Science and Engineering (CSE) majors from eight CSEcourses at a large, research-intensive university located in the United States. Five questions about thestudent experience in the current course and their plans for the next course were embedded into largersurveys administered in each of the participating courses. In this paper, we focus on student responses tothe following survey questions: “What are barriers that might prevent you from taking the next coursein this sequence?” and “What makes you feel good about your plans to take the next course in thissequence?” Each of the participating courses serves as a prerequisite course for at least one subsequentcourse (for example: Intro to CS I is a prerequisite for Intro to CS II).We address the
mirrors a statement in factor 2 in which a participant sawthe value of having different people working together to solve a problem—they both note the benefit ofdiversity of thought. The difference between factors appears to be the way in which a generalized notionof diversity is viewed as related to demographic markers of diversity.DiscussionDiversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is ubiquitous in the current computer science higher educationclimate, yet definitions vary, as do perspectives regarding what forms of diversity are valued ineducational spaces. As DEI plans become commonplace for securing federal funding [28], understandinghow students, staff and faculty conceptualize the value of diversity will only increase in importance.The Q-sort
the semester Plan and deseign how to teach the content using active learning Development and adaptation of guidelines in each content areaFigure 1. Stages of the design process of the course to adapt it to an active learning course.In the first stage, the instructor reviews the structure, sequence, and contents of the courseto analyze the topics in which the Modified ILD could be implemented covering thelearning objectives. In the second stage the planning and designing of the course transformsthe lesson plans by incorporating an active methodology
plan to collect data that will help usbetter understand how situational factors might serve as a barrier to epistemic negotiations andhow they interact with the CCE norms.Barrier 2: Differences in Disciplinary KnowledgeThe first epistemic question posed in this meeting was regarding the impact of noise in a casestudy. Case study is a research method that ”...investigates a phenomenon (the ’case’) in depth andwithin its real-world context” [18, p.15]. Once the case has been defined, the researcher definesthe boundaries of the case. These boundaries provide a clear scope for the project and help theresearcher make decisions about what data to include [18].As Team X’s original plan was to use a case study methodology to study traditional, in
discussions of concepts and issues, which makes some team members impatient. 27 It seems as if little is being accomplished with the project’s goals. 29 Although we are not fully sure of the project’s goals, we are excited and proud to be on the team. Questions for the Storming Stage: 2 We are quick to get on with the task on hand and do not spend too much time in the planning stage. 7 The team leader tries to keep order and contributes to the task at hand. 9 We have lots of ideas but don’t use many as we don’t listen but reject before understanding them. 16 Many team members have their own ideas about the process and personal agendas are
still avoid advanced mathematics and sciencerelated courses and careers because they underestimate their capabilities and not becausethey lack competence or skill.”5During the assessment test on the first day, one young lady, named Louise complained toProfessor Hylton that she could not possibly do any of the mechanical advantageproblems. “That’s Physics, I can’t do Physics,” was her comment. Four weeks later,after being exposed to simple mechanical concepts and the associated math necessary toanalyze them, in addition to participating in numerous inquiry based experiments, thestory was different. On the last day of class, Louise was discussing her plans for classesat school that fall, and her hopes to go to college in a science or engineering
forethought phase occurs before learners begin work on the task andinfluences how they engage in the task and their ability to succeed in it. In this phase, thelearners analyze the task, assess their motivational beliefs, and plan strategies to successfullyobtain their goals and complete the task. In the performance phase, the learners undertake thetask, using self-control to adhere to their planned strategies and self-observation to monitor theirprogress and evaluate their work. In the final phase, self-reflection, learners use self-judgmentand self-reaction to reflect on the effectiveness of the strategies they used during the performancephase and their need for future improvements. Causal attributions only affect self-feedbackpositively when
