obtaining evidence of improved studentachievement during the early “period of classroom adjustment” that occurs when an innovationis introduced into a new classroom setting and the difficulty of seeing learning improvement thefirst few times an innovation is used25 (p. 98). PI: So if you had to rate this whole experience [of using the online forum in Calculus I], one to ten, what would you rate it? MI: Pretty highly – with ten being the best, right? Q: Yeah… A: I’d say an eight. Q: An eight? A: Yeah, I’d say an eight. I mean I would love to have seen dramatic increases in performance on exams, but you know, realistically we shouldn’t even expect that
Education, pp. 267-274, July 2002.4. R. Talbert, “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. K. M. Kecskemety, B. Morin, “Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014).6. M. Stickel, S. Hari, Q. Liu, “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self-Efficacy,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014). Page 26.1698.127. N. K. Lape, R.L. Levy, D. H. Yong, K. A. Haushalter, R. Eddy, N
theimpedance modulus and phase, as well as others parameters (C or L, Q) and plot the values onthe LCD display. Page 26.1775.6 Figure 3. Winning Project Europe Region - 2014USA RegionThe first Digital Design Competition was organized at Rose Hulman Institute of Technology, In,USA, starting in the academic year 2006-2007. The contest was very popular among students, anaverage of 10-15 students participating every year, despite a very busy schedule. Students whopresented their final projects received professional development credits. Starting in 2012, thecontest became national and the last three editions were organized as
J K L M N O P Q R S T U 21 11 3 3 9 11 3Table 2 lists the research topics and physics associated with the 21 most successful models todate. Four topics
“ideal” approach for concept generation. Des Stud 24:341– 3554. Restrepo J, Christiaans H (2004) Problem structuring and information access in design. J Des Res 4:1551–15695. Simon HA (1973) The structure of ill structured problems. Artif Intell 4:181–2016. Förster J, Liberman N, Shapira O (2009) Preparing for novel versus familiar events: Shifts in global and local processing. J Exp Psychol Gen 138:383–3997. Chen C, Kasof J, Himsel A, Dmitrieva J, Dong Q, Xue G (2005) Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. J Creat Behav 39:89–1108. Dorst K (2003) The problem of design problems. Expert Des 135–1479. Crismond DP, Adams RS (2012) The informed design teaching and learning matrix. J Eng Educ 101:738
., Moore, R. A., Newstetter, W (2014). “The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture.” Advances in Engineering Education 4(2): 132. [6] www.makerfaire.com, accessed 02/01/2015. [7] http://powerracingseries.org/ , accessed 02/01/2015. [8] http://miters.mit.edu, accessed 02/01/2015. [9] http://www.instructables.com/member/teamtestbot, accessed 02/01/2015. [10] http://evgrandprixpurdue.org/about/, accessed 02/01/2015. [11] http://evgrandprixpurdue.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/03/reference_guide_20121.pdf, accessed 02/01/2015. [12] http://explorecourses.stanford.edu/search;jsessionid=67bwttmp9iz41frrjrdfjxtv4?q=ME+185%3A+Electric+ Vehicle+Design&filtercoursestatusActive=on&view=catalog&
. Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. (electronic version) Higher Education, 41, 299-325.14. Bain, K. (2004). What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.15. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography – A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21 (3), 28-49.16. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.17. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation methods. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.18. Richardson, J. T. E. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69
to data mine associations between different joints on a human body (red circles in Figure4) and actions that students are performing. Figure 4: Multi-modal data acquisitionThe skeletal data is transformed into numeric XYZ values for each of the joints, as seen in Figure4, with a new data sample captured once every q milliseconds, depending on the hardware Page 26.178.6capabilities. For example, for the Left Hand Node in Figure 4, the first instance of data capturedis 2.4634 (Left Hand Node X), 2.8739 (Left Hand Node Y) and 0.4105 (Left Hand Node Z),representing the 3D position of that particular joint at
