Conference Session

Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (3)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University; Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University; Siddhartha Gupta, Texas Tech University; C. Kalpani Dissanayake; Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Susan A. Mengel, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse P.E., Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

,students followed a set of directions to build their heat engines provided by the instructor; next,students redesigned their heat engines with the goal of increasing the device’s efficiency. At theend of the class, students completed some questions to help them reflect on the activity and itsconnection to efficiency, the design process, and the operation of power plants, and the instructorled a brief discussion during which participant groups shared their results.Analysis and Discussion Several assessment methods were implemented to determine the effectiveness of the E-GIRLprogram with respect to the students’ technical skill, self-efficacy, perceptions of engineering,and interest in engineering. Pre- and post-surveys were conducted asking

Conference Session

International Educational Experiences (1)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alistair Cook, Colorado State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

Citizens  Engineering Students preparedness for working globally  Evaluation of learning programsIt should be noted that developing assessment and evaluation methods in this area is inherently complex,given the list of areas to be investigated, including ethics, social norms, global difference along withstudents own biases based on culture, racial and ethnic position, socio-economic status etc. [12] Thereare also research philosophy and methodological issues to consider, most qualitative measures of globalpreparedness or awareness are by nature, self-efficacy which may call into question the level of ability ofstudents to self-assess given their respective levels of experience. As an example, a recent study into theEWB-USA chapter at

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Tressa Kay Mikel, University of California, Berkeley; Aida Marie Morales; Sanya Sehgal; Melissa L. Whitson, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

faculty and administrators will require a cognizant understanding ofwho these students are, -- the challenges they face, how they handle stress, their levels of self-efficacy, and their development of an engineering identity, -- if they are to successfully designand implement programs specifically targeted at this demographic.The semistructure interview and design protocols have resulted in large amounts of datacollected. Work continues to explore the intricacies of who these students are. The aim is to havelarge enough numbers that results can be generalized and broadly applied. Future work willdwell into adult learners’ level of preparedness and their student-faculty relationship.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the

Conference Session

Exploring the Entrepreneurial and Innovation Mindset

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tuuli Maria Utriainen, Aalto University; Ville Taajamaa, University of Turku; Raghu Ram Movva, SAFM - College des Ingenieurs Italia; Joona Kurikka, Aalto University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

gala after the class whichseems to indicate that the structure is boosting the student’s entrepreneurial skills andaspirations. This is linked with the heightened feeling of both self-efficacy and also reflexiveengineer [20,21]. In this research we take a deeper look into what kind of preferences thestudents have regarding the starting points for innovation to reach an impactful outcome.Innovation for ChangeInnovation for Change (IfC) is a five month long impact innovation program that providesentrepreneurial education for interdisciplinary teams who tackle global challenges that areproposed by big industry/entities and use latest technology from research centres as aninspiration. The program is a collaboration between CERN who provides access

Conference Session

International Research Experiences

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Michelle Hatfield, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Nicole P. Sanderlin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Heather Elizabeth Lyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

asked students about their research self-efficacy and torate themselves on their research ability. Questions included ability to manage a team, identifyresearch problems, and communicate their findings. Qualitative data were collected from theGlobal Engineering Competency Activity (Jesiek, 2011) an open-ended question that askedrespondents to consider themselves as a working engineer in an international location. Therespondent in this imagined role was asked to consider how they needed to be prepared to enterinto this international work situation and list five capabilities and/or things they would need toknow. Given the low number of participants we were not able to run detailed statistical analyses.Descriptive statistics were used to compare

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Misty L. Loughry, Rollins College; David Jonathan Woehr, University of North Carolina Charlotte

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Study 4 and Study 5 into a singleprotocol. See below.Study 5: Frame-of-reference training makes participants better team membersPurpose of study: This study explores the effect of cognitive model development (measured by aknowledge test as in Study 2) on team performance and team-member effectiveness. Trainingmembers of teams to develop a more accurate cognitive model of teamwork should increaseteam performance, team cohesion, team self-efficacy, and satisfaction, and reduce team conflict.Status of study: Participants were recruited to the experimental and control groups at UNCCharlotte and Purdue University for lab studies, and the results of that work are being published.A significant research protocol was designed, developed, and launched at

