workingthrough difficult obstacles. Students were handed a role card with the description of theresponsibilities for each role and given 5 minutes to plan amongst themselves. Students were thenallowed to enter the escape room before the 55-minute timer began counting down (Figure 1).The puzzles were organized into multiple concurrent pathways to provide students with theoptions for exploration, collaboration, and to prevent potential bottlenecks at more challengingpuzzles. Successful completion of each of four pathways will provide students with one of fourdigits to a bottle labeled as “The Cure”. Successful escape occurs when all four numbers areentered in the right sequence before the timer runs out.Figure 1: (Left) Two students attempting to solve a
assessments will be needed to validate these initial findings.Future WorkThe authors plan to deliver a second iteration of the class with updated curricula based onstudents’ recommendations and instructors’ experiences.ReferencesAbr`amoff, M. D., Roehrenbeck, C., Trujillo, S., Goldstein, J., Graves, A. S., Repka, M. X., and Silva III, E. [U+FFFD]2022). A reimbursement framework for artificial intelligence in healthcare. NPJ digital medicine, 5(1):72.American Association of Colleges and Universities (2022). Value rubrics - global learning.Bielefeldt, A. R. and Canney, N. E. (2016). Changes in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students over time. Science and engineering ethics, 22:1535–1551.Braveman, P., Arkin, E., Orleans, T
motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants’ goals,” Rev. Gen. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 4, Art. no. 4, 2015.[19] J. Steinke, “Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEM professionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, p. 716, 2017.[20] J. Steinke and P. M. P. Tavarez, “Cultural representations of gender and STEM: portrayals of female STEM characters in popular films 2002-2014,” Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2018.[21] A. Sahin, A. Ekmekci, and H. C. Waxman, “Collective Effects of Individual, Behavioral, and Contextual Factors on High School Students’ Future STEM Career Plans,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ
team members, it is possible thatimplementing it as a hands-on activity would bring additional value. A hands-on activity wouldrequire additional planning, resources, class time, and clean-up but may be worth the effort,especially in the context of a first-year engineering course that does emphasize hands-onactivities and prototyping. Therefore, this is a step that will be considered in the future.Although the survey results suggest that the video and activities had value, the actual effect onteamwork was not formally measured. Measuring the effect conclusively may be challengingdue to the many factors that affect how a team functions (the members of the team, the classroomenvironment created by the instructors and teaching assistants, the
a distraction if the familiaritythey have with the term does not align with the context being described. With assumedexperiences having a familiarity with context items or events could be helpful when answeringthe questions. As we continue to assess remaining concept inventories, we plan to expand on ourknowledge of the groups most represented in these questions. At the conclusion of thisassessment, we will have categorized almost 200 inventory questions. Engineeringundergraduate students consist of several racial, ethnic, and cultural groups made up of bothdomestic and international students. These students are from a range of socioeconomic andgeographic backgrounds. Within these students, there are a variety of experiences that
based ontheir needs, interest, and career goals. The program evolved given its high student demand and toeffectively align with industry needs.Figure 2: The systematic approach of SEE coursesAlso, with the design rigor, the SEE program is continuously improved and updated based onindustry needs. Due to which, the course topics within workshops, varied over time. Also, newand more courses were added need-based. These topics and course identification and offeringsfollow a systematic process. Please refer to Figure 2 for the approach, which explains the steps toidentify topics, develop and design the training courses customized for the engineering context,plan their implementation, and offer them to students. The concurrent process ends with
andpublishing patterns.Journal articles and conference proceedings were originally planned as the formats to beexamined but as the research proceeded it was determined that a) there was sufficient material toexamine the patterns focusing only on the journals and b) that publishing in conference venueswas potentially different enough to warrant a separate study. Finally, as neither of the authorswas fluent enough in other languages to warrant including them, only articles published entirelyin English were included, i.e. an English abstract alone was insufficient for a study to beincluded. This filter was applied inconsistently by the database vendors so some of the originalnumbers include papers that were written in a language other than English but
