series of mixed-methods projects on diversity in the academic workforce.Dr. Robin Andreasen, University of Delaware Robin O. Andreasen (Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Madison) is Associate Professor of Linguistics and Cognitive Science. She earned her PhD in philosophy and specializes in philosophy of science, philosophy of social science, and in science and policy. A race and gender scholar, Dr. Andreasen is research director and co-PI for UD’s ADVANCE-IT grant.Dr. Sue Giancola, University of Delaware Dr. Sue Giancola joined the Center for Research in Education and Social Policy (CRESP) in 2017 after working over 20 years as an evaluator in both academia and private business. Her career has largely been focused on
Paper ID #24988Familial Influences Affecting Student Pathways to Engineering at Two-Yearand Four-Year InstitutionsMiss Julia Machele Brisbane, Clemson University Julia Brisbane is a senior undergraduate student majoring in Bioengineering at Clemson University, and a full-time undergraduate research intern with the SC:SUPPORTED (Statewide Coalition: Supporting Un- derrepresented Populations in Precalculus through Organization Redesign Toward Engineering Diversity, NSF Award #1744497) project. She plans to obtain a master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education.Dr. Eliza Gallagher, Clemson
initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM programs.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on several engineering education research projects, including one on
serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program
and a facilitator of Safe Zone trainings for engineering faculty and staff who wish to learn more about how to create inclusive environments within engineering for LGBTQ+ individuals.Mrs. Karen G Braun, University of Colorado, Boulder Karen G. Braun is a Special Projects Lead for the Provost at University of Colorado Boulder. She has worked in the Office of Admissions, in the Office of Diversity, Equity & Community Engagement, and the BOLD Center in the College of Engineering & Applied Science at the university. She previously worked as an educational and public outreach specialist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory.Dr. Sarah Miller, University of Colorado, Boulder Sarah Miller provides vision and
, multiple readers will require multiple encodingactions by the institution.This approach ensures that the transcript will be publicly available via the blockchain network,yet the contents will remain private and available only to authorized parties. Each transcriptrequest will include a fee for processing the entire transaction; the administration will take itspart for handling the request, and at each insertion of a new transaction into the blockchainnetwork, the validating node (miner) takes its fixed fee for providing the service of validation,data storage, and transmission. The single greatest cost involved in this system is associated withthe mining of transaction data 4.The impetus for the work discussed in this paper stems from a project in
Angeles.Dr. Jianyu ”Jane” Dong, California State University, Los Angeles Jianyu Dong is a professor in electrical and computer engineering and currently serves as the Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at Cal State LA. Her area of expertise is video compression/communication, multimedia networks, QoS, etc. With a strong passion in Engineering Education, she has been engaged in multiple funded projects and initiatives to increase the participation and success of students from undeserved, low-income communities in engineering areas.Ni Li, California State University, Los Angeles Ni Li, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State
of online modules infuture semesters. Students’ self-selected project topics indicate that in future semesters the topicsexplored in lecture should be expanded beyond cybersecurity issues to include social mediatopics, particularly cyberbullying body image issues.IntroductionCybersecurity is a growing concern for both the private sector and governments. It has enormousimplications for government security, economic prosperity and public safety. The number of databreaches in the education sector doubled during 2017, with only the financial and healthcaresectors having more breaches [3]. The cost of a data breach in U.S. education is higher than thecost in other sectors and countries [18]. Domains with “.edu” addresses are a high risk for
Departmental Presentations Question and Answer Session with Students and/or Faculty from each Engineering Department Engineering Ethics Case Study Discussions in Small Groups Introduction to Design Small Group Project Work and Student Presentations Reflection and Going Forward Individual Semester ReflectionsThe intent of the COE course designers was that each section of the class contain students from amixture of disciplines. It was even hoped that students could be grouped by extra-curricularinterests, e.g., soccer, Anime. The DSS cohorted students into Learning Communities (LC)which meant scheduling the same 25 students in 3 classes together, with one of these LC classesbeing within
Undergraduates (NSF REU) grant,particularly for minority students. In partnership with the National Oceanic and AtmosphericAdministration (NOAA) Center for Earth System Sciences and Remote Sensing Technologies(CESSRST), the program targeted underrepresented minority STEM students and provided themwith a one-year research experience. The REU students were engaged in remote sensing researchprojects that focused on the application of satellite and ground-based remote sensing to the studyof the earth’s atmosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, biosphere, and lithosphere. Students,therefore, participated in a range of STEM research projects that includes the study of air quality,atmospheric water vapor distribution, climate change, coastal waters, hurricanes, sea
demonstrate the ways that these fourthreads are interwoven and interdependent.Research Approach: Systematic, Qualitative AnalysisThe biggest challenge of the research design for this project was the size and diversity of theLEES program in 2018: 13 technical sessions, 46 papers, 5 workshops and panels, and 2distinguished lectures. The complete program appears in Appendix A. The technical sessionsserved as the primary unit of analysis, which made the work more manageable but also requiredreading all of the papers associated with each session to discern each session’s unifying themes. 1 To capture at least some of what transpired in the
