Demetra Evangelou. “The role of extracurricular activities in the education of engineers,” International Conference on Engineering Education. 2006.[30] Lagoudas, Magdalini Z., et al. “Assessing impact of maker space on student learning,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[31] Gerber, Elizabeth M., Jeanne Marie Olson, and Rebecca LD Komarek. “Extracurricular design-based learning: Preparing students for careers in innovation,” International Journal of Engineering Education 28.2 (2012).[32] Fisher, Dara Ruth. “Educating engineers for the 21st century: a framework for skill development through co- curricular and extracurricular involvement,” 2013. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[33] R. J. Morocz, B
new trend that hasthe potential to shift the future of education [1] through (1) digital, physical and logic tools, (2)community infrastructure and (3) the maker mindset, which is characterized as curious, playful,optimistic, persistent, resourceful and willing to take responsibility, take risks and shareinformation [2, p. 5]. These characteristics are similar to the engineering habits of mind [3]:systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, communication and attention to technicalconsiderations [4, p. 152].The maker movement also has the potential to respond to the calls for increased exposure in K-12 curriculum to sciences, technology, engineering and math (STEM) and hands-on and designexperiences in college level engineering
Crushed Dreams: Faculty Perceptions of Discrepancies Between EngineeringAcademics and Students’ Future CareersAlexis CapitanoAlexis is a senior majoring in Electrical Engineering and pursuing a Masters of Science in STEMEducation with planned graduation in December 2024.John CookKathryn Johnson © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Crushed Dreams: Faculty Perceptions of Discrepancies Between Engineering Academics and Students’ Future CareersAbstract: This paper summarizes the findings from a qualitative analysis of how faculty view gapsbetween the curriculum in which they teach and the profession in which their students are likelyto be employed. The data – a set of transcribed, anonymized
President for Academic Affairs at Purdue University. He is also a professor of mechanical engineering. Prior to this, he served as Dean of the Graduate College at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Edward William and Jane Marr Gutgsell Professor of Mechanical Science and Engineering (2009-2014) and on the faculty of mechanical engineering at University of Michigan (1989-2009). He has also served as Acting Director of the Division of Graduate Education and IGERT Program Director at NSF.Dr. Barbara Hug, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Hug is a clinical associate professor with the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at UIUC. She is interested in developing and using curriculum materials that
PhD programs before graduating? 3. Can existing surveys of writing concepts, attitudes, and self-efficacies predict students’ risk for attrition?MotivationThough doctoral engineering education is understudied as a whole, attrition in graduateengineering education is particularly unexplored. Recent reports by the Council of GraduateSchools reported that in engineering, the 10-year completion rate for doctoral programs fordomestic students was only 59% [1]. Attrition is problematic for several reasons. First, since manydomestic students are funded by federal grants (through NSF, for example) and through domesticindustry, each domestic student that leaves academia prematurely represents a lost investment.Second, graduate students are
. His current work explores a range of engineering education design contexts, including the role of power in brainstorming activities, epistemological and conceptual develop- ment of undergraduate learning assistants, as well as the experiences of recent engineering graduates as they navigate new organizational cultures. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Using Utility Value Interventions to Explore Student Connections to Engineering Mechanics Topics AbstractEngineering mechanics courses (e.g., statics and dynamics) are critical foundations within anengineering
education track also teachesveterans about their joint service transcript (JST), which is a transcript listing all of the training,coursework, and professional skills a service member has accumulated through the military. Thistranscript can be used to justify transfer credit even in engineering [38], although not all collegesrecognize these transcripts and give credit for the experiences of student veterans. Potentially,work can be done to better align the JST entries with jargon recognized at major engineeringcolleges, but educating the engineering education community about these transcripts and what iscontained in them may help connect student veteran experiences with academic credit,addressing academic recognition concerns.Tied within much of
University Dr. Gallagher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with joint appointments to Mathematical Sciences and Education & Human Development. Her research inter- ests include student cognition in mathematics, development of teacher identity among graduate teaching assistants, curricular reform to foster diversity and inclusion in STEM fields, and development of mathe- matical knowledge for teaching. She is co-PI on an NSF INCLUDES Design and Development Launch Pilot, ”Statewide Coalition: Supporting Underrepresented Populations in Precalculus through Organiza- tional Redesign Toward Engineering Diversity (SC:SUPPORTED),” Award #EEC-1744497.Abigail E Hines, Clemson
professional guidelines could help overburdenedlibrarians to begin exploring UDL-based accessibility practices. Requiring coursework ininclusive pedagogy for accreditation in LIS programs would ensure that librarians are introducedto accessibility concepts before they step into the classroom. Communities of practice anddiscussion groups are excellent forums to share ideas around implementing inclusive practices inlibrary instruction, reference work, and individual research consultations. Librarians withexpertise can lead efforts to educate their colleagues and promote inclusive strategies in librarywork. And all libraries interested in being more accessible can investigate collaborative effortswith other UDL practitioners on their campuses or in their
the opportunity to think through ethical decisions that directly apply toengineering. Thus, helping students become ethical engineers requires a blend of instruction,guidance, feedback, and practice in moral reasoning. The multi-faceted nature of this development,and the differing abilities of faculty and students from different backgrounds, means that thelimited empirical work on ethics education within engineering has not determine the “best”practices for integrating ethics into engineering [12], and likely, will not be able to do so.Evaluation and assessment of the ethics interventions are also challenge a challenge. Not only doeseach intervention (such as having a stand-alone course, integrating micro-ethics to a technicalcourse, seminar
engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Dr. Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering
developed as part of this initiative.The Need for the Creative Problem Solving CourseAt LTU and at most institutions, in the freshman year, all engineering students complete an“introduction to engineering” course. The course introduces the engineering design process,teamwork, and many design/build/test projects. These topics all cater toward problem solvingand creativity. In the junior year, the students are doing plenty of “real-world” engineering anddesign in their coursework which also promotes creativity and teamwork. Unfortunately, there isa gap in learning experiences that promote creativity, teamwork and engineering design duringthe sophomore year when students are busy taking general humanities, mathematics, science,computer applications
recognized the value of group work and collaborative problemsolving as an effective way of learning engineering concepts that inherently prepare youngengineers for what they will experience as practicing professional engineers [6]. Mercier et al.highlight how collaborative learning differs from cooperative learning, or when team memberslearn cooperatively by dividing the task into different elements and then building upon eachother’s results to accomplish the overall task. In the Boodler’s Pizzeria Case Study, studentslearn through collaboration by developing knowledge through shared performance of thelearning activities. Mercier et al. emphasize the value of collaborative learning in engineeringeducation as it increases student engagement
prepare undergraduate students forengineering practice and advanced study in graduate school, it is necessary to build knowledge inthese areas throughout the engineering curriculum, starting from the first year. However, in atypical civil or mechanical undergraduate engineering curriculum, students are not exposed tobasic stress analysis and force-deformation concepts until the second semester of the sophomoreyear. In addition, experimental techniques and finite element modeling are mostly covered in thejunior and senior years. Interestingly, the fundamental concepts central to much of this coursework are understood much earlier in the students’ education. That is, students understand fromobservation and common experience the meaning of concepts
, underrepresentedminority, disabled, etc.). These challenges illustrate not only an obligation to conduct moreSVSM research, but also a need to push at the current boundaries of SVSM research for thepurposes of deepening the practical as well as theoretical impact of its findings.One way to advance SVSM research within the context of engineering education is through abroad(er) application of available theoretical perspectives and research methodologies,particularly those developed within the research traditions of other professionally oriented fields(e.g., teacher education, medicine). The purpose of this work in progress paper is to present fordiscussion a promising approach for researching alongside SVSM in engineering educationcalled ‘Narrative Inquiry
sustainability. The first-year course, EENV 102:Introduction to Environmental Engineering Design and Sustainability, also addressesprofessionalism competencies with its focus on introducing career paths in environmentalengineering, use of basic engineering tools, and building communication skills. The second-yearcourse, EENV 202: Sustainable Waste Management, includes formal content introducing systemsthinking, social justice, and ethics. Both courses utilize student teams to complete the assignedprojects. EENV 202 additionally includes assessment of team function using the CATMEplatform, developed by Purdue University [11]. The findings from the faculty interviews wereone driver for the development of content for the first project-based learning
program.The UofM ModelOur VIP program leverages these best practices from the well-established VIP model and adaptsit to address unique aspects of our university’s community and interests. Specifically, theprogram includes first-year students and focuses especially on building an inclusive researchculture within the college. It employs a tiered mentoring approach and activities that preparestudents for research and foster networking. The long-term goal of the VIP experience is tocreate a research culture and community in engineering, and eventually across STEM disciplines,that is inclusive and supportive of students from diverse backgrounds. An additional focus is toshowcase the value of diversity in research and innovation through the program. Both
, and tutoring indicates: Page 10.1188.9 • First-year engineering programs currently exist in a variety of forms. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education • While there are many common elements among first-year programs at many institutions, individual programs have been tailored to help students build solid foundations, make well-informed choices, and find the right kind of assistance as they progress through the programs. • In addition to persons
of Global Engineering & Technology, Southco Inc.16. Thomas, A., “Encouraging students in the STEM classroom through Making,” Maker Education, edutopia, September 7, 2012. http://www.edutopia.org/17. Kirk, B. J., “STEM graduation rates show uphill battle with math and science in School District,” December 5, 2011. http://technical.ly/philly/series/state-of-stem18. Landivar, L. C., “Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin,” United States Census Bureau, Report ACS-24, September 2013.19. Rotherham, A. J., “The next great resource shortage: U.S. scientists,” Time Magazine, May 26, 2011. http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2074024,00.html20. “Talking points: museums, libraries, and
school that has educated students since 1988 in aresidential setting. In 2013, Accelerate, South Carolina’s Engineering Launchpad, began in apilot phase, offering blended online coursework with instruction delivered using live video-conferencing technology to exceptional students from across the state. Conceived as a means todraw future engineering talent from across the state, Accelerate was created to attract andprepare the next generation of creative, articulate, and agile engineers. An integrated set ofcollege and honors courses that delivers superior science, engineering, and mathematicsinstruction along with valuable communication skills through dedicated English coursesdistinguishes Accelerate from other engineering courses offered in
