. 2.http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1855481.18554838. Beidel E, Magnuson S. Government, military face severe shortage of cybersecurity experts. National Defense.2011;96(693):32–34.9. Booz Allen Hamilton. Cyber In-Security: Strengthening the Federal Cybersecurity Workforce. 2009.10. Obama B. Remarks by the President on Securing out Nations Infrastructure. Office of the Press Secretary, TheWhite House. 2009.11. Bursztein E, Gourdin B, Fabry C, Bau J, Rydstedt G, Bojinov H, Boneh D, Mitchell JC. Webseclab SecurityEducation Workbench. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security Experimentation andTest (CSET’10). Washington DC: USENIX Association; 2010. p. 1–9.http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1924551.192455812. Fanelli
used to evaluate each individual milestone.A high weighting factor was assigned to “Degree of Completion” to encourage the team to stayon track and not let the project fall behind schedule. This milestone system added structure tothe project and increased timeliness, but the instructors were confronted with an unanticipatedside effect. If a milestone was completed poorly, and the student(s) received an appropriatelylow grade, there was no motivation to fix the problematic issues. Later, another student wouldneed to put in extra work to compensate for the first weak performance. A corrective action wasnecessary to hold the original student responsible for completing the task without letting the teamfall behind. In the year following the
learned the most from. The statistics lab was more of an “experience” than a lab, and was done using jellybeans rather than a chocolate product (so that all the students could eat the candy at theend and avoid food allergy issues). After a lesson on population statistics and some Excelbasics (focused on statistics and graphing), each team was provided a bag of jelly beansfrom the same company. Teams were to compare their number of each type (flavor) ofjelly bean to the total number as well as the results for all of the teams in the class. Asurvey of the student’s favorite flavor was also done to compare to see if the mostpopular flavor (s) were the most prevalent in the population. While the “lab” was simple,and many of the students were aware
engineeringeducation and its impact in the engineering field. The evaluation proposal will not only serve asan indicator of the stage of the PhD program in Engineering Education, but also will serve as amodel to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of PhD programs despite the field.References1. Borrego, M., Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 96(1): p. 5-18.2. Brophy, S., et al., Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(3): p. 369-387.3. Lucena, J., et al., Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re‐Organization of Engineering Education in the United States
either individually or in groups. When appropriate, the TAwould attempt to form study groups for students to work together. When the students were stumped,they could ask questions and receive help from the staff.The course material was divided into seventeen units. Each unit summarized the key concepts,background math and methods required to solve the problems, and about ten to fifteen physicsproblems to solve. Often reading assignments were also included on these units in addition to beingposted on the course website.Students were free to work through the unit(s) at their own pace and solve as many problems as theyfelt necessary. There was no requirement of completing these for a grade like the LRE. When astudent felt prepared to demonstrate
, including a strong corporate sponsor, international host university and one or more partnering US institutions. It also outlines benefits to each partner in engaging in this type of partnership, and recommendations to other institutions wanting to design a similar program. Findings from the study can be used to inform curriculum and design of future international experiences for engineering students. Partnerships between universities and industry have long been important for schools ofengineering. In the U.S., growth in university-industry partnerships began in earnest in the1980’s due in part to changes in national technology policies which sought to promotecooperative research and increase diffusion of technologies
Ability to Influence Department and Faculty Participation. ASEE/CIEC 2013 Conference. Phoenix, AZ.4 The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2014). Almanac 2014-2015. The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 22,2014, Volume LX, Number 45.5 Black. (2013). Explanation and Types of Doctorates. Black Ph.D. / Ed.D. Magazine Online. Downloaded from theinternet April 3, 2013. http://blackphdeddmagazine.com/Explanation_and_Types_of_Doctorates.html6 Dunn, S. (2014). We’ve Formed an Adjunct Union. Now What? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Downloaded from the internet November 13, 2014. https://chroniclevitae.com/news/798-we-ve-formed-an-adjunct-union- now-what?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
