STEM. 2. Identify how cultural concepts of race, gender, sexuality and disability have shaped scientific thought (and vice versa) through history. 3. Critically evaluate literature regarding ethics and diversity in bioengineering. 4. Analyze how engineers handle implicit bias during research and design processes. 5. Propose approaches to promote ethics and diversity in engineering practice.The honors students attended the same class sessions and completed all assignments as their non-honors peers. In addition, the honors students attended a weekly two-hour discussion section andcompleted additional assignments including weekly readings, written reflections, and a finalpaper on a topic of their choice related to the role of
. The authors suggest that short-terminternational experiences need to include pre- and post-trip support in the form of studentresearch and exploration of the anticipated locations and experiences as well as time after the tripto reflect and draw on what was learned during the trip.In summary, there is strong support that study abroad and other types of internationalexperiences have the potential to positively impact students’ global competency. Althoughquantitative studies like those previously discussed assist researchers and practitioners in makingbroad, generalizable comparisons of the impact of international experiences, there lacks a depthof understanding regarding what students are learning from these experiences and which aspectsof the
Page 26.771.2moving their progress forward. However, there is no general consensus as to what specificattributes of feedback lead to improved learning, and multiple lines of research emphasize thatappropriate feedback is specific to the learning context of the student and/or task.6 Researchershave advocated that feedback works best when it directs student attention to appropriate goalsand actions,7 and encourages student reflection.8 Others believe that students are most receptiveto feedback when they are sure their answer is correct, only to learn later that it was wrong.9Additional factors include a student’s understanding of and agreement with the feedbackprovided, the motivation the feedback provides, and the limits on the student’s
, device operation,defects, variability, and reliability. Laboratory projects using low-cost fluorescent cameras,visible and near-IR cameras, and laser scanning are used to characterize the grain structure,defects, surface roughness, reflectivity, and photovoltaic effects in common solar cell materials(e.g., monocrystalline and multicrystalline silicon wafers, thin film solar cells, commercialsilicon solar cells, and photovoltaic modules. Captured images can be imported into MATLABor other widely-available image processing software for analysis and interpretation. Topicallaboratory modules and projects can teach across engineering disciplines including materialsscience, optics, quality control, semiconductor devices, and renewable energy.1
participants andoften lacks evidence of validity. This paper examines the perceptions and use of engagedthinking, a term that encompasses critical and reflective thinking, by six students throughout a10-week Research Experience for Undergraduates summer program. An analysis of a series ofinterviews conducted with each student throughout their research experience presented themesrelated to prerequisites for engaged thinking (background knowledge, disposition, andtransitional circumstances) which could address some of the shortcomings that have previouslyprevented undergraduate research from reaching its full potential.IntroductionThe development of critical thinking skills represents one of the primary goals of undergraduateengineering education.1-3 In
a soccer game, the Afro- Brasileiro Museum, Pinacoteca Museum, a Sambalesson, a history lesson in Independence Park, Mercadão fruit market, Museu do Futebol,Capoeira instruction class, and a visit to the Latin American Museum. These excursions gave aninsight on some aspects of the Brazilian culture but lacked the importance of these activites onBrazilian history. An example of this lack of historical context was when the students were nottaught the history of Capoeira before learning how to practice it.In addition, the students were asked to keep a blog during their time on the dialogue. They wereprompted to answer questions to reflect on their experiences in Brazil and the digest what theysaw in Brazil and how that is different from the US
smaller private engineering department? Were thesurveys sufficient to capture a more fully informed picture of how students were developing asself-directed learners? Would we have a more complete understanding of how SDL is cultivated?Qualitative investigation was extended into the fourth year for the large public university cohort.Analysis of the transcribed focus groups produced some insights and many questions, includinghow self-direction could be defined in multiple ways and measured across time as an unstablecharacteristic, given to transient and episodic experiences of self-awareness and doubt, reflectionand quasi-reflection5. The ongoing processes of self-assessment and reflection provided repeatedopportunities to reveal how students
