– extremely)Post survey items to measure engineering self-efficacy (response options strongly disagree – strongly agree): I will be able to achieve most of the engineering-related goals that I have set for myself When facing difficult tasks within engineering, I am certain that I will accomplish them I believe I can succeed at most any engineering-related endeavor to which I set my mind I am confident that I can perform effectively on many engineering-related tasksPost survey items to measure commitment to engineering (response options): I have no doubt that I will graduate with a degree in engineering (strongly disagree – strongly agree) It is my intention to pursue a career in engineering (strongly disagree – strongly agree
Paper ID #44329Appreciative Inquiry as an Intervention for Equity-Centered EngineeringEducation Research and PraxisAnn Shivers-McNair, University of Arizona Ann Shivers-McNair is associate professor and director of professional and technical writing in the Department of English and affiliated faculty in the School of Information at the University of Arizona, on the lands of the Tohono O’odham and Pascua Yaqui.Gimantha N. Perera, North Carolina State University Gimantha Perera is a Sri Lankan born researcher and educator from NC State University. He was inspired to be an engineer by his maternal grandfather Anil, who
Paper ID #38491A Case Study: Making Facilitates an Engineering Student’s(Re)Negotiation with Her Disciplinary RelationshipsMs. Yume Menghe Xu, Tufts University Menghe (Yume) is a PhD student in STEM Education at Tufts University and a research assistant at Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach . She holds a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in Chemical System Engineering from the University of Tokyo, Japan. Prior to pursuing a PhD at Tufts, she designed and developed educational apps for children, and worked with students, teachers, and mak- erspace in Japan to host making workshops using various materials and
Paper ID #37984Board 152: An Analysis of School District Adoption of K-12 EngineeringCurriculum (Evaluation) (DEI)Dr. Michael R. Odell, University of Texas at Tyler Michael R.L. Odell, Ph.D. is a Professor of STEM Education and holds the endowed Roosth Chair in Ed- ucation. Dr. Odell holds a joint appointment in the College of Education and Psychology and the College of Engineering. He is currently the Co-Coordinator for the Ed.D. in School Improvement program and the Co-Director of the UTeach STEM Teacher Preparation Program. Dr. Odell has published numerous articles, book chapters, proceedings, and technical reports.Li Feng
/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs -2020-2021/ (accessed Nov. 02, 2021).2. N. A. of Engineering and N. A. of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004. doi: 10.17226/10999.3. ASEE, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering: Phase 1 Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives,” ASEE, 1, May 2013. Accessed: Oct. 27, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://tuee.asee.org/phase-i/report/4. Y. Moghaddam, H. Demirkan, and J. Spohrer, T-Shaped Professionals: Adaptive Innovators. Hampton, NJ: Business Expert Press, 2018.5. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: The National Academies
diverse backgrounds, further disrupting efforts to form capableteams in those STEM enterprises.Historically, many diversity-focused interventions have centered on “fixing” the marginalizedminority to cope with the unwelcoming cultures in which they are situated. Instead, theinterventions in this project attempt to change the culture such that it respects and valuesdiversity in all of its forms.Leveraging diversity as a tool for confronting complex and persistent societal problems willtherefore require engineering and computer science educators to be attentive to priming allstudents to work on diverse teams and be committed to addressing matters of equity within theirrespective fields. With this in mind, the ultimate purpose of our 5-year
Paper ID #33505Quality Mentorship Matters: An Innovative Approach to Supporting StudentSuccess in Engineering Undergraduate ResearchDr. Eleazar Marquez, Rice University Eleazar Marquez is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Rice University.Dr. Samuel Garcia Jr., NASA EPDC Dr. Samuel Garc´ıa Jr. is an Education Specialist at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center and Assistant Profes- sor of Practice for the LBJ Institute for Education and Research. Dr. Garc´ıa helps facilitate professional development to both formal and informal STEM educators utilizing NASA resources with a specific focus
