Asee peer logo
Displaying results 121 - 150 of 264 in total
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Stacie Edington, University of Michigan; Steven J. Skerlos, University of Michigan; Claudia G. Cameratti-Baeza, University of Michigan; Abby M. Chapin, University of Michigan; Frank J. Marsik, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
].Just as race and ethnicity may impact the inner workings of engineering teams [11], issues ofrace and ethnicity may influence who benefits from technology [12]. Hence, it is critical for first-year engineering students to begin to understand engineering and engineering design asprocesses that are inherently social and subject to unconscious bias.Course Description & PartnershipsEngineering 110: Design Your Engineering Experience is an introductory course in whichstudents explore the breadth of opportunities available to engineers in both their education andtheir career. The course is structured around three key themes: What is Engineering?, ExploringMichigan and Michigan Engineering, and Self-Understanding. The complete vision, mission
Conference Session
Empathy and Human-centered Design 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Xi Wang P.E., University of Mount Union; Minhao Dai, Kennesaw State University; Gabriella Cataloni, University of Mount Union
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
peerinteractions as well as interactions with faculty members, and these interactions could encouragemore effective understanding of materials and exploration of topics. Second, liberal artseducation focuses on cultivating adaptive problem-solving skills based on critical thinking,collaboration, and effective communication. These skills make students valuable collaborators inengineering projects and afford them a smooth transition into professional life [3]. That means aliberal arts education can potentially lead to a successful engineering career.In the meantime, the integration of engineering education into liberal arts universities posesseveral challenges to the engineering faculty members. For instance, faculty members may lackthe knowledge needed to
Conference Session
Efforts to Understand and Support Students' Socioemotional Factors
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo; Nichole Ramirez, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Xinrui (rose) Xu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Douglas B. Samuel, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
higher rates of mental health conditions in engineeringand understand factors that influence studentsdecisions to seek help. Wider scale studies andcross-institutional engineering-specific studies can provide additional evidence for understandingthe mental health issues faced by our students and how engineering education plays a role inthem and their ability to address such issues timely. Aligned with that objective, this studypresents an initial exploration of the relationship between the stigma typically associated withmental health conditions and help-seeking behavior of students. It is a first step toward a morethorough examination of the engineering culture and its effect on students’ mental health.Engineering culture and mental
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kai Jun Chew, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., E4S, LLC
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
to think more aboutengineering (Jones, 2009). Also, principals, can make better policy and implementation decisionswithin their high schools to support their students’ outcome expectations. Accordingly, the purpose of this qualitative study is to explore teachers’ and principals’perceptions of students’ postsecondary career outcome expectations in two Virginia highschools. This study stems from a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project on studyingsystemic gatekeepers and how they may influence studentsdecision to pursue engineering. Weground this particular study within the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) (Lent et al.,1994) to answer the following research question (RQ): How do teachers and principals in twoVirginia
Conference Session
TS3: Working with Students
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Matthew Frenkel, New York University; Azure Janee Stewart
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
skills insummer 2021, and develop pre and post assessments for a more rigorous study on studentsdevelopment of professional skills. We are also working to pilot an additional program with the2021 Summer Undergraduate Research participants to explore how building electronic researchportfolios may reinforce professional development. Lastly, our work with undergraduatesindicates that many graduate students may be entering Masters and PhD programs lacking in avariety of research and professional skills. We are currently working with members of theengineering faculty to transition some of our workshops towards graduate students, with the hopeof designing a multiyear study on the impact of professional skill development on graduatestudent
Conference Session
Focus on ETAC Accreditation
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Qudsia Tahmina, Ohio State University; Kathryn Kelley, Ohio State University; Aimee T. Ulstad, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
the program is new, regional campuses had to explore outreach strategies and attractstudents to the major. One of the strategies was to have an overlap between engineering andengineering technology programs for the first year. This overlap of coursework would allowcampuses to retain students and offer opportunity for students to explore engineering technologymajor and make an informed decision on which educational path to take. First-year courses suchas physics, fundamentals of engineering and general education courses remain same forengineering and engineering technology students. In addition to these courses, new courses weredeveloped to teach introductory topics in engineering technology in the first year. Thecurriculum is shared with the
Conference Session
Undergraduate Students' Professional Skills and Reflection
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Gloria Washington, Howard University; Marlon Mejias, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Marlon Mejias; Legand L. Burge III, Howard University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Chairman of the Department of Computer Science at Howard University. His primary research interest is in distributed computing. Dr. Burge is also interested in Computer Science Education and Diversity, and Tech En- trepreneurship and Innovation. His work in CS Education and Diversity has primarily been focused on informal and personalized learning, and on the use of technology to aid in the socio-technical encultur- ation of underrepresented students in CS, K-12 initiatives, and diversity, equity, and inclusion beyond compliance. Dr. Burge practices design thinking as an innovative teaching methodology and promotes immersive learning and learning by doing. He co-teaches the Bison Startup and Bison Accelerate courses
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc.
