Advisor to the leadership at Sisters in STEM. Sreyoshi frequently collaborates on several National Science Foundation projects in the engineering education realm, researching engineering career trajectories, student motivation, and learning. Sreyoshi has been recognized as a Fellow at the Academy for Teaching Excellence at Virginia Tech (VTGrATE) and a Fellow at the Global Perspectives Program (GPP) and was inducted to the Yale Bouchet Honor Society during her time at Virginia Tech. She has also been honored as an Engaged Ad- vocate in 2022 and an Emerging Leader in Technology (New ELiTE) in 2021 by the Society of Women Engineers. Views expressed in this paper are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those
and communicate across a variety of disciplines,which might include product design and development, installation, testing, operation, andmaintenance [2].All of these signs reflect a growing awareness of the need for an educational model that willrespond to rapidly evolving challenges. The National Academy of Sciences has raised theconcern that the current educational model should better align existing engineering models withsuch emerging challenges, broadening the context through an increased number of thematic callsand engaging with a wider range of users. In addition, academic literature on Science,Technology, and Society has called for a move towards a heightened awareness of the contextand factors that influence engineering decision
, reflectiveobservation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation, created by contextualdemands. Thus, ELT's implications for the course's design consisted of guiding learners throughrecursive processes of experiencing, reflecting, thinking, and acting to respond to the learningsituation. That is, "immediate or concrete experiences are the basis for observations andreflections. These reflections are assimilated and distilled into abstract concepts from which newimplications for action can be drawn. These implications can be actively tested and serve asguides in creating new experiences" [5]. Specifics of how ELT guided the course implementationare described in the section below.3. The CourseThe course titled Industrial IoT Implementation for Smart
contributing to the team’s work, keeping the team on track, expecting quality,having relevant knowledge and skills, and interacting with teammates. The survey questionsrooted in conflict research (Gonzalez & Hernández, 2014, and Harrison & Klein, 2007) wereused to probe three types of conflicts: task, process, and relationship. We used the termsdisagreement and conflict interchangeably in this paper.The survey also collected demographic data. The sample demographics reflected the gender andracial distribution of the engineering student population at our institution, of which 13% werefemale, one third identified as Hispanic, one third as Asian, 16% as White, 6% as AfricanAmerican, and the rest as either mixed race, Native American, Native
thinking processes YES or NO Does the course include attention to principles of universal design of learning, including access and accommodation? Ex. Consider use of visuals designed to include colorblind students or laboratories that accommodate students with visual or physical impairments YES or NO Does the course include attention to highlighting the contributions of diverse exemplars of engineers? Ex. Tell the full story of the origins of engineered designs, like including the role of Lewis Latimer in the development of the light bulbWizard Outcome 4 - Character4a: Learning activities: YES or NO Does the course include opportunities for students to reflect on
careers atcommunity colleges. These workshops respond to the need for professional development ofgraduate students pertaining to potential faculty career paths. The workshops also provideparticipating students with a career reflection from a community college faculty and a paneldiscussion regarding aspects of faculty responsibilities, student populations, and the overallenvironment at community colleges.At the end of the workshop, prospective students are asked to sign up for a follow-up experience.A select number of students who participated in the workshop are paired with faculty mentors forclassroom observation visits. The mentors provide support by scheduling meetings before andafter the observations along with adequate resources and
Inclusive Teaching: An Exploratory Approach to Evaluate Faculty PerceptionsAbstract:This study describes an exploratory approach to evaluate faculty perception of the peerobservation practice aimed to enhance inclusive teaching.The quality of teaching is a part of the evaluation criteria for Promotion, Tenure andReappointment (PTR) process for university faculty. The student-based evaluation of teaching isknown to have several limitations and hence cannot be the sole basis for instructor evaluation.Peer observation, self-reflection, and assessment of teaching portfolios can be employed asholistic evaluation practices. The Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) department at theUniversity of Connecticut (UConn) adopted a calibrated
education with focus on engineering design, problem-based learning, co-curricular involvement and its impact on professional formation, and the role of reflection practices in supporting engineering undergraduates as they transition from student to professional. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Validation of a Measure of Design Framing AgencyAbstractIn this research paper, we investigate the structure and validity of survey data related to students’framing agency. In order to promote increased opportunities for students to engage in and learnto frame design problems that are innovative and empathetic, there is a need for instruments thatcan provide information about