Paper ID #33887Burning Bridges: Considerations from a Structure-agency Perspective forDeveloping Inclusive Precollege Engineering ProgrammingJacqueline Handley, University of Michigan Jacqueline (Jacquie) Handley is a doctoral candidate at the University of Michigan School of Education focusing on Science Education. Prior to her doctoral work, she studied Biomaterials Engineering, earning a B.S. from the University of Illinois and M.S. from the University of Chicago. Her research interests are in the historical and cultural nature of engineering, and how that translates into pre-college learning environments. Her current
Paper ID #32918A Sojourn of Engineering Identity Conflict: Exploring IdentityInterference Through a Performative LensDr. Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso Cole Joslyn is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and Lead- ership at The University of Texas at El Paso. His research emphasizes humanizing engineering education, particularly 1) increasing Latinx students’ sense of belonging in engineering by a) integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and Latinx cultural assets and values into educational success strate- gies, and b) understanding how
to field trips and interacting with fellow students and mentors. While they acknowledge that they’ve learned a lot from participating in the research project, they believe that future projects have opportunities to contribute more to an increased understanding of HPC and engineering. All projects are computational in nature, and some of our students are not comfortable with the amounts of mathematical, engineering or programming background required. Challenges like this take away time for practicing HPC skills. Above all, since the duration of this REU site is only a short 10 weeks, so mentors and site directors must be mindful of what can be reasonably accomplished during the 10 weeks and set the
through participation in multidisciplinary teams and active engineering projectmanagement; 4) Build professional skills in background research & written, pictorial, and oralcommunication methods, among others.The course has been designed keeping in mind a balance between professional and technicalskills with an emphasis on the connection between engineering and society, including activelearning, and tying learning outcomes to ABET criteria. It is a one-time course, nocourse/sequence or prior experience is required. Most of the students who take the course arefirst-year engineering students however the enrollment allows students in different class standing(sophomore, junior) and students of other majors interested in switching to
opportunities to discuss DEI topics in their work lives,with some only having the EEFG meetings and book discussions as outlets. Some found that it isdifficult to have discussions over Zoom, citing body language as a barrier that remote meetingshave difficulty overcoming. Techniques that were particularly useful for these participants wereintroducing DEI topics in direct relation to the engineering discipline and design considerations,along with integrating important historically diverse engineers related to national heritagemonths throughout the year, e.g., Black History Month or Hispanic Heritage Month. Participantswere also more mindful of the graphics they use in their presentations and examples they use intheir classrooms to be more
to validate the findings and to learn how minority stu-lished during the summer and carries over into the academic dents persist in pursuing an engineering or computer scienceyear. During the academic year, HOME Program stu- degree. As for data collected on leadership roles, awards re-dents participate in monthly gatherings in where they partici- ceived, employment, and enrollment in graduate programs,pate in various professional development workshops. HOME the authors propose that a unique senior exit survey be imple-Program students begin to develop relationships with like- mented. In addition, because of the manageable size of stu-minded individuals and these relationships are often main
Paper ID #28033Full Paper: Implementing Classroom-Scale Virtual Reality into a FreshmanEngineering Visuospatial Skills CourseDr. Jonathan R. Brown, Ohio State University Jonathan Brown (B.S., M.S. Mathematics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Ph.D. Mate- rials Engineering, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology) is a research scientist in the Depart- ment of Chemical Engineering and a lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. His background is in computer simulations and theory of polymer glasses and block copolymers for energy applications. He teaches
R.K. Wats, “Developing Soft Skills in Students,” International Journal of Learning, pp. 1-10, 15 (12), 2009.[5] S. Chikumba, “Development of Soft Engineering Skills for Industrial Engineering Technologists through Effective Mentoring,” WACE 17th World Conference on Cooperative & Work-Integrated Education, Philadelphia, PA, 2011. Available: http://www.waceinc.org/philly2011/conference_proceedings/Refereed%20Papers/South %20Africa/STEADY~1.PDF. [Accessed Oct. 8, 2021][6] J.S. Brown, A. Collins and P. Duguid, “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning,” Educational researcher, 18 (1), pp. 32-42, 1989.[7] L.S. Vygotsky, “Socio-cultural Theory,” Mind in Society, 6, pp
