following questions and answer options.Part 1: Student Evaluation of the Course Response Options1. Textbook/supplementary material in support of the course.2. Value of assigned homework in support of course topics. 5. Very good3. Value of laboratory assignments/projects in support of the course topics. 4. Good4. Reasonableness of exams and quizzes in covering course material. 3. Fair5. Weight given to labs or projects, relative to exams and quizzes. 2. Poor6. Weight given to homework assignments, relative to exams and quizzes. 0. Not applicable7. Definition and application of criteria for grading.Part 2: Student Evaluation of Instructor
necessary prerequisite courses and student confidence in their ownunderstanding, we feel it safe to assume that students have already been exposed to two-dimensional heat transfer and have a reasonable understanding of the material.Questions three, four, and eight focus on whether the lab provided students with an increasedunderstanding of two-dimensional heat transfer and a greater ability to visualize the process.Students generally agreed with this notion, especially in terms of visualization. Additionally, inquestion five, students generally agree that participating in a numerical and experimental heattransfer project was more instructional than a similar project performed on paper. Questions 6and 7 indicate that the lab setting not only helped
. Historical event discussion suchas the longbow deployment in the English-French 100-year Conflict is a well-known examplewhere technology determined the outcome, although the physics of the longbow technology wasfinally put forward by Newton 200 years later. The technology of the atomic bomb and thephysics of the Manhattan Project is another example that society demanded physics applicationand created nuclear technology. However, we found that the learning motivation of the studentshave not improved much with this strategy of showing how physics is related to historical eventsin terms of feasibility and the consistency with all known physical laws. Therefore the physicsadvances relevant to the historical events are supplemented with parallel
tools such as recorded lectures in a classroom setting. Forexample, the Construction Project Management courses can be taught effectively by utilizingonline software such as bidding, scheduling and Construction Management software.Class lectures can be recorded and uploaded on course pages. Also instead of homeworks,classroom work can be given to students so that they can work under the direct supervision of aninstructor. This enables the students to ask questions and get into discussions. Also,communication can happen through internet via email, social media and internet video chatrooms.For the purpose of communication, lots of software is available for use including “BlackboardClassroom” that helps in interactions among students with video
Paper ID #15732A Sense of Belonging: Creating a Community for First-generation, Under-represented groups and Minorities through an Engineering Student SuccessCourseEmily E Liptow, California Polytechnic State University Emily Liptow is an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University. She works with the College of Engineering and the Center for Excellence in STEM (CESAME) on a variety of projects to promote equity in STEM. She recently finished her bachelors of science in Industrial and Systems Engineering at The Ohio State University, where she was also active with many social justice and diversity
applying science knowledge in the classroom and engaging in engineering practices.4As of early 2016, 17 states plus the District of Columbia have adopted NGSS as the basis of theirscience standards.5 And engineering content of many forms has proliferated. Third-party curriculainclude Engineering is Elementary, Project Lead the Way, and The Infinity Project, and schools havealso developed their own programs, either on their own or with other institutions, to make engineering aclassroom option for students.We asked three questions to hone in on specifically how outreach programs might be working to bringengineering directly into K-12 classrooms: • Does this program work to bring engineering into the K-12 classroom through student teachers
theatre. If we reframe day-to-dayinteractions as offers, it’s easy to spot effortless ungenerous offers and their effects. We all knowthe feeling of being asked, “How was your day?” and reluctantly trying to create and edit asatisfying narrative of our day for another’s entertainment and edification; our return offer ismost frequently an uninspired “fine”.When we reframe ours’ and our students’ interactions together as offers, a litany of activelearning stumbling blocks take on new clarity. An excellent example of this was shared by Dr.Raquell Holmes, who led a group of four students to write a book on cell modeling over multiplesemesters. Intentionally, this project required a lot of stretching on the part of the undergraduategroups. They were
Project Lead theWay, engineering education in K-12 is mostly not public, and the role of teachers in developingthese experiences has to date been limited. In this paper we seek to show why this is a problem,particularly for creating pathways to engineering for students of low socioeconomic status andstudents of color. As the Next Generation Science Standards come online, and as more and morestates adopt engineering standards for K-12 education, how can engineering education bedelivered as part of public education, involving teachers and unions fully in the process? Whatkinds of redirection are needed to reverse the privatization that has already occurred?IntroductionEngineering, along with most other STEM disciplines, has made scarce progress in
hands-on sustainable design courseSustainability Module in Engineering CourseThe introductory course for civil and architectural engineering (CAE) students (2-credits)included sustainability as one of five main topics in the course. The course learning goals relatedto sustainability were: define sustainability, describe its importance to engineering, and identifyaspects of sustainability in civil & architectural engineering projects. A sustainability module hasbeen included in the introductory civil engineering course since 2008.12 In 2012 the civilengineering course merged with the introductory architectural engineering course. This studywas conducted with the fall 2015 course. The first day of class, students were introduced to theidea of