Testing, 2012.9. M. Jenkins, A. Martinez, J. Rodriguez, and E. Rojas. Designing a blended software testing course for embedded c software engineers. In Proceedings of the Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. Acta Press, 2011.10. E. L. Jones and C. L. Chatmon. A perspective on teaching software testing. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 16(3):92–100, Mar. 2001.11. C. Kaner and J. Bach. Black box software testing, 2005.12. C. Kaner, J. Falk, and H. Q. Nguyen. Testing Computer Software. Wiley, 2 edition, 1999.13. C. Kaner and S. Padmanabhan. Practice and transfer of learning in the teaching of software testing. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training, pages 157–166, Washington, DC
Big Before Massive: Scaling Up Participatory Learning Analytics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (pp. 93–97). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2567574.256762617 Steen, M. (2011). Tensions in human-centred design. CoDesign, 7(1), 45–60.18 Friesen, N. (2013). Learning Analytics: Readinessand Rewards. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 39(4), 1–12.19 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.20 Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.21 Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand
. Table A.1. Data Collection. Survey Response Overall Q 1 2 3 4 5 Response 1 10 15 0 1 0 1.69 2 10 13 3 0 0 1.73 3 9 11 6 0 0 1.88 4 12 13 1 0 0 1.58 5 6 13 6 1 0 2.08 6 14 11 1 0 0 1.50 7 8 13 5 0 0 1.88
Association, New Orleans, LA.23 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.24 Boekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioural change. Applied Psychology, 41(4), 377-397.25 McCord, R., & Matusovich, H. M. (Under Review). Study Context Matters: Time Crunches Lead to Coping Modes of Learning.26 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.27 Matusovich, H. M., Stephenson, J., Montfort, D., & Brown, S. A. (2013). Voices in Their Heads: Motivational Utterances in Engineering Problem Solving. Paper presented at the American Educational Research
. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225-252, 2011.13. Chronicle Staff, Chronicle of Higher Education, “Black Women May Face UniqueBarriers to Obtaining STEM Degrees,” The Ticker, September 24, 2014.http://chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/black-women-may-face-unique-barriers-to-obtaining-stem-degrees/8667514. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering (NACME), “UnderrepresentedMinority Women in Engineering,”, Research and Policy, Vol 3, Number 3, July. Page 26.618.17http://www.nacme.org/publications/research_briefs/URMWomeninEngineering.pdf15. Whalin, R. W., Pang, Q., & Jackson, M. Gender and Diversity Trends Of BSEngineering Graduates. 2012
Dirty,” in IEEE SoutheastCon, 2010, pp. 181- 184.[28] D. L. Farber, “Understanding Engineering Systems Futures : Using Scenario Analysis and Planning to Develop Engineering Systems Leadership,” Social Science Research Network, 2011.[29] D. C. Aragon, P. Golding, R. V Gonzalez, G. J. Moreno, D. Natera, R. F. O’Brien, R. T. Schoephoerster, S. A. Starks, E. Q. Villa, W. S. Walker, I. N. Webb, V. P. Manno, R. K. Miller, R. Martello, M. Somerville, L. A. Stein, J. D. Stolk, and J. Townsend, “Model Collaboration for Advancing Student-Centered Engineering Education,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013, pp. 212–214.[30] W. Karwowski, T. Ahram, and B. Amaba, “A system-of-systems engineering approach to leadership and
-Organization ofEngineering Education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4),433–447; Mitcham, C. (2009). A historico-ethical perspective on engineering education: From use and convenienceto policy engagement. Engineering Studies, 1(1), 35–53; Sato, Y. (2007). Systems Engineering and ContractualIndividualism: Linking Engineering Processes to Macro Social Values. Social Studies of Science, 37(6), 909-934;Zhu, Q. (2010). Engineering Ethics Studies in China: Dialogue Between Traditionalism and Modernism.Engineering Studies, 2(2), 85–107
