chemistry, physics,engineering, and biology, to design nanomaterials for a wide range of applications, such ascatalysis, energy, and medicine. The medical application of nanotechnology for diagnosis andtreatment of diseases is referred to as nanomedicine and is a cornerstone of biomedicalnanotechnology. This technology has the potential to transform healthcare and clinical outcomes.Due to the impact and potential of nanotechnology on research and society, students inbiomedical engineering benefit from training in basic nanotechnology concepts.There are several examples of nanoparticle labs for undergraduate students in the literature, butthese are typically designed for chemistry students rather than focused on biomedicalapplications [1]–[5]. There
notesonline and addressing a broader range of application in the 2019 iteration of the course.Furthermore, we hope to apply this structure to other courses in biomedical engineering, thusenhancing the students’ experience, their active interaction with the material, and as a result, theirlearning. 7. Acknowledgment We thank Columbia University’s Center for Teaching and Learning for their in-kind supportand collaboration in developing the technological elements of this project, and we acknowledgefinancial support through a Provost Award for Hybrid Learning Course Redesign and Deliveryand NSF grant number NSF-ENG1662329.References1 Silberman, M. Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach Any Subject. Allyn and Bacon, (1996).2
master’s in mechanical engineering from Wayne state university in 1981 • Currently a Part time faculty at UM Flint Campus • Recently retired from Delphi as senior staff engineer • 30 years of automotive experience in product design and development • Recipient of various patents in pump technology and presented paper in SAE symposium • Board member of Flint Islamic Center and school board member of Genesee AcademyFardeen Mazumder, University of Michigan-Flint Undergraduate Research Assistant, University of Michigan-Flint, USA c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Integration of CFD and EFD for Experiential Learning in Fluid
Engineering (CHBE 220), and how it affected students’perceptions of the field of chemical and biological engineering. CHBE 220, and the courses itreplaced, as well as the major topics of focus of these courses are outlined in Table 1.Table 1: Courses existing before and after curriculum changes including major topics covered Before curriculum changes After curriculum changes CHBE 243: Introduction to Chemical and CHBE 220: Foundations of Chemical and Biological Engineering Process and Biological Engineering I (4 credits) Technology (1 credit) Major topics: Major topics: Process design project definition Introduction to a variety
Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investi- gated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first-year coursework and interdisciplinary electives.Dr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr
Paper ID #29479A Curriculum-Spanning Review Video Library to Improve Retention ofPrerequisite Course MaterialDr. Hope Leigh Weiss, California State University, Fullerton Dr. Hope L. Weiss is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Fullerton. She earned her B.S. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Cornell Uni- versity, and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Weiss’ research focuses in the areas of nonlinear dynamics and chaos and engineering education. Her current research includes biomedical acoustics
, her M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of California at Davis in 1998, and her Ph.D. from the University of California at Davis in 2000. She has been teaching geotechnical engineering and general engineering topics at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville since then.Michael Penn, University of Wisconsin-Platteville MICHAEL PENN is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at UW-Platteville. He received his B.S. in Industrial Engineering and M.S. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Michigan, and his Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Michigan Technological University. He has taught environmental engineering courses at Clarkson
University of New Orleans, located for the most part on high ground on the edge of the lake,suffered several feet of flooding on the southern part of its campus (see Figure 4). This section isthe lowest in elevation and also is located two blocks away from one of the breaches of theLondon Canal floodwall. The engineering building, married student housing, BienvilleResidence Hall, The Cove, the chemistry building, and the science/geology building wereflooded for three-four weeks. UNO, sitting right on Lake Pontchartrain, was buffeted by veryhigh winds and wind gusts, especially the buildings in the Technology Park. Many universitybuildings were damaged by the wind, with broken windows and cladding damage allowing raininto the interior of most
values of Duty, Honor, Country, and prepared for acareer of professional excellence and service to the Nation as an officer in the United StatesArmy.The mission of the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at USMA parallels theAcademy’s mission, while focusing on educating and inspiring students in the fields of civil andmechanical engineering 19:To educate cadets in civil and mechanical engineering, such that each graduate is acommissioned leader of character who can understand, implement, and manage technology;and to inspire cadets to a career in the United States Army and a lifetime of personal growthand service.The mission includes educating and inspiring, and training at the Academy level. The threeelements of the mission
AC 2008-329: A SIMPLE ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR FORCE ANALYSIS OFPLANAR FRICTIONAL TREE-LIKE MECHANISMSKazem Abhary, University of South Australia Kazem Abhary, A. Professor in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at the University of South Australia, obtained his B.Eng and M.Eng in Mechanical Engineering from Tehran University and M.Sc. and Ph.D. (1975) in Mechanical Engineering from UMIST (University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology), England. Since then he has been continuously involved in tertiary education and research, and has acted as a consulting engineer to variety of industries. His publications, exceeding 120, include numerous international journal and conference papers
