and Roy, 2021). Thisapproach aims to equip students with the ability to integrate theories, concepts, andmethods from multiple disciplines (Lattuca et al., 2004), fostering the development ofnew knowledge, insights, and problem-solving capabilities (Holley, 2017).Currently, interdisciplinary engineering education research lacks a universallyaccepted theoretical framework and cohesive academic structure. Existing studiesoften focus on various aspects, including the motivations and goals ofinterdisciplinary education, such as solving complex real-world problems (Lansu et al.,2013), fostering entrepreneurial competencies (Klapper and Tegtmeier, 2010), andpromoting social values like sustainability (Apul and Philpott, 2011) . Additionally
DEI ID Engineering Equity, Student DEI Skill Development,2021 DEI COVID-19 Pandemic COV SD Student Professional Communication Skill Development, ID ET2022 Ethics, COVID-19 Pandemic H2023 Measuring LC Impact IMP Measuring LC Impact, Entrepreneurial Mindset, Student2024
Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Namita Shrestha, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Namita Shrestha earned her PhD in Civil
. Thisinvolves educating students on environmental, social, and economic challenges, empowering themto make a positive impact on the world.Preparing Engineering Students for the Sustainability FutureThe report underscores the importance of preparing future engineers to appreciate diverseperspectives and needs. Human-centered design and empathy are highlighted as indispensableelements, fostering inclusivity, and cultivating engineers capable of leading across disciplines andcommunities.To prepare engineering students for a sustainable future, it is crucial to provide them withknowledge, skills, and a mindset focused on addressing environmental, social, and economicchallenges associated with sustainable development. This can be achieved through
-solving experiences [19, 20].Supportive learning environments that encourage experimentation, risk-taking, and design iterationare critical for cultivating creativity [21]. Instructors play a pivotal role by facilitating open-endedproblem-solving and fostering an inquiry-driven mindset. However, Kazakhstan’s socio-economicdisparities, particularly in rural regions, limit access to modern infrastructure and creative learningresources. Implementing Project-Based Learning, design thinking, and entrepreneurial programscan help address these barriers. For example, simulation-based learning and TRIZ (Theory ofInventive Problem Solving) methods have been shown to double the number of creative ideasgenerated by engineering students [22].Mapping the
/christian_engineering_conference/2024/proceedings/ 25[23] “Entrepreneurial Mindset | Engineering Unleashed.” Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset[24] W. D. Lawson, “In Defense of A Little Theory,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 206–211, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2002)128:4(206).[25] M. Criswell, “Has The Moment Passed For Classical Solutions? Definitely Yes, Definitely No,” presented at the 2004 Annual Conference, Jun. 2004, p. 9.663.1-9.663.11. Accessed: Jan. 02, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/has-the-moment-passed-for- classical-solutions-definitely-yes-definitely-no[26] R. Fry, “Classic Rhetorical
Innovators to Achieve Macro Impact: A Course on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in a Nanoscience Makerspace for Undergraduate StudentsIntroductionThe incorporation of the innovation mindset, along with an increased appreciation for designthinking, creativity, and problem-based learning opportunities sparked the university makerspacetrend that began in the late 1990s. As this trend has continued to gain momentum,entrepreneurship and the role of making in entrepreneurial activities added further fuel to thismovement. A census conducted in 2018 and 2019 of 784 public U.S. institutions of highereducation found that 214 institutions had at least one makerspace and an additional 31institutions were planning to build their first
Biomedical Engineering and a MS and BS in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech. She has been founding faculty of two brand new U.S. engineering undergraduate programs and is leading change across diverse contexts. She has been PI on many NSF awards (include a NSF CAREER) and currently is PI on a multi-year Kern Family Foundation KEEN award targeted at ”Educating the Whole Engineer” through innovation (entrepreneurial mindset) and character. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Transforming Undergraduate Education to Educate the Whole Engineer: Implementing 100% Experiential Learning at Wake Forest Engineering Through Grounding to Learning Theories, Motivation Theories, Strategic
transformative framework in higher education by integrating research and teaching,fostering deep engagement, and creating dynamic learning environments.As universities face increasing complexity and global competition, the VIP model provides a solution thatshifts from traditional knowledge transmission to more interactive, research-oriented approaches. Themodel aligns with global educational trends emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, experientiallearning, and entrepreneurial mindsets. The VIP framework enables students at various academic levelsto collaborate on research projects, bridging the gap between undergraduate education and facultyresearch and fostering interdisciplinary teamwork. Strachan et al. [1] emphasize that this continuous
software accessibility and summarize it Impact of engineering on society (include link to source). Why did you pick this example? 3. What does having an entrepreneurial mindset mean to you? Do you think this is important as a software engineer? Why or why not? 1. How do you typically assign tasks when working in a team