advice of Schunn, modeling the engineering design cycle forchildren is an essential component for their true understanding of the concepts of engineering.5All TEAMS Club activities follow a pattern for design-based student engagement: identify theproblem, brainstorm ideas, design solutions, build a prototype device, test the device, reflect,redesign/improve the device. The value of engineering design being practiced by the volunteersand modeled for the elementary students leaves a lasting impression on both groups in terms ofengineering interest and problem-solving development.14,15This research aimed to discover the impact of the University of Colorado Boulder’s afterschoolK-12 engineering education initiative through exploring the following
future. Her research focuses on underrepresented minority youth’s access to and persistence in STEM pathways. She holds a B.A. in Anthropology and Community Health and an M.S. in Occupational Therapy from Tufts University.Rachel E Durham Rachel E. Durham (PhD, Sociology & Demography, Pennsylvania State University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Education at Notre Dame of Maryland University, and a Senior Fellow with the Baltimore Education Research Consortium (BERC). With a background in sociology of education, education policy, and demography, her research focuses on graduates’ transition to adulthood, career and college readiness, community schools, and research-practice partnerships.Prof
AC 2012-3989: PK-12 COUNSELORS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, ANDBEHAVIORS RELATED TO GENDER AND STEMMs. Meagan C. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineer turned engineering education enthusiast, Meagan Ross is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a recipient of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. She received a B.S. in computer science from Texas Woman’s University and a M.S. in electrical engineering from Texas Tech University. Prior to beginning her doctoral studies, she worked as a microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) engineer for Texas Instruments. Ross is currently a K-12 STEM consultant, curriculum developer, professional development
. She is currently the William and Elizabeth Magee Chair in Chemical Engineering Design and leads the process design and first year design teaching teams. Her current research focuses on sustainable engineering design and leadership, the engineering graduate attributes and their intersection with sustain- ability, competency based assessment, learning culture, engineering identity and continuous course and program improvement.Dr. Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University Dr. Lucas Landherr is a teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in comics and engineering education.Dr. David L. Silverstein, P.E., University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein
Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver Dr. Maryam Darbeheshti is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado, Denver. She is the PI of a recent NSF award that focuses on STEM identity at Urban Universities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “I’m not a big English person but I liked this class”: Lessons from aCollaboration between the School of Engineering and the English DepartmentAbstractThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper describes a two-semester STEM-focused Englishcomposition sequence developed as part of an Engineering Learning Community (ELC) at apublic urban research university. To create a course that achieves the goals of the standard two
new multidisciplinary degree program which provides both liberal arts and technical content through competency-based experiential learning. Page 26.1786.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 “What’s in it for me?” A Look into First-Year Students’ Perceptions of a Digital Badge SystemAbstractIn Fall 2014, the Purdue Polytechnic Incubator – a new undergraduate program with the focus oncompetency-based interdisciplinary skills – welcomed its initial cohort of first-year students.During the first semester, students were involved in a number of holistic
Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering and been focusing on student focused pedagogy centered around Game-based learning techniques.Dr. Joe Bradley, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Joe Bradley is a Clinical Assistant Professor in Bioengineering in the Grainger College of Engineering, a Health Innovation Professor and the Director of Engineering Education and Entrepreneurship in the Carle Illinois College of Medicine. His research focuses primarily on engineering design/Bio Design collaboration in transdisciplinary teams. He has used and developed tools to study the alignment of products and services with organizational processes as an organization seeks to address needs and bring
taught in the department by CEE faculty ever since it was first created in the late1990s (when it was first created, it was entitled, “Intro to Computer Applications in Civil andEnvironmental Engineering”).Computing and data science play critical roles in the CEE undergraduate (and graduate)curriculum at Carnegie Mellon University. The undergraduate curriculum in this departmentprovides students with a grounding in traditional CEE material, but has a particular emphasis onempowering students to play an active role in reimagining the field of CEE in the future. Thiscourse establishes the foundation for further computing (and sensing) skill development inrequired junior- and senior-level lab and project courses, including our senior capstone
participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the academy and industry; 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields. She uses her scholarship to challenge the perceptions of who belong in computing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Need for Change: How Interview Preparation and the Hiring Process in Computing Can Be Made More EquitableAbstractMedia and literature frequently describe the need to increase the number of workers in computingto meet growing demands and
active member of Northeastern’s Gateway Team, a select group of teaching faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at NU. She also serves as a Technical Faculty Advisor for Senior Capstone Design and graduate-level Challenge Projects in Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership Program. Dr. Jaeger has been the recipient of numerous awards in engineering education for both teaching and mentoring and has been involved in several engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyond.Dr. Richard Whalen, Northeastern University Dr. Richard Whalen is a Teaching Professor at Northeastern University in Boston, MA and a core member of the Engineering Gateway Team. The focus of this team