Guidebook provided a number of evaluation areas onthe basis of, not only cost, student and faculty use, but perceptions of OER (mainly focused onstudent perception). The Guidebook also provided a menu of survey questions that could directlybe provided to students to evaluate these areas. Thus, the Guidebook was selected as the primarysource of questions used to evaluate the “attitudes” of students regarding OER implementation inthe CON 357 course. The survey questions used are outlined in Table 4.Table 4. Survey questions for evaluation of impacts of OER implementation. Q# Question 1 In general, how often do you purchase the required texts for the courses you take? 2 How much do you typically spend on texts each semester? 3 For a typical
, Association for Computational Linguistics, Nov. 2020.[14] J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, B. Ichter, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. Le, and D. Zhou, “Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models,” Jan. 2023. arXiv:2201.11903 [cs].[15] K. Bhatia, A. Narayan, C. De Sa, and C. R´e, “TART: A plug-and-play Transformer module for task-agnostic reasoning,” June 2023. arXiv:2306.07536 [cs].[16] S. Huang, L. Dong, W. Wang, Y. Hao, S. Singhal, S. Ma, T. Lv, L. Cui, O. K. Mohammed, B. Patra, Q. Liu, K. Aggarwal, Z. Chi, J. Bjorck, V. Chaudhary, S. Som, X. Song, and F. Wei, “Language Is Not All You Need: Aligning Perception with Language Models,” Mar. 2023. arXiv:2302.14045 [cs].[17] J. Wei, M. Bosma, V. Y. Zhao, K. Guu, A
. 233–243, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.012.[6] Y. Chen, Y. Ma, X. Mao, and Q. Li, “Multi-Task Learning for Abstractive and Extractive Summarization,” Data Science and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–23, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41019-019-0087-7.[7] A. Magooda, M. Elaraby, and D. Litman, “Exploring Multitask Learning for Low-Resource AbstractiveSummarization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08565, 2021.[8] J. P. Verma and A. Patel, “An Extractive Text Summarization approach for Analyzing Educational Institution’s Review and Feedback Data,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 143, pp. 51–55, 2016.[9] W. Luo and D. Litman, “Summarizing student responses to reflection prompts,” in Proceedings of
Publishing Limited, 2012.[13] E. Blosser, “An examination of Black women’s experiences in undergraduate engineering on a primarily white campus: Considering institutional strategies for change,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 52–71, 2020.[14] S. Leath and T. Chavous, “Black women’s experiences of campus racial climate and stigma at predominantly white institutions: Insights from a comparative and within-group approach for STEM and non-STEM majors,” J. Negro Educ., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 125–139, 2018.[15] L. C. Brown, B. M. Williams, and Q. S. Williams, “Melanin messages: Black college women’s experiences and reflections on navigating colorism.,” J. Divers. High. Educ., 2021.[16] V. Borum and E. Walker, “What makes the
stakeholders & network connections b. Briefly present research findings c. Group share-outWhy should stakeholders participate in shared vision? (15 minutes) a. Activity on brainstorming what motivates your potential stakeholders, and how this impacts how you will engage with them b. Briefly present research findings c. Group discussionWhat strategies encourage shared vision? (15 minutes) a. Activity on identifying short-term wins b. Briefly present research findings c. Group share-outGroup discussion and Q&A (10 minutes)Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this material arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
readings. Black horizon- tal line segments are averages over time widows corresponding to steady state operation.Table 2: Sample steady-state results. The Q row is computed with Equations (1) and (2) using Vin = 12V and R = 5.4 Ω for heat sink E, and p values from the PWMheat row of this table. Values of Tave are obtained by averaging over the horizontal plateaus of the data in Figure 12. PWMheat 21 50 80 100 122 143 160 209 229 255 Q (W) 0.096 0.0548 1.40 2.19 3.26 4.48 5.61 9.62 11.5 14.3 Tave ◦C 24.2 29.0 34.0 37.6 41.0 44.5 47.8 56.1 59.5 63.5gives the data in Table 2. Note that the temperature data in Figure 12 was obtained by capturing theoutput from the
both mean value and standarddeviation, to return a numerical track quality indicator, which will inform the user whether or notthe given case of operation if feasible. In order to numerically determine the track quality, Q, anequation that effectively ranks each situation was elaborated.Additionally, serious wear marks were noticed on the Elizabethtown College outdoor athletictrack, which makes it one of the most difficult cases to achieve (Table 3). On the other hand,readings were collected from the new outdoor athletic track at Alvernia University (Reading,PA), to quantitatively rank more than one typical quality of outdoor tracks. It was found that theanalyses of these readings were much more conclusive, making it a far easier case. However
