Wimba. Professors at our institution strive very hard tokeep their knowledge up to date and explore new ways of effective and efficient teaching bylearning.Technological advancement in classroom equipment provides an edge to teaching. This bringsflexibility to both teachers and the students. Audio-visual aids like using power point slides, lasertechnology, video clips to emphasize important points, and using WebCT, Wimba are effectivelearning tools with proven impacts. Due to the availability of these technologies, more studentsare able to take courses via online. In our online courses, we made the course curriculum suitablefor online students. Students were allowed to view the lectures, performed group projects,appeared quizzes and exams
Mechanical Engineering 5 david.akopian@utsa.edu, Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringAbstractEducational robotics provides many opportunities to enhance science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) education for students and teachers by using engineering and computerprogramming techniques integrated into the curriculum. In addition to in-class activities, thereare many programs targeting use of educational robotics in after-school activities. In this paper,we present our experience at the Interactive Technology Experience Center (iTEC) in design,development, and implementation of robotics activities for K-12 students and teachers. iTEC isa K-12 STEM center at the University of Texas at San
, manufacturability, and ethical). In short, our challenge is toeducate an engineering professional who is far more sophisticated than the engineer of the 20thcentury. Additionally, challenges brought on by the overuse of natural resources put a specialresponsibility on materials science and engineering (MSE) faculty, whose role it is to assist inshaping the MSE profession. How can faculty deliver relevant curricula for the MSEengineering professional in an already crowded curriculum? Certainly curricular content must beup-to-date. However, a number of the goals can be met through changing the way in which thecurriculum is delivered. In particular, we have emphasized mastery at the lower levels toincrease retention, and implemented a number of learning “best
Engineering Education, 2011 Transformative Learning Experience for Incoming Freshmen Engineering Students through Robotics ResearchAbstract – An intensive four-week 2010 Summer Bridge The Summer Bridge program is distinguished frompilot program introducing four incoming freshmen to other project-based, hands-on engineering courses inrobotics research is presented in this paper. Through that, rather than using a project as a teaching tool in athis program, students acquire the necessary knowledge course whose primary objective is to prepare studentsand skills to become active participants in an ongoing for future coursework, it is designed
participants, the content is intendedas a resource for teachers to use when talking with principals, parents, school boards, andcolleagues about why computer science should be offered in their school.After defining computing, its intellectual merit, and its wide ranging applications, the content ofthis session is primarily data showing the unmet need for computing professionals and how thatneed could be better met by drawing on women and minorities, populations that are severelyunderrepresented in computing. Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational projections arecontrasted with Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System15 reports on numbers ofstudents earning degrees in computing. The contrast shows an extreme shortfall. Further, mostother
industrialprojects in an engineering curriculum. This paper focused on one of the major burdens in offeringindustrial project experience to engineering students, the handling of communications amongproject teams, industrial partners, and supervising faculty. In this paper, the approach of usingcollaborative environments is proposed for the reduction of some communication relatedproblems in industrial project implementation process. WebCT and a low cost web-basedcollaborative environment are the tools suggested for managing industrial projects. The purposeis to use available tools for managing projects that can reduce the complexity involved inmonitoring industrial projects.IntroductionToday’s engineers and managers often are in charge of various engineering
. We will plan to interview fivepeople from each of the networks for the pilot study.II. Data CollectionA. Learning the Landscape of Global Grand ChallengesWe did an extensive review of global initiatives that hail from a wide range of disciplines,policies, and foundations. We conducted the search through research in international peer-reviewed journals, online forums, foundation websites, and policy white papers. We did initialsearches of “grand challenges” and also of key terms that are integrated in the NAE GrandChallenges and the UN SDG vernacular such as, “sustainability,” “health,” “vulnerability,” and“poverty.” We searched not only for global initiatives but also explored if any of those globalinitiatives included specific academic
