development activity, Create Your Unique Personal Development Plan:Explore Your Options, was also held in Fall 2013 and led by the Associate Dean of theUniversity of Arkansas Honors College. This session was set up as a panel discussion with apanelist addressing each of the five topics listed in Table 2. Students were required to submit inwriting two-three questions in advance of the session and there were also provisions to submitquestions at the session. After the formal portion of the presentation, a lively Q&A sessionensued.Both sessions were held in the evening to avoid conflicts with students’ class schedules andattendance was very strongly encouraged. Members from the faculty oversight committeeattended the sessions as well. Plans are
34, 393-404 (2010).16 Bartol, A., García, E. R., Ely, D. R. & Guyer, J. The Virtual Kinetics of Materials Laboratory, (2012).17 Magana, A. J., Brophy, S. P. & Bodner, G. M. An Exploratory Study of Engineering and Science Students' Perceptions of nanoHUB. org Simulations. International Journal of Engineering Education 28, 1019 (2012).18 Ely, D. R. & García, R. E. (n.d) Introduction to the Modeling of Rechargeable Batteries Retrieved October 2013, from https://nanohub.org/groups/mse597batterymodeling/wiki/MainPage.19 Polya, G. How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. (Princeton University Press, 2008).20 Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3 edn, (Sage
their learning.In addition, communication and support tools such as an online Q&A tool, Facebook forumand online tutoring were provided. These online resources were organised through an in-house developed “Learning Pathway” tool that provided links to what students needed toknow and what they needed to do. The Learning Pathway tool organised and presented thisinformation on a weekly basis. The results of these improvements are apparent in Figure 4but more is needed to communicate the rationale in ways that make sense to students (seediscussion below).Observation of student learning activities revealed many unexpected insights into whatstudents need to learn and how they go about learning it, from the group in the workshop whocould not
of Media on Learning: The Debate Continues. SLMQ, 22(4). Accessed 12 Nov 2013. URL: http://www.ala.org/aasl/aaslpubsandjournals/slmrb/editorschoiceb/infopower/selctkozmahtml11. Kurubacak, G. (2006). “Critical Curriculum Design for Blended Learning in Higher Education: The Strategies, Principles and Challenges of Interactive Classroom Management.” The Institute of Education Sciences. Accessed 12 Nov 2013. URL: http://eric.ed.gov/?q=media+richness+theory&ft=on&id=ED49525912. Layton, J. R. (1999). No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Educational Technology & Society 2(3), pp142- 143.13. Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within a
Industrial Engineering at thelarge private university in South America partially supported this exploratory study.Bibliography1. Allen, D., et al. (2008). “Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report.” Grant X3-83235101- 0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.2. Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, J., Mihelcic, J., and Vanasupa, L. (2008). “Civil and environmental engineering education (CEEE) transformational change: Tools and strategies for sustainability integration and assessment in engineering education.” Proc. ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.3. Koehn, E., Patel, D., and Khonde, S. (2009). “Introduction of sustainability to civil and
). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.[26] Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.[27] Ollerenshaw, J. A., J.W. Creswell. (2002). Narrative research: A Comparison of two restorying dataanalysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(329), 329-347.[28] Patton, M. Q. (2006). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.!!!!! !! !!!! ! ! Page 24.688.11
. 100, No. 4. (2011): 760-777.2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. and Tang, J. “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention.” J. Engineering Education. Vol. 98, No. 4. (2009): 361-376.3. Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and Shuman, L. “Predicting STEM Degree Outcomes Based on Eighth Grade Data and Standardized Test Scores.” J. Engineering Education. Vol. 99, No. 3. (2010): 209- 223.4. Burtner, J. Critical-to-Quality Factors Associated with Engineering Student Persistence: The Influence of Freshman Attitudes. Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/ISEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session F2E-1 (2004). Available online at http://fie-conference.org
notarized. Upon receipt of the application, MoE forms a reviewcommittee consisting of members from government, academia, research institutes, and otherorganizations. The committee may meet multiple times until all the issues raised by thecommittee are addressed by the applying institute. The review committee visits the campus inSongdo and has a Q&A meeting with the faculty and staff. At the final stage of the review, thecommittee has a site visit to the overseas main campus. Every time new programs are added tothe already approved branch campus, MoE requires a new submission of the application,although some sections of the application may remain unchanged.The Global Campus can contribute to the higher education in South Korea by providing
further align the goals of both JADE and Brasil Junior in theexpansion of Junior Enterprise worldwide. Both Brasil Junior and JADE offer opportunities tonetwork internationally through biannual meetings and biennial Junior Enterprise WorldConferences. These conferences focus heavily on networking and provide professionaldevelopment through workshops, competitions, and Q&A panels.Junior Enterprise has had a significant impact within Junior Entrepreneurs’ own countries andthroughout the world. The European Commission conducted a study on Junior Enterprise in 2012on behalf of the European Union. The results of this study, which compared Junior Enterprisestudents to typical university students, demonstrated the benefits of Junior Enterprise in