(ECDH), digital signature algorithm (ECDSA), and integrated encryptionscheme (ECIES) are placed. In all of these security protocols which are standardized by severalnational and international organizations, the main computation is point multiplication. Theelliptic curve point multiplication is defined as Q = k.P, where k is a positive integer, and Q andP are two points on the elliptic curve. The efficiency of computing point multiplication dependson finding the minimum number of steps to reach Q from a given point P.Some of the educational goals in this step were (a) understanding the implementation platforms(commonly referred to as hardware [ASIC/FPGA] or software platforms [microcontrollers])through which the overheads were derived, (b) soft
generate a modulated sinusoidal wave). • Music synthesizer (to modulate an analog wave with an ADSR envelope generator). • Music synthesizer I/O core. square wave d q + phase reg (a). Digital DDFS square wave d q phase to amplitude
pattern was distinguished by the phrase “I feel” as well as the word“just.” The use of “just” seemed to reference an innate feeling the student had about theirattitudes and beliefs, rather than a specific affinity towards some trait such as creativity or actionsuch as problem solving. Students expressed two kinds of emotional responses to belongingness:comfort and enjoyment. An excerpt from Candace’s interview transcript is an example ofstudents’ comfort towards being in engineering. Q: Do you feel like you belong in engineering? Candace: Yes. I don't know, I've just never felt like I wasn't in the right place or I wasn't- I guess I've never felt like I didn't belong, so I don't know why I feel like I do belong, but
ScienceFoundation.AppendixFigure 2 shows the plots for the comparison groups. The histograms and Q-Q plots show that thedistribution of the cumulative GPA does not follow the Normal distribution. The results of thenormality tests presented in Table 9 also confirm that. Table 9. P-value of Normality test methods for cumulative GPA for C-Groups Jarque Shapiro- Anderson- Kolmogorov- Groups/ Method Bera (J-B) Wilk (S-W) Darling (A-D) Smirnov (K-S) Not 1&2 6.338e-13 4.612e-06 2.986e-06 0.08832 PELL-Eligible 3 <2.2e-16 <2.2e-16 <2.2e-16 1.048e-07 1&2 2.174e-07 7.481e-05
-grid-ercot/. [Accessed: 24- Jan-2022].6. “Text - H.R.2482 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Microgrid ...” [Online]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2482/text?r=165&s=1. [Accessed: 24-Jan-2022].7. “S.1183 - A bill to establish an energy storage and microgrid grant and technical assistance program.,” Congress.Gov, 11-Apr-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate- bill/1183/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22microgrid%22%2C%22microgrid%22%5D%7D&r=43&s=1. [Accessed: 23-Jan-2022].8. “(H.R. 4447) to establish an energy storage and microgrid grant and technical assistance
Exact Test is used with twonominal variables to find out if the proportions from one variable are different among values ofthe other [Bind & Rubin, 2020]. Due to the test's exact nature, it is more accurate than a Chi-SquareTest alone.Figure 1. Items A, G, and M relate to aspirational capital. Items B, H, and N relate to linguistic capital.Items C, I, and O relate to familial capital. Items D, J, and P relate to social capital. Items E, K, and Qrelate to navigational capital. Items F, L, and R relate to resistance capital. Additionally, Items A, B, C,D, E, and F relate to having or holding a CCW capital dimension. Items G, H, I, J, K, and L relate to adeveloping CCW capital dimension. Items M, N, O, P, Q, and R relate to not having a CCW
was run to examine if LCDLMs offered differentialbenefits or effects based on the gender of participants. Four modes of engagement were assessed:Interactive, constructive, active, and passive scores. Participants were grouped by their gender:male and female. First, we checked preliminary assumptions, and results revealed that data wasnormally distributed, as assessed by inspecting the Normal Q-Q plots. There were no univariateand multivariate outliers, as assessed by boxplot; there were linear relationships, as evaluated byscatterplot, and no multicollinearity; and variance-covariance matrices were homogeneous, asassessed by Box’s test of equality of covariance matrices (p = 0.473); variances werehomogeneous, as assessed by Levene’s Test of