Paper ID #15180The Roles of Engineering Notebooks in Shaping Elementary Engineering Stu-dent Discourse and Practice (RTP)Jonathan D. Hertel, Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort that involves 240 teachers in the different states. He also provides evaluation support for the Engineering Adventures and Engineering Everywhere projects. He holds an Ed.M. in learning and teaching from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. In 2013-2014, he was named a
mathematics graduate students. As of Fall 2016, I will be an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson Uni- versity.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incor- porating engineering into
Early Childhood Education/Special Education from Temple University in Philadelphia, PA and an M.A. in Education from LaSalle University in Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Nagle has completed graduate work in Educational Research Methodology at the University of North Carolina-Greensboro and earned his doctorate at George Wash- ington University in Educational Administration and Policy Studies.Professionally he has conducted 21 national and international research and evaluation projects and over 100 regional and local research and evaluation projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering achievement: An exploratory case study of minority
across a broad spectrum of the curriculum for both an undergraduate major programin manufacturing engineering and for a manufacturing engineering concentration in a mechanicalengineering program. Lecture content, assignments, lab exercises, and projects have beendeveloped across eight different courses to increase understanding of GD&T from variousperspectives such as documentation, mechanical design, design for assembly, design formanufacture, fixture design, machining, and inspection. Altogether, the content covers most ofthe key GD&T concepts and provides a consistent, coherent approach to graduating GD&T-savvy manufacturing and mechanical engineers. A comprehensive exam has been compiled totrack student learning and to monitor
design and project work, student experiences in engineering design, the transition from engineering school into the workplace, and also efforts for inclusion and diversity within engineering. His current work is in related understanding how students describe their own learning in engineering, and how that learning supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Mr. Marvin K. Karugarama, Virginia TechDr. John J. Lesko, Virginia Tech Jack serves as the Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in VT’s College of Engineering, Professor of Engineering Mechanics, and is a cofounder of PowerHub
students:Student # 1 –off-campus positionI started my coop with Cincinnati Incorporated on December 10th 2014. I have learned anenormous amount of information and skills while I have worked there. After I graduate I willstart a full time job with Cincinnati Incorporated.I. What were Objectives and Goals of the past 16 weeks? a. Mental Processes used on the job. I have used many processes on the job. I have had to think on the spot, plan out multiple projects and present those projects. I have also had to research many different topics in order to better understand and solve many different problems. b. Work Output. I worked forty hours just about every week since I started on December 10th 2015. I have
scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship be- tween educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co-developer of the Re- formed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1500 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen
toassign scores, meaning that the assessed learning tied to a given point may even fluctuate.As the latest pedagogical trends have shifted in the direction of a more holistic, experientialapproach to education through methods such as project-based and active learning, the educationcommunity has sought alternative ways to assess student learning in these systems. Thechallenges faced by such a reform are formidable, not least of which being a pervasive mindsetthat the primary function of grading is differentiating between students, rather than assessing aparticular student’s achievement or competency.4 However, there is a building momentum forchange, as researchers and practitioners have begun to question the ability of a traditional,summative
Paper ID #15101A Survey of the State of the Power Engineering Profession in the PacificNorthwest and what Working Professionals are Defining as Priorities for Prepar-ing Students to Fill Present and Near-Future VacanciesProf. Donald M. Peter P.E., Seattle Pacific University Don has taught electrical engineering at Seattle Pacific University since 1987, specializing in analog and power electronics, Before that he worked as a design/evaluation/diagnostics engineer at Tektronx, Inc. for eleven years. He has been involved in various consulting projects, including two summers as a NASA Summer Faculty Fellow at the Jet Propulsion
also was the associate director of operations for the Engineering Education Re- search Center from January 2011 to September 2013. Her work experience includes two years as a project manager in the planning department of the Port Authority of Allegheny County in Pittsburgh, and a re- search associate at the University of Novi Sad’s Institute for Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Dr. Vidic has published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings, including those of ASEE and INFORMS. She currently is participating in collaborative research on improving engineering students’ learning strategies through models and modeling and is interested in the assessment and effectiveness of model-eliciting
An Alternative to Videos for Lecture Preparation in a Flipped First-Year Engineering Computing CourseAbstractThis paper describes an evidence-based practice project. At the University of Cincinnati, twocourses, Engineering Models I and II, are offered to all first-year engineering students and form atwo-semester sequence in which students apply fundamental theories from algebra, trigonometry,calculus and physics to relevant engineering applications chosen from a variety of disciplines.MATLAB® is introduced and progressively developed as a computing tool to enable students toexplore engineering concepts, to investigate solutions to problems too complex for handsolutions, to analyze and present data effectively, and to
