ofTechnology engineering graduates in the last 3 years (1994, 1995, and 1996) in order to betterdetermine the industry skill set required of recent alumni. The most important attributes, in orderof priority, were problem solving, ability to design and conduct experiments, recognition of theneed to engage in life-long learning, understanding of professional and ethical responsibility andan ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. Of less importance were depth and breath ofengineering science indicating that the new curriculums will need to emphasize the “softerskills.” Recent graduates attribute prioritization were nearly identical to their supervisors whichfurther reinforces the relative importance of the attributes previously indicated
CBOK and its extensions, which arestrongly related to the CBOK, DOMAIN, DEPTH, SYS ENG, ETHICS, and RECONCILEoutcomes (see Table 3). Figure 2 depicts the organization of the Core BOK, with percentage ofcurriculum content designated for each core area. Notice that the CBOK occupies approximately50% of the curriculum allowing flexibility and specialization in curriculum design andsupporting its extension to support outcomes DOMAIN and DEPTH.The primary source for developing the CBOK was the SWEBOK4. Knowledge elements werealso derived from SE20045 and other sources6, 7, 8. In the study and analysis of these sources, itwas decided that although the SWEBOK organization and content would dominate, variouschanges in areas and topics were needed to
!), and dove into Telecom Engineering. Once in Telecom, my learning continued at MCI, Vartec, and Charter. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Fostering Professional Skills Development Through Application in Core Engineering Subject Courses: A Pathway to Holistic Student Development Surupa Shaw, Randy Brooks Texas A&M UniversityABSTRACTTechnical expertise alone is insufficient for career success in the evolving and competitive field ofengineering. Employers increasingly prioritize graduates who possess key professional skills suchas collaboration, communication, problem-solving, and ethical
engineeringsolutions, aligned with the SDGs and NAE Grand Challenges, contribute to sustainability. Thereport also underscores the importance of cultivating global citizenship through education, whichUNESCO identifies as crucial for achieving sustainable development goals.Addressing the urgent need for a strategic approach to globalize education without additionalresources, the report emphasizes leveraging creativity and the growing diversity of the studentbody. It details how increased international student enrollment in the U.S. enriches educationalenvironments and supports global citizenship.Furthermore, the report discusses the essential values for future engineers, including empathy,ethics, and cultural awareness, proposing strategies for integrating
synthesize information. These students learned how to thinkcritically about the questions they need to ask to lead them to the answer they needed [5].Additionally, AI tools can be used to check answers and equations to provide a deeperunderstanding on complex engineering topics [6].The integration of AI in engineering education also presents challenges. Students may developand overreliance on AI tools and AI may negatively impact academic integrity [7]. Furthermore,concerns surrounding the ethical implications of AI include issues of bias, privacy, and inabilityto validate AI-generated information highlight the need for comprehensive training on theresponsible use of AI [8][5]. Educators must consider these challenges to ensure that AI tools
students exposed to realistic operationand design scenarios which present one or more environmental and/or social ethics dilemmas. Itis only then that the students learn to make environmentally and socially aware decisions and viewthe problem beyond engineering principles alone. This paper presents a project-based learning(PBL) exercise conducted at a graduate level course related to the operation and management ofthe power system, where the students are presented with a design scenario in which manyenvironmental and energy justice issues are intertwined with the technical design criteria. The goalof the exercise is to create ethical awareness in students and develop their ethical judgment througha realistic exercise.2. Electric Power Grid: The
living for polypharmacy patients in isolated living situations.Mrs. Daniela Solomon, Case Western Reserve University Daniela Solomon is Research Services Librarian for Biomedical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electri- cal Engineering and Computer Science, Materials Science and Engineering, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Kelvin Smith Library, Case Western Reserv ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work In Progress: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards Through A Moot Court Case Study in Product LiabilityIntroductionPublic and environmental safety are critical components of engineering ethics that require anunderstanding of the engineering, business, and