study hasexamined how these variables differ in relation to students’ levels of mathematics proficiency.Thus, much knowledge is left to be gained.Present StudyThe current study is a part of a larger, grant-funded study focused on cultivating InclusiveProfessional Engineering Identities within engineering majors. Participants in the study werefrom a large, R1 university and were all first-year students planning to major in engineering orcomputer science. The university divided the students into three different engineering tracks fortheir first year, representative of their level of mathematics preparation upon college entrancebased upon their mathematics achievement and coursework in high school. Students onEngineering Track 1 were deemed to be
gender pronouns is related to their experience using thembefore living in the U.S., with longer exposure to the U.S. leading to increased use of genderpronouns. For international graduate students who have lived in the U.S. for less than one year,the preference for using gender pronouns is greatly different from their peers who have been inthe U.S. longer, suggesting that new international graduate students could benefit from additionalguidance about gender pronouns to assist them in adjusting to the college environment. Buildingfrom this pilot study, we plan to investigate how international engineering students’ perceptionsof gender identity and gender expression practices change over time and identify factors thatinfluence these changes. Then
(participantdesign solutions).In the second stage, n = 25 engineering faculty from various universities attending the First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) conference completed the first ACJ session. Thesecond ACJ session was completed by n = 46 first-year engineering students from the samelarge public R1 university as the initial research stage; however, it should be noted that due tothe timing of the panel and the data collection activities, none of the panelists had personallycompleted the ping pong design task. The student ACJ panel was conducted as part of aclassroom activity. For both ACJ panels all participants for each session took part at the sametime in large open plan spaces
remote learning environment suggest that redeveloping acurriculum with specific targeted courses or activities with remote learning components could bebeneficial to students that prefer or need to reduce the time spent driving to attend all the coursesin person. Since about 60% of the respondents reported that the remote learning was notconducive for their learning, departments may plan a period of transition to support students andhelp them develop good study habits in this online setting. This finding opens the opportunity toidentify courses that programs could deliver fully or partially online, as well the opportunity tooffer some of the courses with multiple sections in different delivery modes (fully remote, in-person, or Hyflex). 5
know about different kinds of STEM jobs.• Question #2: Because of this STEM lab, I am better at building things.• Question #3: This STEM lab has taught me skills that will help me do better in my science classes at school.• Question #4: Because of this STEM lab, I know I can be a scientist or engineer one day.• Question #5: This STEM lab has provided me with the knowledge necessary to understand science concepts.• Question #6: This STEM lab has helped me see that I am a science person. Fig. 6: Program Impact Survey Results for April 2023Future DirectionThe future of VSL includes a plan to continue with once-a-month offerings with two distincttime options. In addition, program leadership is investing time in
: 10.1145/1352135.1352226. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1352135.1352226.[20] Juri Pill. The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 5(1):57–71, 1971. URL http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:soceps:v:5:y:1971:i:1:p:57-71.[21] Mary A Nelson, Monica R Geist, Ronald L Miller, Ruth A Streveler, and Barbara M Olds. How to create a concept inventory: The thermal and transport concept inventory. In Annual Conf. of American Edu. Research Association, 2007.[22] Cynthia Taylor, Michael Clancy, Kevin C. Webb, Daniel Zingaro, Cynthia Lee, and Leo Porter. The practical details of building a cs concept inventory. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on
to support meaningfullearning for students. This idea means that activities should be structured so that group membersare interdependent and work together to achieve the learning objectives.High-stakes assessments such as midterm and final tests are commonly used to evaluate retentionand recall in biomedical engineering courses. In courses such as physiology, such assessmentsare professionally authentic for pre-health or pre-professional students planning to take theMCAT and/or licensure exams. In large format courses, grading time can be reduced by usingelectronic platforms to automate test administration and scoring. For students, these assessmentsoften induce test anxiety that negatively impacts their learning [6].Collaborative testing
each project and categorized them according to the description, emphasis of theprojects, and special requirements.Table 1: The project ideas, including project titles, codes (themes) and special requirements.1- Sustainable Rural Development Students develop site planning, power systems and assistiveCall for Proposals systems for various needs for a rural community. They conduct aCodes: S, P full design process (framing, ideation, prototyping) in a team of 4-6 students over ~6 weeks. The options include greenhouseSpecial Requirements: None control system, natural hazard protection, automated crop harvester, and etc.2
