institution where this project is being developed hasover a hundred laboratories, surpassing the number of traditional classrooms, and also has aresearch center that provides services to various sectors of society, conducting tests and researchin Engineering. The challenge is: how to utilize these Engineering laboratories in the teaching ofPhysics? When students enter an Engineering course, they are eager to practice Engineering fromthe start, and often feel unmotivated when faced with Physics that is not well contextualized withinthe course. With this need for contextualization in mind, coupled with teachers' awareness, the aimwas to find a set of experiences that would put students in contact with the Physics found inEngineering. To develop this
-level engineering and science students who had typically populated the in-person course, as well as students at all levels and of all majors who found food an intriguing topic and desired to complete their “laboratory science” general education requirement. The needs of these two audiences varied and as the University returned to in-person instruction, the online summer course was reimagined with the needs of the non-engineering audience in mind as CHEG 242 Applied Food Science and Engineering for Nonmajors. This course has turned into a regular o ering as part of the small core of exclusively online summer courses o ered at Bucknell. fl ff ff
to theproducer/retailer/consumer triad. Although students are encouraged to consider the full lifecycleof the product, including the sourcing of its materials and its final disposition, they usually focuson the users of the product, the retailers that sell it, or the companies that manufacture it.Investors holding stocks in those companies are often mentioned as well. While valid, theseconnections represent just the surface of the many layers of interactions we would like them toexplore.With this context in mind, the research question guiding this study is as follows: How does anopen-ended scenario-based learning approach influence the breadth of discipline exploration andstakeholder identification among first-year engineering students
Paper ID #47453Engineering Connection: Growing Sustainable Outreach for Graduate StudentsSara C. Kern, Pennsylvania State University Sara Kern (she/her) is an Engineering Librarian at Penn State University. She earned her MA in history from Penn State and her MSLIS at Syracuse University. Her research interests include inclusive library outreach and instruction.Ms. Denise Amanda Wetzel, Pennsylvania State University Denise A. Wetzel is the Eric N. and Bonnie S. Prystowsky Early Career Science Libraries Professor and Science & Engineering Librarian at Pennsylvania State University Libraries. She is also the Patent and
ofdeterminism arising from physics and evolution. Personalism assumes individuals havesignificance, are unique, and serve as ends-in-themselves [6]; that is persons do not serve asmeans to a larger social end. Personalism also recognizes that humans exist in relation to otherpersons and society rather than as isolated, rational, Cartesian minds. In regard to educatingfuture engineers, personalism posits that to become engineers, students should undergo bothprofessional and personal development. Thus, the focus of any degree program should be ondeveloping individuals in fullness.The adoption of personalism—an individual-focused philosophy—as a constraint needs someexplanation in relation to the concept of a “common good” since individual wants and
Paper ID #46528Exploring Women Engineering Students’ Gendered Internship ExperiencesJing Zhang, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignHou XieRosie Ruoci Shen, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignMs. Valeri Werpetinski, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Valeri Werpetinski is the Assistant Director for Women in Engineering and a KEEN Instructional Catalyst in The Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Prof. Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Lawrence Angrave is an award-winning computer science Teaching Professor at the University of Illinois Urbana
at Old Dominion University in Virginia, USA. He earned his B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. degrees in Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering. Prior to joining ODU, he was a Senior Researcher at the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) and a Research Assistant Professor at the Advanced Research Institute (ARI) at Virginia Tech. His research interests include cyber-physical systems, artificial intelligence (AI), trustworthy AI, next-generation networks, and engineering education.Charles Lowe, Old Dominion UniversityDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy
personal interests and finding a senseof community as leading motivations for first-year students to join extracurriculars [23]. Mostprevalent in this study were Avery, Zoey, and Olivia’s desire to engage with a community ofsupport that mitigated underrepresentation in their classes and engaged like-minded individuals.It is evident that classroom environments are not suited to support women in engineering on theirown. An engineering culture that perpetuates masculine social norms forces women to grapplewith the perceived incongruence between their identities as a woman and engineer. As such,these women in engineering chose to seek out counter spaces to feel appropriately supportedwithin engineering.Additionally, GI ESOs were desirable for their
