guidingprinciples for online learning, we can ensure a viable student experience.Transformation to online learningThe Nanotechnology CourseIntroduction to Nanotechnology course was designed as an undergraduate engineering elective toexpose students to the material opportunities offered at the nanometer scale. The course contentis divided into (a) fundamentals, (b) tools for synthesis and characterization, and (c) applicationsof nanomaterials within devices and more broadly technology. Principles of Nanotechnologycourse is a graduate level course that is combined with the undergraduate course. Graduatestudents complete additional assessments that go beyond the undergraduate level assignments.The lecture content, however, is identical between the
., Wills, G., Price, J., Maynard, S., Dror, I. E. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 2009, 40(6), 1124–1134.(4) Brink, J.; Capps, E.; Sutko, A. College Student Journal, 2004, 38(2), 262+.(5) Landherr, L.J.T. “Integrating Comics Into Engineering Education To Promote Student Interest,Confidence, and Understanding”. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2019.(6) Landherr, L.J.T. “The Production of Science Comics To Improve UndergraduateEngineering.” Proc. ASEE Northeast Section Conference, 2016.(7) Vega, E.; Schnackenberg, H.L. Proceedings of the Association for EducationalCommunications and Technology, 2004.(8) Pelton, L.F.; Pelton, T.; Moore, K. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology &Teacher
: It’s Really Not Very Hard” 2018 ASEEAnnual Conference and Proceedings, ASEE, Salt Lake City, June 24-27, 2018.2 ABET, Inc. “Visiting Programs Transitioning to C3 & C5” Webinar presented by Patsy Brackin Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, EAC Criteria Committee Past Chair and Bopaya Bidanda University ofPittsburgh Chair, EAC Training Committee. April 26, 2019, located at: https://www.abet.org/events-and-workshops/assessment-planning-resources/webinars/ (28 Jan 2020).3 ABET, Inc. “FAQs for EAC C3 & C5 Criteria Changes”. Engineering Accrediting Commission. October1, 2018 https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/FAQs-for-EAC-C3-C5-4-8-2019.pdf (28 Jan2020)4 ABET Inc. “Guidance for EAC Criteria 3 and 5 Changes” Engineering
Industrial Engineering.Mr. Vidanelage Lakshika Dayarathna, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Debisree Ray, Mississippi State UniversityMs. Ginnie Shih En Hsu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL TRAINING ENVIROMENT FOR TEACHING SINGLE AND MULTI-QUEUING THEORY INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING QUEUING THEORY CONCEPTSAbstract:In the domain of Industrial Engineering (IE), there are several theoretical concepts such as,inventory theory and queuing theory. The implementation of VR technology in the IE domain canbenefit students by providing an immersive and interactive environment and presenting a morepractical and visual context to the theoretical concepts than can be provided through
has served as a consultant to industry for over 10 years.Dr. Teresa J.K. Hall, South Dakota State University Hall is currently professor and head of the Construction and Operations Management department at South Dakota State University. She also serves the JJ Lohr College of Engineering as program coordinator for the professional masters degree in Engineering.Dr. Albena Yuliyanova Yordanova, South Dakota State Univeristy Education: University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa; Doctor of Technology with emphasis in Sus- tainable Design & Construction (2016); University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri ; Master of Arts in Architectural Studies (2005); Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Sofia, Bulgaria
valuable insightsinto current campus information needs, and raise the level of library efficiency in collectiondevelopment and technical services processing.IntroductionThe development and maintenance of relevant library collections that support engineeringeducation and research experience many challenges. Foremost, the subscription costsof science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) journals and databases hadreached an unsustainable level, with the annual inflation rate being much higher than inother disciplines [1]. Moreover, the number of publications supporting traditionalengineering disciplines and new and/or interdisciplinary research is on the rise.Furthermore, the overall expansion of digital content availability lead to an
. Hatice Ozturk is a Teaching Associate Professor at North Carolina State University, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering. She teaches Signals and Systems, works on curriculum development and coordinates assessment and accreditation activities. Her engineering education area of research is devel- opment of instructional technologies for successful math to engineering transition. She also collaborates with faculty in Women’s and Gender Studies to study the impacts of interventions done to increase the number of women in engineering.Prof. Kelly A Umstead, North Carolina State University Kelly Umstead is an assistant professor of industrial design at North Carolina State University. She earned her MID from NC State
