organizationally aware engineer.Regarding the Myers-Briggs (MB) personality types and work-life, Kroeger and Thuesen [1]explained how the 16 Jungian personality types determine one’s success on the job. In particular,it is often noted that two types, ESFP and ENFP have the strongest people skills due to their E =Extaversion (focus on people and external environment), F = Feeling (make decisions based onhuman values and empathy for others), and P = Perceiving (react to events in a flexible,spontaneous way). The S = Sensing types and N = Intuitive types among E_FPs are evenlydivided (about 5% each) in entry-level employees according to Kroeger and Thuesen. A study at
. The union representing poultry workers are concerned with theincreased work requirements since the injury rate in this sector exceeds a third higher than theaverage for all manufacturing industries (59% of line workers already have carpal tunnelsyndrome at line speeds of 70 to 91 birds a minute). The students developed an educational gamewith at least three variables (independent) affecting quality (positive and negative) and ethics.Figure 1 illustrates one such game board. The objective of this game is to "maximize" companyprofit while improving quality by selecting TQM variable percentages (increasing or decreasingvalues) for the three independent variables chosen namely, Production Rate, Inspectors, andEmployees. The game is designed
particularconcepts. Once these claims are explicated, it is possible to determine how well developers’claims about what is intended to be measured can be supported with empirical and analyticevidence.5 Generally, CI developers make three claims about their inventories. Following are theclaims and examples of methods to validate each particular claim. 1. Overall mastery of all concepts represented in the CI. This claim asserts that (1) overall performance on the inventory measures the focal domain knowledge and that (2) individual items provide coherent data that can be aggregated into an overall measure of performance. Researchers can evaluate this claim in three ways. First, the investigators can determine the
) helpful when solving other problems in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) subjects in school (Table 1.). Table 1. Pre and Post Robotics Camp Surveys (n=510) Scale for Surveys: 1=Not at all 2= A Little 3= Somewhat 4= Very 5= ExtremelyPRE CAMP SURVEY QUESTIONS Question 1 2 3 4 5 Total6. Please rate your awareness of career options inadvanced manufacturing. 6 53 130 173 114 40 5107. Please rate your interest in a career in advancedmanufacturing. 7 37 131 163 123 56 5108. Please rate how realistic you feel careers in
problemsolving. Recommendations include interviewer training on how to ask follow-up questions tomotivation-related utterances.IntroductionDespite considerable research in engineering education, there is still much to uncover withregard to how students learn, what they learn, and why they learn it. While there is a wealth ofdata on cognition, metacognition, and teaching strategies (all examples of the how), andmisconceptions, conceptual change, and curriculum development (all examples of the what),motivation (example of the why) still remains understudied by comparison. Epistemologicallysound qualitative research approaches to study complex learning and motivation interactions arelikewise underrepresented in engineering education research 1. As part of
lives, theopportunities for careers are expanding rapidly. A major challenge of this field is the trainingand education of a new generation of skilled workers. This paper studies different approachesthat are used by different institutions of higher education to integrate nanotechnology conceptsinto their curriculum.IntroductionNanotechnology is the science, engineering, and technology that deals with various structures ofmatter that have dimensions on the order of a billionth of a meter. Nanotechnology is the abilityto observe, manipulate, measure, and manufacture things at the nanoscale, which is about 1 to100 nanometers. While the word nanotechnology is new and was introduced in the late 1970s,the existence of functional devices and
further engagestudents in their coursework and to introduce freshman to some of the basic concepts ofengineering. A form of “student-centered education” where the instructor acts as a guide to theexperiential learning process is preferred over the traditional class lecture format according toSpencer & Mehler[10]. Hixson[4] refer to this as instructor “role-modeling,” where the instructoradvises and nudges the students through a thought process. The decisions are ultimately made bythe students and they are the owners of their solution. The research presented by Ambrose[1]similarly advocates the use of experiential learning opportunities. To better provide students withtimely feedback, the in-class methods of peer instruction, case studies, and
assistance to other sites using the materials. An outlineof the CBI challenge and how the challenge supported course content for the systems thinkingand water science courses are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The CBI challenges for the other coursesare listed in Table 3. The computer science was not completed and is currently underdevelopment for implementation in 2015.Table 1: Challenge and Outline of Systems Thinking Course Systems Thinking Challenge: Model and build a functional low temperature difference Stirling engine from everyday household materials Weekly Module Content Connection to CBI Challenge 1. Systems Introduction and The term system is introduced to students in the context of Basic Theory a