, school-enterprise cooperation [15].Resonating the national ambition in building an innovation-driven economy, the 3E policy alsocalls attention to strengthening the cultivation of engineers’ innovative and entrepreneurialabilities. The policy envisions a "creative-innovation-entrepreneurship" education system forengineers, which aims to increase the employment of college graduates via innovation andentrepreneurship, particularly through supporting incubators for student entrepreneurs, makerspace, and other platforms for innovation and entrepreneurship [15]. The policy stresses theimportance of integrating innovation and entrepreneurship education into professional trainingwith real-world, cross-border issues, ill-structured problems, and future
hands-on curriculum development. Contrary to these best practices,professional development programs in engineering often focus more on tools, processes, andtechniques than on learning or teaching pedagogy.[4] In addition, the programs are typically shortterm, such as three days or one week in length. Gerard et al. found, in a meta-analysis of 43studies, that while most technology-enhanced science education professional developmentprograms helped teachers elicit new ideas, they did not adequately support teachers in reflection,integration, or critiques of their ideas.[12] In this work, we present the structure and outcomes of an immersive integrated researchand teaching experience for middle school teachers, developed as part of our NSF
technologies have been integrated into the syllabus over the last number of years.The objective of this paper is to outline the use of Web 2.0 technologies within the English syllabus forAustrian students and show how these not only link into the curriculum as a whole, but also prepareundergraduates for professional life after completing their degree.The first Web 2.0 technology examined is “webquesting”, which in this case is the organisation of adepartmental excursion to a real Auto Show in an American city from Austria within a given budget.This is used to provide the basis for 2nd semester students’ first written report at university level inEnglish. Prior to this stage, students have only been required to write such documentation in theirnative
Technology (ABET). The guiding principle andultimate outcome of the Engineering Partnership is accreditation of the KU programs to ABETstandards. The partnership agreement is for ten years with the first three years funded. One of themeasures of the quality of engineering education of graduates and the primary step in obtaining aProfessional Engineering (PE) license in the US is passing the Fundamentals of Engineering(FE) examination. The ability of KU graduates to pass the FE exam is a primary metric of thepartnership. The Engineering Partnership is an integrated and iterative approach to improve theoverall quality of the Faculty of Engineering. This approach emphasizes improved and updatedinfrastructure and physical resources (laboratories
me want to be an engineer.”This paper will present the overall curriculum of the MSTI camp with specific emphasis onactivities that could be implemented at other institutions. In addition, detailed assessment resultsof each activity will be presented to help institutions interested in implementing similar camps tochoose activities which appear to be of most benefit to the students.Introduction and OverviewThe Center for Science, Mathematics and Technology (CSMT) and the Bagley College ofEngineering (BCoE) at Mississippi State University were recently awarded a contract by theMississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration(FWHA) to develop and conduct a three-week residential summer institute for rising
-contained, guided experimental setups with a range of disciplinary themes. ASEE 2022 Conference - FPD DivisionIntroductionThis work-in-progress focuses on utilizing simplified versions of the experimental setups foundin their upper level courses to introduce a more situated learning approach to a first-yearengineering program’s MATLAB curriculum. Engineers primarily use MATLAB to supporttheir research and lab-course experimentation in their undergraduate curriculum and careers. It issimply what the platform was designed for; an experimental support tool for collecting,analyzing, and visualizing data. That is the platform's primary use in upper-level courses atNortheastern University. Although those lab
education in pre-college, the Next Generations ScienceStandards (NGSS) was integrated into science education, where engineering education cutsacross disciplines, skills, and practices. It means that each discipline that composes STEMeducation has their-self evolution as an individual discipline too. As a result of thesedevelopments, there has been significant research to explore how engineering education mightsupport learning outcomes, including concept mastery in a social context [18], literacy [15], andlong-term engagement [15]. While these efforts are critical, far less attention has been placed ondesigning learning experiences that support diversity and inclusion. Given what we know aboutthe trajectory of how contemporary engineering education
toeducate. In particular, many of these development platforms have made their way to the classroom,especially for early engineering education with the focus of problem solving [7-11]. However, there aremany different systems to choose from with a variety of capabilities from an assortment of vendors, andsome may or may not be suitable for educational purposes. Great efforts have been made to studydifferent embedded systems [12-14], but these studies are generally created for a specific audience anddo not differentiate between the many available systems on the market. This work attempts to bring anevaluation method, which differentiates different embedded platforms and is applicable to a broadaudience, ranging from electronics enthusiasts to