in the list correspond to hierarchically lower categories and provide a foundation to build upon to reach and achieve higher categories. In addition, the taxonomy has a dimension exploring four types of knowledge: factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive. This taxonomy can greatly aid educators in clearly defining course goals to achieve desired learning outcomes, and it also helps align the expectations of students and educators for the learning experience in a course. Thus, Bloom’s taxonomy can also inform the assessment techniques that educators might use to evaluate whether students have truly grasped the planned learning goals. In fact, Bloom’s taxonomy has been applied in an ECE education context. Meda and
addition to his academic and athletic endeavors, Malcolm was the treasurer of the Black Graduate Students Association of RPI where he planned and executed team events and managed the finances of the group. Prior to accepting a position as a GEM Fellow, Malcolm completed four Graduate Assistant Research As- sistant internships at Los Alamos. In addition to his Ph. D. studies, Malcolm continues to pursue available opportunities in learning by auditing courses such as Fusion Energy at Princeton Plasma Physics Labo- ratory and earning certification in courses such as, Neutron Scattering at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Lean / Six Sigma at RPI. American c
. Additionally, she is the 2019 Teacher of the Year for the state of Indiana. Tamara holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and an M.S. in Engineering Technology Education, both from Purdue University.Mrs. Cynthia Murphy-Ortega, Chevron Corporation Cynthia Murphy-Ortega is currently Manager of University Partnerships and Association Relations of Chevron Corporation. Her organization manages Chevron’s relationships with universities and profes- sional societies and institutes throughout the world. Cynthia joined Chevron in 1991 as an engineer with the Richmond Refinery in the San Francisco Bay Area. She held various engineering, maintenance, oper- ations, financial, business planning and process safety management positions
practices at the P-12 level can assist higher education programs with focusing theirsafety instruction on the areas of greatest need for incoming engineering students. This can alsohelp inform collaborate efforts among post-secondary engineering education programs, P-12engineering education programs, and industry partners to address gaps in safety relative toengineering instruction. Introduction Safety has been a critical component of P-12 engineering education programs for decadesas evidenced by its longstanding inclusion in curriculum plans and academic standards datingback to early manual arts and industrial arts programs (which later transitioned to technologyeducation, and most recently
following sections contain a work plan aimed at accomplishing the design of this curriculum.The proposal plan is divided into modules with specific descriptions of the tasks that will help theinstructor to construct and organize the delivery of embedded systems with built-in security. Figure1 illustrates the modules that describes the new curriculum. 4 Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1: Curriculum design modules of secure embedded systemsThe major tasks of designing an embedded systems curriculum
both from Michigan Tech. Her research program involves using complementary methods (e.g., statistical modeling and analytics, psychological assessment) to evaluate how individual differences are important and impact behaviors at a cultural, social, and behavioral level. She has served as a project evaluator in the multiple NSF funded projects. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 S-STEM Student Reflections and IDP ProcessIntroductionStudent reflections and using individual development plans (IDPs) for mentoring have been anintegral part of an NSF S-STEM project focusing on students pursuing baccalaureate degrees inEngineering
. Beyza Akgun, Georgia Institute of Technology Beyza Akgun is a graduate from the Georgia Institute of Technology, where she received a B.S. in Me- chanical Engineering, a minor in Industrial Design, and a concentration in Automotive Engineering in May 2021. During her undergraduate studies, Beyza was involved in Georgia Tech Motorsports, the school’s Formula SAE team, research on prototyping in design, and assistantship in a project-based de- sign course. Following graduation, Beyza accepted a full-time offer at Triumph Integrated Systems in Connecticut as a project engineer, and she plans to further continue her education by pursuing graduate school in the future.Dr. Katherine Fu, Georgia Institute of Technology
to share the teaching load and learn bestpractices from each other such as project design and LMS (online learning management system)usage. This team-teaching model can readily continue even after the pandemic is over.Throughout the course, the instructors met weekly or biweekly to share observations of the classand adjust plans for the next few weeks. Content-wise, the instructors were able to share theirexpertise on different topics in several formats. Besides learning about multiple topics, thestudents conducted two team-projects with typically three students on a team. The first projectwas to build a touchless candy dispenser. We invited community children and their families tovisit the project room, one family at a time, for a safe