provided insight into the perspectives andmethodologies of the two disciplines. Five graduate structural engineering students were in thecourse. The architecture professor was contemporaneously teaching a third-year undergraduatearchitecture studio. The architecture students spent the semester designing a Social CreativeResource Center (SCRC) and were in the final design phase during the last six weeks of thesemester. It was at this stage that each engineering student was paired with an assignedarchitecture student to participate in an interdisciplinary collaborative project-based learningexperience. The engineering student served as a consultant to the architecture student, helping toresolve structural aspects of the design, while being mindful
Divisions (CED, WIED, DEED, MIND, ERM, LEES, etc.), Society of WomenEngineers (SWE), National Society for Black Engineers (NSBE), National Society forProfessional Engineers (NSPE), Professional Engineers societies, etc.Figure 2 shows an actual Wake Forest Engineering faculty ad from fall 2018. The content ofthis faculty ad shows vision, values, and inclusion. The ad has some elements that one would nottypically see in a faculty ad, including (a) departmental values upfront and visibly clear, (b) asection describing our uniqueness and a vision of the kind of engineering program we arelaunching, (c) a section describing a vision of who we want. The ask for the candidates alsodemonstrate inclusion and an invitation to align with the vision and values
personalized learning. Rand Corporation (2015).[6] Campbell, J. P., DeBlois, P. B. & Oblinger, D. G. Academic analytics: A new tool for a newera. EDUCAUSE review 42, 40 (2007).[7] Okubo, F., Yamashita, T., Shimada, A. & Ogata, H. A neural network approach for students’performance prediction, 598–599 (2017).[8] Pan, S. J. & Yang, Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge anddata engineering 22, 1345–1359 (2009).[9] John, B. Brain, mind, experience, and school. How people learn (2000).[10] Shute, V. J. Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research 78, 153–189(2008).[11] Devlin, J. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).[12
Paper ID #48221BOARD # 201: Development of a Programming Environment to Bridge Studentsfrom Block-Based to Text-Based Programming (Work in Progress)Elliot Benjamin Roe, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDuncan Johnson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Duncan Johnson is an undergraduate student at Tufts University majoring in Computer Science. He is the co-founder and Executive Director of BX Coding, a STEM education nonprofit dedicated to building open-source software and curriculum for STEM educators. Through his work with BX Coding and the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO), his research
Paper ID #47991Designing an Industrially-Situated Virtual Laboratory to Support ElectrochemistryLearning in Chemical EngineeringSamuel Gavitte, Tufts University A PhD student working at Tufts University working with Dr. Milo Koretsky to research engineering epistemic practices in the context of virtual and physical lab activities.Bertrand Neyhouse, Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry, University of TorontoShirin Kuppusamy, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and OutreachGraham Leverick, Tufts UniversityFikile Brushett, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Milo Koretsky, Tufts University Milo Koretsky is the
Paper ID #46871An Integrative, Querencia-Informed Approach to First-Year EngineeringDr. Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Universidad del Norte Ruben D. Lopez-Parra is an Assistant Professor in the Instituto de Estudios en Educaci´on (Institute for Educational Studies) at the Universidad del Norte in Colombia. His Ph.D. is in Engineering Education from Purdue University, and he has worked as a K-16 STEM instructor and curriculum designer using various evidence-based learning strategies. In 2015, Ruben earned an M.S. in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de los Andes in Colombia, where he also received the title of Chemical Engineer
Paper ID #46973BOARD # 383: Investigating the development and manifestation of engineeringstudents’ conceptualizations of well-being in engineering programs and careersDr. Justin Charles Major, Rowan University Dr. Justin C. Major (they/them) is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University where they leads ASPIRE Lab (Advancing Student Pathways through Inequality Research in Engineering). Justin’s research focuses on low-income students, engineering belonging and marginalization mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences, and feminist approaches to EER, and connects these topics to