AC 2007-1928: CULTIVATING A SUSTAINABILITY CULTURE IN IRISHSECOND LEVEL SCHOOLSSonya Quinn, University of Limerick Sonya Quinn graduated with first class honours from the University of Limerick in 2005 in Technology Education. She is currently a researcher in environmental sustainability in the University of Limerick undertaking a Masters by research in the area of sustainability and second level schools in Ireland. Sonya is also a tutor in the Explore Engineering Summer Camp, which is run as an introduction to engineering programme in the University of Limerick and is a consultant tutor in the technology learning centre.William Gaughran, University of Limerick Dr Bill Gaughran is a Senior
Education, and 3) Informal Education [3]. The first addressesstudents while beginning their formal educations. NASA believes that by increasing the numberof students involved in NASA-related activities at the elementary and secondary education levelsmore students will be inspired and motivated to pursue higher levels of study in science,technology, engineering and mathematics (“STEM”) courses.The second component continues that educational focus into the college/university level. TheNASA Office of Education is strengthening involvement with higher education institutions toensure that NASA can meet future workforce needs in the STEM fields. Participation in NASAprograms and research stimulates increasing numbers of students to continue their studies
AC 2007-2036: TEACHING THE BOK ? CHALLENGES FOR FACULTY ANDPROGRAMSDecker Hains, U.S. Military AcademyMark Evans, U.S. Military AcademyStephen Ressler, U.S. Military Academy Page 12.1371.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Teaching the BOK- Challenges for Faculty and ProgramsAbstractIn February 2007, the Second Edition of Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK) for the21st Century was released for review by the American Society of Civil Engineers. The revisedBOK uses an outcome-based approach and Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives todefine what should be taught to and learned by tomorrow’s civil engineers. The 26 outcomes –16 technical and ten
AC 2007-2299: EDUCATING PROJECT MANAGERS FOR THE CONSTRUCTIONINDUSTRYRaymond Krizek, Northwestern University Stanley F. Pepper Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208Ahmad Hadavi, Northwestern University Adjunct Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208 Page 12.570.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Educating Project Managers for the Construction IndustryAbstractWith the increasing complexity of constructing and maintaining infrastructure facilities
students to better apply the introductory math and science courses3.To aid recruitment and retention, the authors have developed a multidisciplinaryworkshop, which has been utilized for a summer recruitment academy and a fallorientation to engineering course. These activities build on the past activities andexperiences of the authors4,5 with the REACH academy and orientation courses. Page 11.1460.2REACH AcademyReaching Engineering and Architecture Career Heights (REACH) is a week-long residentacademy hosted by the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology (CEAT) atOklahoma State University (OSU), Stillwater. Financial support for the academy
reallydo benefit from working in teams. Furthermore, as engineering students begin to trust each otherand develop a commitment to the goals and welfare of the design groups, they truly become ateam. When they become a cohesive team, the team can accomplish tasks and solve problemsthat neither a single individual nor a newly-formed group could ever accomplish.Bibliography1. EAC (Engineering Accreditation Commission), Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering in the United States, Baltimore MD, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., 1998.2. Lewis, P., D. Aldridge, and P.M. Swamidass, “Assessing Teaming Skills Acquisition on Undergraduate Project Teams,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol
textthat included not only additional materials on management and organizational theory, butadopted key sections of the text Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: An Introduction.25Included in this material were readings on the responsibilities of engineers, engineering codes ofconduct, normative ethics, designing for morality and the ethics of sustainability and technology.This material provided the core of three of the delivery techniques outlined by Haws by coveringprofessional codes, ethical theories and heuristics.10 As illustrated in Figure 1, these ethicsmaterials were introduced early in the course and regularly revisited and expanded uponthroughout the semester. Additional materials on ethics were provided through periodicsupplemental
skills in hisor her initial time in professional practice as an employee. This paper presents information from a Delphi-type survey on the additionalcompetencies expected by the structural engineering community to be gotten by the entrance-level engineer during the first 5 years of experience following completion of a masters-levelgraduate program. It does this by defining the competencies as quantified using Bloom’staxonomy [1] expected by the structural engineering profession in 44 specific subtopics within thefollowing 5 general areas: A-Basic Mechanics and Engineering Tools, B-General StructuralEngineering Tools, C-Technology and Communication Tools, D-Structural Engineering Topicsand Tools, E-Management and Professional Tools at both
Technology, 2012. 2. Fairley, R. and Willshire, M. J., Teaching software engineering to undergraduate systems engineering students, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 2011. 3. Fairley, R. and Willshire, M. J., Teaching systems engineering to software engineering students, IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Honolulu, HI, May 2011. 4. Callele, D. and Makaroff, D., Teaching requirements engineering to an unsuspected audience, Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Houston, TX, March 2006. 5. Fabrycky, W. J., Systems engineering: Its emerging academic and professional attributes, Proceedings of the 117th
steering committee for the International Conference on Wear of Materials and on the Mechanical executive committee of the Mechanical Engineering Division of ASEE. He also serves as an ABET program evaluator on behalf of ASME. Prof. Sundararajan has been recognized for his accomplishments with the Young Engineering Faculty Research Award and Early Achievement in Teaching Award at Iowa State University. He received his B.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from The Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (India) followed by M.S. and PhD degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