American fraternities and sororities in engineering students’ educational experiences at a predominantly White institution. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, Arlington, VA. 19. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Page 24.903.11 20. Daly, S.R., Adams, R.S. & Bodner, G.M. (2012). What does it mean to design? Journal of Engineering Education, 101 (2), 187-219.21. Magana, A.J., Brophy, S.P. & Bodner, G.M. (2012). Computational Simulations as Learning Tools. Journal of Engineering
) 20– 3132. Wiesner M., Bottero J. (2007), “Environmental Nanotechnology: Applications and Impacts of Nanomaterials“,ISBN-10: 0071477500, McGraw-Hill.33.Sellers K. , Mackay C., Bergeson L. , Clough S., Hoyt M., Chen J., Henry K., and Hamblen J. (2008),“Nanotechnology and the Environment”, ISBN-10: 1420060198, CRC Press.34.Shen, C., Yang, W., Liu, Q., Maki, H., & Zhang, Z. (2009, June). A Potential Useful Method for CalculatingRelative Safety Index of Nanoparticles. Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering , 1-4.35.Marra, J., Voetz, M., & Kiesling, H.-J. (2010). Monitor for Detecting and Assessing Exposure to AiborneNanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research , 12 (1), 21-37.36.Hansen, S. F., Maynard, A., Baun, A., & Tickner, J
the course. Time Time Blended Teaching Style Traditional Teaching Style (hr) (hr) In-class 28 lecture quizzes 3 individual midterm in-class exams, 4.7 2.5 10 min each 50 min each In-class 28 lecture group practice problem 18.7 Q&A during 25 lectures max (5-10 min
#Wri7ng# Slides#Explaining# Pictures#or#Video# Speaking# Student#Work# Q#A
at which coal is converted into electricity, and has the units of BTU/kWhr. A pound ofcoal has a certain amount of heating value, HHV, which varies from 4000-15000 BTU/lbdepending on its quality and carbon content. The quantity of coal burned in the unit, Coal, resultsin a heat energy input, Q, given in equation (6). This is divided by the electrical energygenerated, which is the work done by the generator, W. Lower values of heat rate are better asthis indicates less coal necessary (less heat energy input) for a given amount of electrical energyoutput. Typical values for heat rate vary from the very good of around 9000 BTU/kWhr (38%efficient), to poor of around 11000 BTU/kWhr (31% efficient). Both BTU and kWhr are units ofenergy. To convert
.[33] N.-s. Zhao and G.-q. Wang, "A health measurement-oriented data application for control system," in Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, 2011, pp. 587-590.[34] G. A. Al-Mashaqbeh, "Computers and e-Health: Roles and new applications," in Computer Systems and Industrial Informatics (ICCSII), 2012 International Conference on, 2012, pp. 1-6.
. Page 24.882.6Table 1. Select questions from Fall 2013FIG Student Survey [%SA/A = percentage of students who either agreed orstrongly agreed; %N = neutral; %D/SD = percentage of students who either disagreed or strongly disagreed;%NoAn = no answer] Avg* STDEV %SA/A %N %D/SD %NoAn Q# Question FIGs have helped me develop valuable connections with 7 students in my own major. 3.73 0.97 61% 25% 13% 2% My peer advisor (PA) has been a source of positive support 11 this semester. 4.35 0.70 86% 13% 0% 2% My faculty mentor
, solicited comments seem to imply that the Page 24.1357.17benefit of shorter videos may be a moot point in the face of playback controls that allow studentsto watch a video, no matter its length, at whatever pace is to their liking. The authors lookforward to seeing future studies, along the lines of the one conducted by Kim et al.10, that wouldexamine student viewing patterns when having the option to watch a video at 1.5×, 2×, etc., andeventually link those patterns to learning and retention.References[1] N. Halyo and Q. Le, “Use of video technology to improve student learning,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA
graduate student) offered in-person Q&A times to supplementthe videos and regular teaching assistants provided additional help to students. In otherwords, the main teaching role of the faculty person was via the online videos (although in thispilot version the faculty instructor did hold weekly office hours). In order to compareteaching methods and learning outcomes, this course is being offered in a more traditionalformat by the faculty instructor during the Winter quarter 2014, and it will be offered againby a teaching fellow in the online-with-tutored-instruction format in the Spring. The quantummechanics course may also be offered in the teaching fellow format in the Spring or Summerof 2014. The fourth of the initial EE Online courses
and Development, 73. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.16) Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, Vol 312, 26 May, 2006.17) Wong, P. Y., & Brizuela, B. M. (2006). Building math: Stranded. Portland, ME: Walch Publishing.18) Piaget, J. (1965). The child's conception of number. London: W W Norton. Original published in1941.19) Piaget, J., Henriques, G., & Ascher, E. (1992). Morphisms and Categories- Comparing and Transforming (Translated by T. Brown). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.20) Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. NYC: Basic Books.21) Jordan, C., Tharp, R., & Baird-Vogt, L
, 39thAnnual Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, pp. 1-6.20. Malik, Q., Mishra, P. and Shanblatt, M., (2008). Identifying Learning Barriers for Non-major EngineeringStudents in Electrical Engineering Courses, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE North Central Section Conference. Page 24.48.15 AppendixMusic-to-Light Modulator Project Bill of Materials total Part Supplier Part # Cost/unit Cost Light modulator kit Carl's Electronics CK1200