guided by learningmotivation, metacognition (thinking about one's thinking, and knowing one’s learning beliefsand strategies), and strategic action (planning, monitoring, evaluating progress, and taking properaction)” 1,2,3. Most educational researchers agree that the self-regulation process is a cyclical process andincludes three major phases: (1) planning, during which learners set goals, make strategic plans,and judge their self-efficacy; (2) execution, which involves learner's performance and control oftheir learning efforts, and use of learning management strategies and self-monitoring; and (3)self-reflection, which involves the self-evaluation of mastery, causal attributions, and reactions tothe learning task and performance after
for students to apply understanding of wavebehavior and patterns while designing a code and device to transmit location information torescue their classmates from “disaster”. Elementary students, in the role as Secret Agents, engagein NGSS wave transfer thinking while applying knowledge of light and/or sound waves.Designed codes and devices are presented to promote and demonstrate understanding of scienceand engineering.Context: Students are introduced to this design challenge after science exploration andinvestigations with the behavior and characteristics of light and sound. These explorationsintroduce the concepts of reflection, refraction, and also develop a model to represent wavecharacteristics using Slinkys and ropes. Students are
their choice of major, begin developing their professionalidentity, and begin defining their professional goals. To assist students in developing theirprofessional identity and behavior, an immersive, first-year experience with shadowingcomponents was developed to renovate the Introduction to Bioengineering course at theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This type of experience is designed to exposestudents to the professional environment with a didactic and self-reflective curriculum, therebysupporting students in their early professional development. The class was taken from a passiveseminar series that broadly covered the bioengineering field to one split into three career-centered foci, each with an overview and experience: i
activities: design, build, and test; which employ the following pedagogicaltechniques: inductive, experiential, and reflective learning respectively (Figure 1). Theseactivities each achieve one or more of the learning objectives: The design activity servesLearning Objectives 2 and 4 by splitting students’ time between two sets of design sketching andfeedback sessions. The build activity facilitates Learning Objective 3. The test activity servesLearning Objectives 4 and 5 through its presentation, load testing, and instructor feedbackcomponents. All activities engage Learning Objective 1 because this is a group work project, andrequires efficient teamwork in order to complete in the modest two-day timeframe. [Figure 1] Three
of the course were completedin groups, but to hold individuals accountable, every student wrote a weekly reflection on theirpersonal progress and learning. At the end of the semester, in lieu of a final exam, each studentsubmitted a 10-15 page learning portfolio in which they wrote a narrative and included curatedexamples of the work they completed during the term. Each assessed element of the course wasdirectly mapped to one of the course learning goals explicitly on the syllabus.In this paper, we provide key assignment and assessment documentation associated with thecourse and discuss how these elements connect to the literature on education. In next offering ofthe course, the pace of the course will be adjusted and more guidance will be
” group, led by the secondauthor. The group provided a forum for brainstorming ideas and the course provided a platformfor testing these strategies. Four recommendations evolved from this effort: 1.) Education onteam function and bias in team dynamics is helpful. 2.) Teamwork skills and strategies forcollaboration and conflict resolution need to be taught. 3.) Mentoring and engaging withstudents is an important aspect of the process and can be enhanced to better serve women. 4.)Reflection and self-assessment exercises can be integrated to build self-efficacy and confidencein students. Assessment was done using data collected from mid-term evaluations, peerevaluations, self-assessment exercises, input from industry judges, and teaching evaluations
recognized as one of the strongest influences on academic scientists’ and engineers’productivity1 and satisfaction2. Perceptions of climate reflect policies, practices, and interactionsat both a local level, as within a lab or department, and at more global level of the college oruniversity. The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE), anemerging voice from Harvard University about faculty careers, measures climate to include (a)personal and professional interactions with colleagues, (b) opportunities for collaboration, (c)sense of fit, (d) intellectual vitality of the senior faculty, (e) fairness of evaluation, (f) equitabletreatment, and (g) support for professional development. Perceptions of climate at the more locallevel
