Glassboro, New Jersey
July 24, 2018
July 24, 2018
July 26, 2018
FYEE Conference Sessions
7
10.18260/1-2--31399
https://peer.asee.org/31399
347
Todd France is the director of Ohio Northern University's Engineering Education program, which strives to prepare engineering educators for the 7-12 grade levels. Dr. France is also heavily involved in developing and facilitating the Introduction to Engineering course sequence at ONU. He earned his PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder where his research focused on pre-engineering education and project-based learning.
Brittney Masters is currently a sophomore Mechanical Engineering major at Ohio Northern University and is very involved around campus both musically and academically. She is a member of Dean's Team, Phi Sigma Rho, Kappa Kappa Psi and Innovators of Ohio Northern. As Engineering College Coordinator for Good News Bears, Brittney is one of the first faces an incoming student might meet at orientation. In her spare time, she enjoys twirling baton at both at the competitive level and as captain of the twirling team for Ohio Northern's marching band.
The national effort to remain a leader in scientific exploration and technological development has redoubled educational efforts to not only introduce students to the field of engineering at younger and younger grade levels, but also to place more effort on retaining the students who ultimately choose engineering as a career path. As a result, more institutions are placing a higher value on first-year engineering introductory courses, a key component of retention.
However, with engineering being an incredibly broad field, there is relatively little agreement from institution to institution on the content and skills to address in a first-year course. Moreover, previous studies have shown that students more often leave their engineering degree programs due to a lack of interest and/or a poor classroom environment than for reasons related to challenging technical content. To address these issues, researchers have investigated best practices for retaining students through tutoring and mentoring and identified positive correlations between classroom practices and student confidence and commitment. Yet gaps still exist in our understanding of the value students place on their first-year coursework, particularly as they relate to their later experiences in engineering classes and professional work.
At a private, Midwestern university’s college of engineering, all students are required to complete a two-course (six total credit hours) first-year engineering sequence. While this course sequence is expected to provide a common foundation upon which all students are able to build their knowledge bases and skillsets, little is known of the students’ true perceptions of their first-year experiences. To address this knowledge gap, four focus groups were conducted with a total of 12 juniors and seniors in the college. During these focus groups, students discussed their first-year engineering courses and how these experiences supported their later coursework and professional work (e.g., internships). Sixteen juniors and seniors completed surveys to gather further supporting evidence.
Outcomes from the subsequent analysis are intended to provide deeper insight into the value that students place on their initial experiences with engineering at the college level, allowing educators to better involve first-year students in class while at the same time prepare them for their chosen professional pathways. The following research questions drive this study:
After experiencing higher-level engineering coursework . . . 1) What value do students place on their first-year engineering experiences? 2) What connections do students make between their first-year engineering experiences and subsequent engineering courses and professional experiences? 3) What technical content and skills do students suggest for a first-year engineering experience?
France, T., & Masters, B. L. (2018, July), Evaluating the Perceived Value of a First-Year Engineering Experience Paper presented at 2018 FYEE Conference, Glassboro, New Jersey. 10.18260/1-2--31399
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015