formasked about instructor and faculty members’ experiences teaching ethics and what resources andtools they have or would find valuable. Initial results from this request suggest that instructorsand faculty find case studies to be the most useful item for teaching ethics (see Figure 1 in theAppendix), and that a simple and straightforward contribution process would encourage them tocontribute materials (see Figure 2). The leadership team will be working to get more feedbackfrom faculty and instructors in the sciences, because engineering was over represented in theresponses.To get a better idea of the OEC’s existing audiences, staff also created and posted an audiencequestionnaire on the OEC. This questionnaire asked about people’s discipline
team cannot be included.Highlights of each semester will be provided in order to enable a comparisonacross the teams. As shown in Table 1, during the first semester studentsconducted an in-depth literature review of each of the topics. Based on theirfindings and interest, two topics were selected for use: Acid Mine Drainage(AMD) and Flowback water from hydraulic fracking (Fracking). The AMD teamwas comprised of two biology, one mathematic, one civil engineering, twochemical engineering, and two electrical engineering students. The fracking teamcontained: one biology, one chemistry, one civil engineering, two computerengineering, and one mathematics undergraduate. Both teams had all of therequisite skills and background to complete the
. Page 26.1665.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Using Graphical Data Presentation Techniques to Improve Student Learning, Program Assessment, and TeachingAbstractPrior to 1997, ABET evaluators focused on inputs to engineering education. Responding to afour decade trend in quality management systems used in manufacturing and service industries,ABET began measuring outputs instead, and focused on continuous improvement. Students,professors, program coordinators, and department chairs must answer three questions: [1] whatare we doing well, [2] what are we not doing well, and [3] how do we improve? In some cases,we can use graphical data presentation techniques to answer these
rising and the need for flexibility at theforefront, the professors decided it was time to embrace the task of establishing an online course.This enrollment trend for the course is outlined in Figure 1 where data from the last five years isreflected. It can be seen that the enrollment is trending upwards, and this continued growthovercame the resource capabilities of the university for presenting this course in a single setting.The facilities available allowed for enrollments of 330 in the fall semester and 216 for the springsemester. Markers are shown where separate offerings were introduced that allowed foradditional increases. Five Year Enrollment Trend 450
easy-to-use tool7. Since its release, MS project hasbeen very popular in the construction industry due to its ease of use, however it has yet tobecome the number one PMS7,12-13. MS Project also gives the user full control with the rightblend of usability and flexibility. One key advantage of the MS Project PMS is its full integrationwith the Microsoft Office family, which makes reporting very easy. However, MS Project is stillused only by about a quarter of the construction industry, as shown in Figure 1. Others, 19% MS Primavera, Project
research labs, working on commercialproduct ideas, or designing equipment for undergraduate teaching labs. This investigation isrestricted to projects related to teaching laboratories. Capstone teams are particularly valuable fordeveloping equipment for labs that are small, for elective courses, and for courses that need a Page 26.1414.3hands on component without having a physical lab space. Since 1995 there have been 14different project teams that have been tasked with designing equipment and experiments for theteaching laboratories, including 3 projects that are currently underway. These projects, listed inTable 1 below, have varied from
capstone design, including their experiences with mentors, thechallenges they faced, their beliefs about what they learned, and their perceived level ofpreparation for the future. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzedusing an open coding process.Preliminary findings suggest that students perceive a wide range of both technical andprofessional learning gains, many of which align with intended course outcomes. Overall, sixsalient themes emerged in students’ discussion of their learning: 1) development of anengineering identity; 2) knowledge of the design process; 3) connections to the “real world”; 4)project management; 5) self-directed learning; and 6) teamwork skills. While several of theseoutcomes intersect with those