Global Practice: A Comparison of North American, Asian, European, and Latin American ApproachesEngineers practice their profession on a global scale. Thus, many engineering schools worldwidehave developed programs of study to better prepare their graduates for global practice. Theprograms often reflect significantly different approaches that are driven by important national,regional, or local factors in the pre-college preparation of their students, the expectations foremployment after graduation, or the general education requirements of the university or highereducation system. This session presents four approaches to preparing engineering students forglobal practice from four corners of the world. A
, i.e. specific homework problem or specific lab project. (Figure 1.) The evidence section is most critical to effective assessment, as it controls against a “Lake Woebegone” effect in which all of the students are seen as “above average”. Faculty are required to provide justification for their ratings.Figure 1. Faculty Assessment of Student Performance 2. Faculty Perception. Faculty are presented with a list of the course-level outcomes for their course, and asked to rate the overall effectiveness of the course in helping the students to meet the outcomes. They are given the opportunity to reflect on successes and shortcomings, identify equipment needs and constraints, and otherwise record their
and most diverse representation of STEM professionals to students. InAugust of 2012, the inaugural training workshops were conducted as an effort to "Equip anArmy" of volunteers to go forth and: 1) Share with students why they love working in STEMcareers, 2) Explain to students the impact they can have on the world by working in STEM, and3) Show students the diversity of real-life women and men in STEM. Using guided, inquirybased instruction and learning, participants/volunteers reflected on their personal stories, anddeveloped strategies for how to talk to students about STEM careers using correct and positivemessaging[11].Two workshops were conducted, and evaluations and reflections from the first, informed thesecond. Each workshop was
exceptional problem solving skills, teamwork,communication skills, and critical thinking ability, it becomes imperative to look for innovativeinstruction approaches to prepare students. Such skills and abilities can be achieved by inductinga coupled approach involving collaborative and problem based learning strategies in curricula.Both cognitive and generic skills will be realized by practicing collaborative learning andproblem based learning3 approaches that involve several self-directing learning demonstrationsin transitioning from problem analysis to reporting-reflection to integration and evaluation. Page 23.322.2Collaborative learning facilitates
knowledge about this concept.• C å Capabilities: the course will develop capabilities in this cross-cutting concept that can be applied within the context of this technology topic area.• D å Decision-making: the course will enable decision-making within the context of Page 15.156.3 this cross-cutting areaA review of existing courses on technological literacy identified four common coursetypes.4,5 These are: (1) Technology Survey Courses (2) Technology Focus Courses (3) Technology Design Courses (4) Technology Critique, Assess, Reflect, Connect CoursesThese four models emerged from efforts to discern patterns that may exist in the
-line Course to Help Engineers (Students and Professionals) Develop Interpersonal Skills – You’re Kidding, Right?AbstractAn on-line course was developed to serve the needs of specific learners. Course material ispresented using text, videos, and readings. Student interaction with the instructor is primarilythrough email while student-to-student interaction is facilitated using an on-line discussionboard. Assessments include reflective writings, on-line tests, and quantification of participationin the discussion board. Student evaluations indicate that the course is effective at enablingstudents to improve interpersonal skills and meet specific ABET program criteria. Evaluationsalso indicate that students consider the on-line learning
way that promotes and encourages reflective and analytical thinking. The idea is toengage students in a context-rich problem, through the use of a driving question, to guide themthrough active learning modules exploring core concepts, and to lead them to a solutionmethodology. The production of a final report serves as a mechanism that allows them to revisetheir original solution based on a synthesis of the knowledge and understanding gained throughthe learning modules.The developmental framework for instructors using EFFECTs begins with the identification ofthe concepts to be studied; in general these are difficult concepts. Next, these concepts areassociated with active learning activities; each concept could be associated with a single
achievement of the learningobjectives, provide students an opportunity to reflect on their accomplishments, and makeprogram improvements. The main components of the assessment system are regularly scheduledstudent surveys and facilitated discussion sessions. This paper presents the results of anexploratory analysis of the survey instrument to assess its structure. Here we also discuss thebenefits and challenges of using such an instrument.IntroductionAs cross-functional teams have become more prevalent within professional work environments,so have interdisciplinary project-based teams in academic environments. More institutions ofhigher education have been incorporating interdisciplinary education into their curricula.Common goals of these programs