specificobjectives were introduced.Engineering Clinic Objectives:http://www.rowan.edu/open/colleges/engineering/current_students/course_material/At the conclusion of the course, students will(i) Demonstrate expanded knowledge of the general practices and the profession of engineering through immersion in an engineering project environment of moderate to high complexity.(ii) Demonstrate an ability to work effectively in a multidisciplinary team.(iii) Demonstrate acquisition of new technology skills through use or development of appropriate computer hardware, software, and/or instrumentation.(iv) Demonstrate business and entrepreneurial skills which may include developing a business plan, market plan, venture plan, or other approved
State’s College of Education. She teaches courses on learning and problem solving. Her research areas include the study of how students learn and the design of educational interventions to support that learning.Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkMs. Carla M Firetto, The Pennsylvania State University Carla Firetto is a Ph.D. candidate in Educational Psychology at Penn State. She is interested in applying principles of educational research to develop interventions that facilitate undergraduate students’ learn- ing, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. She can be contacted at cmf270@psu.edu
, and sound synthesis and electronics for musical applications.Mr. Sergey Dusheyko, San Francisco State University I received my BS in mechanical engineering from San Francisco State University in the Summer of 2013. During my time there I worked on two projects as a member of the Biomechatronics Research Laboratory. On these projects I was responsible, in part, for mechanical design and three dimensional model rendering. Since graduating I have worked as a mechanical engineer for a hydrogeological technology start up.McKenzie Suzanne Campagna, San Francisco State UniversityDr. Ozkan Celik, San Francisco State University Ozkan Celik joined San Francisco State University (SFSU) in August 2011 as an Assistant Professor of
responsibility in the Army to include combat experience as a platoon leader. Evangelista holds a bachelor’s of science in mechanical engineering from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and a master’s of science in engineering management from the Missouri Institute of Science and Technology. He recently graduated from Cornell University with a second master’s of science degree in mechanical engineering. The title of his thesis was ”An Experimental Demonstration of Converting Organic Liquids and their Aqueous Mixtures in a Film Boiling Reactor.” Page 25.595.1 c American Society for
. While working, he received his master’s in business administration and attended several process control and quality trainings. Before coming to Ohio State, he was an engineering technology faculty member for three years at the community college of Zane State College in Zanesville, Ohio. At Zane State, he taught several engineering courses including CAD, solid modeling, statics, strength of materials, machine design, and statistical process control, as well as many others. Page 25.657.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 From the Industry to the Student: Project
. al. of Texas A & M. This was developed and used byengineering programs in the Foundation Coalition. Students in mechanical engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology use a manuscript developed by Don Richards12. A relativelynew text, "Bioengineering Fundamentals" by Saterbak, et. al13,14, has been published for use inbiomedical engineering programs. We have adopted this book for use in EAS211. Althoughmuch of the content, examples and homework problems have a biological emphasis, thepresentation of the basic concepts aligns well with the philosophy of EAS211.It should be clearly understood that EAS211 is intended to provide an introduction to each of thetopical areas, with further understanding developed in courses which follow
Small World: Developing the MEMs/Nanotechnology Curriculum,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin, TX.12. Phillip Wankat and Frank Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill College, 1992.13. Course website: http://users.rowan.edu/~bakrania/nano/.14. William D. Callister Jr., Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 7th Edition, Wiley, 2006.15. Technology Review, MIT Press, link: http://www.technologyreview.com/. Page 15.782.13
Education at Washington State University-Pullman. His research is positioned at the intersection of educational psy- chology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. Olusola’s current research focuses on the use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for evidence-based practice, cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia resources including animated concept maps and diagrams; and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM education. Page 24.296.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 6, 55 – 70. From http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume6/Chambers.pdf 3. Kolodner, J.; P. Camp; D. Crismond; B. Fasse; J. Gray; J. Holbrook; S. Puntambekar; and M. Ryan; Problem-based Learning Meets Case-based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classrom: Putting Learning by DesignTM into Practice; J. of Learning Sciences; 12:4 (2003) pp.495-547. 4. Maida, C.A. (2011). Project-Based Learning: A Critical Pedagogy for the Twenty-First Century. Policy Futures in Education, 9(6), 759-768. Retrieved January 1, 2014 from http://www.editlib.org/p/111000. 5. Elmore, Bill B., A freshman design course using LEGO® NXT Robotics, Chemical Engineering Education
www.hayresourcesdirect.haygroup.com), 2005.12. D.A. Kolb, Experiential Learning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.13. E. Rutz and V. Westheider, Learning Styles of Engineering & Engineering Technology Students –Similarities, Differences and Implications for Effective Pedagogy, paper 2006-419, Proceedings of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006.14. N.E. Cagiltay, Using learning styles theory in engineering education, European Journal of EngineeringEducation, 33(4), 415-424, 2008.15. S.K. Hargrove, J.A. Wheatland, D. Ding, and C.M. Brown, The Effect of Individual Learning Styles onStudent GPA in Engineering Education at Morgan State University, Journal of STEM Education