year of college are often faced with a number of challenges such as anew, higher-level curriculum, managing their time effectively, as well as developingrelationships with faculty and other students [1]. The greatest proportion (over 50%) of thestudents leaving an institution has been found to be between the first and second years of study[2, 3]. In a study of engineering student attrition at the University of Pittsburgh over a six-yearperiod, of the freshman attrition, half was accounted for by freshman that are placed on academicprobation at the end of their first term [4].Within first year engineering programs, mathematics is often one of the largest contributors toattrition in the first year [5]. Many schools across the country have
District in Wilmington, DE. In her role, Amy works collaboratively with secondary science teachers to develop and implement standards-based curricula and assessments. She also provides mentoring, coaching, and co- teaching support to secondary science teachers across the entire trajectory of the profession. Her research focuses on teacher education, classroom assessment, and P-16 environmental and engineering education.Prof. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to
Technology program could only earn their creditsby demonstrating their college-level knowledge and competencies in the academic fields throughthe submission of transcripts from regionally accredited colleges/universities or throughwritten/performance examinations.Anticipating the growing demand for online instruction in higher education and to provide thestudents with an additional avenue for degree completion, B&T launched the online courses inSeptember 2004 starting with the capstone course NUC 495.In Spring 06, a total of 4 upper divison online Nuclear Engineering Technology core coursesincluding the capstone course were launched; they are: 1. NUC 320 Materials ( 3 credit hours) 2. NUC 330 Reactor Core Fundamentals ( 3 credit hours
linkbetween student motivation and engagement in schoolwork 1,2,3,4 . A PBL curriculum provides thismotivation because the students can see what the end goal of the project is and are activelyengaged in the development 5 . (2) It provides deeper learning. PBL provides for deep learningbecause it requires the student to integrate knowledge gained in several classes into the creation ofa product 6,7 .When students work on a laboratory exercise that is simply following a set of detailed steps, thelearning is similar to what can be attained by listening in a lecture 8 . In order to gain the benefitsof PBL, there are several requirements 6 . • It needs to be a complex and challenging problem. • It needs to be an authentic or real-world problem
Civil Engineering Body ofKnowledge for the 21st Century outlines the outcomes that “define the knowledge, skills, andattitudes necessary to enter the practice of civil engineering at the professional level in the 21stcentury.”3 One of the professional outcomes listed is Communication; the document cites theneed for engineers to be able to “plan, compose, and integrate the verbal, written, virtual, andgraphical communication of a project to technical and non-technical audiences.”3In addition, ABET accredited universities are well versed in the necessity of teachingcommunication skills within their curriculum, since one of the required student outcomes is “anability to communicate effectively.”4 As mentioned above, the civil engineering
the topics of Optical Data Links, Integrated Circuit Technology, RF semiconductor compo- nents, and semiconductor component reliable. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and an ABET EAC program evaluator in Electrical Engineering. Page 22.1293.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Simple Analysis Method for Assessment of PEOs Using Limited Survey DataAbstractAlumni and employer surveys are among the assessment tools often used to determine the extentto which a program’s graduates are able to successfully pursue the types of careers
out under that grant includedthe planning of a civil engineering curriculum with an infrastructure theme. As part of the plan-ning process for the new curriculum, the team of faculty members created a framework of the I2Iclass to be taken by sophomores. This class was intended to provide students with a better un-derstanding of the challenges to be faced in improving, securing, and maintaining the nationalinfrastructure. Part of the planned course included student evaluation of infrastructure compo-nents in local communities from direct observation.In 2008, three faculty members from the department were awarded an NSF Course, Curriculum,and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) grant (DUE 0837530) to create and teach the I2I courseplanned under the