new $300 million diversity initiative. Fortune. 2015 Jan 12.4. Wilhelm A. Intel Promises $300M To Boost The Representation Of Women And Minorities In Tech. Techcrunch.2015.5. McGregor J. Is Intel’s diversity goal really that “bold”? Washington Post. 2015 Jan 8.6. Microsoft. Bridging the Gender Gap: Growing the Next Generation of Women in Computing. Redmond, WA;2014.7. Olson R. Percentage of Bachelor’s degrees conferred to women, by major (1970-2012). 2014.8. Caldwell T. Plugging the cyber-security skills gap. Computer Fraud & Security. 2013;2013(7):5–10.9. Leclair J, Lifang S, Sherly A. Women in STEM and Cyber Security Fields. In: Proceedings of the 2014Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration. Indiana: ASEE; 2014.10. Dampier D
contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 3Presenter Name(s):1) Last Kirn First Adam Affiliation University of Nevada, Reno (UNR)2) Last Jurkiewicz First Melissa Affiliation University of Nevada, Reno3) Last Crowther First David Affiliation University of Nevada, RenoContact Person’s Name: Adam KirnContact Person’s Email: akirn@unr.eduContact Person’s Phone: 775-682-7567Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: 864-508-1644Please provide a one-paragraph bio for each presenter (in the order listed above). The bio should Page 18.12.3not exceed 70 words and should be
! Deadline Friday, January 23, 2015 by 5:00PM EST Presenters will be notified of acceptance status by March 14. Late submissions will not be accepted. Advanced Workshop Registration will open December 6, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 3Presenter Name(s):1) Villatoro, Melanie New York City College of Technology2) Samaroo, Diana
Registration will open December 6, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last Richards First Larry Affiliation University of VirginiaContact Person’s Name: Larry G. RichardsContact Person’s Email: lgr@virginia.eduContact Person’s Phone: 434.924.3191Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: 434.806.8441 Page 18.30.22015-ASEE
, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Last Oakes First Bill Affiliation Purdue University EPICS2)Contact Person’s Name: William OakesContact Person’s Email: oakes@purdue.eduContact Person’s Phone: 765-494-3892Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: 765-418-8029 Page 18.8.22015-ASEE-K12-Proposal
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Bottomley Laura Affiliation NC State University2) Parry Elizabeth Affiliation NC State UniversityContact Person’s Name: Laura BottomleyContact Person’s Email: laurab@ncsu.eduContact Person’s Phone: 919-515-3263Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: 919-349-8510 Page 18.29.22015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form
Paper ID #14377ACCREDITATION OF ENGINEERING PROGRAMS AND CERTIFICA-TION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS IN RUSSIA: A FOCUS ON LIFE-LONG LEARNINGJulia Ziyatdinova, Page 19.1.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 ACCREDITATION OF ENGINEERING PROGRAMS AND CERTIFICATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS IN RUSSIA: A FOCUS ON LIFE-LONG LEARNING Chuchalin A., Gasheva Yu., Gerasimov S., Pokholkov Yu., Shamritskaya P.Socio-economic context, industry transformation, adoption of new technologies and changingtrends in the labor market stipulate
Tranquillo, J. 2013. “The T-shaped Engineer: Connecting the STEM to the TOP,” Proceedingsof the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June.11 Downey, G., J. Lucena, B. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B. Jesiek, L. Kelly, J.Miller, S. Ruff, J. Lehr, A. Nicols-Belo. 2006. “The Globally Competent Engineer: WorkingEffectively with People who Define Problems Differently,” Journal of Engineering Education.95(2), p. 107-122.12 Nair, I., M. Norman, G. Tucker, A. Burkert. 2012. “The Challenge of Global Literacy: AnIdeal Opportunity for Liberal Professional Education,” Liberal Education, Winter, p. 2-7.13 http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/intercultural-knowledge accessed: February 25th. 14 https://idiinventory.com/ accessed
participant students and others. Bibliography1. Berdan, S., Goodman, A. (May 12, 2014). Every Student Should Study Abroad. The New York Times. Retrievedfromhttp://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/10/17/should-more-americans-study-abroad/every-student-should-study-abroad2. Bidwell, A. (2014). U.S. falls short in studying abroad. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2014/11/17/how-studying-abroad-has-changed-in-the-last-decade3. Institute of International Education (2014). Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange.Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/opendoors4. Kowarski, I. (July, 2010). Colleges help students translate the benefits of study abroad. The Chronicles of
Psychology, Volume 3, Issue 3, 213–231. (16) Silor, A. (2012) Effectiveness of classical music as background in the story video comprehension strategy among students with multiple intelligence. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vo.. 2, No. 5, 571-573. Web. 9 Mar. 2015. . (17) Ferrer, E., Lew, P., Jung, S. M., Janeke, E., Garcia, M., Peng, C., Tam, C. F. (2014). Playing music to relieve stress in a college classroom environments. College Student Journal, 48(3), 481-494. Web. 9 Mar. 2015. .Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova University