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants
Conference Session
Engineering Communication I: History and Praxis
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Marcy Bloom Milhomme, Pennsylvania State University; Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University; Lori B. Miraldi, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
the group process talk, the topic proposal, andthe problem-solution talk (explained next).2. Researching an independent technical topic Students in the targeted communication course have the autonomy to choose a technicaltopic to explore for a sizable part of the semester. The student’s topic choice spans twoconnected talks; a topic proposal (3 – 4 minutes) followed by a problem solution talk (8 – 10minutes). Various in-class exercises, readings, and lectures are built into the course to helpstudents choose and research a topic that sparks a personal connection or interest. Students maychoose a societal problem followed by an engineering solution, or students may find aninnovative solution and pair it with a societal problem that the
Conference Session
CoNECD Session : Day 3 Slot 2 Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 CoNECD
Authors
Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington; Tiffany D. Pan, University of Washington; Eve A. Riskin P.E., University of Washington; Sonya Cunningham, University of Washington; Saejin Kwak Tanguay, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 15 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational climate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Who benefits most from a holistic student
Conference Session
Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sunay Palsole, Texas A&M University; Jeff Chernosky, Texas A&M University; Randy McDonald, Texas A&M University Engineering
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
Associate Vice Provost for Digital Learning at UT San Antonio, where he established the Office of Digital Learning that created a unit focused on innovative delivery across the entire spectrum of technology enabled learning - from in-class to online. Over his career, he has helped a few hundred faculty from varied disciplines develop hybrid and online courses. He has also taught traditional, hybrid and online courses in various STEM disciplines ranging in size from 28 to 250. He is also co-developer of a Digital Academy which was a finalist for the Innovation Award by the Professional and Organizational Development Network and an Innovation Award winner. He was also named as the Center for Digital Education’s Top 30
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 14
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Nicolas Ivanov, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto; Nhien Tran-Nguyen, University of Toronto; Neal Callaghan, University of Toronto; Theresa Frost, Toronto District School Board; Jose Luis Cadavid, University of Toronto; Huntley H. Chang, University of Toronto; Ileana Louise Co; Patrick Diep, University of Toronto; Guijin Li, University of Toronto; Nancy T. Li, University of Toronto; Corinna Smith, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto; Joshua Yazbeck; Locke Davenport Huyer, Johns Hopkins University; Dawn M. Kilkenny, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
Toronto District School Board. Teachers of both classes werefamiliar with Discovery and had previously participated in multiple in-person program offerings.Discovery-related deliverables graded by class-specific teachers made up 10-15% of final coursegrades.Discovery mentors were volunteer undergraduate and graduate students from the University ofToronto Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. Prior to student interaction, mentors wereprovided a pedagogical approach “cheat sheet” that included technical specifics of the projectsand was compiled based on the experience of previous Discovery mentors and teachers.Program OutcomesEvaluation of the Fall 2020 offering of Discovery was completed using a combination of studentgrade data, student
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eleanor Leung, York College of Pennsylvania
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
, documentation of work conducted throughout the semester, and completion of a finalprototype.The research and design stages of an independent study can be similar to that of an EngineeringCapstone project however there are some key differences in the student experience. First, in anindependent study, the student usually initiates the creation of the project to explore a topic ofmutual interest with a faculty member. At smaller teaching-focused institutions, many advancedtechnical topics in a student’s major are not covered in-depth and some students would like moreexperience in a particular area out of pure interest or to prepare themselves for a future career inthat field. Secondly, the student is not part of a student design team and often works
Collection
2013 North Midwest Section Meeting
Authors
Sousada Chidthachack; Mark A. Schulte; Forster D. Ntow; Jia-Ling Lin; Tamara J. Moore