Paper ID #17785Society of Women Engineers (SWE) Welding and Machining Day: Women’sConfidence with Individual Hands-On ManufacturingMs. Stacy Lynn Mann, Kettering University Stacy Mann is a second degree senior level student at Kettering University and creator of the April 2016 SWE Machining and Welding Day. She received a bachelor of arts with honor and highest distinction in 2011 from the University of Michigan in Anthropology and Asian Studies with a concentration in Chinese Studies. She is now pursuing a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering.Dr. Diane L Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant
indicated, the program included a rigorous daily evaluation of (a) the overall effectivenessof the in-class lectures and related training, as well as (b) the overall relevance of the coveredtopics, hands-on workshops, and team exercises - both toward empowering students to address thewater engineering challenges at hand (Figure 3b). Most offered lectures appear to have beenperceived as effective in students’ minds, and that should not come as a surprise given the fact thelecturers were instructed to highlight the connections between the presented background materialand the following hands-on exercises. Students have assessed ~20% of the workshops theyattended as highly relevant to the open-ended water engineering design challenges. Interestingly
experience. […] The practice of choosing the right language to speak with others outside of engineering will be vital while working in our fields once we graduate and the kid wind project allowed for us engineers to practice that.Finally, students reflected that working on multidisciplinary teams improved their listening skillsand gained open-mindedness. In order to make the team work while creating and revising the lessons, we had to be open minded and listen to each other as we had completely different backgrounds and specialties.Although 91.3% of students reported that they gained or enhanced their communication skills inthis project, only three students responded that it was the most valuable part of the project. Thestudent reflections
with evening midterm exams.DiscussionStudents surveys consistently show that the Peer Advisers are the strength of the first-yearseminar. The average score when students are asked to agree with the statement “Your peeradviser provided support to you in your transition to the University and School of Engineering”are greater than 4.2/5 in every quarter (Table 3). With this in mind, much of the effort of theengineering academic advising team has focused on increasing Peer Adviser satisfaction. Theposition of the PA Coordinator was created to help coordinate communication between NewStudents and Family Programs, engineering academic advising, and PAs. The PA Coordinator isan additional resource for PAs looking for help with content, students of
prison: Vintage, 2012.[25] P. C. Gorski. (n.d., February 04). Circles of my multicultural self. Available: http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/activities/circlesofself.html[26] J.A. Mejia, I. Villanueva, and R. A. Revelo, Using literacy to identify hidden factors that compromise equitable and effective engineering education, In Proceedings of the 2018 American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New York, 2018.[27] K. Boykin. (2007, September 05). Have the folks at intel lost their minds? Available: http://thenewblackmagazine.com/view.aspx?index=939[28] G. Ladson-Billings and W. F. Tate, "Toward a critical race theory of education," Teachers College Record, vol. 97, pp. 47-68, 1995.[29] E
students with challenging behaviors in STEM [14].Conclusion In the concluding evaluation of the Contemporary STEM Issues course, students majoringin math and science education were able to embrace the concepts, strategies, and mindsets oftechnical professionals (engineers, lab scientists/mathematicians, information technologists, 8computer scientists, etc.) and apply this knowledge to integrating engineering into secondaryeducation curriculum/lesson plans. Evaluative reflections demonstrated the mind-set change thatoccurs in pre-service students when exposed to STEM training and provided some aspects toconsider for future
an attempt to not only fill the holes regarding the topic ofengineering that the students might experience, but to also discover the most effective way toteach this growing subject area to a different community of students than typically considered.A Note on Deafness and Language FacilitationThis program is unique as we tailored each activity to the abilities, skills and interests weassumed might be present for the group of deaf students we worked with. Keeping in mind thelittle importance and relevance sound-related activities would hold with our students, wemodified existing activities to include as much visual interest as possible. Each module began byintroducing the engineering discipline of focus and related applications of that
