website can serve as a simplemethod to facilitate an accessible and inclusive learning environment for students.KeywordsTeaching/Learning Strategies, Accessibility, Inclusivity, Distributed Learning Environments,Online learning, Course design1. Introduction1.1 BackgroundThe use of Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) have enabled us to organize learningresources and disseminate information to students with positive impacts in their motivation tolearn [1], [2]. Importantly, analytics from VLEs such as clickstream data can be used topredict at-risk students [3], [4] as well as academic performance of students [5], [6]. VLEsare primarily used as a repository for teaching materials but recently, integration withapplications such as Turnitin, VLEs
performance, including motivation, self-efficacy, values,curiosity, and, most importantly, learning environments. Learning is a cognitive phenomenon thatdiffers from person to person. There is no doubt, however, that learning through hands-onexperience is an effective method of retaining information. Undergraduate students in this digitalage have grown up with technology and come from an education system that encourages criticalthinking, hands-on learning, teamwork, design skills, problem solving, and experiential learning[1]. Most students today are visual and interactive learners, and research in educational theory andcognitive psychology shows that this type of learning is one of the most effective methods forteaching students of all ages how to
/ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Preliminary Reflections and Assessment of the 2022Chemical Engineering Summer SchoolAbstractThe ASEE/AIChE Chemical Engineering Summer School (ChESS) is a week-long, roughlyquinquennial over the past nearly 100 years, faculty development event bringing togetherearly-career and seasoned faculty for workshops and community building [1]. The most recentChESS took place July 25-29, 2022 at the Colorado School of Mines in Golden, CO, witharound 160 participants and 80 presenters. The two core outcomes for the Summer School are1) to build the Chemical Engineering education community and 2) to provide useful knowledgeand tools for teaching, scholarship, and service for those early in their careers.A typical
WiSTEM is theobservation that Black women are underrepresented in STEM for a variety ofreasons that include (1) anxiety pertaining to mathematics and computing (2) a lackof exposure to STEM disciplines and tangential careers (3) a lack of exposure toculturally responsive pedagogy, and (4) a lack of communities of support. Key Words - STEM Identity, Sense of Belonging, Persistence, Community, Self AwarenessINTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM STATEMENTMany institutions of higher education in the US do not reflect the racial and ethnicdiversity of our nation amongst its degree recipients. Clearly, we must acknowledgethe barriers to STEM education for individuals underrepresented in these disciplinesand develop interventions to mitigate them [1]–[3]. Racial
. IntroductionCollaboration with a diverse team of individuals from different cultural and socioeconomicbackgrounds is key when framing and solving complex engineering problems [1]. Specifically inthe Native American community, their expertise and a view on a variety of complex problems isneeded to form new ideas [2].Cross-institutional barriers, lack of connectivity, work and family responsibilities, and loyalty tocommunity of origin discourage participation on problem solving teams and contribute to thefailure of forming interconnected services [3]. In fact, only 17% of Native American studentscontinue their education after high school, which is significant when compared to the rest of theUS population at a rate of 60% [4], [5], [6]. Even many academic journals
such as Germanyhave advanced the concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, often referred to as Industry 4.0[1]. The intent is to integrate design, manufacturing, and consumer activities seamlessly toincrease productivity, reliability and customer satisfaction. An Industry 4.0 manufacturingsystem—also called a cyber physical production system (CPPS)—integrates Internet of Things(IoT), Internet of Services (IoS, or also called Cloud Computing) and cyber-physical system(CPS) technologies [2]. These changes will profoundly impact manufacturing work and workers.Industry 4.0 is projected to add $2.2 trillion to domestic GDP by 2025. The estimated maximumvalue of the operational transformation brought by Industry 4.0 to the global
short workshops for faculty jobsearches, but they generally disseminate information and may not be discipline specific. In thesummer of 2021, a pilot program was created to assist women in STEM fields in creating aportfolio of documents to jump-start their faculty job search process.IntroductionWomen continue to remain under-represented in the STEM workforce, including academia.While women constitute 48% of the United States employed labor, only 34% of STEM-relatedjobs were performed by women in 2019. They earn approximately half of all doctorates inscience and engineering in the United States, but women comprise 21% of full science professorsand 5% of full engineering professors [1]. The unemployment rate was higher for women inSTEM than for
