, aircraft design, and aerospacestructures. The expansion of aerospace engineering education activities included thedevelopment of multiple undergraduate- and graduate-level courses, promotion of aerospacerelated capstone projects, establishment of student chapters of Students for the Exploration andDevelopment of Space (SEDS) and American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA),and creation of an AIAA design-build-fly competition team.This initiative has so far resulted in the establishment of an undergraduate-level AerospaceEngineering Concentration and the Aerospace Graduate Certificate Program. Efforts to expandthe initiative are ongoing, particularly at the graduate level. Aerospace related research activitiesin the college of
variables that predict ET student “seriousness of purpose” as defined by the senior capstone instructor? 3. What academic and curricular variables influenced student success in an ET undergraduate degree program?Use of Multiple Linear Regression and CART ModelingPredicting student success has traditionally utilized multiple linear regression (MLR), and thismethod was used to predict student success (defined as having GPA>2.8 at graduation).However, a binary classification method was preferable in this case, as primary project goal wasto predict whether the student will be successful or not, rather than trying to predict the specificGPA he or she might earn. Further, MLR assumes Type 1 and Type II errors are approximatelyequal. When
and associate director of BME’s undergraduate program. In this role, she will strengthen the department’s connection with the local medical community, both in clinical and industrial settings, in order to foster undergraduate design projects as well as internship and employment opportunities for our students.Dr. Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware Sarah I. Rooney is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Undergraduate Program in the Biomedical Engineering department at the University of Delaware, where she seeks to bring evidence-based teaching practices to the undergraduate curriculum. She received her B.S.E. (2009) and M.S.E. (2010) in Biomed- ical Engineering from the University of Michigan (Ann
of PA often uses senior Capstone Design projects as a recruitment tool, but otherinstitutions [16], [17] highlight undergraduate research to draw good students. We would like toincrease our undergraduate research activity to diversify faculty activity and provide studentswith valuable research experiences that may indicate that graduate school is right for them. Eganet al. [18] explains that participation in undergraduate research encourages pursuit of moreadvanced degrees. Even if students do not move into graduate/professional programs,undergraduate research teaches students critical thinking skills necessary for solving open-endedproblems [12], [19]. If done well, there are clearly many advantages of undergraduate research.Independent
-based and hands-on course activities inthe first-year and integrating engineering design. Makerspaces have become a valuable tool forteaching the engineering design process. They provide students with an opportunity to focusmore on building, testing, and evaluating their design. Makerspaces also provide more creativeopportunities for engineering design projects through rapid prototyping electronics and additivemanufacturing. For some students in the first-year this can seem like a daunting task, particularlywhen they are working alongside senior design capstone teams and graduate researchers in amakerspace. This first-year introduction to engineering and design course added several aspectsto the course to guide and support students through
project management andcommunication, particularly communicating outside of engineering. Overall, the sophomorestended to report similar numbers of team members with each professional skill as the seniors.Whereas the seniors could clearly distinguish between the professional skill areas, thesophomores were not adept at this.To understand the impact of the team asset-mapping activity, we compared the sophomores’scores on items from a peer evaluation conducted twice during the semester. Early in thesemester, students tended to report some difficulty managing conflicts related to team tasks, butby the end of the semester, significantly fewer teams did so.We also describe an asset-based modification we made to the teams in the senior capstone
includingexperiencing, thinking, acting, and reflecting. Through a recursive engagement withexperiencing and thinking coupled with reflection and active experimentation, learnersexperience an ideal and balanced learning process [3]. Application of Kolb’s ELT and learningcycle is not uncommon in engineering, especially in the design of capstone courses. Forexample, Jassim [4] used Kolb’s experiential learning cycle to guide the design of capstonedesign projects in mechanical engineering. Potisuk [5] also used Kolb’s guidance to design atwo-semester capstone sequence in electrical and computer engineering.Informed by the work of Kolb and many others, the National Society of Experiential Education(NSEE) proposes eight principles of good practice for all