practices.Pre-Test Results: Our analysis revealed that before the teachers (N = 347) entered the i-STEMprofessional development offering they had very limited knowledge of core practices. When asked to listcore practices some responded with answers such as, “I have no knowledge of this.” and “Givebackground on rockets, watching videos, building rockets, discuss how and why they flew the farthest,redo and re-fly.” and “Not sure what you mean by "practices."” In contrast, when asked to rate their levelsof knowledge of the math practices (on a scale of 1 – 10) the average rating was 5.67 (SD = 2.21) andknowledge of science/engineering practices was 2.62 (SD = 2.00). Responses indicated that the teachersrated their knowledge as moderate in math and low in
theparticipants. Variety measures the size of the solution space spanned during the conceptgeneration process.Because problems can vary from one to another, the metrics were equated using the LinearEquating equation from ETS 34. By making the problems equivalent, the results from differentproblems become comparable.Experimental MethodsLongitudinal StudyThe four-year longitudinal experiment examines how the design self-efficacy and creativity ofmechanical engineering students changes over time 1. The experiment lasted from Spring 2011 toSpring 2014. Both the design self-efficacy and creativity studies have two separate pieces:within-subjects and between-groups data. The within-subjects study compares the results ofstudents who generated solutions for the
these five values in theirreport.1 A search of academic integrity policies at large, research institutions yields different, butoverlapping definitions. Example partial definitions include, “intellectual honesty,”2 “honestyand responsibility in scholarship,”3 and “honest and responsible scholarship.”4 Despite theconsistency found in institutional definitions of academic integrity, there may be littleconsistency in the beliefs held by students and faculty. For example, while faculty see actingethically and avoiding cheating as the same constructs, students disassociate the idea of integrityfrom their behaviors.5 If instructors are to help foster academic integrity and ethics in theirclassrooms, then it seems that a more structured approach is
important as instructors try to design and understand strategies for creating inclusivelearning environments.Fostering an inclusive learning environment is a goal of engineering educators, especially at thefirst-year level. First, research has shown that feeling a sense of belonging is an essentialcomponent to retention. According to a recent White House report, students leaving science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) cite an uninviting atmosphere along with lackof topic relevance as top reasons for leaving the field.1 This may be addressed by acknowledgingthis deterrent and putting forth intentional efforts to create a culturally-relevant and inclusiveclimate for all students.Second, as students enter university, they bring with
required mechanics sequence in a new integrated format to sophomores beginningwith the Fall 2009 semester. As shown in Table 1, the classical sequence of coursework insubjects of Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Solids, Fluid Mechanics, and Civil EngineeringMaterials was replaced with a series of three four credit courses. An overview of this curriculumrestructuring process is provided by Glynn et al.1 and Wadzuk et al.2 A Body of Knowledge(BOK) approach was used to identify the key concepts to be included in the three new courses.3 Page 26.780.2 Table 1 – Old and new mechanics curricula in CEE at Villanova University
. Furthermore, ifmost students favor or wind up in a Start alone, End together model of studying on their own ininformal academic activity, this would suggest the need for faculty and other instructors tostructure team or group activities to allow for a period of working alone before progressingtoward building genuine and productive teamwork among members of a group.IntroductionWorking together as a team has distinct benefits over working alone. In the educational context,working together in a learning-by-doing mode leads to more active learning, greater retention,increased motivation, improved communication skills, and strengthened interpersonal skills overmore solitary learning styles.1 Yet, when students form groups, whether via faculty
development.Introduction Times have changed. There is a new message emerging. The future of engineering, and some would say of society, depends on its delivery. The new message starts with the recognition that engineering design is a social and humanistic field, as well as a technical and scientific one; and that, like other professions, human impact is placed at the center of the process [1].This excerpt is taken from Diane Rover’s Journal of Engineering Education AcademicBookshelf review of the National Academy of Engineering’s (NAE) Changing the Conversationreport. The conclusion of Rover’s article, much like the report she reviews, is clear – “in an ageof ‘messaging’”, messages have the power to transform engineering education.A
from engineering majors1. Data from our local site indicate that 82% of engineeringstudents return for the second year, while only about 69% continue into the third year, whilethere is a much smaller attrition rate between the third and fourth years2 (see Figure 1). Nationaldata on engineering student retention is typically reported for students persisting until the eighthsemester, and has been shown to range from 38% to 52% across a range of institutions3.Consequently, direct comparisons between the local site and national averages are not possible. Page 26.1021.2 Leave 1st year
