design tasks were performed through manual calculations by followingtraditional lecture notes. The conceptual design was followed by more sophisticated three-dimensional design tasks using computer-aided techniques. Finally, the students were assessedcontinuously with respect to their technical contribution, working techniques and interactionwith their peer group at national and international level. They were also probed regarding theiropinion on various aspects of the project using interviews and forms. These surveys have beenevaluated together with the opinion of the academic staff in order to form future directions. For the planning the students had to consider the engine as a whole before distributing the tasksindividually. This enabled
. In a recent study by Kettering University CoreEngineering Team (CET)[1], a survey of engineering curricula at other universities was carriedout. Reviewed universities included all of Kettering’s Association of Independent TechnologicalUniversities (AITU) peers, Michigan universities with major engineering programs, anduniversities participating in the Foundation Coalition. This review[2-6] found that manyuniversities, including Kettering, continue to offer relatively traditional core curricula. Non-traditional or innovative programs are in place at a number of universities, but relatively few ofthese have been implemented for all students. Most remain in an experimental stage and areoffered to only a subset of the students and taught only by
· Teaching via the case method · Designing for experiential learningIn addition, journal articles will be highlighted to support educators with how, and why, to usevarious technologies to design unique learning experiences in the entrepreneurship classroom.Such examples include: · Online collaboration tools · Creating a classroom community online · Real-time case writing through teleconferencing · Cross-university collaboration · E-mentors: Transcending geographical barriers to provide real-world contentd. The CommunityIndividual comments regarding the challenges faced by entrepreneurship educators indicated thatmany faculty lack the time to review resources, and miss having a peer group with whom toshare
peers on the basis of nationalstereotypes.According to David Harvey (1989), in a system of flexible accumulation subcontracted "flexible"workers use their multiple skills to produce products according to rapidly shifting tastes.Globalization also depends on the availability of flexible workers to produce "just-in-time"products according to consumer demands and on the rapid dispersal of those products around theglobe. Again, Harvey does not give engineers special conceptual treatment. Furthermore, thedesired feature of flexibility in engineers has been taken for granted as something that can betaught in engineering school, particularly if encouraged by corporations hiring engineers andaccrediting bodies of engineering education (Boeing 1997
theacademy’s goal and mission. While pursuing a four-year college degree, the students thatattend the academy are also training to serve as officers in the United States Army andare therefore known as cadets. The complete student body is referred to as the Corps ofCadets and includes representation from every state in the nation as well as numerousforeign countries.West Point’s Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering offers an AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accredited degree in mechanicalengineering (ME). Cadets enrolled in ME must successfully complete a course of studyvery similar to that required by their peers at civilian institutions. Each year,approximately 75 cadets select mechanical engineering as a major. All
, including,optics, electronics, manufacturing technology, electrical machinery, controls, and nano-fabrication. Recognizing that we could not satisfy all of the needs of all constituents, we focusedon those needs that transcended many businesses. Various different local industries desired toemploy graduates skilled in electronics, three-phase electrical machinery, power distribution,manufacturing, and controls. They needed graduates who can write and speak well, whounderstand the economic and social implications of their business, and who are well trained inthe latest technology - able to apply it during the first day on the job. We concluded thatengineering technology graduates with specialized training in both electricity and electronics,could
assemblylanguages, MIPS and HC11, in the computer organization course. These would be treated in anewly created separate laboratory, thereby allowing us to meet both our primary and secondarygoals. The work to design this laboratory divided naturally into two major tasks: development ofthe actual tutorial hardware to be used, and writing an accompanying lab manual to support bothassembly languages, HC11 and MIPS. Thus, the hardware would employ the 68HC11 and bedesigned to meet the primary goal of bringing the hardware closer to the students while the labmanual meets both goals. The following two sections discuss details about changes we made tothe course, and how and why the necessary hardware was designed and built here at UCSC.Although this was formally
reasons:(i) No coding: Even though SE-382 is a software engineering course, it is the first course for SEstudents in which they do not do any design or implementation. Instead, majority of their time isspent writing documents and specifying the project requirements completely and correctly. Ourstudents, like many seasoned programmers, believe that the major effort in software developmentis programming and testing. Consequently, they found the task of documenting the functionality Page 7.748.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002
Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationIn summary, the Cohort methodology is nothing more than a focused effort to give the studentsin a graduate program the sense of community and trust that is necessary for them to form anatural work group. If this work group mentality is properly formed and nurtured, then eachstudent’s individual academic success will naturally improve. The techniques they learn andapply through the cohort activities gives them the interpersonal and organization skills valued inthe technology workplace.Impact of the Cohort methodologyOne direct measure of the Cohort methodology is its acceptance under peer review by educatorsin the engineering and science communities. The Cohort methodology formed the
