experiences.Constraints in curriculum expansion set by state mandates make it difficult to add additionalcourses as graduation requirements, even one credit hour seminar courses, so the program wasspecifically developed to tie into an existing course, CEE 463, “Civil Engineering Professions.”The combination of a general lecture and a course component allows for impact on the entireCEE student body while imposing a required component on graduating seniors. One potentialbenefit of this approach is that by the time students reach their senior year, they have a betterunderstanding of societal and global impacts than they would have if they were only exposed to aseminar class in their senior year.Program DevelopmentTwo components were developed to address the goals
and serves as the director of the Project Lead the Way training institute in Maryland.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Research of Project Lead The Way® (PLTW) Curricula, Pedagogy, and Professional DevelopmentAbstractPre-college students must be educated to make informed decisions in our technology-basedworld. Project Lead The Way® (PLTW), a pre-engineering curriculum, focuses on producingsecondary graduates with an enhanced level of technological literacy and competency. Theresearch activities regarding increasing engineering and technological literacy of K-12 studentsin the PLTW network will provide a perspective of how well pre-college students are learningabout technology and engineering
2006-1148: PROJECT PATHWAYS: CONNECTING ENGINEERING DESIGN TOHIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS IN AMATHEMATICS-SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMStephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor and an Associate Chair of the Chemical and Materials Engineering Department at ASU. His teaching responsibilities are in the areas of design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering, and structural characterization of polymers and semiconductors. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge of students in
, accessibility, student satisfaction, faculty satisfaction, and costeffectiveness). The paper includes a methodology for video development that elevates skills ofthree distinct audiences within the capstone design program (undergraduate student users,undergraduate student authors, and graduate student mentors/faculty/professional staff).IntroductionIn today’s rapidly changing world, state-of-the-art approaches to design and just-in-time methodsfor learning relevant tools, techniques, and technologies are in great demand1,2. For manyorganizations, especially Universities, this problem is accentuated by a large annual turnover ofthose who participate in research and development. An approach to knowledge transfer thatintegrates physical, virtual, and human
2006-2119: INTEGRATION OF INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS AND VIRTUALEXPERIMENTS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS COURSES FOR ONSITE, ONLINEAND HYBRID DELIVERYYakov Cherner, ATeL, LLC Dr. Yakov E. Cherner, a Founder and President of ATEL, LLC, combines 20+ years of research and teaching practice with extensive experience in writing curricula and developing educational software. He is the author of an innovative concept of multi-layered simulation-based conceptual teaching of science and technology. This instructional approach uses real-world objects, processes and learning situations that are familiar to students as the context for virtual science and technology investigations. To facilitate this methodology for
professional growth and innovativepractices for Indiana teachers. We envision facilitating a “community of practice” (CoP) thatextends across the state, helping teachers from one end of Indiana to the other to share ideas,collaborate on projects, disseminate best practices, and network expertise.Our CoP features go beyond threaded discussion “forums” or asynchronous “chat rooms.” Forexample, groups of teachers working on a project can reserve their own PRISM “meeting room”– either short- or long-term. Within this private web-workspace, members can set meeting times,post agendas, update calendars, collect data, vote on issues, use a shared whiteboard, and storematerials. We welcome planning committees from within school districts or across
19/22 20 Fall 2005 b, c 9/16 C J class lab O R 16/16Key:Instructors (Lab Assistants):b Dr. Randall D. Beerc Dr. Hillel J. Chield Dr. Richard F. Drushelp Leslie Picardo (then a Ph.D. student of Dr. Beer)Course Structure:A all students: 6 first-half exercises with checkouts or brief lab reports; second-half project (did not have to be Egg Hunt robot), design notebook for project only.B all students: 7 first-half exercises, no lab reports; second-half project is Egg Hunt robot; design notebooks kept throughout the semester.C like B except, for graduate students only, 7 first-half lab reports and a 10-page design