Paper ID #20335Design and Assessment of the Social Responsibilities of Researchers’ Gradu-ate Training Program at the University of Notre DameDr. Mark L. Bourgeois, University of Notre Dame I am a postdoctoral fellow at the Reilly Center for Science, Technology and Values at the University of Notre Dame. I have a professional background in engineering, a PhD in philosophy of science, and for many years taught ethics and design in the Engineering school at Northwestern University. My current responsibilities are for implementing the NSF-sponsored Social Responsibilities of Researchers project at ND
University (Fort Collins, CO, USA). She has experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engi- neering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. Nicole’s engineering education interests include active learning, metacognitive thinking, and the use of technology platforms. Her doc- toral research is focused on the material properties of spinal cord tissues to contribute to the understanding and treatment of spinal cord injuries.Jasmine Erin Nejad, Colorado State University Jasmine Nejad is a PhD student in the Biomedical Engineering program at Colorado State University (CSU). She completed her B.S. in Biochemistry and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at
. During his professional tenure he has received awards for construction innovation, superior project performances and one of the projects, a rebuild of a university campus, received industry recognition a project of the year. Dr. Austin earned his Bachelors and Masters in Civil Engineering from the University of Connecticut and University of Texas. He earned his Doctorate in Construction Management from the Georgia Institute of Technology where his research focus was on accelerated project deliveries (i.e., faster, more predictable fast-track construction). His publications include a selection of industry articles on concrete technology, project management, safety and quality management. His academic research and
Paper ID #21194Teaching Research Data Management: It Takes a Team to Do It Right!Mr. Larry Schmidt, University of Wyoming Larry Schmidt is an associate librarian at the University of Wyoming and is the current Head of the Brinkerhoff Geology Library. He holds BS degree’s in Chemistry and Biology, MS Degree in environ- mental engineering from Montana State University and received an MLS from Emporia State University in 2002. His interests lie in providing undergraduate and graduate students with information, data and science literacy skills that will allow them to succeed in a global economy.Dr. Joseph H Holles, University of
Missouri University Science & Technology in Civil Engineering in 1999, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 2004. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Michigan.Mr. Michael O’Connor P.E., New York University With five decades of construction and project management experience as a civil engineer, split equally between the public and private sectors involving projects with a total value of several hundred billion (US$s); my goal has always been to deliver solutions that are customer focused and performance that adds value. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Supporting ASCE’s Grand
analysis of several additional comics.Background Chemical engineering can be a difficult major for any student, given the complexity of the coreconcepts and frequency with which the subject matter can be highly theoretical. This challenge isparticularly difficult to address as an instructor, given the breadth of fields within chemical engineering,and the resulting range in depth of mastery that each student will need upon graduating. These challengesare similar to those facing current education in STEM (science, technology, engineering, math), inparticular the theoretical nature of some core concepts. Traditional approaches to support instruction,and establish connection between concepts and applications, include providing examples of real
, experimental means will be developed toscientifically determine if the student’s interest are changed due to the introduction of the biomedicaldiscipline.references[1] J. Enderle and J. Bronzino, Introduction to Biomedical Engineering 3rd Edition, Elsevier, 2011.[2] College of Engineering, "Introduction to engineering courses," Carnegie Mellon University, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://engineering.cmu.edu/education/undergraduate- programs/student-life/introductory-courses.html.[3] D. Lauffenburger, P. Matsudaira and B. Belcher, "20.010J Introduction to Bioengineering (BE.010J)," Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/biological-engineering/20-010j-introduction
curriculum.References1. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.2. U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012 (131st Edition). Washington, DC; 2012.3. Engineering Workforce Commission (EWC). Engineering & Technology Enrollments, Fall 2009. Washington, DC; 2010.4. Gándara P. Priming the pump: Strategies for increasing the achievement of underrepresented minority undergraduates. New York; 1999.5. Tsui L. Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature
out the interior of a building to assist blind students. Martin’s post-graduate research interests include aerospace, aeronautics, robotics, and automation.Dr. Tomas Estrada, Elizabethtown College Dr. Tomas Estrada is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at Elizabeth- town College, in Elizabethtown, PA. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Universidad de Costa Rica in 2002 and his M.S. and Ph.D. (both in Electrical Engineering) from the University of Notre Dame in 2005 and 2009, respectively. His research interests include control systems, engineering education, technology-related entrepreneurship, and sustainable engineering applications
college cost increased about 15%. The US global rank [11] in the highereducation attainment is 10, in the since and technology researchers is 6; corporate investment inR&D is 5, and in government investment in R&D is 8. Half of the employers surveyed [11] saidthey had trouble finding qualified college graduates to hire.Adopting the systems engineering approach will open a new horizon to aerospace engineeringstudents and excites them to embrace the new challenges. Throughout this approach, varioustechniques for generating creative design alternatives are introduced. An effective approach increative design as a source of new ideas is brainstorming which is mainly applicable in theconceptual design phase. In general, aircraft design requires
professional and technologically-equipped workspace performed significantly betteron technical content and communication than students asked to complete their project inavailable space in campus engineering buildings 10. Dinsmore et al. focused on how changingthe student learning environment from traditional classroom lectures to a student team projectchanges declarative, procedural, or principled knowledge 11. In this context, declarativeknowledge includes understanding engineering terms such as benefit-cost analysis, proceduralknowledge applies to understanding processes such as pavement design, and principledknowledge is being able to explain the concepts behind the design. This study examined anengineering design course using student teams guided
-9830.2002.tb00689.x11. Habib, E., Ma, Y., Williams, D., Sharif, H. O., & Hossain, F., 2012. HydroViz: design and evaluation of a Web- based tool for improving hydrology education. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(10), 3767–3781.12. Delgoshaei, P. and Lohani, V. K., 2014. Design and Application of a Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Lab in Sustainability Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 1–14.13. Accreditation Board of Engineering Technology (ABET), 2012. 2013-2014 Criteria for Accrediting Page 26.238.13 Engineering Programs. Accessed August 14, 2014. http
Environmental Engineering.Dr. Steven D Hart, Virginia Military Institute Dr. Steven D. Hart, P.E. is an adjunct professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute, the Chief Engineer of Hart Engineering, LLC, and an aspiring gentleman farmer at Hart Burn Farm. His research areas of interest include infrastructure engineering, infrastructure education, infrastructure resilience and security, and grass-based sustainable agriculture.Dr. Matthew W Roberts, Southern Utah University Dr. Roberts has been teaching structural engineering topics for 14 years. He recently joined the faculty in the Engineering and Technology department at Southern Utah University
. 44, no. 2–4, pp. 334–347, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1562396.[6] E. M. Rowley and A. Ben Wagner, “Citing of industry standards in scholarly publications,” Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh., vol. 92, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.29173/istl27.[7] J. Z. Piety and A. McCormick, “The standards collection in the Science and Technology Department of the Cleveland Public Library,” Sci. Technol. Libr., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 37– 48, May 1990, doi: 10.1300/J122v10n03_03.[8] B. S. Mathews, “The role of industry standards: An overview of the top engineering schools’ libraries,” Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh., vol. 46, spring 2006, doi: 10.5062/F48C9T6D.[9] L. J. Pellack, “Industry standards in ARL libraries: Electronic
-019- 02434-7. [Accessed Jan. 15, 2020].[3] A.W. Eberhardt, O.L. Johnson, et al. “Team-Based Development of Medical Devices: An Engineering-Business Collaborative”. J Biomech Eng. Vol. 138, No. 7, Jul. 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org10.1115/1.4032805 [Accessed Jan. 31, 2020][4] C. Cohen., D.C. Fehder, et al. “The design of startup accelerators”, Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 1781-1791, Sep. 2019 [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003 [Accessed Feb. 3, 2020].[5] Y. Yazdi, S. Acharya. “ A New Model for Graduate Education and Innovation in Medical Technology”. Ann Biomed Eng, Vol. 41, 1822–1833 (2013). [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0869-4. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2020]