summarizes students’ self-reportedpreferences for receiving information visually or verbally, processing information in an active orin a reflective manner, focusing on sensory or intuitive types of information, and understandinginformation in a sequential or a global fashion. The ILS can be used to identify an overallpreference or to describe a degree of preference (mild, moderate, strong) for a learning style, andis a valid assessment tool for the purpose of discussing teaching and learning [2,7]. With priorInstitutional Review Board approval (#UT316), we administered the ILS to all students attendingthe first day of the Fall 2002 session of ENGR 100, the first-semester introductory engineeringcourse at Tulane University. The ILS was administered a
9.317.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationtheories of stress concentrations. The combined effects of assembly stresses in the MachineDesign course are not covered. In fact, the literature review showed that many articles have beenwritten about SCF around holes in members in tension; the literature is bereft when describingthe effect of bearing and contact stresses. In 2003, utilizing the methods of reflected andtransmitted caustics, the effects of assembly stresses were indirectly mentioned in regard to thestress field in a plate5.Experimental stress analysis laboratory practice improves the
semiconductor device courses are typicallyreliant on visualization methods. 20 16 Active Reflective Sensing Intuitive 15 12 CountCount 10 8 5 4 0 0 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
newalternatives and depart from established comfort regions of their respective disciplines andpractices, they must simultaneously reconfigure their approaches to design processes.A widely accepted concept in green building design and construction is a shift away from linearand sequential design processes towards a more iterative and integrated process. This approachallows the relationships between building systems and features to be considered in more robustand efficient ways, and can lead to more minimalist design decisions in creating more elegantbuildings. For example, the decision to use a more reflective paint can improve the efficiency ofindirect lighting and as a result, lower cooling and mechanical system loads, thus minimizing ductand equipment
number of reflective and analytical techniques. Thesetechniques help the students learn how to work in teams and on projects. As we, instructors,were preparing to teach the course for a third time, we had to sort out a confusion in the coursedesign, brought about by the presence of many techniques taught in many ways. We devised amethod to organize these techniques by scope (for individuals, teams, projects, systems) on oneaxis, and by how they were taught (as mini-lectures, homework assignments, project experience,coaching sessions, experiential sessions, etc.) on another axis. This enabled us to see “holes” inour course design that were not obvious before. As a result, we adjusted our prioritiesaccordingly and focused our efforts. This paper
Page 8.1065.1duties.”3 In fulfilling their responsibilities, engineers are not only accountable, but also need to begranted professional autonomy as a necessary correlate. Autonomy requires engineers be able toexercise independent authority regarding the appropriateness of technical decisions, as well as aboutthe moral implications of those decisions. When making moral judgments, engineers have two explicit, and one implicit, sources onwhich to rely. The explicit sources are the professional codes of ethics and moral theory. Theimplicit source is the engineers’ cultural background in the form of moral intuitions. Codes of ethicsare historically evolving documents which reflect agreed upon standards within the engineeringcommunity
. Recent revisions of theET program that include the addition of a four-year seminar series focusing on professionaldevelopment and documentation of student workplace competencies / program outcomes wentinto effect for students entering fall semester 2010. Students, as a requirement for graduation,must individually submit integrative and reflective ePortfolios to document with direct evidencetheir intellectual growth and mastery of the ET program’s workplace competencies. Compilationof the ePortfolio contributes to the students’ professional development, and its completion andsubmittal for summative evaluation in the senior seminar is considered a fundamental componentof the capstone experience. The four-year seminar series provides an opportunity
in significance testing because many test statistics follow this distribution when the null hypothesis is true6. The Chi Square test of equality of proportions was used as the data was collected from multiple independent populations and the hypothesis to be tested was that the distribution of some variable is the same in all populations. Students were categorized into the dimensions of active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, visual/verbal, and sequential/global. Therefore, a 2x2 contingency table Chi Square test was preferred since it would provide meaningful results for the current data set. Statistical analysis was performed for each dimension of learning style to test the following three hypotheses:1. Students from the