have shown that integratingsustainability principles into engineering education fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, andleadership skills [13], [14]. Additionally, education for sustainable entrepreneurship has beenfound to influence students' attitudes and propensity to act sustainably, although its direct impacton entrepreneurial intention remains limited [15]. This highlights the importance of couplingsystemic knowledge with personal transformative learning to create a balanced and impactfuleducational experience [16] and to equip the future workforce with the skill sets and mindsetsneeded for sustainable development.Despite these benefits, there are significant gaps and challenges in the implementation ofsustainability programs
curiosity would involve work; processes should be integrated into the ECE curriculato achieve this goal systematically. It should also be noted that it is essential to nurture thecorrect amount of curiosity as too much of it may lead to anxiety and not enough of it wouldresult in boredom [14]. Our university is a member of the KERN Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN), we would like to include an Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) in all oureducational endeavors and our STEM outreach activities are no exception. In addition, we wouldlike to apply an iterative approach to our efforts in order to find “best practices” to foster an ECEmindset and also to teach problem-solving early on.STEM outreach activities play a crucial role in shaping high school
… Programming… Proficiency in… Entrepreneurial
are looking to hire (i.e., person-focused). Inaddition to highlighting the work they do or details about their organization, Category 2companies often identified specific characteristics for prospective employees such as forward-thinking, entrepreneurial mindset, specific majors, or types of prior experiences. 305 companies(~88%) fell into Category 1 and the remaining 42 companies (~12%) were in Category 2.The Overviews in each Category were then fully read and analyzed using a hybridinductive/deductive coding strategy. The five-theme model [7] discussed previously acted as thebase codes, but the coding framework was also expanded and revised as analysis progressed. Forexample, some companies highlighted their pay and benefits packages (i.e
), An exploration of psychological safety and conflict.[43.pdf] (Werth et al., 2022), Assessing student engagement with teamwork in an online course.[46.pdf] (Mesutoglu et al., 2024), Boundary interactions in a challenge-based learning course.[48.pdf] (Magana et al., 2024), Characterizing team cognition within software engineering teams.[49.pdf] (López-Reyes, 2022), Collaborative learning of differential equations.[51.pdf] (Thite et al., 2024), Design of a simple rubric to peer-evaluate the teamwork skills of engineering students.[53.pdf] (Ita et al., 2023), Designing a biomedical engineering course to develop entrepreneurial mindset in students.[54.pdf] (Uotila et al., 2024), Developing engineering students' generic and professional skills
, project planning, timeliness, and completion of tasks according to specifications. 2.) Develop a basic proficiency with the LabVIEW and Arduino programming languages. 3.) Develop a basic proficiency in project documentation via written memos and reports, and via oral in-class presentations. 4.) Become familiar with the engineering profession and professionalism, including engineering ethics, safety, quality, and social responsibility.With the topics being the following: 1.) Three-Phase Design 6.) Entrepreneurial Process Mindset 2.) Writing as an 7
Matters.Dr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work In
, characterizing information creation as a process andresearch as inquiry [8], (b) metaliteracy, conceptualizing students as active participants, effectivecommunicators and translators of information [9], and (c) makers literacy, an emerging literacyenabling students to build self-efficacy, explore their entrepreneurial spirit, and learn skills thatwill last them long past their academic career [10].2. Literature ReviewInformation literacy in higher education: The ACRL Information Literacy CompetencyStandards for Higher Education [11] state that information literacy is an intellectual frameworkfor understanding, finding, evaluating, and using information, in relation to tasks and activitiessupported by information technology; it initiates, sustains, and
noticed underrepresentation of female students in technology-based fields. To break down thebarriers, GirlSET was designed as a female-centered summer camp, created by women for women. The initiative aimsto introduce and inspire young girls aged 14-17 to engineering and computer science, with the goal of fostering apositive mindset towards STEM careers. Originally conducted in person, GirlSET adapted to an online format duringthe COVID-19 pandemic and returned to an in-person experience in 2024. The camp has successfully run for eightyears, engaging young girls through targeted activities and mentorship. In this paper, we report on the insights gainedfrom implementing GirlSET and the impact it has had on participants’ perceptions of STEM fields
, Jr. ’45 Chair II at Texas A&M University, where she has developed new classes on innovation and technology development as part of her leadership of the INVENT (INnoVation tools and Entrepreneurial New Technology) Lab. She is Co-PI on a National Science Foundation engineering education grant to develop a culture of and tools for iterative experimentation and continuous improvement in curriculum development.David Christopher Seets, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University Karan L. Watson, Ph.D., P.E., is currently a Regents Senior Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, having joined the faculty at Texas A&M University in 1983 as an Assistant Professor. She is also