Engineering. Students must complete one ortwo industry-sponsored projects per semester.Student Empowered Design and Monitoring is a guiding principal for the program model;students own responsibility for their learning. Students identify which outcomes will beaddressed at the beginning of each new project, while working with faculty. Each project cycleincludes two reports – a design report and a written report, and a final presentation. The finalpresentation is made to faculty and external clients, and includes an oral examination to assessstudent understanding of the knowledge and competencies required. Establish Learning Graduate Entering Students and Design
Conference Session
Bridging Content and Context in the Classroom
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Mark A. Chapman, University of San Diego; Bryce Fledderman, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education, Equity
socialrelationships and an understanding of social issues is extremely valuable for the development ofengineering students. Unfortunately, engineering programs emphasize the technical content sointensely that most engineering students do not get the opportunity to work with social issuesthus never creating that awareness.The focus on technical aspects of engineering, and the perception that engineering work isobjective, has also led engineering students to think about the profession as apolitical [8, 9].This depoliticization frames engineering as a technical space where the social and politicalsides are tangential to engineering decision-making. Cech argued that students'conceptualization of engineering as apolitical has also created issues related to
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sigrid Berka, University of Rhode Island; Bing Mu, University of Rhode Island; Lars Olav Erickson, University of Rhode Island; Iñaki Perez-Ibanez, University of Rhode Island
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
International
universally accepted intercultural competence assessmentinstrument that can be used in every context does not exist. Our decision to use the IDI for ourquantitative analysis is rooted in our belief that the development of intercultural competence is aprogressive and ongoing process [2], [34], [35]. The IDI is recognized as a cross-nationallyvalidated psychometric instrument developed based upon Milton Bennett’s DMIS that spansfrom monocultural orientations to intercultural orientations to cultural differences. Theinstrument provides an indication of respondents’ predominant orientation to cultural differences,referred to as their Developmental Orientation. The IDI is well established as an instrument tomeasure student gains in intercultural
Conference Session
CoNECD Session : Day 3 Slot 8 Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 CoNECD
Authors
Philippa Anne Martin, University of Canterbury; Eileen Frances Britt, University of Canterbury
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
Education, 2021 Training University Staff and Faculty in Motivational Interviewing: Advancing Diversity, Equity and InclusionAbstractMany minority and under-represented minority University engineering students are experiencinga chilly climate, which is partially a result of experiencing higher levels of micro-aggressions,harassment, discrimination and unkind acts. It can be challenging to address these issueseffectively through formal University discipline procedures. This paper discusses an informalapproach to addressing such acts as an early intervention and education approach. Specifically, 17University staff and faculty in engineering were trained to use Motivational Interviewing forchange conversations around
Conference Session
College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Shruti Misra, Unviersity of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships
ofreal-world experience as a factor in the ENGINE student experience is not surprising. Similarly,given the generally important role that faculty and teaching assistants (TAs) play in studentlearning as well as the importance of grades to undergraduates, the emergence of instructionalsupport and assessment as factors in the capstone design experience is also justified. Andfinally, the fourth factor, task value serves as an indication of students' motivation to participatein the ENGINE capstone experience. Task value draws from expectancy-value theory and hasbeen demonstrated to be a distinct contributor to academic engagement and effort [26, 27] aswell as educational and career aspirations [28].RQ2: Was there a difference in student perceptions
Conference Session
Assessing Hard-to-Measure Constructs in Engineering Education: Assessment Design and Validation Studies
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jiaqi Zhang, University of Cincinnati; P.K. Imbrie, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
or choosing inventions to address specific concerns.From a descriptive perspective, students with low scores in academic motivation (AMO),persistence (PST), social engagement (SCE), and decision making in college major (DMA)should be referred to the academic consulting center, those who have low scores in fit withmajor/career (FIT) could lead to a consulting in the career center. Also, a low score in masterylearning goal orientation (MLG), personal achievement goal orientation (PAG), deep learningapproach (DLA), surface learning approach (SLA), and problem-solving approach (PSA) maywarrant a referral for tutoring in the major.The SASI III could be used for intervention development and research for causality-relatedconcerns from an