as the program chair for the pre-college divi- sion and serving on two task forces with the president to create a framework for ’Weaving in Students vs. Weeding them out’ and a report to NSF for changing students’ mindsets. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 1 Qualitative Study of Women’s Personal Experiences of Retention and Attrition in Undergraduate Engineering ProgramsINTRODUCTION Women’s continued underrepresentation in the field of engineering should continue to beof national priority. From 1997 to 2016, the proportion of women earning degrees in
. 1Introduction In the United States, the engineering profession has historically and continues to excludeand marginalize certain racial and ethnic populations, including Black, Latinx, and Native people.The engineering profession was founded as a field of predominantly white men who have set thedemographic, narrative, and cultural norms [1]–[4] to the detriment of the equity and inclusionideals that leaders in the engineering field currently espouse [5], [6] and to the detriment of thesocial and ethical responsibilities of the engineering field to serving our diverse communities. Theresult of this foundational exclusion and its perpetuation is the phenomenon often referred to as“underrepresentation” of these racial and ethnic populations in
implement the engineering design process.community goodwill, positivemarketing, and opens doors for Work cooperatively to research and present novel solutions to realfurther collaboration. engineering problems.1. Break down the topic 2. Educate via play and 3. Task with creatinginto learning objectives discussion with experts working modelsRegional cooling technology is Brief lessons on the learning Using basic supplies andcomplex, therefore the overall objectives included lectures tools, students createdengineering was broken down from
computingenvironments [1]–[4]. In many ways, faculty from racial groups that are historicallyunderrepresented in computing (i.e., Black, Latinx, Native American, and Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander) experience similar issues as students of the same identities (e.g., discriminationfrom students, faculty, and staff; campus policing; microaggressions, and other policies andpractices that are inherently exclusive [5]–[7].Scholars are often marginalized when publishing academic papers, facing numerous obstaclesand systemic barriers that can impede their academic success [8]–[10]. Research demonstratesthat racial identity impacts whose work is considered scientific knowledge, reinforcing“idealized notions of meritocracy in science” [11]. Scholars often encounter
an Introduction to Design course. These modules enabled students to experience and practice effective teaming skills through role- playing. The modules focused on how to act and how to respond to promote psychological safety on design projects. Each module was tailored to a different phase of the design process. The themes of the three modules are (1) treating every idea as having potential to contribute to a positive outcome, (2) questioning an idea to obtain valuable insight, and (3) applying the brake to improve a decision. To explore the impact of the modules, we deployed a post-course survey to measure students’ perceptions of psychological safety on their project teams. Compared to control sections of freshman design in
controlled. Wildfires are caused by variousreasons such as droughts, volcanic ignitions, thunderstorms, and human factors. In the last fewyears, the number, frequency, intensity, and severity of wildfires have increased worldwide.Forests are drier because of the global temperature rises caused by climate change. “Today’sflames are larger, more ferocious, and linger longer than they used to be in many regions of theworld. [1]”. Wildfires release huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the environment andsignificantly impact the local and global climate. Thirty percent of carbon dioxide in theatmosphere comes from forest fire [2]. The increase in the number, frequency, and severity ofwildfires is severely affecting countries economics, ecosystem, and
, namely, Mechanical,Civil, Electrical, Chemical and Industrial, have courses on materials, both at the undergraduate andgraduate levels as well as funded research projects in materials. Furthermore, the Faculty of Arts andSciences has similar emphasis in materials, in the departments of Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Geology.In sum, the Division of Materials of ASEE is of great interest for our academic improvement [1]. Hence, thispaper!Over the last few years, several natural and man-made phenomena have affected any progress of thissmall island. While the earthquakes and the hurricanes are natural phenomena, not disasters, COVID-19was certainly a man-made cataclysm. We had a severe earthquake, over 7 on Richter’s Scale, plus COVID-19 started
Engineering DesignIntroduction/BackgroundIn its 2022 Report on the state of US science and engineering, the National Science Boardhighlighted the continued need to broaden participation in engineering [1]. This undoubtedlyrequires a multifaceted approach, with higher education playing a key role in attracting andretaining students who historically have been underrepresented in STEM. Evidence howeversuggests that many of these students experience disproportionately higher attrition rates fromscience and engineering programs [2]. In the same study, the authors note a common set offactors which plague attrition in engineering programs, including a lack of self-confidence orself-efficacy, unwelcoming academic climates, as well as sexism and