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dina Verdín, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

moderatelyhigher (p < 0.05) than their non-FGCS peers. Indicating that, on average, FGCS enter engineeringwith higher confidence in understanding engineering, feeling like they can perform well on examsthan their non-first-generation college student peers. First-generation college students’ high self-reported measures of performance/competence is directly related to their self-efficacy andperception of themselves in relation to their chosen field, in this case engineering35. Theimportance of students’ self-confidence and self-efficacy for persisting in science and engineeringhas been further articulated in a literature review by Geisinger and Raman49. This study examinedliterature on engineering students’ attrition, while not explicitly focused on FGCS

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea M. Ogilvie P.E., Virginia Tech; David B Knight, Virginia Tech; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Arturo A Fuentes, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley; Patricia A. Nava P.E., University of Texas, El Paso; Valarie E. Taylor, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

study is an adaptation of the Laanan-transfer students' questionnaire (L-TSQ)1,2,3,4 plus a compilation of survey items extracted from the following multi-institutionalresearch studies that investigated transfer student experiences in STEM: Prototype to Production:P2P5 and Measuring Constructs of STEM Student Success Literacy: Community CollegeStudents’ Self-Efficacy, Social Capital, and Transfer Knowledge.6,7The final survey instrument, the “Engineering Transfer Student Survey”, was developedspecifically for this project and is comprised of six sections that include a mix of multiple choiceand open-ended questions. Multiple survey items are embedded in 16 of the 45 questions. Ahigh level summary for each section of the survey is provided as

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Sunday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Chiki, Ohio University; Braden Vale Jay Robinson, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

), 525-548.[4] Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R. & Kennedy, M. S. (2016). Measuring undergraduate students' engineering self-efficacy: A validation study. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366–395.[5] Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Work

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Scott R. Bartholomew, Purdue University; Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Michael Grubbs, Baltimore County Public Schools; Daniel Gordon Mendiola Bates, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

comparative judgment, integrated STEM learning, Technology & Engineering Design learning, and self-directed learning. I have taught at the middle-school, high school, and collegiate levels and am dedicated to strengthening Technology & Engineering Education.Mr. Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Andrew Jackson is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute, with an emphasis on Engineering and Technology Teacher Education. His research interests are engineering self-efficacy, motivation, and decision making. Andrew is the recipient of a 2015 Ross Fellowship from Purdue University and has been recognized as a 21st Century Fellow by the International Technology and

Conference Session

Changing the Engineering Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dong San Choi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

: they believe in innate talents. Thegrowth mindset is considered an important component in promoting positive learning behaviorsand dispositions, because it promotes success through effort.Dweck also found that students with the growth mindset adopt a mastery goal orientation, inwhich they strive to master an academic subject whereas students with the fixed mindset adopt aperformance goal orientation in which they aim only to earn a grade or to perform better thanpeers8. Mastery goal orientation has been associated with positive outcomes such as self-efficacy,persistence, preference for challenge, and self-regulated learning, whereas performance goalorientations has been associated with maladaptive patterns of cognition, affect, and behavior 9

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Orlando Sanguinette Hoilett, Purdue University; Asem Farooq Aboelzahab, Purdue University; Erica Amanda Layow, Purdue University; Jacqueline Callihan Linnes, Purdue University; Chi Hwan Lee, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

application in clinical physiological measurement,” Physiol. Meas., vol. 28, no. 3, p. R1, 2007.[6] O. Hoilett, “PulseFit - DIY Heart Sensor With Auto-Adjusted Threshold and Heart-Shaped LED Heartbeat Indicator,” Instructables.com. [Online]. Available: http://www.instructables.com/id/Heart-Sensor-With-AutoAdjusted-Threshold-and-Heart/. [Accessed: 23-Mar-2017].[7] T. Knapp, B. Fisher, and C. Levesque-Bristol, “Service-Learning’s Impact on College Students’ Commitment to Future Civic Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Social Empowerment,” J. Community Pract., vol. 18, no. 2–3, pp. 233–251, Aug. 2010.[8] C. Levesque-Bristol, T. D. Knapp, and B. J. Fisher, “The Effectiveness of Service-Learning: It’s Not Always what you Think,” J. Exp