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sydney Nguyen, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Gabriel Medina-Kim, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Franz J. Kurfess, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Elise St. John, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Jingzhe Wu, The World Bank; Gudrun Socher, Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences; Anurag Uppuluri, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Angie Paola Garcia Arevalo, The World Bank; Erin Sheets, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering
. The GPSS aims to supportgovernment decision-makers in boosting efficient large-scale intervention strategies andinvestment plans to reduce disaster risks in schools and improve learning environments forchildren.ContextIn the learning experience examined in this paper, two student teams were formed during theWinter 2020 term to collaborate with a professional team from the GPSS of the World Bank todesign a solution aimed at improving baseline data to assess the vulnerability of schoolinfrastructure. Students from an upper-division undergraduate level Human-ComputerInteraction (HCI) course and a graduate-level Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)course participated. The AI/ML team developed a back-end automatic structural
Conference Session
Medley of Undergraduate Programming and Pedagogies
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto; Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto; Rubaina Khan, University of Toronto
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
and alumniperceptions might differ. Although we will also be using student surveys and focus groups in thisproject, we decided to start with program alumni as we feel they are uniquely well-positioned todiscuss their learning experience in the program with a juxtaposition to their career and graduateschool experience, and speak to the relevance of the program’s teaching and learning approachesbeyond the program itself. Comparing faculty perceptions with alumni perceptions is key indistinguishing between the intended and the enacted curriculum [19], [20].To engage in this research, we sought previous research on comparing instructor and alumniperspectives. Interestingly, despite an extensive literature review, the majority of studies focuson
Conference Session
STEM Issues
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura Kasson Fiss, Michigan Technological University; John L. Irwin, Michigan Technological University; Sarah Tan, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
future career than non-ETS honors students.This paper investigates the student experience in the ETS-IMPRESS program in three ways. Tocapture student experience of the use of the IDP and the faculty mentor relations, we solicitedlong-form responses to anonymous surveys. Analysis of reflections submitted in courses andcomponents allows for a window into longitudinal student development as well as their directreflections on the effects of the program. Finally, analysis of student questionnaires, a full reportof which appears as an appendix, sheds light on student development. We find that studentsbenefit from this program and encourage the incorporation of IDPs and other means of reflectioninto engineering curricula, particularly as a regular
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Julia A. Scott, Santa Clara University; Evangelia Bouzos, Santa Clara University; Matthew Philip Hendricks, Santa Clara University; Prashanth Asuri, Santa Clara University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
and members fromUniversity corporate and external relations offices. This board provides accountability andguidance to support the ongoing success and growth of the Lab’s mission. The director alsoworks closely with University Relations to identify external partners and funding sources. Whilethe director ties together all the components of the Lab’s functions, the faculty mentors are theprimary interface with students. Once a project is initiated with a faculty mentor, the facultyperson acts as the liaison between the students and the external partner. This person manages theproject, provides area expertise, and teaches the students associated professional skills. Primarysuccesses for the faculty mentor are in the student outcomes and
Conference Session
Impact of COVID-19 on Design Education 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Victoria Bill, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering; Anne-Laure Fayard, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