- 1308, 1998.[6] V. Ramakrishnan, Y. Zhuang, S. Z. Hu, J. P. Chen and K. C. Tan, "Development of a Web- Based Control Experiment for a Coupled Tank," Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 6, pp. 4409 - 4413, 2000.[7] C. Batur, Q. Ma, K. Larson and N. Kettenbauer, "Remote Tuning of a PID Position Controller via Internet," Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 4403 - 4406, 2000.[8] F. M. Schaf and C. E. Pereira, "PID Controller Remote Tuning Experiment with Learning Environment Integration," Proceedings of 12th IFAC Symp. on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, pp. 261- 266, 2006.[9] K. P. Ayodele, O. Akinwale, L. O. Kehinde, O. Osasona, E. O. B. Ajayi and O. O. Akinwunmi, "Advanced
Universality-Diversity Scale. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 33, 157–69 (2000).9. Kottke, J. L. Additional evidence for the short form of the Universality-Diversity Scale. Personal. Individ. Differ. 50, 464–469 (2011).10. Jesiek, B. K. The Origins and Early History of Computer Engineering in the United States. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 35, 6–18 (2013).11. Richardson, J. W., Imig, S. & Ndoye, A. Developing Culturally Aware School Leaders Measuring the Impact of an International Internship Using the MGUDS. Educ. Adm. Q. 49, 92–123 (2013).12. Yeh, C. J. & Arora, A. K. Multicultural Training and Interdependent and Independent Self-Construal as Predictors of Universal-Diverse Orientation Among School Counselors. J. Couns. Dev
workstations. Max (A)= (MTBFj- Availability MTTRj)/ MTBFj Utilization of each workstation as well as the average Utilization utilization of the FMS specified periods (days, weeks, Max(U j) = Q j / PCj mouths) Tooling Information on various aspects of tool control,This project uses a hypothetical case problem for designing a factory that produces 5 parts. Theseparts run through a series of processes, including: (1) Loading/Unloading, (2) Turning, (3)Milling, (4) Drilling and (5) Cleaning, with different machining sequences6. A list of workstationprocessing
on their ability withrespect to the following four items: • Clearly describe a problem orally (Q15) Page 26.1178.6 • Clearly describe a problem in writing (Q16) • Explain my ability to others (Q17) • Ask probing questions that clarify fact, concepts, or relationships Q(22) 100% 80% Unanswered 60% A great deal Moderate 40
curriculum: a problem-andproject-based approach,” International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2012.[14] Bohn, J.H., “Integrating rapid prototyping into the engineering curriculum – a case study,” RapidPrototyping Journal 1997, 3(1), 32-37.[15] Ann, S.H., Montero, M.,Odell, D., Roundy., S., and Wright, P.K., “Anisotropic material properties of fuseddeposition modeling ABS,” Rapid Prototyping Journal 2002, 8(4), 248-257.[16] Sood, A., Ohdar, R.K., and Mahapatra, S.S., “Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fuseddeposition modeling processed parts,” Materials and Design 2010, 31, 287-295.[17] Sun, Q., Rizvi, G.M., Bellehumeur, C.T., and Gu., P., “Effect of processing conditions on the bondingquality of FDM polymer filaments,” Rapid
communications technologies for process automation—an experimental study," ISA transactions, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 461-470, 2012.[12] Y. H. Elawady and A. S. Tolba, "general framework for remote laboratory access: A standarization point of view," in 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT), 2010.[13] A. Tekin, F. Ata and M. Gökbulut, "Remote control laboratory for DSP‐controlled induction motor drives," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 702-712, 2012.[14] S. Hong, X. Zheng, B. Dalage, V. Kristiansen, Ø. Strøm, M. S. Shur, T. A. Fjeldly, J.-Q. Lu and T. Ytterdal, "Conducting laboratory experiments over the Internet," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol
) Studying alone 2.36 (0.85) 1.94 (0.65) Studying with others 5.36 (0.29) 5.53 (0.27) Page 26.1206.7Table 4. Student responses to survey questions (1 strong agreement, 3 neutral, 5 strong disagreement). CEE549 CEE542 Q# Question Description μ (COV) μ (COV) 4 Having an online project instead of a final exam was overall an excellent decision 1.53 (0.72) 1.82 (0.41) 5