influenced recruitment and the motivations that ledstudents to accept (or decline) their internship offer across the themes. In terms of programstructure, this was the first summer that not all of the Penn State students took advantage of theroom and board offered by ARL. However, two Penn State students specifically cited the roomand board as motivators for applying and the quote from P8 was directly from a Penn Statestudent. Additionally, in their individual interviews several of the Penn State students living offcampus brought up their meal plan as a benefit of the program and ate in the dining hall withtheir on-campus peers. While it was originally thought that the data would show largerdifferences in opinions regarding the room and board, it
and exit survey filled out by thestudent users of the Hub has been collected. The Hub’s activities also have included ancillaryactivities such as the Three Minute Thesis, (3MT).® competition, fall and spring Writing Retreats, and quiet writing time where students can showup and take a small private room to work in and make a plan for themselves.We acknowledge the need for more systematic study and evaluation of outcomes, but thus far,students who have visited the Hub are appreciative and rate the value of learning and help ontheir projects very high. Likewise, evaluations of the writing and oral communications coursesare highly rated with enrollment sustained primarily through word-of-mouth recommendations.Future work includes definition and
constructing thewind turbine (or not) and why? If so, which location would you recommend and why? Prompt 3 -How does your recommendation impact the [three pillars of sustainability]? Prompt 4 - Identify a facet of your DS2 design project which involves an ethical dilemma and discuss briefly.Student and Faculty PerspectivesStudents were also provided opportunities to comment in open form within the above surveys.Comments from the Fall 2021 offering of the course highlight the lack of ethics integration intothe design aspects of the course: “The Ethics Week at the end felt a bit out of the ordinary coming after two design sessions back to back.”For the Fall 2022 offering of the course, students noted the planned
, investments, and planning for the future. I am most interested in the investments part of financial literacy. Making an investment that could eventually grow and aid in my retirement in the future sounds very appealing to me. Another student stated that “Financial literacy is about teaching you money arrangement. Growing up I did have to learn a lot on my own about finances and one of the main difficulties that I still face today is with building credit. I have yet to start a credit at the age of 20. Part of me doesn't find it useful for the time being but I know at some point I will need it. My fear with credit is that I simply don't know where to start and/or how to apply and where to apply.” This
thatassessment and standards were the same across both sections. The upper-level course typicallyfollows a design structure based on writing a series of documents that frame a proposed designproject and then detail discrete plans for its completion. These assignments and a briefdescription are as follows: Request for Proposal: A document meant to frame the need for the project. Students write as if they are an industry partner framing the request for the engineering work that needs to be completed. In COM 420, this document is occasionally drafted in collaboration with real industry partnerships to give students a direct sense of working across institutions. Requirements: A document that outlines the requirements for
” regards interdisciplinary knowledge as one of the core education elementswhen cultivating STEM graduates. Thus, interdisciplinarity has become an increasinglyimportant feature of engineering education over recent decades, and work has begun toextend these efforts from undergraduate to graduate education [5]. Despite multiple interdisciplinary teaching modes being designed to meet this need,critics view interdisciplinary teaching innovation at this stage as lacking novelty, scholarlydepth, methodological rigor, and integrated planning [6]. It has been recommended that thevalue of interdisciplinarity cannot be explained without attention to the subjects valuing itand the inner changes they undergo [7]. However, previous studies of
, committeesmust comprehensively understand the test and its purpose to make fair and informed decisions. Ashift towards a more holistic approach to admissions can help to create a more equitable andaccessible graduate school application process, but engineering program leaders must considerhow such a shift will affect other aspects of the admissions process, such as the resourcesrequired. An institution cannot suddenly shift to a holistic evaluation approach and expect thesame number of faculty or staff to handle the higher workload effectively.We plan to use the results of this study to design a more comprehensive survey that can capturethe perspectives of a wider breadth of faculty at our institution and other institutions. As moreinstitutions adapt to