Evaluation in Higher Education, 10(3), 225-235. 4. Brooks, C.M. and Ammons, J.L. (2003). "Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments," The Journal of Education for Business, 78(5), 268-272.Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova University 5. Dyrud, M.A., (2001). "Group projects and peer review," Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 106-111. 6. Freeman, M. and McKenzie, J., (2002). SPARK, a confidential web–based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects, British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 551-569. 7. Kulturel-Konak, S., Konak, A
: National Academies Press.3. Hadi, A. (2011) Construction employment peaks before the recession and falls sharply throughout it: Job lossesin residential construction began well before the 2007–09 recession, and employment in both residential andnonresidential construction declined rapidly during the recession. Monthly Labor Review 134(4), 24-27.4. Farooqui, R., Ahmed, S., & Saqib, M. (2010) Desirable Attributes and Skills for Graduating ConstructionManagement Students. Retrieved from http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2010/paper/CEGT206002010.pdf on2/27/15.5. Magretta, J. (2012) Understanding Michael Porter: The essential guide to competition and strategy. Boston, MA:Harvard Business Review Press.6. Colvin, G. (2012) There’s no quit in
faculty,administrators, and facility leaders to work together and gradually transform the curricula in itsentirety, thus paving the way for a new generation of professional engineers and an excitinginnovative future.AcknowledgmentsThis work was partially supported by the College of Engineering and Computer Science FacultyExcellence Award and the National Science Foundation under grant CBET-1403405.References1. S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W. M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2008).2. E. J. Coyle, L. H. Jamieson, W. C. Oakes, Integrating Engineering Education and Community Service: Themes for the Future of Engineering Education
in the nanotechnology minoris presented in the Table 2. Table 2 - list of the textbooks used for the courses in the nanotechnology minor Course TextbookIntroduction to nanotechnology Nano: The Essentials – Understanding Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, T. Pradeep, Tata McGraw-Hill 2007Semiconductor Microfabrication Introduction to Microfabrication, 2nd edition, S. Franssila, Wiley, 2010Thin Film Processing Materials Science of Thin Films, 2nd Edition, Milton
long tests were conducted to collect data and to record observations. The tests wereconducted in the town of Barre, VT, USA, located at 44.1853° N, 72.4861° W at an elevation of186 meters above sea level. The comparison system is located in Tubarao- SC, Brazil is located7.00 meters above sea level at the coordinates 28.4667° S, 49.0069° W.Sample Operating Procedures and Processing DataAs stated, the capability of piping materials to absorb and transfer collected solar heat to theliquids contained within the pipes is critical to the absorbers efficiency. This investigation is todetermine the Solar Tubes performance compared to each other and to the limited resultspublished by Mr. Alano. The descriptive statistics indicated an average daily
, 1995. 11. Bloom, Benjamin S., ed. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Longman, Newark, New Jersey, 1956. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 8 2015 ASEE Zone III Conference (Gulf Southwest – Midwest – North Midwest Sections) 12. Felder, R.M., and L.K. Silverman, L.K. “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education [Electronic Version],” Engineering Education, 78 (7), pp.674-681, 1988. http://www4.ncsu.edu./unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS- 1988.pdf, accessed July 10, 2015. 13.Biographical
students could easilyface. The magazine published many of critical letters including one from a career advisor at theUniversity of Missouri-Rolla (now Missouri S&T) that read, “… (The student’s) word should mean something. … (Otherwise) his/her word may be questioned in the future. … (The students would) leave the company in a poor position. … We tell students to quit interviewing when they have accepted a job. It is like continuing to date after you are married.”Students frequently ask about professional expectations. At what point am I committed to take a job – after a verbal acceptance or after papers are signed? What if the company will not wait longer for an answer to a job offer? How long should one work at a
/s based on the plot? 5. The experimental result is obtained from the setup of the following system in the figure below. a. Write the equation of motion. b. The mass of the hanging weight is 500 gram. Using the frequency obtained from experimental result in problem 4, calculate the spring constant k.