was open to the entire university. The hours variedduring the week but were generally 10AM – 5PM with a few weekend hours. In additionto the manager, there was an additional full-time staff member who split their time 50%with the makerspace and other IT services, and 45-50 student employees. The managerhad created a large team structure for student staff, with sub-teams who focused ondifferent aspects of operational support and student team leads. After training from themanager, graduate students led faculty course prototyping and training requests.Covid-19 and ongoing: In Spring 2020, the space was closed and the manager led PPEproduction, mainly face shields. All student staff were offered the option to workremotely to finish out the
Conference Session
The Role of Peers in Promoting Learning and Persistence
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Thien Ngoc Y Ta, Arizona State University; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Cody D Jenkins, Arizona State University; Karl A. Smith, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Ryan James Milcarek, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
research in engineering education in areas of sustainability, resilience and fuel cell education.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and
Conference Session
Industrial, Professional, and Practical Contexts of Engineering Ethics
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
learningopportunities. As Eyler points out, such opportunities provide students with “‘real world’challenge” [5, p. 41], and through workplace experiences students often come to see “therelevance of the curriculum to life in a complex organization” [5, p. 50]. Eyler (1993) morespecifically found that co-op students learned how to be “an expert on people and organizations”[5, p. 47], including how to be an effective member of their employing organization. It has alsobeen argued that internship or co-op programs are helpful for students’ professional growth [6].Based on their empirical study with business students, Bhattacharya and Neelam reported thatstudents developed greater confidence, negotiation skills, social sensitivity, and cross-culturalunderstanding
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mayra S. Artiles Ph.D., Arizona State University; Juan M. Cruz, Rowan University; Sarah Anne Blackowski, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Stephanie G. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas; Gwen Lee-Thomas, Quality Measures LLC
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member and administrator at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Her research interests include: Teamwork, International Collaborations, Fac- ulty Development, Quality Control/Management and Broadening Participation. She is an honor graduate American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
Conference Session
Academic Success and Retention
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Danika M. Dorris, North Carolina State University; Julie L. Swann, North Carolina State University; Julie Ivy, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, North Carolina State University Julie Simmons Ivy is a Professor in the Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Fitts Faculty Fellow in Health Systems Engineering. She previously spent several years on the faculty of the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan. She received her B.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan. She also received her M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a focus on Operations Research at Georgia Tech. She is President of the Health Systems Engineering Alliance (HSEA) Board of Directors. She is an active member of the Institute of Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS), Dr
Collection
2011 North Midwest Section
Authors
R. Nelson; J. Bumblis; C. Liu; A. Turkmen; N. Zhou; D. Olson; R. Rothaupt
Office of Economic Development (Eau Claire, WI); Open Silicon Inc. (Eau Claire, WI); Hutchinson Technologies . (Eau Claire, WI); Silicon Graphics Inc., (Chippewa Falls, WI); 3M Corporation (Menomonie, WI); AREVA T&D (Seattle, WA).New faculty recruitment/hire At least two faculty members are needed to teach electrical/computer aspects to ET, PE and MFGE students. An additional faculty member was needed to join the current faculty to ca a a a a CEE c . A nationwide search resulted in Dr. Cheng Liu joining us as a new tenure-track faculty member.Student recruitment E a ab Computer Engineering program at UW-Stout
Conference Session
Mechanics & Mechanics Related
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., NASA EPDC
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
skillswere developed through continual oral interaction between faculty advisor and team members,while reports were required to further enhance the use of technical writing.For this reason, the number of STEM undergraduate students engaging in research opportunitiesis rather significant given its short-term and long-term benefits [13], [15], [16]. In a surveyconducted by Russell in 2006, 53% of all STEM majors indicated some sort of researchcommitment throughout their undergraduate matriculation [12], [14]. Mogk and Tomovicsimilarly reported that partaking in undergraduate research is considered an effective educationaltool which enhances the overall undergraduate experience [6], [7]. Such tool has further proven toincrease the pursuit of STEM