professional societies charged with implementingaccreditation standards will become even more important.DisclaimersAny opinions expressed here are based on the experiences of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the current policy of the supporting agencies.Bibliography1 “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” Effective for Evaluations During the 2006-2007 AccreditationCycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, ABET, Inc.,Baltimore, Maryland, 2006.2 “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” Effective for Evaluations During the 2004-2005 AccreditationCycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, ABET, Inc.,Baltimore, Maryland
AC 2008-548: FINITE ELEMENT LEARNING MODULES FORUNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING TOPICS USING COMMERCIALSOFTWAREAshland Brown, University of the Pacific Ashland O. Brown is a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA. He has held numerous administrative, management and research positions including Program Director, Engineering Directorate, National Science Foundation, Dean of Engineering at the University of the Pacific; Dean of Engineering Technology at South Carolina State University; Engineering Group Manager at General Motors Corporation: and Principal Engineering Supervisor, Ford Motor Company and Research Engineer Eastman Kodak Company. He
/Operations Planning and Scheduling; Work Methods, Standards and Design; Product and Process Design; Quality Systems; Modeling and Analysis of Operation. It seemed that this option could also eventually lead to accreditation. 5. Provide an engineering management certificate based on a 12-15 credit management related course sequence. Courses for the certificate could be comprised of existing business and engineering courses (particularly Engineering Economy, Construction (or Project) Management, and Information and Technology), and/or some of the new offerings suggested above. 6. Provide a 30 -33 credit (1 Academic year) Engineering Management Master's Degree program that includes the proposed new
thatchemical engineers typically use, including Perry’s Chemical Engineers Handbook, theChemical Economics Handbook, the Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, andthe Chemical Market Reporter, as well as databases including Compendex and SciFinderScholar. The presenters stress the importance of proper literature citation and give students briefpractice citation exercises, and they discuss the idea that the credibility of information dependsstrongly on the source, with Perry’s Handbook and a MySpace blog representing extremes oftrustworthiness.3 Page 12.121.4 3 The following assignment is
Paper ID #5876Improving Student Attitudes Toward the Capstone Laboratory Course UsingGamificationProf. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the associate head of the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering department at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of interest are chemical vapor deposition and engineering pedagogy.Mr. Daniel D. Anastasio, University of Connecticut
ofremedial actions or regulation compliance. Third, it enables students to know the real worldapplication of the LabVIEW programming language. Furthermore, implementing real-timecollection of water data has a number of advantages over traditional sampling in the field [2] andreal-time monitoring technology is becoming increasingly important for evaluating water quality[3].In the following sections, first, the freshman engineering course and related programminginitiatives that led to the adoption of LabVIEW in the course will be discussed. Next, the gradualintroduction of data acquisition and LEWAS as an environmental data acquisition system relyingon LabVIEW - since its early developmental stages-in the course, will be discussed. Next,challenges
supposed to suppress alcoholism by artificially increasing alcohol sensitivity. Studentgroups are assigned different formulations, each altering different parameters in their massbalance model, and are asked to analyze the effects of their drug to determine its efficacy.Formulations can vary from detrimental to beneficial, requiring students to develop analyticalskills and engineering judgment as they assess the drug performance.By combining computer technology and biochemical principles, we created a self-contained,group, project module which introduces students to a number of different biotechnological andhuman health issues, and develops critical thinking, team work, and communication skills. Thisproject addresses students’ professional
feelings and worldview” • Self-Knowledge – the ability to identify how one’s own experiences “inform as well as Page 15.417.8 prejudice understanding”Their work presumes that educators want to support students’ development of multi-faceted,sophisticated understanding. Wiggins and McTighe’s facets of understanding can be mapped toBloom’s Taxonomy; both can serve as useful tools for developing learning outcomes andassociated course content.As part of the development of course content, lesson plans, and evaluation approaches, faculty incivil engineering also use the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)requirements to