). New partners sometimes inquire whether that person could be eliminated from the program to save costs. In short, our answer is a resounding no. This person is the glue that holds the teams and their research together. 3. Team-based research. Projects work best, and the program scales best, when students work in teams. We have found that teams of between 2-4 students maximize the benefits of team-based work, while still making it feasible for students to find time to coordinate and work together. 4. Mentor students on planning their course load while they participate in ERSP. At UCSB, we found that there is a tendency for students to take ERSP as an overload even though they receive elective credit that
system (Author 2018). The pioneering engineering educators atTsinghua emulated the engineering curriculum and instructional methods from the US. Thoughthe teaching was conducted in Chinese, major textbooks and reading materials provided to thestudents were written in English. Programs like electrical engineering and aviation engineeringadapted relevant teaching plans from MIT –including a 4-year Bachelor’s program and the use ofa credit system. For the aircraft program, the general courses and most fundamental professionalcourses of aviation program were almost the same as the mechanical program. Of course, there arealso a wide range of professional bases and less professional courses.(Cao 1999).Based on the Sino-US agreement, Tsinghua started
that also motivated this study. Swivl robot-facilitated classes, as wellas continuous improvement checks, have been well documented in the literature as a means tosupport and promote instructor reflection and development. Initially designed to capturepresentations, the Swivl is a robotic mount for a smart device and remote controlled with adevice called a marker. The Swivl tracks and records the person holding the marker [3].What follows are guiding self-study questions that ultimately facilitate an institutionalcontinuous improvement plan, leveraged with the same formative motivations as the QualityMatters framework. (1) Can course quality be most effectively impacted through a full QM, 43-criterion review or can a subset of QM
change following participation in an integrated learningexperience?Below we describe the intervention, the integrated math, science, and engineering unit, followedby discussing our research methods. Finally, we conclude by examining our findings within thecontext of the literature.Integrated Math, Science, and Engineering UnitThe engineering design process anchored mathematics and science learning throughout ourintegrated unit. Students engaged in lessons to explore science, engineering, and mathematicsinterconnections and designed solutions for a water quality problem. Table 1 provides anoverview of the key topics addressed in the unit. Appendix A displays a lesson plan used to teacha key topic, conservation of mass and operations and algebraic
) learned that construction engineers will focus on “Business,Management & Contracts” (68%), and construction engineering students (ConE) provided “Cost& Budget” (76%) as the most prominent theme described. These themes tie directly to the riskand reward scenarios of different contract types that are presented in lecture, and then practicedin the game. Other themes included: “Planning” (41% CivE, 24% ConE), “Owner/CivilCommunication Coordination” (32% CivE, 35% ConE), “Construction and Execution” (19%CivE, 12% ConE), and “Risks” (14% CivE, 6% ConE). 46% of the CivE responses (n=37) and41% of the ConE responses (n=17) were coded to multiple themes. Most coded categories aresimilar in the percentage of civil and construction engineering
%.It becomes more crucial than ever to study how students perform and behave in classroomenvironments. A deeper understanding of student behavior, motivation, and interest are necessarybefore implementing changes in the curriculum. Student motivation has proven to be an efficient and reliable precursor to measure studentsuccess and persistence in STEM. Motivation is regarded as one of the most influential aspects ofsuccess [20], alongside sound technical knowledge in engineering. Across all disciplines,educators and practitioners have noted the importance of student motivation in producing anengaging learning environment [21]. The impact of student motivation is studied for decades andresearchers have suggested various intervention plans to
Figure 3. Faculty Mentor Goals andmentoring map worksheet was to provide an Expectations of Mentee Worksheetopportunity for mentoring to become a visualexercise, with mentors and mentees co-developing the map that documents career goals,development plans, professional networks to engage with, and identification of resources.Documentation of aspirations, strategies, and resources for goal achievement is an importantaspect of the mentoring process. Mapping these items help mentees and mentors create visualconnections and associate related characteristics and can advance mentoring conversations fromsuperficial to strategic [32], [33].Mentors were additionally provided with a meeting log worksheet to document meetings withmentees