capabilities to projects. Students are typically quite anxious to have areal world engineering design experience to help them prepare for the workforce. Wehave found that many students favor projects that have social impacts or deal withfamiliar subject areas for which they have had some prior exposure. They prefer designproblems with few constraints and would rather approach design from a “clean sheet”perspective. It is often more difficult to motivate students to work on projects thatinvolve the application of existing technology to complex systems for which they mayhave had little or no prior background or exposure. And, it can be difficult to keepstudents motivated on projects for which the best approach to design is to use off-the-shelf hardware
2006-1882: ABET OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT THROUGHTHE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSE IN AN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMShantha Daniel, Iowa State University SHANTHA DANIEL is pursuing her doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering at Iowa State University. She has served as a graduate assistant in teaching as well as research including objective evaluation and outcome assessment.Devna Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University DEVNA POPEJOY-SHERIFF is pursuing her master degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies with an emphasis in Student Affairs. She currently serves as the Academic Advisor for IE undergraduate students in IMSE Department.K. Jo Min, Iowa State University K. JO
module to introduce the nanoscale to students, targeting high schooljuniors/seniors and their teachers. We mention teachers explicitly because in almost all cases, wesuspect that these materials must be educative for them. This is the responsibility of anymaterials that introduce new content.Our primary mission is to engage all students in the classroom with materials consisting of asound selection of content and best-practices. Reflecting the reasons stated above for introducingnanoscale learning, we want to motivate interest in science, and we want to contribute to theachievement of several learning goals.The module is designed to take about 2 weeks. This is a significant chunk of curriculum time,but the learning goals and tasks are not add-on
2006-324: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF AN MSC.ADAMS CONTROLDESIGN PROJECT IN UNDERGRADUATE MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGLouis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso Louis J. Everett is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and has research interests in the use of technology in the classroom. His technical research interests include robotics, machine design, dynamics and control systems. leverett@utep.edu http://research.utep.edu/pacelab Page 11.95.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006A
rationale for the decisions. Thepaper provides others considering similar requirements the experience gained by thisorganization. The study also considered a campus-wide laptop policy, but concluded there weretoo many unanswered questions and risks which are both discussed in the paper.1 IntroductionThe Division of Computing Studies Arizona State University (ASU) at the Polytechnic campusoffers Computer Science programs at both baccalaureate and masters levels. It distinguishesitself from the traditional Computer Science programs on the Tempe campus in two respects.First, the predominance of courses are problem-based, hands-on, and utilize computing best-practice tools, methods and languages. Second, upper-division and graduate offerings earn
2006-1537: PLOTTING A BRIGHT FUTURE FOR MANUFACTURINGEDUCATION: RESULTS OF A BRAINSTORMING SESSIONDaniel Waldorf, Cal Poly State University Dr. Daniel Waldorf is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Cal Poly State University in San Luis Obispo. Dr. Waldorf teaches mainly in the manufacturing processes area, including courses in manufacturing process design, tool engineering, computer-aided manufacturing, and quality engineering. His research interests are with machining process modeling and monitoring, especially related to cutting tool wear, vibrations, and advanced tool design. Prior to coming to Cal Poly Dr. Waldorf worked in Chicago as a quality
, Page 11.306.2engineering design is held responsible for the impact it has on life-cycle issues such as costs,usability, safety, manufacturability, serviceability, recyclability, sustainability, disposability, andquality; ultimately, determining the success or failure of products and organizations. Indeed,design is considered an issue of national importance2. Good design practices can be observed,but how can the expertise and methodologies employed be captured, transferred, implemented,formalized or improved? Why are some people more likely to be good designers? These are justsome of the questions that researchers and practitioners have sought to answer.In engineering education, students (undergraduate and graduate) are often involved
Learning, Projects that Matter: Concepts and Models for Service Learning in Engineering, AAHE, E. Tsang, ed., Washington D.C., (2000).6 Design Criteria for Sustainable Development in Appropriate Technology: Technology as if People Matter Robert C. Wicklein, Ed. D. University of Georgia, USA7 Hazelton, B, Bull, C. Appropriate Technology: Tools, Choices and Implications, November 1988.8 Wilk, et. al., Preparing Engineering Students to Work in a Global Environmen: The Union College Model,, Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition9 Mayes, et. al., ABET Best Practices: Results form Interviews with 27 Peer Institutions, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and
