to work in Benin, religious/spiritual motivations, or other motivations? 9 Thinking back on when you applied for this program, how would you characterize your primary objective(s) for becoming involved? (e.g., you wanted to determine your own interest in pursuing a research career, you wanted to determine your own interest in a future career in development, you wanted to expand your life experience to include living in a developing country, or other objectives . . .). 10 Do you believe that your objective(s) was(were) met? (Mote that this does NOT necessarily mean that you obtained the experience you anticipated. For example, if your objective was to determine your own interest in
1983.9. Dollár, A. and Steif, P.S., “Learning Modules for the Statics Classroom,” 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.10. Steif, P.S. and Dollár, A., “A New Approach to Teaching and Learning Statics,” 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.11. Crouch, C.H., Fagen, A.P., Callan, J.P., and Mazur, E., “Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment?” American Journal of Physics, June 2004.12. Yoder, D.C., Parsons, R., Pionke, C.D., and Weber, F., “Hands-On Teaching of Engineering Fundamentals,” 1998 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.13. 80/50 Inc., 1701 S. 400 East, Columbia City, IN 46725, www.8020.net. Page 12.151.12
Orleans,LA.11. Gibbons, S., Kimmel, H., and O'Shea, M. (1997) “Changing Teacher Behavior Through Staff Development:Implementing the Teaching and Content Standards in Science,” School Science and Mathematics, 97 (6), 302-309.12. Cano, R.M., Berliner-Heyman, S., , Koppel, N.B., Gibbons, S. and Kimmel, H.S. (2001, October)..”Evaluationof Summer Enrichment Programs For Women Students.” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference. SaltLake City, UT.13. Hirsch, L., S., Gibbons, S., J., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R. and Bloom, J. (2003, November). “High SchoolStudents Attitudes to and Knowledge About Engineering”. Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, Boulder, CO.14. Gibbons, S., J., Hirsch, L., S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R
-directed learning capabilities shows apromising line of research for meeting the needs of individual learners (and fulfilling one of theABET standards). Perhaps one area for improvement may be to consider more ways to providestudents with feedback about their scores on the two self-directed learning scales utilized at PennState University. My review of Litzinger et al.’s paper suggested the data is used for programevaluation and researchers have yet to explore the benefits of using the data to designintervention strategies for individual students. In addition to the work at Penn State University,the Freshman Year Experience course for engineering students at the University of Connecticutprovides a nice model for how to design an orientation course
of the parameter(s) on which to conduct the sensitivity analysiscan be considered as an indirect measure because the most relevant information is that whichprovides the best prediction of the most critical parameter (i.e., the parameter that will have thegreatest impact on the decision criterion). The online environment also tracks the informationresources visited by the student teams and the time of visitation. Data collected from a largeengineering economy course are used to evaluate the effectiveness of these assessment methods.IntroductionMaking good engineering decisions is a critical skill for every engineering discipline. Thecomplexity of decision making is tied to multiple criteria which can often be in conflict. Largevolumes of
of formulae. For example, ourintuition tells us that the words tree or eat can not be broken down into any meaningful parts.In contrast, the words trees and eating seem to be made up of two parts: the word tree, eatplus an additional element, -s (the ‘plural’) or –ing (the ‘past o present participle’). In thesame way, our intuition tells us that the chemical word Fe can not be broken down into anymeaningful parts. In contrast, the word Fe(s) seems to be made up of two parts: the word Feplus an additional element (s), which indicates the solid state of aggregation.Inflectional versus derivative morphemes‘Tree’, ‘eat’ and ‘Fe’ are called free morphemes; while ‘–s’, ‘-ing’ and ‘(s)’ are called boundmorphemes. Two or more morphemes in
product multiplication, anduse of i, j, k unit vectors), unit conversions, and dimensional analysis. If they lack calculus orvector algebra, an introductory course in these subjects could be taken during the first semesterof their senior year while taking GSEN. Topics such as vector algebra and dimensional analysiscan easily be integrated into existing algebra and pre-calculus courses. In many cases thesetopics are already being taught and only lack an engineering applications emphasis. In somecases special primer courses can be developed to address deficiencies in pre-requisite subjects.The instructor(s) for a GSEN type course does not need to possess an engineering background(although preferred). Only a background in instructional applied