experienceencouraging transformative learning. The students explain the purpose, rationale, potential targetpopulation as well as demonstrate their prototype. The summer following the completion of thisintroductory assistive technology course, faculty members in occupational therapy andengineering meet to discuss which projects are best suited for further development.Occupational therapy students who have expressed an interest and whose projects have thepotential for universal design, pitch their AT device to student engineering teams. Thebiomedical engineering students are either in the first semester of their capstone design course orin a product development course. Not all occupational therapy AT projects presented to theengineering design teams are chosen
multidisciplinary collaborative research projects, capstone and honors projects, andpotential entrepreneurial initiatives. Follow-up information is collected to track oral/posterpresentations, published manuscripts and patent applications resulting from course projects.4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONEight engineering students enrolled in the course in spring 2016 and six in 2017. The engineeringstudents included students from the biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, andindustrial systems concentrations. In 2017, 3 teams of engineering students partnered with 12students from the entrepreneurship course in the College of Business (4 per team). Studentsreported spending an average of 6.3 ± 2.4 hours per week outside of class and clinic, preparing
agreements to leverage facilities, or Publishing RFPs on a regular cycle provides a frameworkparticipation in other university programs such as consortia to pace both work and funding. Setting this pace provides theand capstone projects. To expand on this further, the engage- company with predictability in annual budgets and provides thement under the MRA and our presence on campus is a strong faculty some predictability in opportunities. The pacing alsodriver for participating in the capstone process and would not establishes expectations to complete projects within definedoccur in the absence of the engagement. budgets and time windows so that new projects can launch.Co
ToolAbstractOccupants’ behavior inside buildings is a vital parameter in determining the building energyconsumption. Occupancy density distribution is a wide uncertain parameter due to the difficultyin predicting the attendants’ behavior. Currently, occupancy detection tools and technologieshave been insufficient of determining the exact number of occupants and, thus, the spaceventilation requirements are not set at its optimized values.This capstone project was part of a bigger project conducted at Purdue Polytechnic Kokomo tobetter improve the energy consumption used for ventilation and AC in buildings. The objectiveof this capstone project was testing potential energy savings in an office space by using anoccupancy seat sensor. An experimental and
have documented: elective face-to-face courses [3],[4], online courses [5], course concentrations [6], [7], capstone experiences [8], [9], and project-based courses embedded in the engineering curriculum [2], [10]–[12]. Most studies on entrepreneurship education have analyzed psychological outcomes, such asself-efficacy and entrepreneurial intent [13]. Few of them have explored short and long-termeffects on professional competencies and career goals [14]. Some of them have used classroomassessment techniques and academic records to understand students’ conceptions ofentrepreneurial learning [15], [16], but more efforts are needed to explore how students learn aboutentrepreneurship as they develop ownership of their ideas [17]. This article
Department of Secondary Education University of Wyoming mike.borowczak@uwyo.edu , andrea.burrows@uwyo.eduWith the adoption of pedagogical practices such as Authentic Science and Inquiry-based projects withincollegiate level classrooms, researchers focused on delivering advanced concepts investigated the level ofstudent success in conducting authentic science during a six-week long inquiry project. Two main questionsare explored: 1) do students working on self-guided, problem-based projects, engage in active inquiry? and2) is there alignment between exemplar active inquiry projects and other assessments? This pilot researchstudy focuses on twelve self-selected projects from a group
capstone design (72%). Other course types believed to include ESI educationwere: sophomore/junior engineering science/ engineering courses (49%), design-focused coursesin sophomore to senior year (non-capstone; 45%), first-year introductory courses (43%),humanities and/or social science courses (35%), first-year design focused courses (26%),professional issues courses (24%), full course on ethics (15%), or “other” courses/co-curricularactivities (13%). Course types written in as “other” included: laboratory courses, safety course,inter-professional team project course, and “students are required to take a "Technology inSociety" course chosen from a list of ~15 courses that meet this category”.There was a median of three different course types that
theirparticular course or project. Several implementations are described below.The workshop was implemented twice in a management engineering capstone design projectseries of courses. In one implementation, it was delivered just after the mid-point of the designprocess, as students were creating detailed design verification plans. In this case, the “concepts”on which the students sought peer feedback were different ideas they had come up with to verifytheir designs. In the other implementation, the workshop was delivered about one-third of theway through the design process, once students had completed their problem formulation phaseand had begun creating a number of different conceptual designs to address the identified need.The workshop was also