Engineering Major at the US Air Force Academy.The Secretary’s goal was not only to create a core of officers who possess a systems-levelperspective for research, developmental engineering and acquisition of new systems, butto develop that same perspective among graduates who serve as Air Force pilots,operations officers and battle managers. Through the combined efforts of departments from the Engineering, BasicSciences and Social Science Divisions, the Academy’s Systems Engineering major wasestablished in 2003 with its first graduates to be commissioned in June 2006. Inrecognition of the importance of a discipline with a more managerial focus, the SystemsEngineering Management major was also created. These two academic programs share acore of
construction for the Cooper River Project is a success storyand a huge positive step for the acceptance of Design-Build as a highly viable project deliverysystem. It is also a success story that needs to be told to construction engineering and technologystudents that as ‘constructors’, they have the same opportunities for building such megastructures as do graduates from the discipline of civil engineering.In the late 1990s, the author conducted a Survey of some of the top Owners listed in theEngineering News Record (ENR) to ascertain the prevalent construction contracting practices inthe United States. Among the several questions asked of the Owners, one of the Survey questionsdealt with the topic of ‘Project Delivery Systems.’ In response to the
. It considers objects from our daily environment and focuses on their principles ofoperation, histories, and relationships to one another. Physics 105 is concerned primarilywith mechanical and thermal objects, while Physics 106 emphasizes objects involvingelectromagnetism, light, special materials, and nuclear energy. They may be taken ineither order. The course was designed for non-scientists and built around everyday objects.The course became exceptionally popular. For more than a decade, 500 students took thecourse each semester, however enrollment is now capped at 200 students. The impact ofthe course How Things Work has been widespread. At the University of Virginia, manynon-science students who would otherwise have no exposure to
Raju, P.K., "Impact of Della Steam Plant CD-ROM in Integrating Research and Practice", 1998 North American Case Research Association, p. 118.9. Sankar, C.S., Raju, P.K., Kler, M. (1999), "Crist Power Plant: Planning for a Maintenance Outage", Business Case Journal, 5(1&2): 122-145.10. Raju, P.K., Sankar, C.S., Halpin, G., and Halpin, G., “Dissemination of Innovations from an EducationResearch Project through Focused Workshops,” Journal of SMET Education and Research, 3(3&4): 39-51,July-Dec. 2002.’11. Raju, P.K., Sankar, C.S., Halpin, G., Halpin, G., and Good, J. “Evaluation of an Engineering Education Courseware Across Different Campuses,” Frontiers in Education 2000 Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2000
and has recently become interested in the areas of sustainability, industrial design, and the intersection of engineering and the performing arts.Richard Savage, California Polytechnic State University RICHARD N. SAVAGE is an Associate Professor in the Materials Engineering Department at Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA. He joined Cal Poly in 2002 after 20+ years in industry. He received a bachelor in science degree from Juniata College, Huntingdon, Pa. and a Ph.D. in Analytical/Physical Chemistry from Indiana University, Bloomington, In. He is the graduate coordinator for the MATE department and director of the Micro Systems Technology Group
2006-1332: METHODOLOGY AND TOOLS FOR DEVELOPING HANDS-ONACTIVE LEARNING ACTIVITIESJulie Linsey, University of Texas-Austin JULIE LINSEY is a Ph.D. candidate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin. Her research focus is on systematic methods and tools for innovative and efficient conceptual design with particular focus on design-by-analogy. Contact: julie@linseys.orgBrent Cobb, U.S. Air Force Academy CAPT. BRENT COBB is an instructor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy. He received his B.S. from the Air Force Academy and his M.M.E. degree from Auburn University. He previously worked for the Propulsion Directorate of the Air
Management, the Babson Entrepreneurship Research conference, and the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and has several refereed publications and book chapters. Dr. Neck is the Faculty Coordinator of REFLECT, a reunion program for alumni of the Price-Babson Symposium for Entrepreneurship Educators and is currently designing a NSF-funded education program to help engineering educators infuse entrepreneurship into schools of engineering. At Babson, she teaches Entrepreneurship & New Venture Creation and the Foundation Management Experience, an introductory course that requires students to create, start, manage and liquidate a business.John Bourne, Olin