. 21, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-skills-focused-approach-to-teaching-design-fundamentals-to-large-numbers-of- students-and-its-effect-on-engineering-design-self-efficacy[3] W. H. Guilford and B. P. Helmke, “Cultivating Entrepreneurial Mindset Through Structured Engineering Problem Statements,” Engineering Unleashed. Accessed: Aug. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/3845[4] R. Bailey and Z. Szabo, “Validation of Approaches to Assess Design Process Knowledge,” in Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.[5] R. Bailey and Z. Szabó, “Assessing Engineering Design Process Knowledge,” 2006. Accessed: Jan. 13
University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Namita Shrestha, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Namita Shrestha earned her PhD in Civil/Environmental Engineering from South Dakota
years at Priority Designs working on consumer goods, sporting equipment, lawn care equipment, medical devices, UI/UX development and marketing. In that time, Wisniewski was able to work with industry leaders like Nike, TaylorMade and Scotts. He returned to Ohio State because he missed teaching students. From his experience in his teaching assistant days, Wisniewski had the itch to get back in the classroom and help the next generation of engineers. His teaching goal are to give engineers a better understanding of manufacturing, visual communication skills, entrepreneurial endeavors and how to bring their ideas to life.Prof. Annie Abell, The Ohio State University Annie Abell is an Associate Professor of Practice in
[6] H. Zhu, “Fostering entrepreneurial mindset through a hands-on designof motion (i.e., Lagrange’s equation and Kane’s method). These project in a mechanism design course.” ASEE Virtual Annual Conferencetechniques are common in advanced mechanics courses which Content Access, July 2021.students will see if they go on to graduate school, therefore [7] A. Ferri, and B. Ferri, “Blended learning in a rigid-body dynamics courseintroducing them at the undergraduate level would leave using on-line lectures and hands-on experiments.” ASEE Annualstudents better prepared. Previous authors have successfully Conference & Exposition, June 2016.introduced Lagrange’s
entrepreneurial mindset in learning environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Spreadsheets in Civil Engineering: Fostering Proficiency through Practical Applications in StaticsAbstractSpreadsheets are ubiquitous in civil engineering offices and are an important tool for datamanagement, engineering calculations, visualization, and report generation. Proficiency inworking with spreadsheets also improves productivity and streamlines the qualityanalysis/quality control process. Cultivating proficiency requires students to integratespreadsheet usage into their daily activities. While first-year and second-year students maysporadically utilize spreadsheets in their science
through competition: Best Product Proposal and theInvestor of the Semester. Instructors have found opportunities to complement other courses in thecurricula, introducing the entrepreneurial mindset. This paper discusses the course’s content anduses student feedback to assess the course learning objectives for continuous improvement of thecourse. The summative teaching evaluations show students gained new insight and perspectivesto the engineering profession and the course integrated topics from various disciplines. Studentsalso recognized the course’s value in the larger context of their particular engineering major. Theshort-term benefits continue and evolve to shape student choices concerning additional upper-level offerings of engineering
solving, iLEARNED modular scaffolding approach to organizing course content in a flipped classroom, and the incorporation of entrepreneurial minded learning into engineering courses.Dr. Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Darcie Christensen is a probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Iron Range Engineering on the Mesabi Range College Campus. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation is ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of
problem-solving.Increasing Awareness and EducationIt is necessary to raise awareness about the gender gap in engineering and the importance ofdiversity [40] in the STEM fields. Educational campaigns, workshops, and seminars can encouragemore women to enter engineering fields by changing societal attitudes. Research found that highereducation positively influences women's entrepreneurial purpose, emphasizing the importance ofsupportive educational environments [41].Mentorship and Support NetworksImplementing programs to support and guide women in engineering can ensure their success.Mentorship from successful women in the field can increase girls' motivation, while peer supportsystems provide emotional and academic support. Universities and
mindset into engineering undergraduates," Journal of Engineering Entreprenurship, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-19, 2010.[29] L. Dooley and D. Kirk, "University‐industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures," European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 316-332, 2007.[30] J. Guimón, "Promoting university-industry collaboration in developing countries," World Bank, vol. 3, pp. 12-48, 2013.[31] I. L. Hurtado, J. Crichigno, and A. J. Perez, "A Successful Partnership between Industry and Academia: Curriculum Improvement, Research, and Outreach through Collaboration with Industry," in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24.115. 1
solving design projects.The gaps between perceived and real-world applications can be closed with these projects, andthe process of working through these projects is as important as the final product [12, 13].Learning to produce a solution to a realistic problem is not easy and demands that students lookbeyond what they learn in the classroom [14, 11]. Many different design challenges have led todocumented increases in technical and problem solving skills and can be used to foster animproved innovation mindset [15]. Participating in student competition design projects has alsoresulted in long-term retention of subject matter [12].Many engineering curricula primarily focus on the attainment of technical knowledge and therelevant technical skills