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University; Denny C. Davis, The Ohio State University; Sarah Winfree, The Ohio State University ; Kaycee Ash, The Ohio State University; Bashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

initially associatesvalue with a behavior, and then begins to engage in that behavior, until becoming fully motivatedto act out the behavior in everyday life16.Existing Motivation Assessments. A number of established assessment instruments exist withconstructs related to motivation. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ),developed to measure learning strategies and academic motivation used by college students,identifies motivation constructs for extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, taskvalue, and control expectancy20The Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), a multidimensional measurement to assess students’subjective experience in laboratory experiments, includes constructs for attainment, utility

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research and a Force and Moment Lab

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Prins, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

"soft skills" (a.k.a."essential skills") as advocated by ABET 2000. A more recent example is provided by Boylan-Ashraf who includes hands-on lab activities as part of an arsenal of active strategies applied in anintroductory solid mechanics course (based on presented topical coverage the course would serveas a course in statics). Indicated advantages of active strategies include their increasedlikelihood (compared to lecture-based activities) to provide experiences that are significantenough to build connections as well as a strong association with improved self-efficacy. It isfurther suggested that hands-on learning may promote student retention.Developing contextual knowledge for the "machines" topic In spite of the potential advantages

Conference Session

Pre-College: Robotics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University; Sonia Mary Chacko, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering; Vikram Kapila, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

. Since educational robotics activities are often designed to promote situated cognitionand learning, we believe that the lack of trust in robotics may adversely affect student’s cognitionand understanding of STEM concepts underlying the robotics lesson. Note that the concept of trustin robots for young age middle school students, who may have less experience with technologiesin general and robots in particular, may differ from the concept of trust in robots for moreexperienced technology persons, including the teachers. Moreover, it may be necessary to examinewhether different STEM disciplines and gender affect students’ trust levels in robots for theirrobotics-aided lessons. The concept of trust in robots may also be connected to teachers’ self

Conference Session

Student Success & Development - Focus on Academic Support

Collection

2017 FYEE Conference

Authors

Kristine K. Craven, Tennessee Technological University; Elizabeth L Hutchins, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, FYEE Division - Paper Submission

that indicate college success and are on the job, interpersonal communication strategies,within the power of the individual to adjust. The activities and networking, interview strategies, working on a team, projecttopics covered in the Connections course focus on these six management and working in a global context. Furtherfactors and provide resources to help students improve. The opportunities to become connected are provided through theareas are as follows: academic self-efficacy, organization and Clay N. Hixson College of Engineering Student Success Fairattention to study, stress and time management, involvement where each organization and department shares informationwith college activities

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darryl Dickerson, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

interaction of MEPs and cultural engineering student organizations such asNSBE and the combined impact of their programs, activities, and services warrants furtherinvestigation [16], [18], [19]. Future studies will be conducted to explore how and why the associations present in thisstudy occur at this particular chapter. However, elements that have been identified in theliterature such as participation in social, academic, and professional activities of the chapter, aswell as regional and national conferences, may contribute to outcomes that support persistencesuch as fostering a strong sense of community or “family”, increased self-efficacy, increasedconfidence in technical and non-technical skills and abilities, and a strong social and

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brett Doudican, University of Dayton; Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton; Brian Lawrence LaDuca, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

such, teachers need to have access to high quality STEM curriculum that isaligned with the academic content standards or to professional development opportunities thatwill enhance their capacity and self-efficacy in engineering if they are to be successful inimplementing the NGSS.Professional development in STEM is available to teachers through a variety of engineering andeducational professional organizations such as ASM, American Society of EngineeringEducation (ASEE), and through various National Science Foundation sponsored programs.17-20One such program is the National Science Foundation’s Research Experience for Teacher (NSF-RET) program.21 This program seeks to provide authentic engineering research experiences forteachers in university

