Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Work-in-Progress Session: Exploring Learning and Development in Engineering Courses
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
13
10.18260/1-2--44309
https://peer.asee.org/44309
166
Courtney Faber, Ph.D., is a Research Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She is also the Director of the Fundamentals of Engineering and Computing Teaching in Higher Education Certificate Program. Her research focuses on empowering engineering education scholars to be more effective at impacting transformational change in engineering and developing educational experiences that consider epistemic cognition. She develops and uses innovative research methods that allow for deep investigations of constructs such as epistemic thinking, identity, and agency. Dr. Faber has a B.S. in Bioengineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education from Clemson University and a M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University. Among other awards for her research, she was awarded a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2022 to study epistemic negotiations on interdisciplinary engineering education research teams.
Lorna Treffert is a 1st year Ph.D. student in the Theory and Practice in Teacher Education Department at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She holds both a BS and MS in Industrial and Systems Engineering. Her research interests include facilitating diversity and inclusion within engineering education and applications of operations research in an education context.
Alexis is a PhD student in soil science - they also teach interdisciplinary senior design and are pursuing a certificate in engineering education
Isabel is a third-year student at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville studying biomedical engineering. She has conducted several mixed methods research projects centered around diversity and inclusion in engineering and is interested in pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education.
Chulin Chen is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. He earned his BS and MS in Industrial Engineering and his research interests focus on applying industrial engineering tools and systems thinking approaches within the context of engineering education.
There are three certainties in life: death, taxes, and group projects. Whether working on a team leads to innovative solutions or frustration often depends more on the dynamics amongst team members than the project itself. These dynamics can be especially important on interdisciplinary teams where individuals may have different ways of thinking (or epistemic beliefs) because of their disciplinary backgrounds. These differences are often not addressed because they are misidentified as communication challenges leading to tensions that can prevent the team from reaching their goals. Within the field of engineering education, working on interdisciplinary teams is essential as engineering education practice often comes from the integration of educational research, practice, and industry. We intend to study the epistemic culture of engineering education research (EER) teams, that is, how these teams generate and apply knowledge during their collaboration. In particular, we will examine how EER teams negotiate epistemic differences using an ethnographic case study approach.
For this Work-in-Progress paper, we studied a single interdisciplinary engineering education research team (EER Team) that was conducting a project implementing research into practice. We observed ten recorded EER Team meetings that occurred between 2020 and 2022, and we took field notes to document discussions the EER Team had that focused on using research approaches, planning, or applying knowledge and interactions between EER Team members that added to our understanding of the team dynamics.
From our field notes, we identified multiple instances that were epistemic in nature (i.e., centered around approaches to knowledge generation or application). Some of these instances were collaborative, with members of the EER Team sharing and integrating their ideas. Other instances revealed barriers to collaborative epistemic negotiations. To gain insight into why some of these interactions were collaborative while others were not, we applied Longino’s critical contextual empiricism (CCE) model. This model defines the four norms of an idealized interdisciplinary knowledge community. These norms are 1) providing venues for criticism, 2) uptaking criticism, 3) recognizing public standards, and 4) maintaining tempered intellectual equality.
In this Work-in-Progress paper, we will present our analysis and discussion of three instances using Longino’s CCE model. The first instance represents a collaborative negotiation, where members of the EER Team were open to different justifications of how to move forward with data collection, allowing us to see how this team enacted elements of the CCE model. The other two instances represent non-collaborative epistemic negotiations, where we observed a lack of criticism venues and an imbalance of intellectual equality. This work provides the foundation for future epistemic negotiations studies on engineering education research teams.
Faber, C. J., & Treffert, L., & Gillmore, A., & Boyd, I. A., & Chen, C. (2023, June), Work in Progress: Making Engineering Education Teams more Effective: An Exploration of a Nearly Epistemic Negotiation Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44309
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015