education. She has been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student misconceptions and how to increase the adoption of research- based instructional strategies by college instructors and corporate trainers. He is actively engaged in presenting workshops on instructional design to both academic and corporate instructors.Dr. Margot A. Vigeant
. The Chain Rule examples include: gaining weight,volume change, changing shadows, changing pendulum period, and inflating a balloon. TheProduct Rule examples include: changing number of apples, changing volume of a warehouse,and changing number of tiles. The Quotient Rule examples include: sharing lottery money, andchanging number of passengers in metropolitan area. To enhance understanding of the concepts, examples in this paper use discrete values thatcan help in developing good intuition for the different rules. Some examples are based on dailyexperiences while other examples are STEM-focused.The Bigger picture This work is part of a multi-modal integrated project aimed at visual, intuitive, andengaging understanding of
as a consulting engineer in Colorado and Texas. Prior to joining the UNL faculty, she was a faculty member at Union College in Schenectady, NY. Dr. Jones has been a principal investigator or co-principal investigator on over 25 research projects. She has authored or co-authored over 50 papers and served as committee chair for over 25 Masters and Doctoral students. Since 2008, she has served as one of the faculty advisors for the University of Nebraska’s Chapter of En- gineers Without Borders-USA. Dr. Jones has received numerous awards for her leadership, mentoring and teaching including most recently the 2015 Holling Family Distinguished Teaching / Advising / Mentoring Award from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
paired F/T-LEARN cohort (FTIC students only for F-LEARN comparisongroup, transfer students only for T-LEARN comparison group); 2) first academic term ofenrollment is similar to the paired F/T-LEARN cohort; 3) declared as STEM in their first term(see Appendix A for a list of CIP codes that map to STEM majors for this project); 4) have notparticipated in another Living-Learning Community or other Enriching Learning Experience(e.g. honors in the major, National Merit Scholars, mentoring programs, etc.); and 5) have acumulative GPA similar to the F/T-LEARN cohort (high school GPA for FTIC; previousinstitution GPA for transfer students), which was done by computing the minimum andmaximum high school GPA or previous institution GPA for the F/T-LEARN
facilitate this. Alearner-centered approach requires that students are engaged and become responsible for theirown learning process and that the instructor becomes a facilitator of their learning, instead ofbeing the center of their learning process. When I taught using the flipped-classroom learningenvironment, my students watched videos outside of the classroom and took online quizzes totest their understanding. In the classroom, students applied their learning by completingindividual or team activities and projects, with my guidance, on their own chosen topics ofinterest.The main problemThe main problem when you transition from one paradigm to another is that, as explained at thebeginning, your expertise and previous success in one paradigm, does
measurement schema. We set out to use the validated linkbetween overt behaviors and cognitive states to develop a tool that allowed students to report ontheir own cognitive engagement. As the ICAP theory suggests, cognitive engagement is influencedby the environment in which student learning takes place. Despite educators developingcurriculum (i.e. homework, projects, writing assignments, etc.) to influence student’s out-of-classenvironment, cognitive engagement outside the classroom is rarely addressed in the literature onSTEM students. One of the unique contributions of our instrument is the measurement of cognitiveengagement in two distinct environments: inside the classroom and outside the classroom. Wedeveloped a measurement schema that prompted
STEAM MachinesTM outreach camps across the Navajo Nation with the ambition to expand to Tohono O’odham Nation.Dr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER
in the networking and project “Ride-on Cars for Children with Disabilities.”social aspects of an HKN chapter. When HKN students They are partnering with the WSU Go Baby Go program,continue their education at a different institution, the new Project Lead the Way, and local organizations to provideHKN community can facilitate the transition and can mobility for children with disabilities through theprovide an immediate and familiar social connection. modification of ride-on cars. “ Perspective of a Department The international IEEE-HKN organization encourages Chair19.above-the-chapter networking among students, faculty, and “It
. The second, third, and The first of the challenges is fairly easy to overcome. As fourth are remedied using the techniques mentioned in thesuggested with other activities, a camera could be utilized other activities within this paper especially as students willto project the images of the animals on the overhead project be familiar with seating positions and group divisions thisso that students in the back of the room can see. One could late into the semester. For the fourth challenge of supplyingalso replace the stuffed animals with pictures of animals on feedback, that could be handled in multiple ways. The firsta PowerPoint slide. Another option would be to set up is to have students volunteer their
field can often save orthe quality control performed during the doom a construction project. Because of theconstruction phase. While great time and nature of earthwork, the liability it carriesexpense is used in the initial investigation, tends to be much greater than in the vastthe field quality control is usually regulated majority of the other trades. A fieldto the lowest bidder. In 2002, theInternational Union of Operating Engineers, technician is vital as quite often they areLocal 150 started an organizing effort in the asked for recommendations when failingChicagoland area. In the area of Soils, the results are obtained or