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily A. Bovee, Michigan State University; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University; S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University; Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

sense of belongingwith their selected major and college (Good, Rattan, & Dweck, 2012). Indeed, feelings ofbelonging are related to overall well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2000) as well as higher levels ofacademic self-efficacy and motivation (Freeman, Anderman, & Jensen, 2007). It is particularlyconcerning that students who belong to groups that are underrepresented in engineering feel lessconnected with their major, which is also generally related to problems with adjustment to thecollege environment (Dennis, Phinney, & Chuateco, 2005). To address the issues of retention inengineering majors, many colleges and universities have implemented programs to supportstudents in their first year (Purdie & Rosser, 2011). This paper will

Conference Session

Quantitative Research Methods

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #18317Cluster Analysis in Engineering EducationMr. Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Andrew Jackson is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute, with an emphasis on Engineering and Technology Teacher Education. His research interests are engineering self-efficacy, motivation, and decision making. Andrew is the recipient of a 2015 Ross Fellowship from Purdue University and has been recognized as a 21st Century Fellow by the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. He completed his Master of Science in Technology Leadership and Innovation at

Conference Session

CoED: Embedded Systems and Robotics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ying Lin, Western Washington University; Todd D. Morton, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

understanding of the DSP topics covered in lectures, which might not be a good direct measure of student’s understanding of topics. However, it shows a relatively high level of students’ self-efficacy which can improve learning performance9, 10. Students also supported the use of this platform for future DSP offerings except for one student who pointed out that the selected K65 board might be too powerful for most senior design projects. As noted in Section III, we are currently investigating a similar but smaller size MCU board (i.e., the FRDM-K66F development board) as the alternative platform for the DSP laboratory coursework. This board could be a better option for some senior design projects compared

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Assessment

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

pursue undergraduate degrees in STEM fields, and have slightlyhigher undergraduate grade point averages6, while evaluations of FIRST Robotics programs haveshown similar outcomes7,8. One of the few studies exploring the effects of a wide range of pre-college engineering activities measured significantly higher engineering self-efficacy amongstudents who had participated in pre-college engineering classes or had engineering-relatedhobbies9. Overall, relatively little work has been done to broadly understand the effects of pre-college engineering participation on the experiences and success of university engineeringstudents, resulting in limited theory to guide the understanding of this experience.To address these limitations, we developed a

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University; Jung Sook Kim, Ohio State University; Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

them, expectancy, self-concordance, and commitment canbe adopted since WOC faculty in engineering with sustained motivation may be predicted toshow greater goal persistence and attainment .10,11 Buse and Billimoria12 use a mixed methodsapproach in studying the factors related to the retention of women in the engineering profession.They first used a qualitative method to collect narratives of women through interviews. From thenarratives, they argue that one’s personal vision was a contributing factor to persistence. Basedupon this finding, they developed a scale to measure one’s personal vision conceptualized as the“ideal self,” which is comprised of self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and core-identity. They arguethat this ideal self directly

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University; Jessi L. Smith, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

interventions to create change.Background – Utility Value Theory Research in social psychology has continually shown that students’ expectancies for success(e.g., self-efficacy) and the perceived value of a particular career predicts motivation to pursuethat career. Classic work within this Expectancy-Value framework (e.g., Eccles et al., 1983) hasexamined this relationship for decades on primarily non-engineering students (e.g., math andbiology, Eccles, 1984; Wigfield & Eccles, 1992; Sullins, Hernandez, Fuller, & Tashiro, 1995).Until relatively recently, the focus of expectancy-value research has centered predominately onthe “expectancy” side of the theory (and has extended into other theories such as social-cognitivecareer theory, Lent