, she felt the project was properly planned, and resulted in a textbook that can be extremelyuseful for students. She believes that incorporating student examples gives the students a chanceto develop and solve their own problems, which helps in the learning process. The opportunity tohave their work included in a textbook also incentivizes the students to want to participate and dotheir best work for the submissions. She recognizes that there is a range in the complexity andquality of submitted problems, but they are all useful to convey content. She encourages professorsto incorporate OERs and self-generated problems as it is financially economical for students andbeneficial for their learning.Student Researcher BStudent researcher B
).[3] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development andOffice of the Under Secretary, “Advancing Diversity and Inclusion In Higher Education,” 2016.[4] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology,” American Society of Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2021.[5] Q. Ketchum, “Indigenizing ASABE: Why We Should, and How We Can,” ResourceMagazine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 19–22, 2021.[6] G. S. May and D. E. Chubin, “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success forUnderrepresented Minority Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp.27–39, 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00735.x.[7] A. Rattan, K. Savani, M. Komarraju, M. M
need.ResultsSixteen students, 15 first year students and one junior enrolled in the course. Student majorswere widely distributed as shown in Table 1.Number of students Major7 Engineering (civil, electrical, material science, mechanical, nuclear)5 Biology1 Computer Science1 Fashion and Textile Management1 Physics1 PsychologyTable 1: Breakdown of plans of academic study for students enrolled in the courseStudents were given a pre and post survey at the beginning and end of the course. Surveyquestions were divided into three broad categories, self-evaluation of prior knowledge, opinionson the importance of the interaction of
higher for the project report to satisfy theexpectations. The percentage of students receiving 70% or higher grades was calculated. Thepercentages of >90%, >80%, >70%, and <60% were considered exceeding, meeting, minimallymeeting, and not meeting expectations, respectively. Minimally meeting and not meetingexpectations required changes made or plans to do something different in the future, closing theloop for continuous improvement. The assessment for the selected outcome showed that 83% ofthe students received a grade of 70% or higher; therefore, the outcome was met.Students in the Microfabrication course were challenged with the theory and lab experiences.This hands-on course is not common at the undergraduate level. The course was
iteratively “engineer” withoutdoing the prerequisite planning, designing, or calculating that would be necessary in subtractivemanufacturing. It was clear that numerous students were printing, realizing they made amistake, then re-printing. While 3D printing is useful for rapid prototyping, it does not replacerobustness of mechanical design. Moving forward, we felt that this could be addressed byincluding some more direct information on the relative benefits and weakness of additive vs.subtractive manufacturing as well as mandating that certain components be machined insteadof printed.Anecdotally, many students told us that this project was cool and that they were excited towork on it. At our focus group over the summer, we will attempt to gain
of all committee members toindicate their approval. The final report should be submitted by the last day of the semester.The instructor may include the final report in their dossier for the annual review process andadopt the suggestions provided by the committee to improve their teaching practice in the future.The faculty member provides to the committee a written reflection report on the peerobservations including how they plan to make use of the suggestions/recommendations.The committee members review them for the next class visit and verify if the committeerecommendations are adopted by the instructor.Assessment Objectives and MethodologyThis work seeks to assess faculty perceptions of the efficacy of peer observation procedures
Plans and Support for COVID-19 Risk Mitigation MeasuresAmong Parents and Guardians,” Acad Pediatr, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 684–693, May 2021, doi:10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.017.[8] D. J. Deming, C. Goldin, L. F. Katz, and N. Yuchtman, “Can online learning bend thehigher education cost curve?,” American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 496–501, May2015, doi: 10.1257/AER.P20151024.[9] S. W. Hemelt and K. M. Stange, “Why the move to online instruction won’t reducecollege costs,” Brookings, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2020/07/28/why-the-move-to-online-instruction-wont-reduce-college-costs/(accessed Jan. 17, 2023).[10] S. Hubler, “As Colleges Move Classes Online, Families Rebel Against the Cost,” TheNew York Times
, no. 4, pp. 335–361, 2006.[16] A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman, “Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics,” in Knowing, learning, and instruction. Routledge, 2018, pp. 453–494.[17] M. I. Campbell and K. J. Schmidt, “Polaris: An undergraduate online portfolio system that encourages personal reflection and career planning,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 931, 2005.[18] B. Sattler, D. Kilgore, and J. Turns, “I have never spent time to think about what i have gained from my projects: Linking portfolio development and life-long learning,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2010, pp. T3H–1.[19] A. Thompson, B