Paper ID #13184Facilitating successful global research among Engineering and Technologyscholars: The case study of agricultural supply chainDr. Shweta Chopra, Iowa State University Dr. Shweta Chopra is currently an assistant professor in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering De- partment at Iowa State University. She has Ph.D. in Industrial Technology from Technology Leadership and Innovation Department at Purdue University, Masters of Material Science and Engineering from Rochester Institute of Technology and Bachelors in Polymer Engineering from Pune University. Her re- search areas are lean manufacturing for small and
. Bibliography1. D’Andrade, R. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion, ed. R. Shweder and R. Levine. 88–119.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2. Kroeber, A.L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology Papers 47.3. Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. 1988. Systematic data collection. Vol. 10, Qualitative Research Methods Series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.4. Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 5-22.5. Fryberg, S. C., & Markus, H. R. (2007). Cultural models of
may signify a core societalbelief in the capability of technology to solve human problems. Indeed, the popularity oftechnological approaches to education as well as health and fitness may be indicative of thismindset. Page 26.1339.2Perhaps these inroads are reminiscent of what Seymour Papert cautions against in A Critique ofTechnocentrism in Thinking About the School of the Future, an essay on the unscrupulousincorporation of technology in the classroom. In the essay, Papert presents a poignant definitionof technocentrism that may be salient for all engineers to be mindful of: the fallacy of referringall questions to technology.4This paper
Paper ID #12603Rising Sophomore Abroad Program: A Model for Professional Formation ofGlobally Competent EngineersMs. Andrea M. Ogilvie P.E., Virginia Tech Andrea M. Ogilvie, P.E. is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Department of En- gineering Education at Virginia Tech. Andrea’s research mission is to broaden participation in STEM and her current research interests are focused on understanding the relationship between institutional pol- icy and student pathways in engineering (i.e. access, recruitment, persistence, retention, migration, and degree completion). Prior to joining Virginia Tech
development and program assessment, the Committee identifiedthree guiding principles. According to these recommendations2 engineering education should 1)emphasize engineering design; 2) incorporate important and developmentally appropriatemathematics, science, and technology knowledge and skills; and 3) promote engineering “habitsof mind.”The majority of research studies focus on measureable outcomes of K-12 engineering educationprograms. Some have focused on enhanced engineering career awareness.3,4 Others havefocused on increased understanding of engineering design principles.5,6 Yet others have focusedon increased awareness of the ways engineers apply science and mathematics functions andprocedures.7 In all, these assessments of children’s
Paper ID #16486Measuring the Impact of Service-Learning Projects in Engineering: HighSchool Students’ PerspectivesTamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of Johns Hopkins and Stanford University. Originally trained as a biomedical engineer, she spent years in the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer
9 43% Multidisciplinary 1 5% Nuclear 1 5% Total Participants 21ResultsWe analyzed our transcripts with the following research questions in mind: 1. Why do veterans pursue a Bachelor’s degree in engineering? 2. How do military experiences shape student veterans’ educational experiences? 3. What are the experiences of student veterans in engineering education?Our thematic analysis indicates that military veterans pursue engineering based on (1) previousexperiences with engineering-related activities while in the military, (2) recommendations fromfamily and friends, (3) the intellectual challenge they
Paper ID #16339Developing an Affordable and Reconfigurable Experimental Platform for Teach-ing Engineering Lab CoursesDr. Collins Adetu, Florida A&M University Collins Adetu received his BSc in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Florida A&M University in 2005. After graduating with his Bachelor’s degree, he worked in industry before returning to Florida A&M University to complete his MSc and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His research interests include robotic controls, teleoperation, and haptics.Dr. Camilo Ordonez, Florida State University Camilo Ordonez received the B.S