2006-2023: LEVERAGING REHABILITATION NEEDS INTO FRESHMANENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECTSBruce Ankenman, Northwestern University Bruce Ankenman received a BS in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University and an MS and PhD. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Prior to his graduate work, he worked for five years as a design engineer for an automotive supplier in Ohio. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department at the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern University. His research interests include the statistical design and analysis of experiments. Although much of his work has been concerned with physical
at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA). He graduated from USCGA with his BSEE in 1992 and earned his MSIT from Naval Post Graduate School in 1996. He holds the rank of Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Coast Guard. Address: U.S. Coast Guard Academy, Department of Engineering, 27 Mohegan Ave., New London, CT 06320-8101; telephone: 860-444-8541; fax: 860-444-8546; e-mail: jstaier@exmail.uscga.edu. Page 11.80.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A NEW APPROACH TO TEACHING INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AT THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
2006-96: VIDEOCONFERENCE TEACHING FOR APPLIED ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY STUDENTSVladimir Genis, Drexel University Dr. Vladimir Genis, Associate Professor in the Goodwin College, Drexel University, taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses in physics, electronics, biomedical engineering, and acoustics. His research interests include ultrasound wave propagation and scattering, ultrasound imaging, electronic instrumentation, piezoelectric transducers, and engineering education. He serves as a member of the Emerging Technologies and Workforce Development Advisory Committee.William Brownlowe, Montgomery County Community College William Brownlowe, Associate Professor of
. Faculty members develop courses in responseto the school’s context and instruction is tailored to the specific needs andinterests of the students and faculty members at a particular school. A review ofcourse syllabi collected as part of the faculty survey suggest that there are few, ifany, examples of best practices in seismic design education that are readilytransferable to a majority of architecture programs. Most depend on the ability ofuniquely qualified faculty or access to regional professional resources in areas ofhigh seismicity. The development of demonstration projects that are carefullydesigned for transferability could help schools address seismic design efficientlyand effectively. These projects could examine ways to access expertise
untenured faculty member should (andlikely will) spend most of their time. Page 11.256.3Tip #1: “Invest In Yourself” – When you successfully defend your doctoral dissertation,you are one of the best in the world in your field of Topic X. Thus, you have the bestchance to make an immediate scholarly impact by: • writing one or two more papers in Topic X. This keeps your publishing record intact and shows you can publish papers on your own (usually a key “deliverable” of a national research grant) • making a “lateral move” into a new, but parallel field of research. When you submit a proposal for review, the reviewers of your proposal
immediately in competitiveenvironments with system engineering, information technology, and soft (communication,leadership and team) skills in addition to traditional engineering fundamentals 2,3. Such skills areparticularly relevant for Industrial Engineers who often serve as a facilitator of technical andbusiness interactions4,5.A number of efforts to increase these skills have been undertaken, the most common being thecapstone senior design projects. Curriculum designers are increasingly more aware ofdeveloping courses that combine skills from several prior courses to practice such skills.Especially innovative approaches introduce students to systems thinking early and continuouslythrough their program, stressing both engineering and business
. Common practices for reducing energy consumption andwaste will be discussed. In addition, strategies for product packaging and delivery will Page 11.364.8be presented.End-of-use strategies - This module addresses strategies and challenges associated withreducing the environmental impact of a product after it has been used by a consumer orbusiness. Discussion will address re-use, remanufacturing, recycling, and disposaloptions. Design for recycling tools will be demonstrated and practiced on real products.In addition, the current economic and legislative realities of end-of-use strategies will bepresented.Environmentally responsible management - Industry
could impact all the students the educator teaches, undergrads and grad students, research labs and traditional classrooms. One educator decided to attend a teaching-related workshop in order to learn new teaching strategies he could incorporate into his teaching repertoire. 5. All the students in my department. This code captured decision points that could possibly impact all students within the educator’s department. For example, one department chair decided to assist in designing, implementing and modeling mentoring relationships with undergraduates, graduates and junior faculty members. Such an approach would eventually affect all the students in the department. 6. All students in the college. This