presentations before individual teachingteams, to no presentations at all.Action research projects can be particularly important in helping teachers internalize thematerials, in convincing school peers of the need for change, and in ultimately effecting changewithin the classroom and school. To encourage serious research projects we offered to pay forsubstitutes for two days of release time so the teachers could conduct their action researchprojects. However very few schools invoiced us for either the workshop materials and suppliesor the release time substitutes, though all teachers placed their personal orders for the resourcematerials. Evidently many schools are not well versed in the process of invoicing externalinstitutions for money, and/or it is
improvement.Assessing student learning of the engineering design process is particularly challenging, andefforts to assess design competency are varied 5-6. Examples of using surveys include self-assessments of abilities and knowledge7-8 and peer-based instruments where students assess the Page 7.310.1competency of their peers9-10. Examples of performance-based assessments include: juries where Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
all members is required to complete a project effectively. 9. Foundations in technical report writing. An effort coordinated with the English Technical Department. Reports 10. Foundations in preparing and presenting information in oral presentations. Oral Briefings 11. A Tool: Foundations in using the USAFANet and the WWW. Computer Nets 12. A Tool: Slide and figure preparation using MS-PowerPoint. PowerPoint 13. A Tool: Foundations in using MS-Excel to create and use spreadsheets to catalog data Spreadsheets and to make calculations.from the instructor’s suggestions for improvement. We have found that the feedback sheetimproves student
realization ofplace and develop future direction. Additionally, the work of Arthur Chickering (1969)has provided a theoretical framework for these objectives and, together with institutionalexperience, has provided an increased awareness that engaging students from multipleperspectives is more often than not responsible for helping students develop academicallyand socially.Success as a college student requires development of a strong personal network ofsupport, connection among peers and purposeful awareness of their course of study.Studies of how college effects students by Pascarella and Terenzini (1991) offer citationafter citation as to the value and importance of the concept of mentorship, i.e., connectionto faculty, staff, students and others
definition, and presentation in a suitable learning format andpace. This phase also allows the developers to focus on the selection of the best course material,lab and homework exercises, and presentation methods in the traditional lecture format. In the second phase, the focus shifts to distance learning strategies, iterative refinement of thecourses, and collaboration with other peer institutions. All lectures will be provided via I2, butleft available on the class website for later or repeated viewing by students. An additional goal ofthis phase is to begin incorporating the additional research developments into the courses. This isdone through a variety of methods including, but not limited to: a) having students in the classreview recent
provide the teaching materials fortheir students in addition to examination and certification, distance education has become a truealternative to conventional education, particularly for those who did not make it intoconventional universities. A measure of the success of the distance experiment is that there are asmany students enrolled at the Open University of Sri Lanka as in all the Sri Lankan conventionaluniversities put together.However, the distance option still suffers from problems. There is a high failure rate because ofdiminished peer interaction, lack of full time commitment and other reasons. But the problem ismost severe in engineering and (to a lesser extent) in the physical sciences where sometimesthere are more academic staff
schools that participated in the program· Increase number of teachers with engineering design knowledge· Increase awareness of the nature/limits of science· Raise standards to which students hold themselves (i.e., encourage peer evaluation as an alternative to teacher-based grading)· Encourage and support implementation of results at the local level after the factThe goal of increasing student learning opportunities and skills was translated into the followingobjectives:· Provide a framework for student decision making and problem solving· Increase number of students exposed to engineering problem solving and engineering design processes· Offer another avenue for active learning· Expand use of groups and teams in classrooms
choice, multiple select, numerical, fill-in-the-blank, symbolic, and essay questions. Wewill demonstrate how to use these techniques to write more intricate questions to actively engagestudents in the learning process, help them understand basic concepts, and improve theirproblem-solving skills. We will also illustrate how to use assignments delivered by WebAssignto create a learner-centered environment by promoting interactive, cooperative learning amongstudents and increasing interaction between students and faculty.Through using WebAssign to deliver, collect, and grade homework and quizzes, we haveobserved that students have increased the number of hours spent on academic tasks outside theclassroom in Calculus and General Physics as well as
students who are involved in campus organizations, such as fraternities, sororities,and athletic teams, are more likely to cheat than their peers 2,18,21,23.Finally, there has been some research performed on how situational factors, such as the pressureto succeed in school, affect academic dishonesty. Other such factors include external workcommitments, heavy course loads, and financial aid or scholarship requirements 1,4,24.Additionally, students frequently place the blame for cheating on the faculty, citing poorinstructional quality, irrelevant course material, and faculty apathy about cheating 23.Overall, we believe that the responsibility for reducing academic dishonesty lies with the entirecollege community, including students, academic
(aq) + HCl(aq) –> NaCl(aq) after calculating the )H for the following reactions:NaOH(s) –> NaOH(aq) and NaOH(s) + HCl(aq) –> NaCl(aq).Acid - Base Titration - Students determined the concentration dependence of pH for carbonicacid and then estimated the amount of base required to neutralize the acid. They repeated this forcalculation HCl, and by comparison learn that the difference between a strong and weak acid.Kinetics - The students determined the rate law of crystal violet (CV) + NaOH to determine if itis an elementary process.In these experiments the students were not given specific experimental conditions to examine,and were required to write a brief lab memo (with an introduction, procedure, results anddiscussion) to explaining