Illinois at Chicago B.S. Purdue University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Continuous Evaluation of Student Class Performance Using Group Based, In-class QuizzesIntroductionTraditional methods of evaluating student performance in the classroom involve assigningweekly homework assignments, semester long projects, conducting examinations (e.g., mid-terms/finals), and holding arbitrary pop quizzes. Amongst these methods homework assignmentsare a traditional indicator of a student’s continuous learning of the subject matter. Traditionally,performance on homework assignments reflects the level of understanding that the student has ofthe material that is covered in the
from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Data Analytics for Interactive Virtual LaboratoriesIntroductionWe have previously described the development and implementation of a set of InteractiveVirtual Laboratories (IVLs) in thermodynamics.1 Each IVL provides a set of activities to addresstargeted threshold concepts2 via actively engaging students in a series of actions. The IVLsprovide a less
, Virginia Tech Cassandra is currently a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA. Her research interests include student engineering identity development, communication practices and discourse strategies, power negotiation, and student artifact development. She earned her Masters (2011) and Bachelors (2009) degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in Rapid City, SD.Mr. Benjamin David Lutz, Virginia Tech Ben Lutz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include design teaching and learning, mentoring in design and project work, student experiences in engineering design
Pennsylvania.While the benefits to the students are vital, the impact of a co-op program goes beyond thestudents. Industry can gain benefit by obtaining staffing for projects at a substantially reducedrate (and typically without the benefits overhead). Moreover, by hiring interns and co-opstudents, industry can develop a recruiting system that allows them to make better hiringdecisions than can be done via a resume and interview alone.The benefit also extends to the higher education institutions. An organized co-op program canhelp the institution develop relationships with regional and national industry. Thoserelationships can be valuable in many ways. For example, at the authors’ institution, the industryrelations developed through the co-op program have
projects to those unfamiliar with them, as well as serving as the lead engineer onprojects.Two of five undergraduate subjects referred to a particular experience which discouraged themfrom continuing in the engineering field. One subject experienced a negative first workassignment which ties back to the importance of quality work assignments for engineeringstudents and the importance of feeling like part of the team. This subject mentioned that hergroup “set me up pretty poorly…with how it was run. So that was kind of discouraging because Icould not show up and no one would notice. So I hated that.” She mentioned that she overcameher negative feelings about the group by proactively seeking information from others in hergroup and learning all that
. Cross, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cross completed her doctoral program in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2015 and is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students at UIUC. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion, teamwork skills, assessment, and identity construction.Mrs. Jeremy Alexis Magruder, University of Florida Doctoral student in the materials group of the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the Univer- sity of Florida.Ms. Chanel Renee Easley, Techbridge Young woman of color with a Master of Science in
, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAIN SLO learning initiative she and her colleagues have been active researching in transformation in higher education.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is Chair of the Women’s & Gender Studies Department at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. She is also an Associate Professor in Ethnic Studies, Director of the Science, Technology &
development advising, capstone projects program, industry partnerships, first-year interest groups, and other special programs.Dr. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas - Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow in Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Professor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Markey is a 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy and has a B.S. in computational biology (1998). Dr. Markey earned her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a certificate in bioinformatics, from Duke University. Dr. Markey has been recognized for
Paper ID #14483Understanding Diverse and Atypical Engineering Students: Lessons LearnedFrom Community College Transfer Scholarship RecipientsDr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University Prof. Melani Plett is a Professor in Electrical Engineering at Seattle Pacific University. She has over eigh- teen years of experience in teaching a variety of engineering undergraduate students (freshman through senior) and has participated in several engineering education research projects, with a focus on how fac- ulty can best facilitate student learning.Angelina Lane, Seattle Pacific UniversityProf. Donald M. Peter P.E., Seattle
Technology, Athens, Greece. He has published more than 50 referred journal and conference papers and 4 book chapters. He has been project manager and a member of several research and industrial grants. Dr. Agrawal actively serves as committee member and reviewer for conferences and journals in his area of research. He is a senior member of IEEE and a member of ACM, and ASEE.Mr. Myron L. Stevenson, North Carolina A&T State University Myron Stevenson is a candidate for a Masters of Information Technology degree at North Carolina A&T State University. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Mass Communications from Elon University in 1998. Myron has over 15 years experience in information technology. He is currently a