development of research self-efficacy in NHERI-REU participants, apre- and post- assessment was administered. A paired-samples t-test was used to determinewhether there was a statistically significant mean difference between the pre and post researchself-efficacy of REU participants. While outliers were detected (question pairs 1,5, 11, 13, and20) that were more than 1.5 box-lengths from the edge of the box in a boxplot, inspection of theirvalues did not reveal them to be extreme, and they were kept in the analysis. Since there weremore than 50 participants, the Normal Q-Q lot method was used to analyze and demonstrate thatthe difference score between question pairs was approximately normally distributed for allquestions. Further, paired samples t
reactive (Q) powers suppliedby the transformer. They also measured the RMS values of the transformer input current and theload current (RLC load).Exercise 4: In this exercise, students used the Simulink toolboxes to simulate a three-phasepower system that includes a transformer and several loads as shown in Figure 2. Specificationsincluded: A balanced Y-connected source with Vphase-to-phase voltage of 120 Vrms, 60 Hz,connected to a three-phase transformer with a turns ration n = 2. The output of the transformersupplies power to two separate loads. The first load is a -connected three-phase series RLCload of PL = 10 kW, QL = 200 VARs, and QC = 100 VARs. The second load is a three-phaseseries RLC load with P = 10 kW, QL = 200 VARs, and QC = 100
. Each created a 10-20 minute video which was posted on the IEC website a few daysbefore the meeting. The session began with a short presentation on the video highlights, followedby an open Q&A. The stories shared were very powerful, demonstrating many opportunities lostby the panelist’s home institution. Mentoring was identified as a critical issue and a variety ofexamples were presented that showed the impact of both good and bad mentoring. Thepresentation and the Q&A both helped to motivate the Anti-Racism workshops being offered byIEC spring 2021.The next two sessions were organized and presented by Prof. Russ Korte of George WashingtonUniversity and IEC leadership.Session 6: Team Science Part 1 (October 2020) Teamwork and task work
their early experiences leading to the Bridge program. The secondinterview explored their experiences in the Bridge program and their aspirations for their co-op.Interviews were professionally transcribed and pseudonymized.Data were analyzed using a narrative approach that includes multiple readings [19]. Themultistep process included reading for: familiarization with the transcripts, identifying contentsuch as individuals mentioned and major storylines, detecting identity of the participant andothers, and uses of CCW and funds of knowledge. After the readings, a narrative case waswritten for each participant.Quality was considered internally and externally. Internally, we used the Q 3 framework [20],[21] as a reflexive tool to guide each phase
implementing Project COMPLETE in high schools 4) A Q&A session intended to solicit feedback from the teachers and counselors about their specific concerns with teaching the curriculumIt is important to note that speaking responsibilities were divided up among the project’s collegeand high school representatives, which allowed workshop participants to hear about variousaspects of the program. For instance, a high school counselor shared about how to enroll studentsin courses and get them specific credit. Since every school has to navigate their version ofcurricula, credit, and state education priorities/incentives, this was an important topic to cover. Itwas also valuable for the workshop’s teacher participants to learn what the
, 2018.[2] V. Eubanks, Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press, 2018.[3] C. C. Perez, Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Random House, 2019.[4] D. Norman, The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, 2013.[5] D. E. Forsythe, “New Bottles, Old Wine: Hidden Cultural Assumptions in a Computerized Explanation System for Migraine Sufferers,” Med. Anthropol. Q., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 551– 574, 1996.[6] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering,” 2017. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/digest/occupation/overall.cfm (accessed Jun. 23
environment. Some of thoserecommendations included (1) a website video to introduce the project to the schools and engagefamilies and students; (2) an enhanced web presence to engage with students and families online,and (3) monthly industry spotlight videos to students to build program momentum. The researchteam also presented regular research Q&A talks to student cohorts within the first day of theircourse beginning with the goal of boosting research participation.Equitable Access to High Quality Teachers. Teachers are an essential partner in the collaborativemodel. Securing high-quality teachers in rural districts is a persistent challenge in the literature(Goodpaster, Adedokun, & Weaver, 2012). Data shows rural districts are more likely