between thestudent and professor. Sometimes the contract is required to specify deliverables.An independent study usually addresses a topic that is not covered in a regular course. Facultycan use them to build up their teaching and research program. For example, an independent studymay be used to introduce a student to a particular research area in which (s)he may pursue athesis (though in some cases, students are not allowed to earn both independent-study and thesiscredits on the same topic). It may also be used to assist another student on a thesis project, aswhen an undergraduate gathers data that a graduate student can use in writing a thesis.Independent studies can also be used to enrich existing courses. A faculty member may want
ECE Core Course Digital I Computer Networks Microprocessor Design I Networking M Machine Design Engineering Drawing A Hands-on Skills Machining Skill Circuit Design P Java & Visual BASIC S Limnology BIO Core Course Environmental
ce le ge S ad ca H en M le -R tis at ci ol
AC 2007-2939: KEEPING FROM REINVENTING THE WHEEL: SOME LESSONSLEARNED FROM A SUCCESSFUL TC2K PROGRAMDavid Cottrell, University of North Carolina-Charlotte DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after more than 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in an MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in 1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has taught courses in statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, graphic communications, engineering
∫ h(v, k , c) ⋅ 8760 ⋅ v3 ⋅ dv (8) 0The best way to assimilate the aforementioned is to consider some example problems.Wind Energy ExamplesExample 1Find Vmode, Vmean, Vrmc , the power density available distribution, and the power extracted per m2for a wind turbine at a site which possesses a Weibull wind distribution with c = 15 m/s and k =1.5. The density is 1.225 kg/m3.Solution:A graphical representation of the Weibull distribution for k = 1.5 and c = 15 m/sec is presented inFigure 2. The mode, the most probable wind speed, occurs at 7.21 m/sec. The mean wind speedand the root-mean-cube speed are defined in Eqs. (2) and (4), respectively. The arithmetic forthis example is
. Page 12.1381.12References[1] King, P. M. and K. S. Kitchener, Developing Reflective Judgment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1994.[2] Lynch, C. L. , S. K. Wolcott, and G. E. Huber, “Steps for Better Thinking: A Developmental Problem Solving Process,” http://www.WolcottLynch.com, 2002.[3] Sims, R., and Sims, S., The Importance of Learning Styles, Understanding the Implications for Learning, Course Design, and Education, Greenwood Press, 1995.[4] Rosati, Peter, “Specific Differences and Similarities in the Learning Preferences of Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, November 1999.[5] Astin, A., What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisted
reverseengineering and imitation. Typical civil engineering problems are used to present theprogramming concepts. Especially in the instance of VBA, students learn how to combine theuse of spreadsheet functions with VBA code. The paper includes an overview of the course andexamples of the materials covered and the teaching techniques employed. General thoughts arealso presented about the directions in which programming education may be headed in the future.1.0 IntroductionCourses about computer programming have been part of undergraduate curricula for more thanhalf a century. For example, the electrical engineering department at CMU was teachingcomputer programming in FORTRAN in the late 1960’s as a way to introduce logical thinking(e.g., flow charts) and
F W S S F W S S F W S S F W S S F W S Freshmen Sophomore Pre-Junior Junior Senior n School WorkThe students enrolled in each major are divided into two sections. As one sectionis in school the other is on a work assignment and vice versa. Each studentcompletes six quarters of co-op, over three of their undergraduate years.Engineering and Engineering Technology students average 1.7 employers perstudent. This alternating schedule requires the university to offer all sophomore,pre-junior, and junior courses twice during each academic year.Co-op students