arguments support this option along with flexibility in the block ofcourses undertaken and adding work experiences outside of academe. Ethics and Public Policy Engineers and engineering managers have a strong sense of responsibility to develop products and make decisionsthat are highly beneficial to society [3],[4]. They also have an admirable propensity to adhere to prescribed ethical codes ofthe profession. However, the need for a higher level of societal concern and public responsibility is now emerging withincreasingly sophisticated high technology products and services. Special courses in graduate curricula are advocated as athird sub process substitution to help engineering managers
material and in-class activities, a cognitivist approach. The final four semesters (n=152) were structured with aflipped classroom approach. Students accessed course material through weekly online modulesand class time was spent in reflective discussion and experiences based on the material offeredonline, a constructivist approach. The survey included 55 items that covered seven sub-scales:understanding of ethical issues, global awareness (world view), communication skills,organization/leadership skills, self-knowledge, creativity, and teamwork. Only student paired(pre and post) data were used in the analyses in this study. Most survey items had a significantincrease from pre to post course survey response in the desired direction. To evaluate
data; design a system,component, or process in at least two more than one civil engineering contexts; includeprinciples of sustainability in design; explain basic concepts in project management, business,public policy, and leadership; analyze issues in professional ethics; and explain the importance ofprofessional licensure.2. FacultyThe program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarily design in contentare qualified to teach the subject matter by virtue of professional licensure, or by education anddesign experience. The program must demonstrate that it is not critically dependent on oneindividual.Where we last left offThe initial paper1 documenting the committee’s work started with a review of the literature
. This article is used to start the discussion of legal issues in design. Video 2: FMEA tutorial Video 3: Amy Cuddy TED talk Your body language shapes who you are. Communication is clearly a critical part of design. But students rarely think about the importance of body language, which this video discusses both in terms of brain chemistry and in terms of the perceptions of others. Video 4: Steve Howard TED talk Let's go all-in on selling sustainability. This talk is presented from the view of an IKEA executive, who talks about the moral and financial reasons for pursuing more sustainable products and supply chains. Video 5: Craig Martin talk at U. of Kansas on Engineering Ethics, 2013 J.A Tiberti Lecture on Ethics in
: • An ability to function effectively on teams (Outcome e) • An ability to communicate effectively (Outcome g) • A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning (Outcome h) • An ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibility (Outcome i) • A respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal, and global issues (Outcome j)In the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program at Milwaukee School ofEngineering (MSOE), the Capstone Project course has been used a curricular point for bothinstruction and assessment with respect to these outcomes. The Capstone Project course is a 10
the ability to generate sets of working drawingsthrough an intense final group project. For the past three years, the approach to this final projecthas been for the instructor to give a fairly well defined description of a problem and leave thedevelopment of an early-stage solution to the creativity of the students. This approach hasyielded positive results with respect to preparing them for their sophomore and senior levelengineering design courses. However, in order to incorporate the ethical and societalresponsibility of the engineering profession, while maintaining the traditional emphasisnecessary in graphics science, a service-learning element has been included in the final projectbeginning Fall 2001 wherein the students define their
. International Experiences 10 Tours Begin 10a. Library Skills 10b. Student Panel 11a. Ethics 11b. Registration Review (Registration begins this week) 12 Fall Break – students work on projects, classes do not meet 13a. Units and Dimensions 13b. Estimation of Answers 14 Thanksgiving—students work on projects, classes do not meet 15a. Minidesign #3 Demonstration in Class 15b. Course Evaluation 16 Grade review, meetings with instructor Page
with rapid changes intechnology, they must also broaden their focus, cultivate entirely new skills, and consider unfamiliar territory suchas economics, policy, and ethics. In this paper, we suggest an unlikely avenue of potential relief: history. Morespecifically, we report our experiences over the past half dozen years with team-teaching a course entitled“Electrical Engineering in American Life.” An outgrowth of earlier reforms intended to enhance retention ofengineeringstudents, this course has evolved in ways we believe make it an ideal instrument for implementing the letter and thespirit of the new criteria in engineering education. The roots of our course go back to January 1993, when engineers and historians at Georgia Tech joined
