninterests, attitudes, and values
at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Colorado State University in 2001. His research and teaching interests c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19223involve modeling, analysis and control of drug-delivery systems. He is the author of a series of educationaland interactive modules (Laboratory Online), available at http://laurentsimon.com/. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Long-Term Impact of Including High School Students in an Engineering
robot fingers or grippers with varying designs. on the right.We needed to test fabrication materials and steps in classroom contexts since the processes wereadapted from research laboratory settings. This was done through several pilot tests with 1) anundergraduate engineering and technology teacher education course at Purdue University, 2) alocal afterschool program, 3) our own families, 4) a local high-school technology classroom, and5) a summer camp program where the soft robot experience was implemented. The yearculminated with leading a teacher professional development experience for partner teachers whowould implement in the fall.Soft Robot Design ExperienceFor the final version of the soft robot lesson we decided to engage students
Communication,Data Communication, Digital Image Processing, and Renewable Energy Systems. Our currentcurriculum includes, in the junior year, a series of laboratory experiences with emphases inCircuits (Fall Quarter), Electronics (Winter Quarter), and Signals and Systems (Spring Quarter).This lab sequence is designed to equip students with skills necessary to successfully complete ayear-long junior design project that has a unique theme each year; we aim to design an IoT-themed project for AY 2018-2019. Through the proposed initiative, we foresee that ECEstudents will encounter an IoT-enhanced course at least thrice per year, throughout theirundergraduate program. Based on prior enrollment data, this translates into an average cohortsize of 140
documented a communication protocol for transmitting GPS location information and device status to the backend server. • (k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice – Throughout the design and development process the GPS tracking device team made use of a variety of engineering tools and techniques. They utilized the Kinetis Software Development Kit (SDK) and hardware development kit to develop the initial software. Schematic capture and PCB layout tools were also incorporated. Testing and debugging of the custom PCB was done using standard laboratory equipment such as multi-meters and oscilloscopes.Based on rubrics for each
Engineering Technology (EET) shouldcover the following topics:1) Robots and Degrees of Freedom2) Representation of Rigid-Bodies in 2D and 3D Space3) Kinematic Chains and Forward Kinematics4) Velocity Kinematics and Statics5) Inverse Kinematics6) Dynamics7) Control Systems, Actuators and SensorsActuators, Sensors and Control Systems are important elements of the EET program. We madea point to emphasize these areas of Robotics in the Laboratory section of the course.Course LayoutWe felt the textbook that best fit our needs was “Modern Robotics Mechanics, Planning andControl” by Kevin M. Lynch and Frank C. Park. One of the many advantages of the textbook isshort video lecture segments provided on-line for students to view. The videos covered
translate to post-graduation success. For example, students involved in research report greater confidence in theirability to relate to people of different races, cultures, or backgrounds, work successfully on ateam, and listen effectively [2]. These skills, individually and/or collectively, could translate intobenefits in post-secondary education or professional settings.In addition to the above benefits to students, faculty who mentor undergraduate student researchmay benefit by having additional assistance in a laboratory or with data collection, expansion oftheir own creativity and critical thinking, and overall professional growth [5].The objective of this study is to examine, from the perspectives of both mentors and mentees, theperception of
alongside key concepts and practicesin the informal teaching and learning space.Implementation StrategiesThis case study is based on an informal education program which provides students with anopportunity to dive into hands-on engineering. This program also serves as a laboratory settingfor teacher-researchers to pilot new programming that they would not have the opportunity to trywithin the formal classroom. The program serves approximately 100 diverse 6th and 8th gradegirls in an engineering summer program. The diversity of the educators may add to theinnovation with formal educators including a secondary math teacher, K-5 STEAM specialists,an inclusion coordinator, a tech integration specialist, secondary science educationundergraduates
explore moreabout privilege, perspective, and how hard work – while it makes a difference – may not get oneas far if there are systemic hurdles in their way. The role of one’s community on the individual’ssuccess is discussed further as well.Lecture 6: Teaching with ConstraintsIn this activity, students put into groups and asked to design a typical lab lesson. They are told thatthey have access to a standard laboratory classroom, will have a diverse class among manydimensions stressing that there will be students of varying familiarity with the material, ethnicitiesand socio-economic backgrounds. They are told that the materials for their lab cost about $300and to plan accordingly. After the initial lesson is designed, each group is given
formulation and development.Evaluation: Each topic was aligned with a laboratory assignment, problem identification, group(2-4) oral presentation, and a final project deliverable.Module 2: Weeks 3-4, United Nations SDG-4 Quality of EducationThe second module focused on the integration of vectors, geometry, trigonometry, andexperimentation for analysis of scientific phenomena and engineering systems, addressing UNSDG-4 Quality of Education.Specific objectives of this moduleStudents will learn to apply mathematical concepts to determine: (i) forces and stresses in staticsystems comprising linear elements, (ii) reflection and refraction of light from plane interfaces,and (iii) current in a simple circuit. Students will also learn to take measurements
) programs in aneffort to more holistically develop future scientists and engineers as described above, but thevery asset of the apprenticeship, the highly-situated nature of the REU, presents challenges forprogram design. REU’s typically mirror the laboratory experience of advanced level graduates,with undergraduates working closely with graduate student mentors and situating knowledge inauthentic and novel research projects over a six-to-10-week summer program, as opposed tohighly structured classroom-style learning models. Historically, many REU’s heap theresponsibility of leading inexperienced undergraduates in learning and integrating into a newfield onto postdoctoral or graduate student mentors who often have “little preparation, support
. selection, set-up, and calibration of instrumentation and the preparation of laboratory reportsand systems documentation associated with the development, installation, or maintenance ofmechanical components and systems;c. basic engineering mechanics.An associate degree program must have an integrating or capstone experience which utilizes theskills acquired.For baccalaureate programs, given the breadth of technical expertise involved with mechanicalsystems and the unique objectives of individual programs, programs may focus on preparinggraduates with in-depth but narrow expertise, while other programs may choose to preparegraduates with expertise in a broad spectrum of the field. Therefore, the depth and breadth ofexpertise demonstrated by
Paper ID #24669Effective Faculty Development – More than Time in the SeatDr. Louis J Everett P.E., University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Everett is the MacGuire Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett’s current research is in the areas of Mechatronics, Freshman Programs and Student Engagement. Having multiple years of experience in several National Laboratories and Industries large and small, his teaching brings real world experiences to students. As a former NSF Program Director he works regularly helping faculty develop strong education proposals
interact with engineers. Some ofthese activities were conducted in university laboratories and some in the engineering conferencearea that is the location for the summer camps. Activities were led by engineering students andfaculty. IRB approved protocols were followed. The total number of participants in the campsduring summer 2018 was 62 that included 20 in the Young Women in Engineering camp, 17 inthe First Generation camp and 25 in the open-enrollment Introduction to Engineering camp.Seven campers did not have parental consent and we did not have complete data for eight. Hencethe total number of participants included in year 1 of the study was 47.Quantitative Data collectionQuantitative data consists of a pre-survey, administered