Configurations”, San Jose, California, Feb., 2009.3. Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Todd Austin, “Structured Computer Organization”, Pearson publisher, 2012.4. Robert Duron, Barbara Limbach, and Wendy Waugh, “Critical Thinking Framework for Any Discipline”, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, Pages 160-166, 2006.5. James Graham, Karla Conn Welch, Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, and Shamus McNamara, “Critical Thinking in Electrical and Computer Engineering,” in Proceedings of the ASEE 2012 Annual Conference, 2012.6. Robert J. Niewoehner, “Applying a Critical Thinking Model for Engineering Education,” 2006 World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, Vol.5, No.2, 2006.7. Belgin Yildirim, Sukran Ozkahraman
received first by the instructional designers that are responsible forsetting up the support system, then by the RLE responsible for providing support and finally bythe student-inmate. This multiple responsibility challenges the instructor, who is then worriedabout certain content that may not comply with copyright laws. It is for this reason that theinstructor limits the number of images within in the instructional materials and asks for theseitems to be returned at the end of the year. This, at various levels, seems to the instructor, aconstraint. The instructor thus adopts a more conservative attitude with regards to the contenttransmitted, claiming the need for strict compliance with copyright laws, a constraint that s/hemay never have voiced
., Dick, M., Markham, S., Macdonald I., Walsh M., “Cheating and plagiarism: perceptions and practices of first year IT students”, Proceedings of ACM-SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’02), 2002, pp. 183-18711. Upchurch, R. L., and Williams L., “In Support of Student Pair Programming.”, Proceedings of ACM- SIGCSE’01 technical symposium on Computer Science Education, March 2001, pp. 327-33112. Williams, L. and Kessler, R.R. “Pair programming illuminated”, Boston, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 2003 Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education
3515. Pestana, A, Alves, T., and Barbosa, A. (2014). “Application of Lean Construction Concepts to Manage the Submittal in AEC Projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 30(4), 05014006.6. S. Mohamed, P.A. Tilley, S.N. Tucker. “Quantifying the Time and Cost Associated with the Request for Information (RFI) Process in Construction.” Acadamia.edu. http://www.academia.edu/3580760/quantifying_the_time_and_cost_associated_with_the_request_for_infor mation_rfi_process_in_construction.7. Chin, Chang-Sun (2010). “RFI Responsiveness of Paper-Based vs. Web-Based Information Processing Systems.” Proceedings IGLC-18, Technion, Haifa, Isreal8. Tsao, Cynthia C.Y., John Draper, Gregory Howell. (2014). “An Overview, Analysis, and Facilitation tips for Simulations
level. Findings/ Data: KEYR= Right L=Left B= Back S= Stomach Sys= Systolic Dia= Diastolic Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education/Pacific South West Conference Copyright © 2015, American Society for Engineering Education 356 The following results are average systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulses (on the Y axis) of each of the twenty participants (on the X axis) in the experiment. Systolic and diastolic are recorded in millimeter of mercury