class review/Q&A online Station #1 Station #2 online quiz quiz Three-station 10 min 10 min 40 min 40 min 40 min 10 min class review/Q&A online Station #1 Station #2 Station #3 online quiz (workshop) quizFigure 3. Class timeline (150 minutes)Learning Assistant Classroom SupportAn important part of the rotating station design was the availability of an undergraduate LearningAssistant (LA) provided by the University. Undergraduate students who qualify to become anLA have earned an A or B+ in the course they are an LA for, successfully
. Trytten, "'I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:' Achieving Individual Diversity," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, pp. 103-115, April 2007.[21] R. L. Shehab, T. J. Murphy, J. Davidson, C. Foor, T. Reed-Rhoads, D. A. Trytten, et al., "Academic Struggles and Strategies: How Minority Students Persist," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.[22] S. E. Walden and C. E. Foor, "Is Transfer Credit a Strategy for Success or a Prescription for Failure?," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.[23] Q. Hughes and R. L. Shehab, "What They Say Matters: Parental Impact on Pre-College Academic Identity of Successful African American
to design examples andexercises that meet the specific needs of each classroom. In order to better understand thedifferences between classrooms, students from two different classrooms (named“Classroom 1” and “Classroom 2”) were submitted to the same following question duringan electrochemistry lesson:Consider the following overall reaction for a battery: 2 Ag+ + Sn → 2 Ag + Sn2+What is the reaction quotient (Q) for this redox process?a) [Sn2+].[Ag]2/[Ag+]2.[Sn] b) [Sn2+]/2[Ag+]c) [Sn2+]/[Ag+]2 d) [Ag+]2/[Sn2+]The correct answer to the question above is letter c): Q = [Ag+]2/[Sn2+].Although it seems to be a very easy question, is was possible to
-Alampay, T. A. Beehr, N. D. Christiansen, and R. K. Van Horn, “Adjustment and strain among domestic and international student sojourners: A longitudinal study,” Sch. Psychol. Int., 2002.[13] M. S. Andrade, “International students in English-speaking universities,” J. Res. Int. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 131–154, Aug. 2006.[14] R. A. Layton, M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and G. D. Ricco, “Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2010.[15] A. Ednnondson, “Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams,” Adm. Sci. Q., 1999.[16] W. A. Kahn and W. A. Kahn, “Psychological Conditions of Personal
constraints and ethics ● Explore: Activity 1 – function of sensors and components using snap circuit components ● Explain: Notes/Practice/Homework 1 – Sensor CircuitsDay 3: Explore Sensor and Logic Components (Lesson 2, 90 min) ● Review Sensor Circuits and repeat Activity 1 with Logic components ● Explain: Notes/Practice/Homework 2 – Logic CircuitsDay 4: Engineering Task Introduction (Lesson 3, 50 min) ● Review Sensor and Logic Circuits; Quiz 1 ● Explain: Notes 3 – Engineering Process ● Explore: Activity 3 – Sensor Circuit Engineering (Q 1)Day 5: Engineering Project (Lesson 3, 90 min) ● Review Logic Circuits; Quiz 2 ● Explore: Activity 3 – Sensor Circuit Engineering (Qs 2-5)Day 6: Engineering Project (Lesson 3, 50 min) ● Explore
Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, as well asthe office of the Vice Provost for Research and by the School of Engineering and ComputerScience at Oakland University.References 1. About the AERIM REU program, retrieved from http://me-reu.secs.oakland.edu 2. L. Guessous, Q. Zou, B. Sangeorzan, J.D. Schall, G. Barber, L. Yang, M. Latcha, A. Alkidas and X. Wang, "Engaging Underrepresented Undergraduates in Engineering through a Hands-on Automotive-themed REU Program," Paper # IMECE2013-62111, ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Diego, CA, November 2013. 3. L. Guessous, Q. Zou, B. Sangeorzan, L. Smith, L. Yang, X. Wang, J.D. Schall, G. Barber and M
ideas to fit what ATE will supportDay 0 Evening Assignment: Each college should appoint a spokesperson and prepare aone minute introduction of your team and your project for tomorrow morning.Day 1Monday, July 15, 20196:30-8:00AM Breakfast at hotel8:15 -8:30AM Bus pickup at hotel9:00 – 9:10AM Welcome9:10 – 9:30AM Introduction of Colleges9:30-10:00 Session 1: ATE Basics (brief session 30 minutes including Q&A) Components of ATE proposal Head’s up about submission process, Fastlane, grants.gov, research.gov What PIs and grants offices will have to do between now and submission day10:00-10:45AM Session 2: Rationale (45 minutes) Brief presentation on importance of rationale (10
. ., Huang, J. C. H. ., Huang, A. Y. Q. ., & Yang, S. J. H. . (2017). Applying learning analytics for improving students engagement and learning outcomes in an MOOCs enabled collaborative programming course. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 220–234.Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896. http://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20090918Sadhasivam, J. (2014). Educational paradigm shift: Are we ready to adopt MOOC? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4), 50–55