students who are working can more easily relate to ethical issues, can sense the interpersonalissues involved and can sort out the responsibility lines. Typically, these students enter college fiveto fifteen years later than the traditional students, work full time in industry, and invest five to tenyears earning an A.S. degree. For instance, they pick up well on the career implications of mostethical dilemmas. They bring to the classroom an appreciation for the pressures in the industrialworld and the methods used to cope with them. The younger students, in general, try to follow atypical textbook approach in their course of action, and then come up with a solution, which,although correct in theory, sometimes would not go over well in a real
effectively and to be effective teachers as well as learners.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education• Ability to cope with ethical dilemmas and conduct themselves in an ethical and professional manner.In addition, the program seeks to increase and enhance the involvement of women andunderrepresented minorities in the networking and general information technology areas and toprovide educational benefits to undergraduate and masters students in the participating academicdepartments. Multiple implementation strategies are being applied.• Creating a research program focused on overcoming barriers to achieving a vision of the future
in ResearcherReflexivity, Adhering to Research Ethics, Framing the Research Problem and Questions,Identifying a Critical Framework, Conducting the Literature Review, Choosing ResearchMethods, Engaging with Participants, Crafting Instrumentation and Collecting Data, Analyzingand Interpreting Data, and Reporting on Research.After analyzing 12 standards bodies from seven countries and several dozen research articles[12–23], the working group created guidelines for each of the major areas. For example, Figure 2shows the resultant critical framework guidelines resulting from the analysis.4 ReflectionThrough our analysis, the working group merged valuable standards offering insights, guidance,and concrete examples for conducting education research
establishment of the Global Forum on Nuclear Education, Science, Technology, and Policy. Aditi holds undergraduate and doctoral degrees in Nuclear Science and Engineering from MIT. Her work, authored for academic as well as policymaking audiences, has been published in Nuclear Engineering and Design, Nature, Nuclear Technology, Design Studies, Journal of Mechanical Design, Issues in Science and Technology, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, and Inkstick. Aditi enjoys hiking with her dog, reading speculative fiction, and experimenting in the kitchen.Dr. Katie Snyder, University of Michigan Dr. Snyder is a lecturer for the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She teaches design, ethics, and
anything, 3) collaborates, and 4) innovates. Theentrepreneurial/enterprising engineer needs a global perspective and the globalization of roboticsbrings several implications for robotics engineers, including manufacturing, food production,defense, and telepresence.Thus, the globalization of robotics carries many potentially disruptive societal impacts.Destruction of existing jobs / creation of new jobs. Enhanced security / reduced individualliberty. Longer lifespan / quality of life. Telepresence / never quite being present. Because of thedisruptive potential of their craft, Robotics Engineers bear a special responsibility to humankind,embodied in a Code of Ethics for Robotics Engineers. We conclude that in addition to a broadand rigorous
procedures used. QA scope covered all operations and all Based on our quality policy to units of the Faculty including affiliatedpursue upgrading teaching and institutes. Working team from eachlearning, research process with good unit had been setup to review thequality taking into considerations both existing system. The procedures werecultural and ethics, the Faculty of then drafted to match withEngineering has therefore adopted the requirements and practices. Staff andCUQA system which comprised of 14 faculty were trained on requirements,basic and 7 progressive requirements. procedures and internal audit practices.The Faculty had then
exercises arealso an integral part of this REU experience. Environmental ethics, diversity and communityimpact of engineering activities are the topics of mini workshops. All these topics havetremendous relevance to pollution prevention and sustainability but can be absent from atraditional engineering curriculum. It is anticipated that the undergraduate research experiencepromotes interest in pursuing graduate school and strengthens leadership skills and self esteem.IntroductionMany engineering programs worldwide are integrating pollution prevention, green engineeringand sustainability modules in their traditional curriculum. The College of Engineering at RowanUniversity is taking numerous innovative measures to integrate environmental education
provides student agency inintellectual development, and (4) it provides content adaptability to emerging trends. 3For example, our first-year Chemical Engineering graduate curriculum comprises five courses:Thermodynamics, Kinetics and Reactor Design, Transport Phenomena, Mathematical Methods, and Safetyand Ethics (taught in one course together). Although this curriculum is reasonably standard in ChemicalEngineering graduate education, its structure leaves little room for customization, specialization, andflexibility on emerging topics. In contrast, one-credit modules enable students to adapt to their priorknowledge level - for example, by testing