, Kaminsky J. An Introduction to Engineers Without Borders and Its Impact on Employee Recruitment, Retention, and Success. OzWater. Melbourne, Australia; 2009.9. Eccles J. Understanding Women’s Educational and Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. Psychol Women Q. 1994;18:585–609.10. Eccles J. Where are all the Women? Gender Differences in Participation in Physical Science and Engineering. Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2007. p. 199–210.11. Matusovich H, Streveler R, Miller R. Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values. J Eng Educ. 2010;99(4):289
introduced in the course in fall 2012 (timeline of the use of the technologies included inFigure 1): Piazza is an online interface that helps manage Q&A in the form of online discussion.Students posted questions regarding cases, assignments, and tests online via Piazza and otherstudents could view or answer the questions. Instructors of SYS 2001 also visited Piazza Page 24.547.6frequently to respond to students’ questions, post information relevant to the course, and/orinitiate new course-related discussions. Panopto is an all-in-one video platform that allows users to record, upload, and playvideos online. The student teams were randomly
investigation to explore this disconnect in the context of undergraduate engineering education. The primary tasks of the research are: (i) To assess the Faculty knowledge of SDT; (ii) To develop a measurement framework for assessing the classroom environment as it relates to SDT; and (iii) To determine the association among Faculty knowledge of SDT, student motivation, learning environment, and student learning.6. A longitudinal, quasi-experimental design is employed where both instructors and students in the various Engineering Departments at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) are the participants. The research design and measurement framework (e.g. Learning Climate Questionnaire or LCQ; Riverside Situational Q-sort
: Ambrose, Ch. 1Week 3 How Students Learn ANGEL Q & A: Guest speaker; Discussion Ch. 1 "Prior Knowledge" Activity: Learning Styles cases Reading assignment: Ambrose, Ch. 3 Reading assignment: "Teaching Culturally Diverse Students"19 Page 24.189.8Week 4 Motivation Discussion Ch. 3 "Motivate Students" Activity: Observations logistics Reading Assignment: Ambrose, Ch. 7 Reading Assignment: "Backward Design?"Week 5 Strategic Course Planning Discussion Ch. 7 "Self-Directed Learning" Activity: Writing Learning
Higher Education 20, no. 2 (1984):131-153. 6. Golde, Chris M., and Dore, Timotthy M. “The survey of doctoral education and career preparation: The importance of disciplinary contexts”, in The Path to the Professoriate: Strategies for Enriching the Preparation of Future Faculty 2004, edited by Donald H. Wulff, Ann E. Austin, & Associates. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2004. 7. Staton, Ann. Q., & Darling, Ann. L. “Socialization of teaching assistants” in Teaching assistant training in the 1990s, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1989, No. 39, edited by J. D. Nyquist, R. D. Abbott, & D. H. Wulff, 15-22. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989. 8. Van Maanen, John. “Breaking
responsive. (Student W) Problem I have actually learnt a lot of things through this assignment. I learnt the ways to Solving solve problems, to find engineers for the interview. (Student Q) Leadership Next, it is about leadership .Actually, I never ask my team member to assign me as their leader, but it just happen indirectly .Sometimes, the responsibility that have been given indirectly is more likely to be done. They are very easy to handle and follow my instruction very well. In giving the orders, I learn not to use bossy words. This will make them become friendly
and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1-38.25. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V. & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, Vol Page 24.746.14 312, 26 May, 2006.26. International Center for Home Education
Outcomes’.The university then designs the courses and the student outcomes are further deployedinto ‘Course Outcomes’. The university devises the course content or activities, whichprovide the learning experience to the students to achieve the intended courseoutcomes. Assessments are carried out at various stages and students who reached thepre-defined standards become graduates. They then go back to the constituencies andserve the community. Now the evaluation starts in a big way. As Barbara Walward[10] puts it “Assessment tells how an individual student performed with respect tomany student outcomes, while Evaluation tells that, while students are strong in X andY they are weak in Q and R. That detailed information tells the department what
/magnetic fields created by the electrical signaldirectly impact the optical index of refraction. This can occur through a number of possiblephysical interactions including one of which is specifically referred to as the elecro-opticeffect4. In acousto-optics, the electrical signal does not directly impact the index of refractionand therefore within this more selective interpretation “acousto-optics” is often treated as adistinct specialty area within the field of optical engineering. A wide range of applications existfor acousto-optic devices which include laser beam deflectors, ultrasonic imaging, Q-switchingfor pulse generating lasers, real-time signal processing, a plethora of radar applications, andtunable optical filters. One application for
administration. She holds a bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering fromWSU, a master degree in Engineering Management from the University of Dayton, and a second master degreein Student Affairs in Higher Education Administration from WSU. Page 20.11.3 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Q Designing Customizable Content Delivery Systems Using Lean-Agile Principles for Improved International Student SuccessIntroductionIncreasing economic and technological interdependence has provided global incentive forcountries to further investments in