programs with oneof the following program titles (with a few slight variations): Engineering (including GeneralEngineering), Engineering Physics, and Engineering Science(s). This paper presents informationabout ASEE’s new role, including the related activities of its Accreditation ActivitiesCommittee, the recruiting and training of prospective program evaluators and their participationin the actual accreditation process, some perspective from the first year of actual visits, and otherinformation about the near future. Also included is information about the 67 multidisciplinaryengineering programs at 65 institutions that are currently accredited by ABET and now assignedto ASEE for program review.IntroductionOne of the significant distinctions of a
student’s peer reviewed document, prepared for inventory Content—RDC RDC on the comment inventory sheets stands for Rhetorically-Driven Content analysis,corresponding to what many have called higher-order concerns.17 We teach the course with a Page 12.278.7rhetorical emphasis, by which we mean students are taught to evaluate communication by the degree towhich it successfully adapts to its rhetorical situation: its audience(s), genre (communication type),purpose, topic, and specific context (recognizing that communication does not occur ‘in a vacuum’).Rhetorically-driven content analysis, then, will comment, for example, on whether the
ρ A = 0 at t = 0 (2) ρ A = HP0 at x = 0 (3) ρ A = HP at x = L (4)The boundary condition given by equation (4) is in terms of the unknown instantaneous pressurein the upper chamber. The auxiliary equation needed to determine this pressure can be obtainedfrom an integral mass balance on the upper chamber as follows: d V dP D S ∂ρ A ( cVu ) = u = − AB c
and the genre demands of theoutcome(s) expected, and proceeds as a series of linked assessment “events”. These events relateboth backwards and forwards in a knowledge-building progression—to the requirements for thecourse and the expectations for the communication outcomes—and also loop around to return tothe overall context of the engineering discipline and to move beyond the course context toparticipate in the next phase of becoming a competent member of the knowledge community.Along the way, the assessment events are conducted collaboratively among combinations ofstudent/working group or student/instructor, and designed to allow analysis of both adequatepresentation of disciplinary content and rhetorical style (making and arguing a case
engineering SCHOOL DEGREE TITLE(S) MAIN FEATURES • Accredited by NCA Higher Learning Colorado Technical Commission Software Engineering University 6 • Online academic library • Courses taught in multimedia format • Offered mainly to industrial partners Michigan Technical • Course delivery includes videotaped Engineering
theypropose, undertake, and complete projects for a variety of clients. The tenor of the sequence focuses on theunderlying principle that engineering is a profession in which services for clients are rendered in an equitable,economical and ethical manner. This paper describes the learning objectives, evolution, current status, andassessment of the four-course sequence. This paper details the content, implementation, activities, teaching loads,assessment, and student reactions to the design sequence.Index Terms – Creativity, Teamwork, Design, Project, Professional.Introduction“. . . the proper study of mankind is the science of design . . .”, Herbert A. Simon1In the mid-90’s, the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Rose-Hulman Institute
this independence is that work progressed slowly and many codingideas were explored, found to be inadequate, and discarded. The end result of this project wasthat a well-planned and detailed LabView driver was successfully created, but integration intothe rest of the system was not achieved because of lack of time. References:[1] S. Avramov-Zamurovic, B. Waltrip, K. Stricklett, and A. Koffman, "A Balancing Algorithm for system with correlated injections" IEEE IMTC Proc., Vail, Colorado, 2003.[2] B. Waltrip, A. Koffman, S. Avramov-Zamurovic: "The Design and Self-Calibration of Inductive Voltage Dividers for an Automated Impedance Scaling Bridge", IEEE IMTC Proc. Anchorage, Alaska, 2002.[3] B. C. Waltrip S
focuses on oil spills, a major reason for the development ofMOTEMS4.Summary and ConclusionsThis paper presents the development of coastal engineering design projects/studies in civilengineering Capstone courses at The Citadel. Specifically, a structural engineering professor hasdeveloped a project involving the design of a fixed marina dock system for gravity andenvironmental loading. An environmental engineering professor has included a separatecomponent to consider the environmental aspects of marine oil terminals.References1. ICC, 2003. International Building Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, VA.2. Department of Defense, 1 July 1999, “Mooring Design,” Mil-HDBK-1026/4A, Washington, D.C.3. Ferritto, J., Dickenson, S
