, and how the model addressed an acute need during the COVID-19 pandemic.Moreover, it will provide an overview of the implementation journey, specifically highlightingchallenges that arose within the broader institutional and industry partner ecosystems and howthey were addressed. Finally, it will discuss how the intervention, now established, could beused to open up access to experiential learning—especially for non-traditional, international,and traditionally underserved minority students.Broader contextEconomists find that entering the workforce in an economic downturn has short-term salaryimplications and impacts an individual's earning potential throughout their entire career [5], [6].The analysis found that entering the workforce in a
. 71 3.28 0.70 I will continue to use EarSketch to make music 71 2.58 0.84 after this competition. I would tell a friend they should try using 71 2.92 0.89 EarSketch to make music. Response scale ranges from 1 = “Strongly Disagree” to 4 = “Strongly Agree”Future Coursework & Career Path IntentionsStudents’ responses to items centered around coursework and career intentions indicate thatcompetition experience did not have as broad of an impact or as immediate of an impact, whichis likely appropriate for a 3-hour experience. For each subject area, the mean response wasslightly higher for the item on course intentions as compared to the item on career
from 44% in fall 1999 to 81% in fall 2006. During this sameperiod, the seminar's retention rate ranged between 69% and 74%. The one-year retention ratesfor those who never enrolled in the seminar are considerably lower, between 40% and 61% [10]. In 2008, the course goals for the course were modestly updated, and a course-specifictextbook, edited by faculty and staff, was adopted [11]. The text addresses: (a) Academic Skills;(b) Transition Issues; (c) Careers; (d) Finances; and (e) Campus Resources. The text was updatedeach year through 2016. At that time, accompanying instructional support and resources wereadded. Online modules were also developed to support course goals, including career and goalsetting, information, and financial
further internships, transfer preparedness, teamwork ability, and senseof self-efficacy.1. IntroductionDespite years of investments and resources devoted by the federal government and institutions ofhigher education towards broadening participation of underrepresented minorities (URMs) inscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers, significant progress has not beenachieved. For instance, since 2000, underrepresented minorities’ shares in engineering andphysical science degrees have been flat despite a rapid increase in their representation of theoverall US population. In fact, even though URMs currently constitute 30 percent of the USpopulation, they account for only about 12.5 percent of baccalaureate degrees awarded inengineering1
predict significantjob opportunities for graduates in the Energy Engineering profession due to energy economicsand the age of the current work force in the field. Surveys of members of the Association ofEnergy Engineers show relatively large numbers nearing retirement, an anticipated growth inemployment opportunities, and overall strong career opportunities(http://www.aeecenter.org/files/reports/2015EnergyManagementJobs.pdf ).At the university level, many graduates of chemical, electrical, mechanical, and otherundergraduate engineering disciplines specialize in energy through technical electives andresearch projects. There are also specialized degree programs, although they are somewhatlimited at the undergraduate level. Penn State’s Energy
policy describe compelling reasons why new science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education pathways, able to supportachievement among the nation’s nontraditional and underrepresented minority students, areneeded. Specifically, policy recommendations emphasize that increased enrollment and retentionof student veterans in STEM degree programs is critical to our nation’s capability to reachrequired levels of future STEM workers [1]. Moreover, since many SVSM are women and/orunderrepresented minorities, recruitment and retention of SVSM along STEM career pathways isvital for diversifying, as well as strengthening, the nation’s STEM workforce [2-4]. As a group,student veterans and service members (SVSM) are considered well-suited
Paper ID #26141The NSF S-STEM Program 2010-2014 at Purdue University Northwest (Ex-perience)Prof. Harvey Abramowitz EngScD, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond BS Materials Science 1972 Columbia University MS Extractive Metallurgy/Mineral Processing 1975 Columbia University EngScD Extractive Metallurgy/Mineral Processing 1983 Columbia UnviversityMr. Roy L. Hamilton, Purdue University Northwest Throughout his career Roy L. Hamilton has been an advocate for providing the leadership and resources that promote educational opportunity for those who have traditionally been excluded from the American educational mainstream
-- in part,because our existing science and engineering programs cannot handle the number of studentswho state an interest in science” [7 p. 9]. This prescriptive curriculum can make it more difficultto enter throughout their career or to repeat courses without delaying graduation [8].While quantitative studies have been completed to point to factors that decrease success inengineering curriculum, little work has been done to understand the factors that underlie theissues. The question of degree attainment is compounded by the intersection of multipleidentities a student carries- gender, ethnicity and first generation degree seeking status. Currentefforts are falling short to increase enrollment of women and marginalized groups. The currentbody
career in academia or industry, including the developmentof soft skills and increased confidence to articulate their technical ideas and knowledge. This approachcan be further extended to all STEM fields to enhance learner engagement in research-based tasks andincrease learning outcomes relating to creative and professional activities. Our results based on an IRB-approved survey indicate that 81% of the participants strongly agreed or agreed that attending the paneldiscussions increased their understanding of research topics related to the course materials. Furthermore,94% of the survey responders strongly agreed or agreed that working on a capstone report helped thembetter understand the process of creating a research paper, while 75% of the