engineering education (EE) have played a significant role in thedevelopment of countries before, during, and since colonization [1]. Lucena & Schneider [1]remind us that while economic and political conditions may have differed across countries,engineers' primary goal during colonization was to transform nature into infrastructure to becontrolled, get a return on investments, and demonstrate superiority over indigenoustechnology. Across different colonizing powers, engineers filled a role in service to thecolonial project. Over time, as colonies became independent countries, engineering was - andstill is - considered an essential tool for helping these “traditional” societies on the path todevelopment [1]. In addition to engineering, formal
has been noted that the national graduation rate for Latinas with a Ph.D. inengineering is very low; only 91 (< 1%) of awardees in 2018- 2019 identified as Latina. Ourresearch investigates the interest of first year engineering students in research, which mightilluminate strategies for addressing the underrepresentation of Latinas in national Ph.D.engineering programs. The purpose of this quantitative study is to characterize early perspectivesabout research, graduate school, and becoming a researcher. A statistical analysis of the resultsfrom a cross-sectional survey was completed. A principal component analysis extracted thefollowing constructs: (1) research self-efficacy, (2) engineering research identity, and (3)perceived cultural
definitions: Identifying requirements, Develop Preliminary Design, DevelopDetailed Design, and Final System Design. The updated phase definitions were created toprovide more structure for the student teams and better capture what the school’s design processwas in practice rather than in theory.This paper will present the original and revised project phases and the review of the designprocess. This process should be of interest to programs with capstone experiences and other teamdesign project courses.BackgroundEngineering is a field that consistently updates with ongoing technological advancements. Theemployers of engineering graduates demand technical knowledge and other professional skills[1]; communication skills, teamwork, multidisciplinary work
tacklethe “messiness” of open-ended design problems.[1] Particularly in large first-year courses,implementing and assessing these open-ended design problems is difficult due to resource(space, staffing, time, financial, etc.) constraints. Finding an appropriate balance betweenconcrete and open-ended design projects is critical to maximizing students’ learning.ENGGEN 115: Principles of Engineering Design is a required first-year course in the Faculty ofEngineering at the University of Auckland. The course was re-designed in 2022 to emphasizedesign process over technical engineering, promote creative problem solving, and to test aconcrete/open-ended balance that might work for the combination of curriculum, student cohort,and faculty arrangement in
environment to be less supportiveoverall [1]. In terms of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors,studies have also found that first-generation students are 6% less likely to complete a degree inthese fields compared to their continuing-generation peers [2]. Research focusing on theengagement of first-generation college students in engineering is a topic that has not been widelyexplored up to this point. Because of the present battles that first-generation students face, moreresearch on their engagement is essential to aid them in achieving their educational goals.This work-in-progress (WIP) research utilizes the National Survey of Student Engagement(NSSE) as the main data collection instrument [3]. This survey is 40 questions
/school effortstoward both recruitment and retention of faculty from historically excluded groups. Recognizingthe key role startup support plays in recruitment and retention, the research team has initiated adetailed assessment of startup offers to STEM faculty at Mason. Startup support is a keycomponent to faculty success, with a recognized range of models for this form of support [1].White women, women of color, and men of color are underrepresented minorities (URM) in manySTEM fields, particularly at the faculty level. A vast amount of research has shown that there aresystemic barriers and disparities to URM faculty in hiring, promotion and tenure, service, teaching,research and salaries [2]–[4]. One area that is understudied is whether there
his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Pro- gram Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introduction Engineering classrooms have adopted team-based learning as a popular and effectivepedagogy for a long time [1-3]. Given the booming of computer-assisted learning technologies,instructors could easily observe the different ways of interaction and collaboration across teamsand among team