Conference Session

Action on Diversity - Institutional Change & Perspectives on Diversity

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

taxonomy of motivation theorieswhich captures the breadth of motivation in educational research. Eccles and Wigfield groupedtheories into four categories 1) expectancy (e.g., belief about the difficulty of a task and a person’sability to perform it successfully); 2) reasons for engagement; 3) integrating expectancy and valueof a task; and 4) integrating motivation and cognition. This systematic review found that over halfof the articles found did not have a specified framework for their study. Of the papers that used aframework, three were most prevalent including Bandura’s self-efficacy construct68, Deci andRyan’s self-determination theory69, and Eccles and Wigfield’s expectancy-value theory70. Self-efficacy is one’s belief in his or her ability

Conference Session

The Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle D. Gagne, Alfred University; Bethany C. Johnson, Alfred University; Steven M. Pilgrim, Alfred University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. However, point values wereincreased for the second Cohort and the data remained collapsible.Finally, it is possible that the measures used in the present investigation are not actuallypredictive of persistence in an engineering program, and therefore the null result we founddepicts the true state of reality. There are myriad components to self-regulation beyond thesubset chosen for this study. For example, self-efficacy, or the personal belief that one can orcannot accomplish particular tasks in particular domains, has been linked to academic outcomes[16], as have implicit theories regarding the source of one’s intelligence in subsequentimplications for outcomes [17, 18]. Nelson and colleagues incorporated knowledge building andclass goal

Conference Session

Research Experiences at Two-year Colleges

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Nicholas Patrick Langhoff, Skyline College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

towardsincreasing the number and diversity of engineering graduates by addressing the retentionproblem in the first two years of college. One of the strategies commonly employed in improvingundergraduate STEM education is providing students access to research experiences. There aremany studies documenting the benefits of research opportunities for undergraduate studentsincluding increased student engagement in their education, enhanced research and laboratoryskills, improved academic performance, increased student self-efficacy, and increasedunderstanding and interest for their discipline. These studies also show that early and multipleexposures to undergraduate research experiences offer the greatest benefit. However, a recentextensive study of Research

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Ruth Childs, University of Toronto; Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

particular, some reasons provided in the literature paint a highly gendered classification oftalent/capabilities: females are less skilled in science and math, which diminishes femaleconfidence (stereotype threat) [13-15]; females have an inborn disposition for ‘caring’ or‘humanities’ jobs [16], and female secondary students have lower self-efficacy in STEM subjectsand lower interest in engineering [17].The underrepresentation of females in both Canadian and American programs is evident inFigures 1 and 2, but another interesting and yet-to-be-understood phenomenon is theheterogeneous distribution of female enrolment by program. If we understood the causes for therelatively high female enrolment in disciplines such as Chemical Engineering, then we

Collection

2017 FYEE Conference

Authors

Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Matthew A. Verleger Ph.D. (He/His/Him), Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Heidi M Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach

courses and/or programs. Allafter the two group discussions. disciplines are welcome to attend. Our goal is continuousFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 – August 8, 2017, Columbus, OH W1A-2 Session W1Ainnovation and we welcome all perspectives to promotecreative thinking and change. REFERENCES[1] Hutchison, M, A, Follman, D, K, Sumpter, M, & Bodner, G, M, “Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students”, Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela M Leggett-Robinson, Georgia State University-Perimeter College; Brandi Villa, Belay Consulting LLC; Naranja C Davis, Georgia State University Perimeter College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

and four-year colleges influence student identity, belonging, self-efficacy,and encouragement. The “STEM culture” a student experiences shapes their awareness andunderstanding of standards, expectations, and their sense of belonging in STEM. Moreimportantly, the encouragement or lack thereof within the “STEM culture” of the departmentand/or institution can support or undermine their performance and persistence through their self-concepts and beliefs and their feelings of community and belonging in STEM fields.3-5For historically underrepresented students, such as black students, views of the way race andethnicity function in their college environment are especially important in their social andacademic adjustment.25 Experiencing a college