engineer.” They also felt thatempathetic and caring faculty were helpful in motivating students to learn, and felt that empathyand care were already included in engineering coursework.Research QuestionsThe goal of this study was to better characterize faculty who are engaged in LTS. The specificresearch questions being explored were: 1. How has the number and type of engineering faculty who are active in LTS changed over time? a. It is hypothesized that given changes in generational values, younger engineering faculty are more likely to embrace LTS. However, the typical model at research- intensive universities places more value on research as compared to teaching and service, which
-year colleges and universities and howstudents’ innovative capability influences such transfer capacity. The goals are: (1) to explore thepedagogical practices used to support non-traditional students in community colleges to informpersistence, (2) to understand whether such practices are effective in offering non-traditionalstudents a program that enables them to stay in engineering and science majors and to transfer toa four year college or university, and (3) to determine if students’ propensity for innovativeproblem solving influences use of pedagogical practices and ultimately, transfer persistence. Theresearch targets five research questions: (1) What are the patterns of pedagogical practices thatcommunity colleges employ to enhance
. Page 26.1773.2INTRODUCTIONThroughout history there have been many attempts to provide an incentive to graduate fromcollege as fast as possible in order to optimize the different resources available to students.1 Whencompared, some of these incentives have been more effective than others.2 Undergraduate studentstake longer than expected to graduate with a 4-year undergraduate degree.Specifically at The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) students take longer than the nationalaverage3 to graduate4. Some of the factors for this delay are: social setting (commuter campus),low-income student population, cohort is not as homogeneously defined as in a residential campus,and the lack of available data to the operator or the agents. In some cases the
, including stem cell and developmental biology, cell culture and tissue engineering,immunofluorescence, cell transplantation and animal manipulation, and microscopy. Through thecommon core coursework, students develop laboratory skills, while also developing anappreciation for primary literature and stem cell research - from its historical roots to the latestcontemporary studies.After the coursework, the students complete a 1-week intensive Stem Cell Techniques Course atthe Scripps Research Institute3. During this experience, students are trained in human pluripotentstem cell culture, embryoid body development, directed cellular differentiation, and other hands-on skills for working with and evaluating stem cells. After the training, students embark
, business,and design are well-suited to urban problems); and we have a history of collaborativeinteractions with various city departments that play a vital role in maintaining and improvingurban infrastructure.In fall 2014, the urban systems IPRO had 35 students, representing several engineeringdisciplines, architecture, psychology, business, and the sciences. The sequence of major tasks forthe semester (Figure 1) guided students through a multistep process including problemdefinition, exploratory prototyping, and project execution, all culminating in a final presentationat a campus-wide IPRO exposition. Weeks 1 -‐ 4: Weeks 5 -‐ 6: Weeks 7 -‐ 9: Weeks 10 -‐ 13: Examine
to the additive manufacturing resources, capabilities, capacities, and products that could be produced. They were then introduced to several processes underway, including the one with which they would be engaged during the balance of the event. The introduction also included supervised processing and post-processing. Once a level of participant hands-on confidence with 3D printing was achieved, they were provided the opportunity to process canned products, which they could have personalized, and then 3D print the designs they developed. During the end of the last session of the event, the participants were administered a post-event poll to, on a 1-4 scale, gage their satisfaction with the event and to ascertain their plans for the
featuring their classroom professor and students who wereinstead exposed to a non-local professor. Additionally, an end of course survey revealed that ingeneral students had no preference for who was featured in the videos. Further refinement of theclass materials management system and the inclusion of additional course modules areopportunities to improve and further validate this study.Section 1: IntroductionOver the last several decades, more and more U. S. students are enrolling in college, with nearlyforty percent of Americans obtaining at least a two-year college degree1,2. The United States haslong been the leader in higher education, boasting a majority of the top universities and collegesin the world3. As the economy moves away from an