. Page 23.548.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools for Computer EngineeringIntroductionA primary goal of engineering education is to provide students with requisite technicalgrounding along with practice and experience in the design and evaluation of real and practicalsystems. This goal becomes increasingly difficult with the expanding body of knowledge,integration of concepts across disciplines, and complexity of design tools needed in engineeringindustries. While an expert/apprentice model of education may be more fitting to preparingengineers for professional practice, traditional instruction models include
Paper ID #19742Freshman Design Course: Device Design for Low-Resource SettingsDr. Emma K. Frow, Arizona State University Emma Frow is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University, with a joint appointment in the School of Biological & Health Systems Engineering and the School for the Future of Innovation in Society. She has graduate training in both the natural and social sciences, with a PhD in biochemistry and an MSc in science & technology studies. Emma is interested in the engineering imagination, particularly in the emerging field of synthetic biology. Over the past 7 years, her curricular and
topicscovered in subsequent math fundamentals courses. Logistically, the approach is appealingbecause it does not replace the traditional math sequence taught by the math department. Itsimply removes its role as a prerequisite for subsequent engineering courses, allowing mathcourses to be taken later in the engineering curriculum. Because of these features, the WrightState Model has been highly successful not only at Wright State, but at other universities as well.Despite the success of the WSU Model, and its straightforward approach to the long-standingproblem of a lack of integration between math fundamentals and engineering applications, itcan’t be expected to work within all engineering programs. Many engineering programs may notbe able to offer an
identified as essential were implemented in-person provided they obtained an approved safety plan. Students were not compelled to attendface-to-face courses and were given the option to pursue virtual alternatives. This combination offactors presented us with a unique opportunity to study the impact of face-to-face and virtualsynchronous instruction modes.A critical part of the biomedical engineering curriculum at [the institution], [this course] coverscore engineering analytical and computational techniques, with a laboratory portion consisting ofa sequence of MATLAB-based programming activities for undergraduates in biomedicalengineering [1]. Typically offered in a face-to-face (F2F) modality, the most recent Fall 2020 termpresented these
role model [17]. Since the LEAPformat is designed to incorporate scholar to scholar learning, where the scholars are eitherundergraduate or graduate students in an engineering field, the importance of understanding thestudent’s perception related to this person’s knowledge, skills, and attitude is paramount movingforward. This same rationale could be applied to the course Instructor, although there is alimitation within this comparison because at this particular institution the instructors may also begraduate students.2.0 Research QuestionsThis paper describes first-year engineering student performance within the curriculum in relationto their perception of the instructional staff in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitude. We
engineering industry.Dr. Lori Houghtalen, Abilene Christian University Lori Houghtalen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Physics at Abilene Christian University. She is Co-Director for Senior Clinic, the capstone senior design course, and teaches courses in the engineering and physics curriculum. Dr. Houghtalen has won awards from the National Science Foundation, Georgia Tech, the ARCS Foundation, and the Association of European Operational Research Societies. She holds degrees from the University of Tennessee and the Georgia Institute of Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: Lessons learned while developing community
defineepistemologies as “ways of knowing” [36], or individuals’ thoughts surrounding knowledge oracquiring and retaining knowledge. With this definition, we define hidden epistemologies as theunspoken, unacknowledged ways of knowing that guide engineering in educational spaces aswell as the field. Though this terminology may be less common in EER, hidden epistemologieshave been studied in this field as hidden curriculum [37]–[39].The term “hidden curriculum” was coined by Philip Jackson [40], and it has been operationalizedin EER to mean “the unwritten, unofficial, and often unintended lessons, values, andperspectives made by individuals and found in physical spaces within an academic environment”[39, pp. 2–3]. One way researchers have distinguished hidden
instructional tasks, and how to assess learning 20. In order tosuccessfully impact student learning, teachers must have deep understanding of mathematics andscience they teach. Well-designed professional development experiences are integral todeveloping such knowledge and skills 5. Project TESAL targets improved mathematics andscience content knowledge in an engineering design based approach 21. We strive to shiftstudents and teachers from being processors of information toward becoming creators ofmathematics and science models as tools to help solve societally relevant scientific challengesthrough design/development of appropriate technologies 22.The Project TESAL ModelOur model utilized iterative design/redesign to address “the engineering problem