hardwarelocations. Despite the perception of the remote lab approach as a temporary measure suitableonly for the pandemic, our experience teaching a digital design course using a remotelyaccessible FPGA lab has proved successful in providing similar or even superior learningoutcomes compared to traditional in-person labs [1]. This experience has inspired thedevelopment of the BEADLE curriculum, which leverages a remote FPGA lab to promote accessto expensive, industry-grade hardware that could be out of reach for many underservedcommunities and educational institutions with limited budgets and resources.The Remote Hub Lab (RHL or RHLab) [2] has developed RHL-BEADLE, a platform designedto introduce digital design to pre-college students by providing remote
Education, 2023 Work In Progress: A Novel Approach to Understanding Perceptions of Race Among Computing UndergraduatesINTRODUCTIONBlack, Native American, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and Latinx undergraduates remainseverely underrepresented in computing [i.e., computer science (CS), engineering, andinformation systems] [1]. This is often attributed to student-centered, deficit-based factors suchas a lack of access to K-12 computing courses, culturally relevant role models and curricula, andsense of belonging. However, research notes how racial “othering” in university courses,departments, and cultures from peers, faculty, and staff negatively impact them [2]–[4].Shifting national conversations around race, racism, and anti
research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these institutions. Specifi- cally, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and career pathways, and (3) design as central to educational and global change. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Who are Graduate Program Directors and What are their Roles in Healing within Graduate Engineering EducationAbstract This Work in Progress (WIP) paper proposes a synthesis of
recent critical edition ofthe novel published in celebration of its bicentennial highlights its relevance for fostering ethicalformation among scientists and engineers [1]. Likewise, recent scholarship draws attention toFrankenstein’s role in engendering critical reflection among scientists about social and ethicalaspects of their work [2]. Despite, however, the novel’s potential to speak to ethical dimensionsof scientific and engineering practice, some instructors have encountered difficulties successfullyintegrating Frankenstein into an undergraduate engineering curriculum; and students havestruggled to appreciate the novel’s value to their professional development as engineers [3].Nevertheless, the novel’s capacity to address ethical aspects
discussion of thefive fundamental principles that embody QuantCrit: (1) the centrality of racism (this principleasserts that racism is a ubiquitous component of society, and some scholars do not believe it isquantifiable); (2) numbers are not neutral (e.g., using statistics to show deficits in minoritizedgroups); (3) Categories/groups are not natural nor given (i.e., race and gender as socialconstructs); (4) Data cannot speak for themselves (all data require interpretation); (5) Socialjustice and orientation (QuantCrit denies assumed objectivity and political neutrality whenapplying quantitative research).Person-Centered and Variable Centered ApproachesTo help distinguish between the underlying mechanisms of various quantitative approaches,Godwin
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Renewed hope: Utilizing Freirean pedagogies to enhance multicultural STEM classroomsAbstract The STEM field for the underrepresented is analogous to the "leaky pipeline" metaphor,which describes the mass exodus of minority students over the course of time [1]. Nationally,the attrition rate of STEM majors for underrepresented students failing to complete their degreehovers at 53 percent [2]. Students of Color have endured many challenges in the STEMclassroom, resembling isolation [2], stereotype threats, racial microaggressions, lack ofconfidence, diminished sense of belonging, and other hurdles as a result of race or gender [1].These factors contribute
initially, followed by two sets of questions to assessthe participants' stress levels related to job-seeking and future career challenges. These questionswill be categorized as personal and work-related stressors. Furthermore, this study aims to gatheropinions on the necessary skills that should be integrated into a mental health educationalprogram. This will provide insights into the required educational content for future mental healthcurricula targeted towards engineering students.Introduction According to the recent survey by American College Health Association (ACHA) among26,000 undergraduate students in the US, nearly 40% reported experiencing depression andanxiety [1]. Another research project, which examined mental health among more than
students' career social capitalIntroductionWhile there have been many policy level calls for increasing the diversity of the engineeringworkforce, there is little known about the work experiences of engineering students of identitiestraditionally excluded from engineering (e.g., women, LGBTQ+, Black, and Hispanic/Latinx)engineering students [1]–[7]. As Co-ops and internships are many students first industryexperience, it is important to understand how these experiences shape their career development. Work-integrated learning (WIL) programs, such as Co-op programs, internships, andworkforce development programs, are valuable for engineering students’ career development.WIL programs provide opportunities for students to access valuable