Torres, A., & Sriraman, V., & Humphries, E., & Adams, E. (2015, June), Peer Teaching in Construction Project Management Scheduling  Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24557

\bibitem{asee_peer_24557}
  Torres, A., \& Sriraman, V., \& Humphries, E., \& Adams, E. (2015, June), \emph{Peer Teaching in Construction Project Management Scheduling}
  Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington.
  10.18260/p.24557

Anthony Torres, Vedaraman Sriraman, Evan  Humphries, and Eric Adams.  "Peer Teaching in Construction Project Management Scheduling".  2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2015.  https://peer.asee.org/24557 Internet.  12 Jan, 2025

\bibitem{asee_peer_24557}
  Anthony Torres, Vedaraman Sriraman, Evan  Humphries, and Eric Adams.
  "Peer Teaching in Construction Project Management Scheduling".
  \emph{2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2015.
  https://peer.asee.org/24557 Internet.  12 Jan, 2025

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_24557
author = "Anthony Torres, Vedaraman Sriraman, Evan  Humphries, and Eric Adams"
title = "Peer Teaching in Construction Project Management Scheduling"
booktitle = "2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2015"
month = "June"
address = "Seattle, Washington"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/24557}
number = {10.18260/p.24557}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -           Peer-Teaching in Construction Project Management Scheduling                        Anthony Torres and Vedaraman Sriraman                                         AbstractA peer-teaching method has been implemented in Construction Project ManagementScheduling (CPMS) course that focuses on Project Management Software (PMS)learning. The two graduate students that were enrolled in the CPMS course were requiredto learn and teach the PMS package, Primavera, to the remaining undergraduate studentsin the course. This learning method promotes topic retention, as the student is required tobe the expert on the topic. The results were verified through in-course surveys,comparative assignment grades, and graduate student reflection summary. The resultsshow that the graduate students not only enjoyed teaching the topic, but they feel thatthey learned more by the employed teaching method. Additionally, the results show thatthe undergraduates students’ learning was not adversely affected by having their fellowstudents teach the topic. The survey also indicates that the undergraduate’s studentspreferred the peer-teaching method to standard professor lecture and demonstration. Thepaper concludes with recommendations for future work.
AU  - Anthony Torres
AU  - Vedaraman Sriraman
AU  - Evan  Humphries
AU  - Eric Adams
CY  - Seattle, Washington
DA  - 2015/06/14
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Peer Teaching in Construction Project Management Scheduling
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/24557
DO  - 10.18260/p.24557
ER  -