Office of Medical Student Education. Tony has a PhD from Indiana University in Higher Education and Student Affairs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Analysis of Student Utilization and Activities in a Campus Innovation CenterThe Branam Innovation Center (BIC) has served our campus for six years providing support forcompetition teams, capstone and class projects, a maker space, and other campus activities. The16,000 sq. ft. center provides project space, supervision, and access to fabrication andprototyping resources. It has been a popular and increasingly utilized resource with studententries to the building increasing 1.35 times in the last two
necessary.Design faculty across a range of educational institutions still feel that the leaders of engineeringschools (deans, department heads, tenured faculty) are unable or unwilling to recognize theintellectual complexities and resources needed to support good design education.Fortunately, more and more educators are becoming aware of the issues of design, and steps arebeing taken world wide, to address the concerns of industry at large. One approach has been toform “symbiotic” partnership between industry and academia through senior capstone projects.The capstone course has evolved over the years from “made up” projects devised by faculty toindustry-sponsored projects where companies provide “real” problems, along with expertise andfinancial support
, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami community, alumni and industry leaders. Starting in 2016 and through her work with the University of Miami’s Engaged Faculty Fellowship program, Dr. Basalo incorporated an academic service component into the final project for a sophomore-level Measurements Lab
site in Panama. This second structure will also be used as a trainingdemonstration site for mission teams to visualize and help plan for construction when in Panama.Shop drawings were created based on the design and implementation. This research involvedcommunity-based activity and engagement in Cieneguita, Panama as well as Lineville, AL.This research is the second phase of a multi-phase research effort. The research wasaccomplished as part of a scholarly capstone project in the Auburn University’s McWhorterSchool of Building Science (BSCI) Master of Building Construction (MBC) Program. Thepurpose of the capstone project is to demonstrate the student's ability to independently explore anew topic, demonstrate appropriate application of the
, program and project management. LTC Raby teaches EV450 (Environmental Engineering for Community Development) and EV 481 (Water Resources Planning and Design).Mr. Erick Martinez, United States Military Academy Erick Martinez is a Captain in the United States Army and an Instructor in the Department of Geogra- phy and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He is a 2007 graduate of the United States Military Academy with a B.S. in Environmental Engineering and recently graduated from the University of Florida with an M.E. in Environmental Engineering. He teaches Environmen- tal Engineering for Community Development, Environmental Science, and Environmental Engineering Technologies.Col
, government agencies, national R&D laboratories, and universities. He is also a registered professional engineer in California. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Self-Awareness of Student Leaders in an Experiential Undergraduate Engineering Clinic ProgramIntroduction to Clinic ProgramThe engineering clinic program at Harvey Mudd College was started in 1963, six years after thecollege first opened its doors [1]. It was different from other capstone projects at the time as itprovided students with real problems rather than ones invented by professors but was still keptin-house so that the intellectual experience could be overseen [1]. The ingenuity of its design
their second-semesterpoverty alleviation project, as quality preparation for their senior capstone projects. Notably,students largely did not identify any other courses as being directly connected to their first-yearcoursework. This was unexpected since, to an extent, several of the first-year course activitieswere developed to familiarize students with subsequent courses (e.g., circuits and staticscalculations). However, these activities were relegated to a somewhat cursory overview, and asnoted by two students, there was not enough “technical content” in the first-year courses toprovide benefit, particularly since this content was reviewed at the beginning of future courses.Moreover, while three total participants later recommended that
Education, vol. 17, no. 4/5, pp. 431-435, 2001.[4] M. Johnson and Y. Lu, "Teaching software engineering through competition and collaboration," in Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.[5] A. Portilla-Figueras, S. Jiménez-Fernández, and S. Salcedo-Sanz, "A project-based competitive learning scheme to teach mobile communications," International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 460-468, 2010.[6] J. A. Wahlquist, D. D. Jensen, K. L. Wood, K. Fitle, and D. Carte, "Using Mini Design Competitions in Capstone," in Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.