: A Description of CPR. 2007, (2003).15. Gehringer, E. F. Electronic Peer Review and Peer Grading in Computer-Science Courses. Thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education (2001).16. Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S. J., Yuan, S. & Chiu, C. Web-Based Peer Review: The Learner as Both Adapter and Reviewer. IEEE Trans. Educ. 44, 246–251 (2001).17. Moreira, D. A. & Silva, E. Q. A Method to Increase Student Interaction Using Student Groups and Peer Review over the Internet. Educ. Inf. Technol. 8, 47–54 (2003).18. Ngu, A. H. H., Shepherd, J. & Magin, D. Engineering the ‘Peers’ System: The Development of a Computer-Assisted Approach to Peer Assessment. in Research and Development in
this case asks the student to draw the vector vˆQ,guess as a guessto the true velocity direction vector vˆQ of point Q. The question will be graded ascorrect if the true velocity direction is within a certain tolerance δ, that is, if vˆQ − vˆQ,guess < δ. Other question formats within PrairieLearn include numericalanswers and multiple choice. On the right side of the question page, the student can seetheir current mastery score, as well as question-specific information including thecurrent recommendation level, the number of points that will be awarded if this questionis answered correctly, the number of points that will be deducted if this question isanswered incorrectly, and the number of times this question has already been attempted.The
. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: an overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 273-290.10. Ngunjiri, F. W., Hernandez, K. A. C., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), Article-E1.11. Reed-Danahay, D. E. (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Berg.12. Wall, S. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38-53.13. Wall, S. (2008). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146-160.14. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods . SAGE
Annual Conference &Exposition. 2005.35. Zhu Q, Zoltowski C, Feister M, Buzzanell P, Oakes W, Mead A. The development of aninstrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-based design teams:Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.2014. Page 26.1363.13
, pp. Session AC 2007-894.11 R. K. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.12 J. J. Pembridge, "Mentoring in engineering capstone design courses: Beliefs and practices across disciplines," Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2011.13 M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002.14 B. Lutz, C. Hixson, M. C. Paretti, A. Epstein, and J. Lesko, "Mentoring and facilitation in entrepreneurship education: Beliefs and practices," presented at the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, San Jose, CA, 2014.15 J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative
between the interviewer and astudent when the student was asked to define critical thinking.A Well, I would define critical thinking as the employment of reason in order to reach a conclusion especially in regards to problem solving.Q Okay. Um, can you elaborate a bit more on that, like give me more explanation to it? Page 26.235.3A Um, more explanation of?Q Your, what you believe, maybe your reas—how you reason through something.A Okay. Um, (pause) well, I mean, you have to, well, I mean, I consider the multiple aspects that, um, are, it’s hard to phrase, let’s see…This student is having
predictive mathematical models,” Computers & Education, 61, 2013, pp. 133- 143.[5] R. White, “Predicting likely student performance in a first year Science, Technology, Society course,” International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 12(1), 2012, pp. 72 - 84.[6] L. Lackey, W. Lackey, H. Grady, and M. Davis, “Efficacy of using a single, non-technical variable to predict the academic success of freshmen engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 2003, pp. 41-48.[7] Q. Jin, P.K. Imbrie, J. Lin, X. and Chen, “A multi-outcome hybrid model for predicting student success in engineering,” 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada.[8] A. Olani
No. 2 February 2007American Chemical Society(10) Vapor Pressure And Normal Boiling Point Predictions For PureMethyl Esters And Biodiesel Fuels Yuan, W; Hansen, A.C.; Zhang, Q;Fuel 84 (2005) 943–950 Page 26.318.12 Appendix: Biodiesel Lab Activity Worksheet Biodiesel Processing LabObjectives: To determine process parameters for a chemical conversion process: converting wastedeep fryer oil (triglyceride (TG) source) into fatty acid methyl ester (FAME = biodiesel) using ahomogeneous alkaline catalyst based process.Tasks:1. Listen to process outline presentation