, but they’re like, “Just keep focusing and you’re going to get through it. That’s how it is. That’s just engineering… How it is... Like, it’s not that you’re stupid.” I’m using the word stupid, but it’s not hard. Yes. You don’t know, but that’s just how engineering is. You need to figure out how to get through it. You have to find a way to get through it. They also offered resources to help navigate the class, and actually, it was just mind blowing for me. I remember that night like it was yesterday. I’m really grateful for being a member of NSBE. That was really monumental.”Although there was again this acceptance from students that they must struggle —“That’s justengineering” through her peers
mental health experiences of other engineeringstudents like them and sought to design with them in mind, they also had the opportunity toreflect on themselves and their own experiences. The following sections will address thebackground and motivation for this work, describe our intervention in detail, and provide somepreliminary quantitative and qualitative results from four sections of the fidget toy project.BackgroundEngineering is perceived to be one of the most challenging undergraduate programs a student canundertake [13], [14], often having a heavier course load and an unforgiving culture ofcompetition [15], [16]. In fact, many engineering students expect that poor mental health as aresult of these elements is inevitable, often refusing to
in modernpsychoanalysis and cognitive psychology. We discuss the implementation of a novel interventionfor first-year engineering students around conscious and unconscious bias in engineering design.Beyond typical discussions of bias in engineering, we take the concept a step further to the rootpsychoanalytic mechanisms, taking a deep dive into concepts around the unconscious mind, andusing these to structure our intervention activities. A qualitative study was conducted based onthe results of a group activity where students articulated their thoughts within fourpsychologically derived categories around one of two design scenarios, aiming to build a betterunderstanding of how student groups characterize their chosen engineering design
, effective learning strategies, and mindfulness practices.Through the final project, students apply systems engineering principles to synthesize coursetopics into meaningful groupings, reflecting on their personal and academic growth.The study addresses three research questions: (1) Which course topics do students identify asmost influential and useful for their future? (2) What common grouping strategies do studentsuse, and do these align with the course framework? (3) Does the systems engineering approachfoster unique metacognitive insights? A qualitative analysis of student submissions from the Fall2024 cohort reveals that time management and rest are identified as the most impactful skills.Grouping strategies ranged from simple categories
- Engineering Workforce DevelopmentIntroductionFounded in 2000 with a grant from NSF (EEC-EWFD-Eng Workforce Development), TeachEngineering (teachengineering.org) is a free digital library of classroom-tested, standards-alignedK-12 STEM resources created in collaboration with educators across the nation. The major goalsfor the current NSF funded grant are: • Democratize and broaden the project’s classroom impact by creatively supporting K-12 teachers. • Create a community of practice among K-12 educators to empower teachers to adopt the collection as their own. • Advance penetration of engineering habits of mind among K-12 youth and educators through strategic partnerships. • Create tools to optimize the system for the
practices, and the broader impacts of digitaltechnology use, is a pressing issue in our modern world. By incorporating digital wellnesseducation into the engineering curriculum, educators can equip students with the tools requiredto create more ethically minded and user-centric technologies. This study explores datacollection surrounding the implementation and integration of digital wellness content inundergraduate engineering education at the University of Calgary's Schulich School ofEngineering. Multiple methods were used to determine average daily digital technology use anddigital wellness perceptions in students and educators. The results suggest that students andeducators spend a significant amount of time using technological devices yet
knowledge about the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) framework [1] for Entrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML), and how this framework has worked for engineering students, and realizing that this framework can also work for any discipline, the instructor prepared the course based on the KEEN framework, and each of the individual course’s learning objectives. The unintended interdisciplinary nature of such a course, blending engineering and humanities presented an opportunity for the instructor to select a community-based approach with active learning and information literacy. A community based approach was chosen based on the course theme