pivotal moment inAI adoption driving rapid transformation across many fields. For higher education, the newtechnological wave demands a reevaluation of traditional teaching and learning models to remainapplicable in an AI-driven world [2]. Higher education institutions now face a monumental taskof embracing AI literacy as a core competency, akin to such fundamental competencies ascritical thinking and effective communication. However, integrating AI into higher educationpresents several challenges, including the lack of standardized guidelines for curricularintegration and established governance structures, ethical and safety concerns, facultypreparedness, quality and reliability of outputs, and the potential of increasing the digital divideand
) teachundergraduate students, (2) administer a degree program (i.e., Department Chairs), (3) serveas a top-level administrator over all engineering degree programs (i.e., Deans), and (4) workprofessionally in engineering. Survey items address areas including instructional strategies,instructional technologies, assessment strategies, curricula, evaluation of teaching, andpreparation of graduates. With over 2100 respondents, these survey results can informconversations about the future of ECE education. This paper focuses on responses from theover 600 academic respondents. When asked about teaching and assessing problem solving,moral/ethical reasoning, and design, respondents were most likely to teach problem solvingand design. This suggests that ethics may
may have heard of frequently, may even fear violating, butmany students fail to integrate the underlying values and purposes of abiding by academicintegrity within their own lives. The debate over whether academic dishonesty is on the rise orwhether technology has altered the way that violations appear is ongoing; however, what isimperative is that engineering educators begin to work to integrate this crucial aspect of one’seducation into the objectives of their courses. Students need to learn that academic honesty is acritical part of their educational endeavors and that their future work as an engineer is dependentupon the professional ethics that they must uphold.There are many types of academic integrity violations, ranging from minor to
studentdevelopment. Those student development areas are: Knowledge (Critical Thinker), Relationships(Mentor), Ethics (Active Citizen), Well-being (Healthy Individual), and Service (Catalyst forPositive Change). By identifying these development areas, in the framework the university seeksto nurture personal leadership development within individuals as they interface with and interactwith their peers and the community, university and civic. The adapted model is shown in Figure3. The “pillars” serve as linkages between the university’s values and leadership identitydevelopment in a way that reflects the mission of the university in preparing students for their
thestudents involved obtained a thorough understanding of the engineering concepts and alsoimproved their soft skills, including team working, communication, and ethical and problemsolving skills. In-depth information about the evaluation results, course map and instructionalstrategy are provided in this paper.IntroductionEngineering curricula have experimented with multiple methodologies that expose students toreal-world problems. There are also deep concerns about American internationalcompetitiveness, amid indications that the U.S. is doing a relatively poor job at retaining andtraining students in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines14.Too many talented students get the impression from introductory courses that
Session 2661 Engineering, Technology and Society: Increasing the Dialogue Between Liberal Arts Majors and Engineering Students Joan A. Burtner Mercer UniversityAbstract The EC2000 Criterion 3 a-k outcomes have increased engineering educators’ awarenessof the importance of contemporary and global issues in undergraduate engineering education. Inan effort to increase college students’ understanding of ethical, professional, and contemporaryissues related to engineering, a senior-level discussion-based seminar has been offered at MercerUniversity
higher self-efficacy in using ChatGPT as a learning tool in comparison with othergender identities. Furthermore, Freshmen engineering students tend to have high perceptions onusing ChatGPT as a learning tool, while junior engineering students have the lowest. Finally,freshmen engineering students tend to have high perceptions on ease of accessing ChatGPT, whilesophomore engineering students have the lowest.Keywords: ChatGPT, concerns with ChatGPT, ethical considerationsIntroductionEngineers working in Open Artificial Intelligence (OpenAI) developed the language model ChatGenerative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT). It's a kind of artificial intelligence (AI) systemthat can produce text responses to a variety of questions and prompts that seem