Paper ID #31529Diversifying the Engineering Pipeline through Early Engagement ofNeurodiverse LearnersMs. Constance M. Syharat, University of Connecticut Constance M. Syharat is a Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF-RED) project, ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. In her time at the University of Connecticut she has also worked as a Research Assistant for NSF CAREER project ”Promoting Engineering Innovation Through Increased Neurodiversity by Encouraging the Participation of Students with ADHD” and
. Kristin Kelly Frady, Clemson University Kris Frady is an Assistant Professor in the Departments of Educational and Organizational Leadership and Development and Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and Faculty Director for Clemson University Center for Workforce Development (CUCWD) and the National Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education Center for Aviation and Automotive Technological Education using Virtual E-Schools (CA2VES). Her research and experiences include implementation of digital learning solutions, development of career pathways including educator professional development, and analysis of economic development factors impacting education and workforce development.Dr. Patrick
applied Voice ofCustomer to engage students and faculty to identify the pilot program’s requirements. They usedthe lean six sigma process design tools and root cause analysis to identify the critical tosatisfaction characteristics and the factors that will positively impact success of the mentoringprogram. This is a work in progress and constitutes the first step in designing and piloting anengineering mentoring program. The program will be piloted in Fall 2019, based on the findingsfrom the Lean Six Sigma project. This program will provide mentorship to women engineersthroughout their college career as well as support them for a career in engineering in theworkplace.Key words: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, STEM, Women
of the CareerWISE research program, supported by the National Science Foundation since 2006. Her over 250 publications and presentations and over $3.6 M in external support have focused on the application of psychologi- cal science to the career advancement of women and underrepresented minorities and the development of effective learning environments for graduate education.She is a AAAS fellow and has won a number of awards for her work on equity, inclusiveness and mentoring of students and faculty. Dr. Bernstein holds a bachelor’s in psychology from the University of California at Berkeley and graduate degrees in Counseling Psychology from the University of California at Santa Barbara.Ms. Kerrie Wilkins, Arizona
only 8-12 weeks while service is 27 months.Peace Corps training ranked significantly higher at greater frequencies in language and culturalskills over most elements, but this difference was not significant compared to the anthropologyand Sustainable Development Engineering courses. Thus, the pre-Peace Corps preparatorycourses offered through anthropology and the Sustainable Development Engineering coursesignificantly fulfill the self-reported global competency of language and cultural skills, which arethen reinforced during the Peace Corps. These results help reinforce the usefulness andimportance of pre-service MIP courses in preparing program participants for their Peace Corpsservice and future careers that may otherwise be lacking in the
Paper ID #11535A Series of Singular Testimonies: A New Way to Explore Unearned Advan-tages and Unearned DisadvantagesDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the
faculty for evaluation using aLikert scale. The responses provided data of how the three groups perceived the relevance of thecourse outcomes addressed to the students’ future careers. Responses to pre and post coursequestionnaires assessed the three evaluators’ perceptions of student areas for improvement andstrengths as related to the learning outcomes. This study allowed for similarities and differencesto be identified between the three groups of stakeholders: students, faculty, and professionals.This paper addresses the performance of an environmental engineering capstone design coursefollowing the integration of the WEAT design prompt and highlights components of the courseweaknesses. Additionally, longitudinal data showcases students
’ leadership orientations change across their career trajectories?4) How do engineers’ leadership orientations change in response to different situations?5) When do engineers begin to value the skills associated with each orientation?6) What are the skills and traits associated with exemplary engineering leaders of eachorientation?Methodology Page 26.1519.2The primary source of data for our analysis was a survey of 175 engineers working for twointernational engineering-intensive organizations with head offices in Canada. We sent thesurvey link to key leadership personnel at our two partner organizations and invited them todistribute it to their
levels of interest in engineering, their success andcompletion rates have been low due to a number of factors including low levels of preparationfor college-level work, especially in math; lack of awareness of academic and career options;lack of financial, academic, social and cultural capital needed for success; and lack of self-efficacy (i.e., students do not believe that they can succeed in engineering). To address thesebarriers to student success, Cañada College developed and implemented a number of programs tokeep students engaged and motivated towards achieving their academic goals. Among suchprograms is the Creating Opportunities for Minorities in Engineering, Technology, and Science(COMETS) program. Funded by a four-year grant from NASA
(Jan 1, 2015 – Dec 31, 2018) with the goals of producing significant improvements infreshman and sophomore retention rates in Chemistry, Computer Science, Engineering,Engineering Technology, Mathematics and Physics and increasing the number of female,Hispanic and African American students completing undergraduate degrees in these STEMfields.The funded NSF - IUSE project comprises the following strategies and supporting activities:1. Improve instruction by (a) establishing a STEM education active learning faculty summerinstitute and quarterly brown bag and (b) redesigning introductory CS courses.2. Establish early and motivating field-of-study and career explorations for students through a)Summer Orientation Sessions for first-year STEM