University. She excels at leading cross-functional projects, and on MEERCat, she drives the Center’s overall strategy, operations, and research-to-practice initiatives. At Purdue, Angela’s passionate about driving change in the School of Mechanical Engineering and making the experience even better for future students.David Allen Evenhouse, Purdue University, West Lafayette David Evenhouse is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. He graduated from Calvin College in the Spring of 2015 with a B.S.E. concentrating in Mechanical Engineering. Experiences during his undergraduate years included a semester in Spain, taking classes at the Universidad de Oviedo and the Escuela
projects into two design courses at Mines and assessthe ways in which HCD protocols, which included significant stakeholder engagementcomponents, impacted students’ understandings of sustainable development and their perceptionsof their roles in sustainable development initiatives. One of the selected courses was, Projects forPeople, and the other was the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) SeniorDesign Capstone course. The courses were chosen because of their focus on applying HCDprotocols, as well as the instructors’ willingness to participate in the project. Also, both of thecourses are required for students enrolled in the Humanitarian Engineering (HE) minor. The HEprogram, home to the HE minor, began at Mines in 2006 with the
Paper ID #24441Work In Progress: Synthesizing design challenges to improve student effec-tiveness in first year engineering design coursesJames R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology James R. McCusker is an Associate Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Since joining Wentworth in 2010, he has been heavily involved with an array of interdisciplinary design courses that range from introductory to capstone courses.Prof. Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor Carpenter is an Assistant Professor at the Wentworth Institute of Technology. In 2012, he
aspects of the design process, including iterativebrainstorming, hands-on prototyping & fabrication, CAD, materials, machining, assembly, andbasic microcontroller design. Seniors then complete a yearlong capstone sequence in which theypursue a client-mentored project and apply the skills they have developed in the prior courseswithin the curriculum [2]. All projects in the introductory design skills course and the vastmajority of projects in the capstone are client-sponsored, pre-identified problems or need areasthat the client pitched to potential teams, such that students who take these core design coursestypically do not have the opportunity to identify clinical or patient-centered needs as part of thecourse structure. However, a growing
reflections is analyzed elsewhere but shows that overwhelmingly students felt a sense of vulnerability during the simulation which could have influenced their chosen design solution. Design Quality Rubric: Each final project was evaluated by two researchers using a design quality rubric, as described by Sobek and Jain [14]. The assessment rubric was developed to evaluate the outcome quality of engineering design capstone projects. The rubric is designed to be objective so only the prototype quality is assessed. For the present study, the satisfaction of the end user was not considered because there was
development of facilities inlimited square footage for a combination of physical laboratories, teaching and computingspaces, in varying areas ranging from 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing to EngineeringMechanics. Additional laboratory design activities have also been carried out for creative andinnovative design spaces including some for integrated capstone and cross-disciplinary projects,along with off-campus development. This paper will summarize educational learning andresearch facility development trends in academia including selection of educational equipment,digital tools, flexible furniture, and utilization of white board paint or magnetic boards. Safetyand environmental issues are covered. The trends in K-12 education and their
themes in engineering have focused on sustainability, entrepreneurship, designthinking, internationalization and social justice (Murphy et al., 2009; Tranquillo 2013;Tranquillo 2017; UNESCO 2010). As improved health care intersects all of these trends,biomedical engineers are well suited to take on leadership roles. In parallel, pedagogicaltrends have moved toward design challenges, wicked problems, project-based learningand engagement with live case studies (Blumenfeld et al. 1991; Prince 2004; Omenn2006; Bell, 2010; Beaurey 2010; Mote et al, 2016). Biomedical engineering faculty havein fact led the way in developing many of these learning opportunities (Tranquillo andCavanagh 2009; Gimm 2011; Abby et al., 2013; Dolan 2013).This paper outlines