where they show offtheir capstone design projects. Furthermore, they are asked to make a journal entry analyzingtheir individual performance with the rubric suggested by Figure 3 and outlining a personal planof action for elevating their skills to the next level. They are also asked to speculate whyengineering students typically score much lower on the teamwork and communication sectionsthan the design process sections and are asked to suggest actions that could be taken across thecurriculum to improve performance in these areas.At Seattle University some freshman classes take the instrument as an ice-breaker in thebeginning engineering course. This experience initiates fellowship among their peers and helpsstudents see the big picture of what
objective. In additionto the virtual instrumentation (data acquisition), each workstation was equipped with a digitaloscilloscope (Tektronix TDS 210), dual power supply (Agilent E3620A), digital multimeter(Fluke Model 45) and 2 MHz function generator (Leader LG 1301). To provide an ergonomicworkstation, the instrumentation was mounted on shelves on each side of the monitor (Figure 2).This arrangement also met the guidelines for the American Disabilities Act.Engineering Software. Software packages available for engineering design are readilyavailable and very useful in strengthening lecture material. The basic software for report writing(‘Microsoft Office Suite’) and data analysis (‘MatLab’, ‘TKSolver’, ‘StatMost’) was installed oneach workstation
focuses oncommunications issues such as writing styles, written and oral communication within the groupand to others outside the group. Group organization and project management are also coveredduring this week. The next two weeks focus on small case studies in order to emphasizeproblem-solving strategies, group dynamics, and to practice written and oral communication. Page 7.96.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationOf course, students should bring many of these skills to the course, but
students identify competing design project opportunities. Asthe individual students interact, design teams are formed and the teams generate white papers to insurethey fully understand the objectives and constraints of the potential project sponsor. A formal technicalproposal is then generated which contains the detailed planning the team has done in preparation for theproject. Finally, the teams create a web presence for their project so that access to pertinentinformation is available to all stakeholders. The third major objective is to expose the students toimportant areas of information that are not possible to include in the other technically-orientedcoursework. Topics such as business etiquette, resume writing, and compensation packages
an ever lighter human footprint onthe earth."Writing in The New York Times, Jay Parini endowed Orr, chair of theEnvironmental Studies Program, with the apt appellation "environmental guru."Orr led more than 250 students, faculty, and town residents in discussions withnational ecological designers during the building's initial design phase three yearsago. He also raised most of the funds for the project.For Oberlin, that knowledge has resulted in a 14,000-square-foot, $6.6 million,self-sustaining structure of classrooms, laboratories, and surrounding gardens.More than a building where teaching takes place, the Lewis Center is a place thatteaches. By virtue of the building's design concepts, students learn ecologicalcompetence and mindfulness
23 x x x 24 x 25 Page 7.338.8Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Table 4. Approaches to success skills training used in programs HowRef. Computer Team Test- Diversity to Time Conflict # Seminar skills skills Writing Speaking Studying taking training learn management resolution 1
, ajoint engineering and architecture course was organized with half undergraduateengineers and half architects to complete the detailed design drawings of the Page 7.1102.4house. Currently, in Spring 2002, the construction phase of the project hasbegun with the cooperation of architects, engineers, and c onstructionprofessionalsThe Undergraduate ThesisIn engineering, the senior thesis provides a mechanism for the requiredinterdisciplinary collaboration. Engineering students at the University of Virginiaare required to write an undergraduate thesi s; this thesis is directed by theDivision of Technology, Culture and Communication through two core courses:TCC
problem. · Provide an opportunity to apply basic knowledge in addition to what is learned in the course to solve an engineering problem. · Learn to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data. · Provide an opportunity to function on multi-disciplinary teams, which requires communication with team members and to learn professional and ethical responsibility.In order to select a design project for a course, the course objectives must be clearly defined.Advanced mechanics of materials students will be able to: · develop models of mechanical components by making reasonable assumptions and writing appropriate equations, · apply appropriate failure criteria, · formulate a design methodology.For
, American Society for Engineering Education”members. No formal peer evaluation process was implemented. Instead, team problems wereidentified by informal conversations with the teams throughout the semester. It is our opinionthat resolving conflicts is an inherent part of realistic teaming. It may in fact be the mostimportant aspect in maintaining an effective work environment. Therefore, teams wereencouraged to manage themselves courteously and professionally. Irresolvable conflicts werehandled expeditiously in the instructor’s office face-to-face. No attempt was made to determinewhat percentage of the work each team member might have performed as we consider equitableload sharing to be an essential part of team self-management. Therefore, every
motivation, Maslow 1 clarified the relationship between motivation and unmetneeds. His Hierarchy of Needs defines the human needs from bottom up as follows:physiological needs such as food, water and shelter; safety needs such as security, freedom fromfear and order; belongingness and love needs; esteem needs such as self-respect, achievementand reputation; and self-actualization needs. These needs must be satisfied from bottom up. It isassumed in this study that all of the lower level needs of our engineering students are sufficientlysatisfied. They have food, shelter, are safe and feel they belong with their peers. Brandon 2divides self-esteem into two interrelated components: self-efficacy (the sense of self-competence) and self-respect (the