students (n = 46, 23%). In terms of students’ residency, there were moreinternational students (n = 119, 60%) than domestic students (n = 79, 40%). For educationlevel, a similar number of students participated at the master’s level (n = 100, 51%) andthe doctoral level (n = 98, 49%). These representation patterns were similar both in thecomparison and treatment groups.InstrumentWe administered a modified version of the Skills Perception Inventory which was originallydeveloped by Alpay and Walsh 19 . Alpay and Walsh’s inventory was initially developed tomeasure engineering graduate students’ confidence levels after attending three-day work-shops to enhance transferable skills in four areas: 1) communication, 2) group work, 3)project planning and
Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. His re- search interests includes diversity, equity, and inclusion and empathy within the engineering pedagogy.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division
your hand, near your wrist. Watch likely to meet the criteria and Stretch out your arm with your palm as the water droplet rolls off of your constraints of the problem. down and try to balance a pencil on hand, paying attention to which 3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry out fair the back of your hand. Which way direction it travels. As you repeat tests in which variables are controlled does the pencil fall? Repeat the
stress will help us to develop strategies to reduce it as many colleges are planning toimplement the HyFlex model during Spring 2021. In this study, we have two goals: (1) identify the sources of stress for sophomore andjunior level undergraduate students during the Fall 2020 semester and (2) investigate the efficacyof HyFlex instructional tools used in both classes in regard to students’ learning and reducingstress levels during the Fall semester.Class Information and StructureEngineering Physics Engineering Physics - Electricity and Magnetism, is a 5-credit sophomore level calculus-based physics course and is required for most engineering majors. There were a total of 103students enrolled under 5 lab sections during the Fall
practice within engineeringeducation coursework. Activities were related to two 25-minute, video-recorded and transcribeddiscussions facilitated by two veteran teachers. These discussions were facilitated after studentstested their initial designs and before they formally planned their second designs. These post-testing discussions were products of a prior study in which each teacher facilitated a small groupdiscussion with five student avatars to support the students in working collaboratively to critiqueand revise each team’s initial ideas about design performance and improvement.We focus on three features of these discussions, i.e., how teachers encourage students to: (1)engage with other teams about their designs, (2) talk about constraints
widelyacknowledged that graduating engineers require a lot more skills that simply doing workedexamples about a single component of an entire engineering system, such as leadership,teamwork, and communication skills [17,18].Well-planned and well-conceived assessments can provide the opportunity to expand anddevelop these required soft skills at the same time as maintaining the ability to assess courseeffectiveness against ABET student learning outcomes and provide a ranking system of studentsfor future employers. Writing Across the Curriculum [19] is one example of this, where writingand communication exercises are incorporated into all aspects of the curriculum including thetechnical subjects that are often assessed only through worked problems. The
meetsoftware engineering requirements. Rogers suggested several frameworks for guiding learnersthrough reflection. One of these frameworks uses a set of structured questions about a particularexperience, and is the one we use in our study. The work of Schon, Dewey, Moon, and Rogersform our theoretical foundation and we used their ideas as a lens to interpret student reflections.Prior WorkVandegrift et. al. [11] describe an instrument used with an introductory Computer Science coursewith five programming assignments. After the second and third programming assignments theyprompt students to “Write down at least one SPECIFIC plan that you can implement to improveyour software development process”. They found that a majority of students could recognize
workflow, and describesupport for targeted feedback and analysis for the instructors. We present our plans to evaluatethe system, and discuss the results of a preliminary usability study.1. IntroductionRecent studies show problem-solving ability is being increasingly prioritized as a core aspect ofengineering curriculum and a fundamental competency demanded by employers. However, notonly are problem-solving activities time consuming for students, they are also often difficult toassess beyond simply checking for correctness of the final answer. In addition, it is difficult in aclassroom setting to deliver useful feedback [1]. While popular online tutoring frameworks exist[2], [3] that support structures for mathematical problem solving and some