, 2001. 4. Geankoplis, C. J.; Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003. 5. Kranz, W. B., “Pediment Graduate Course in Transport Phenomena,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. 6. Thompson, K. E., “Teaching PDE-Based Modeling to ChE Undergraduates,” Chemical Engineering Education, 34, 146 (2000). 7. Sinclair, J. L., “CFD Case Studies in Fluid-Particle Flow,” Chemical Engineering Education, 32, 108 (1998). 8. Besser, R. S., “Spreadsheet Solutions to Two-Dimensional Heat Transfer Problems,” Chemical Engineering Education, 34, 160 (2002). 9. Zheng, H.; Keith, J
: • Hartman, F. T. (2000). Hartman, F. T. (2000). Don't park your brain outside: A practical guide to improving shareholder value with SMART project management (1st ed.). Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute. • Kerzner, H. (2001). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (7th Ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. • Kezsbom, D. S., & Edward, K. A. (2001). The new dynamic project management: Winning through the competitive advantage (2nd ed. Vol. 1). Toronto, ON: John Wiley & Son. • Project Management Institute, I. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (Vol. 1). Newtown
rigorous classroom work with hands-on exposure toapplications of what students are learning. For over two decades, Rose-Hulman has beenevolving methods to prepare students to meet the increasing demands to be significantlyproductive in shorter and shorter amounts of time. Traditional, single discipline focusedlaboratory experiments do not adequately convey current professional requirements. Since the1980’s, the Institute has increasingly used realistic experiences to educate students about themultidimensional challenges of actually implementing innovation. In 1999, building onsuccesses of earlier efforts in new product development first in applied optics and later in abroader range of disciplines, Rose-Hulman launched a unique incubator/new
AC 2007-2855: PSCAD SIMULATION IN A POWER ELECTRONICSAPPLICATION COURSELiping Guo, University of Northern Iowa Liping Guo received the B. E. degree in Automatic Control from Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China in 1997, the M. S. and Ph. D. degrees in Electrical & Computer Engineering from Auburn University, AL, USA in 2001 and 2006 respectively. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Electrical & Information Engineering Technology Program at the Department of Industrial Technology at the University of Northern Iowa. Her research and teaching interests are mainly in the area of power electronics, embedded systems and automatic control.Recayi "Reg" Pecen, University
multipledepartments. Currently, the author is working to include a final project for the course.Students will be given a final project in the middle of the semester to model a mechatronicsystem and develop a controller to meet several performance specifications. The designs will beimplemented in Simulink with MATLAB’s Real Time Workshop. The final project will betaught as a competition between student teams with an incentive for the winning design team.The students will write a project report and present their final group design to the class.References[1] P. Antsaklis, T. Basar, R. Decarlo, N.H. McClamroch, M. Spong, and S. Yurkovich, “ Report on the NSF/CSS Workshop on New Directions in Control Engineering Education,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 19
arena.Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation's Course,Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement program under grant 0411200.Bibliography1. S. Applin, T. Kaiser, “Design of a Microelectronic Manufacturing Laboratory,” Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 2006.2. L. Frechette, V. Modi, F. Miller, K. R. Farmer, “Hands-On MEMS,” Proceedings of the 15th BiennialUnversity/Government/Industry Microelectronics Symposium, Boise, Idaho, June 2003.3. J. W. Judy, P. S. Motta, “A Lecture and Hands-on Laboratory Course: Introduction to Micromachining andMEMS,” Proceedings of the 15th Biennial Unversity/Government/Industry Microelectronics Symposium, Boise,Idaho, June 2003.4. L. G. Frechette, C. W. Wong, K
-based exams were given to the students for the purpose of verifying theirunderstanding of : • The concept of numerical control (CNC) • The concept of 3D modeling and construction plans (CAD) • Toolpath generation (CAM) • Cutting tool selection (CAM) • Cutting parameters (CAM)Entry/Exit AssessmentIn addition to aforementioned evaluations two survey-based assessments were conducted duringfirst and last weeks of the classes. The survey questionnaire along with the numerical studentresponses for the spring of 2006 class are shown in Figure 5. Page 12.44.6 E N TR Y -E X IT AS S E S S M E N T O F IT__