. New professionals entering thisworld must apply skills from these Skill Sets quickly and effectively in any operation,troubleshooting, repair, or maintenance scenario generated within any I4.0 situation. Techniciansfacilitate successful scenario resolutions by promptly applying the appropriate ET skill.The Professional Development Platform for Engineering Technology (PDPET) is designed withthis technician’s responsibility in mind. Faculty exposure to PDPET opportunities that aresubsequently adapted and inserted into their teaching practices at the intensity level that matchesthe target student population's learning profile is an excellent initiator in creating the techniciansI4.0 requires.The independent Engineering Technology Curriculum
that relate to their project, in some cases, are disappointed and believe that none of the examples are useful for them, missing the high- level point. We plan on creating separate cohorts of teams and running separate workshops, one with case study examples more relevant to each cohort.(2) What is intuitive: User flowcharts are always more intuitive to the students, closely followed by FBDs. PCDs are the last on this list. Students struggle during the brainstorming sessions, hitting mind blocks to come up with several concepts. This has been observed by other engineering education researchers as well [18]. Providing them with brainstorming tools and prompts has improved their performance [20]; however, students miss the
in engineering education toward the goal of graduatingengineering students who can navigate and balance process constraints with user needs, whichbetter prepares them to navigate the diverse and complex modern engineering workplace in aproductive and mindful way.AppendixInterview Questions: 1. Can you briefly describe the ways in which you are involved in the HCDE program? 2. Can you give a brief overview of what this course covers? 3. On average, how well do you think students achieve this learning objective? 4. How does your course support students in achieving this learning objective? (e.g., describe activities, requirements, assignments, etc. that connect to it) 5. In your opinion, why is this learning objective
Paper ID #45504Cultivating Global Citizens Through Engineering Education: A Frameworkfor Sustainable DevelopmentProf. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, PhD COE Distinguished Professor Northeastern University 367 Snell Engineering Center Boston, MA 02115 ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Cultivating Global Citizens through Engineering Education: A Framework for Sustainable Development Bala Maheswaran College of Engineering Northeastern
sociotechnical education in theclassroom. [5] For example, we examine approaches to engage technically-minded students toconsider sociotechnical skills as central to their engineering education. This holds for broadengineering ethics courses as well as ethics modules embedded within core technical courses.Courses that explore engineering culture by integrating ethics and history encourage students,many of whom are interested in using teamwork to solve problems, to think how they mightimprove upon past collaborations if equipped with hindsight. We also discuss classroomexperience with students who are technically-minded (or expertise-minded) but have their homein Colleges of Arts and Science and major in pre-med, pre-law, or pre-business fields such
Paper ID #46857Shared Learning Objectives in Human-Centered Design Engineering AcrossProject-Based Courses in a Mechanical Engineering ProgramDr. Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Leslie A. Rose Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab and Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn
, helpingstudents engage deeply with course material and complex concepts. In the AI era, excessivedependence on such tools risks eroding these vital educational opportunities and diluting theintegrity of the learning process.The Need for Writing Support ToolsIncorporating writing support tools, such as guides and scaffolds, is essential in the era ofgenerative AI to address diverse student needs and preferences. These tools, including grammarcheckers, proofreading software, outlining aids, and mind-mapping platforms, offer personalizedassistance in grammar, syntax, organization, and vocabulary. They help students refinemechanics, structure ideas, and create coherent compositions. Engineering students, in particular,benefit from tools that address complex
students from all backgrounds. Throughout the year-longprogram, we are conducting longitudinal interviews and surveys to follow the participants’growth trajectories with regards to their understanding and implementation of inclusivepedagogies in engineering classrooms and the impact the program has on cultivating equity-minded practitioners in engineering education. The focus of this paper is the preliminary resultsregarding the motivations of engineering faculty to participate in this type of facultydevelopment program and significantly redesign one of their courses. We seek to answer thefollowing research question: What motivates engineering faculty to participate in an inclusiveexcellence faculty development program?Through a qualitative