under-represented minority groups.Dr. Mark Tufenkjian, California State University, Los Angeles Dr. Tufenkjian is Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at Cal. State LA. His research interests include advanced geotechnical laboratory testing and in-situ testing of soft clay soils. His research has been funded by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Department of Defense. He is currently the PI on a STEM grant from ONR to provide engineering students pathways to careers at Navy Labs in the southern California region.Dr. Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles Emily L. Allen, Ph.D., is Dean of the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at California State University, Los
United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Ally Kindel Martin, The Citadel Ally Kindel Martin is the Director of Student Success in the School of Engineering. In her position, she has worked with the Supplemental Instruction program, launched STEM Freshmen Outreach initiatives, created an Engineering Mentor Connection program, and revitalized the Engineering Career & Network- ing Expo. She holds a M.Ed. in Higher Education and
importance of family in influencing different aspects of students’academics. For example, it was found that students taking an indirect path to a four-yearinstitution are more likely to have their parents involved academically by monitoring schoolworkand influencing the student’s academic plans [13]. Additionally, students at two-year institutionswho subsequently transferred to a four-year institution had, on average, a higher socioeconomicstatus than those who did not transfer to a four-year institution [13]. Specifically related toparental influences, parental behaviors were found to be related to a student’s career decision-making self-efficacy, or how strongly the student believes that they can complete the necessarytasks to make career
College of Engi- neering’s interdisciplinary, industry sponsored, senior project class as well as course in mechanics and design. He also conducts research in the areas of creative design, machine design, fluid power control, and engineering education.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S
Families’ Engineering, Design, and Inventive PracticesAbstractBlack students belong in STEM career pathways but often experience a diminished sense ofbelonging in their college programs. Through informal conversations, the authors learned thatsome Black students felt they had not had the formal pre-college engineering training andextracurricular experiences that they perceived their peers had and therefore they did not feelthey possessed engineering knowledge. There is little research that identifies the diverseengineering family practices of Black families and further finds ways to connect these practicesto formal higher education learning environments. Acknowledging the rich history of Blackengineering, design, and invention that occurs in Black
indicates that engineering leaders and social science andhumanities scholars can benefit from dialogues like this one. Engineering leaders grapple withethical quandaries at all stages of their career: depending on their level of authority andresponsibility, they may be willing to engage differently with ethical concepts and theimplications of ethical decision-making. Social scientists and humanities scholars can learndirectly from the lived experience of engineers and project managers and better understand therationale for their decisions when in direct conversation. The interest in engaging on thesetopics, and deeper study on the ways in which practicing engineers engage on these topics, maybe a valuable point of study for future engineering
financial need and help them to succeed instudies and careers within an urban setting. To achieve this goal, the collaborators have built onresearch, best practices, and evidence-based findings from other projects including severalcollaborators’ NSF/DUE S-STEM and STEP projects.2-1. GoalsThere are six overarching goals of the Urban STEM Collaboratory project. All project activities,evaluation, and research efforts were designed with these goals in mind. The six goals include:Goal 1. Increase the recruitment, retention, student success, and graduation rates of academicallytalented undergraduate mathematical sciences and engineering majors with financial need.Goal 2. Implement strategies and activities that contribute to student academic success
;bringing their full selves to team experiences, extra-curriculars, or internships; or continuingtheir studies at all.Storytelling is one tool that can be used to address concerns about belonging. Telling personalstories allows students to explore their reasons, ideas, hopes, fears, and feelings related to theiridentities as engineers and scientists. Students can connect their past selves with their current andimagined future selves to be able to understand their roles and paths forward in their careers [3].Storytelling can be leveraged this way because stories tend to exhibit similar general themes thatinclude redemption, contamination, or agency which can impact the storyteller’s mental health.Redemption stories exhibit a negative to positive
model which provided visualand performance feedback about energy use, daylight, and cost as the students changedskyscraper variables. Students with higher STEM self-competency (SC) selected higher-performing designs, viewed more design iterations, and ranked the building’s appearance as theirlowest priority. These results inform future design educators about student outlook prior to anyprofessional training and reveal potential limitations in student approaches to multidisciplinarybuilding design tasks.1.0 INTRODUCTION Aspects of college students’ career choices are influenced by how closely they identifywith the subject matter, particularly in STEM fields [1], which may influence them to behave ina way they feel is emblematic of that
students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a 2016 National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical
undergraduate researchers and not large ambiguousresearch aims that is more commonly done in graduate school training.STEM Research - Future ThinkingWe next sought to understand the impact of undergraduate research on ND and NT individualfuture career plans. Previous research has indicated that participation in undergraduate researchopportunities significantly increases the chance of individuals pursuing graduate school [23].With the desire to increase representation and diversity in graduate school programs, we soughtto understand if participation in undergraduate research impacts career plans differently from NDto NT individuals. Both ND and NT participants had similar low percentages for disagreeing andstrongly disagreeing that they received quality