everybody out. I guess that's the best thing you could take from that game. To apply to classes when you're doing team projects, to jobs where you're working on actual projects that you have to be on teams for. - Black male, MS student CCW MCCS Navigational Capital Professional Integration 27Discussion 28Implications – Research • Extension of theories • CCW within an engineering student organization context • Integration outcomes of MCCS from the lens of an engineering student
Paper ID #27165Research Paper: Where Do We Meet? Understanding Conference Participa-tion in a Department of Engineering EducationMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Tech Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the department of Engineering Edu- cation. Tahsin holds a BSc. degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from IUT, Dhaka and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500. He is actively engaged in different projects at the department involving teamwork, communication and capstone design with a focus on industrial engineering practice.Ms. Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech
professionals in STEM-related careers. 7. Increase student motivation to follow through with next steps to fulfill STEM career decisions. 8. Increase student interest in working on STEM projects in the future. 9. Increase student commitment to continue studies and/or professional development in a STEM area.Description of ProgramSISTEM was a grant-funded program that offered high school participants the opportunity tolearn about a variety of STEM careers. The program took place at a university in the southwestregion of the United States. SISTEM met once per week for five consecutive weeks. All of theparticipants arrived in the evening, ate a complimentary dinner, and then attended a briefinformation session or “lightning” talk on a
undergraduate engineering courses, such as a fluid mechanics course [2], a first-year introductory engineering course [3], a hybrid thermodynamics course [4], and project-baseddesign courses [5]. Best practices [1] have been established by educators from severaluniversities.Continuous-time signals and systems (CTSS) is a fundamental electrical and computerengineering course in which students are introduced to mathematical models for commonengineering signals and systems. The CTSS course is typically prerequisite to other ECEcourses, such as digital signal processing, control systems, and communication systems. Theconcepts found in a CTSS course are among the most conceptually difficult [7-8] in a typicalECE curriculum. To that end, many attempts have
serve as enhancement or replacement toconventional instruction. Hennessy et al. [13] concluded that instructors prefer computer-based technologies since they allow not only to replicate the real experiments, but also toexplore "what-if" scenarios. To that end, many scholars investigated the use of simulation-based instructional materials. For example, Montevechi et al. [14] examined the use ofdiscrete event simulation and how it can be used to increase students' understanding of thereal systems in conceptual models, where Lego Mindstorms' robot application was used asan example for the project. Skoogh et al. [8] examined ways to include simulation as partof learning objectives by including objectives to learn discrete event simulation.This
practice and reflection doing normal activities such as eating, moving, and journaling.MethodsOur participants in this study were undergraduate engineering students—mostly first- and second-year and from various demographic backgrounds—who took the course on engineering thrivingduring 2018. We examined changes in students’ scores on gratitude, meaning, and mindfulness atthree time-intervals: a pretest the first day of class (n = 12), a post-test the last day of class (n =12), and a follow-up six months later (n = 5). Part of a larger project (NSF #1626287), we measuredthese competencies using a previously validated survey [26] that examined the impact of variousnon-cognitive and affective factors on engineering student success. For gratitude
program includes up to 40 participants, rising juniors or seniors at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), who have interest in pursu- ing STEM disciplines at the graduate-level. Annually, Dean Vaughan supervises direction of the 4-week FAME/UD Summer Residential Program for 30-35 high school students, the RISE Summer Enrichment Program for incoming engineering freshmen and, in the past, the HEARD (Higher Education Awareness Response in Delaware) Project, a college awareness program, funded by the Department of Education through Philadelphia GEAR UP for College Network. Globally in the College, he manages academic programs and policies that impact the careers of all engineering students at both the
M.S. in operations research in 1973 and his Ph.D. in IE in 1975 from Stanford University, and his MCE from UAA in 1999.Dr. Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University Jerome P. Lavelle is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering economic analysis, decision analysis, project management, leadership, engineering management and engineering education.Dr. Neal A. Lewis, Fairfield University NEAL A. LEWIS, CPEM, received his Ph.D. in engineering management in 2004 and B.S. in chemical engineering in 1974 from the University of Missouri–Rolla and his MBA in 2000 from the University of New
as well as intrapersonalskills. The new millennium also needs an enlightened workforce that possesses written and oralcommunication skills in addition to acquiring in–depth knowledge in their chosen discipline. Leading scholars in the area of Cognitive Science and Educational Methodologies haveconcluded that it is essential that students need to be taught in a creative learning environment.Educators who utilize the Discovery Approach help students acquire much needed real–worldproblem–solving skills. In this paper the author outlines how interactive projects can help theinstructor in promoting a problem–based learning environment. Furthermore, he also providesinitial results of his assessment data.Introduction Educators