: (i) architectural history as a background to discuss the relationship betweenthe changes in society and the architectural developments from the first industrial revolution topost-modernism and (ii) recent technological and societal changes to reflect on the foreseeablefuture challenges. The present paper describes our experience developing and deploying thiscourse for the first time. We start by presenting the motivation behind this new course, the learningobjectives, the schedule of topics, and assessments. Following, the instructors provide lessonslearned from the course's first iteration. Finally, we conclude by making suggestions for improvingfuture iterations of the course. These suggestions can also be relevant to others considering
a number of reasons, including ensuring that academic terminology and workshopmaterials were relevant and well adapted to the local institutional context. Further, it helpedbuild capacity and expertise through authentic partnership and knowledge sharing. There wasalso parity in leadership and contribution for running the workshop exercises. Finally, agileapproaches–like on-the-fly changes to facilitation activities in response to the energy andexperiences of the faculty participants in the room, as well as post-mortem reflections at theend of each day–help the team pivot exercises.Secondly, the workshop was designed exclusively using active learning strategies. A pitfall ofworkshops on active learning strategy is that the pedagogical
integration of the otherdomains as well as for the skills and knowledge associated with those domains. Thus, we usedthe characteristics of engagement were comprised by Cunningham and Kelly’s (2017) epistemicpractices of engineering in this study because they are reflective of the nature of engineering,specific to the habits of mind reflected in the Framework for P12 Engineering Learning, butgeneral enough to be more likely to arise in the interviews. The three groups of stakeholderswhose views were examined in this study are not engineers and it was unlikely that theirreflections on STEM engagement would be specific enough for the Framework (2020) to be themost meaningful descriptors of their views. For example, it was unlikely that the community
’ learning capability throughindividual development and peer engagement. The course design allows students to activelyparticipate in learning as a “resident” living in a “neighborhood”. Besides the traditionalindividual work, various group activities are performed inside one group and among multiplegroups, or the “households”. Students feel more obligated to better performance and high-qualitylearning outcomes. Another focal point of this study is the assessment of student learning underthe proposed course frame, where tailored tutorials and guidance are vital. Although supportfrom the teaching team is essential in this “neighborhood”, we still want to put students in thecenter as the leader of their study. The ongoing data collection reflects the
. Structured deliverables provideguidance as to what elements of a design process may be appropriate to move through theengineering design process. The scaffolding to emphasize prototyping and adoption of aprototyping mindset may help as a pedagogical tool [33]. Artifacts that are created in thesecourses reflect tangible evidence of activity. From the idea to realization, there are means todescribe the role, purpose, and creation of prototypes. Gerber & Carroll [19] describe theconnection and process of prototype creation. Houde & Hill [20] discuss different types ofprototypes as what do prototypes prototype (function, looks-like). Makerspaces also provideadditional context for the tools, mindsets, and community of practice [21-23, 11].Design
lectures andbreakout discussions, reflecting on actionable steps to promote justice and equity in both the CoEcommunity at Penn State and across the global engineering workforce. The goal of this inauguralsummit was to empower and educate the entire CoE community, from students to faculty, to staffand alumni on equity and inclusion related issues in industry.DRT student leaders sought to provide a greater variety of topics as part of the 2022 EngineeringEquity Summit. The hybrid format of the summit consisted of two sets of concurrent sessionsoffered both virtually and in person with the goal of maintaining accessibility for attendees. Theevent was compressed to a one-day, 5-hour event, and centered around the theme of Mentorship,aligning with the
where Black students begin toexplore Black history in an in-depth lens, their own positionality as it pertains to the plights ofthe community and are taught how to use their time to serve the Black community through atantamount of student-leadership activities and organizations. I am grateful for my time at myHBCU, I often look at the rich dynamic of HBCU education—what it offers Black students andthe surrounding communities that other institutions cannot. However, as a Black feminist and aBlack woman in technical engineering communities, I also can think about the areas in whichHBCUs can improve in their servingness outside of patriarchal normatives. Though I recognizethese normatives reflect the white supremacy that exists in society, at
courses (Authors 1 and 2) met every other week to discuss the students’ progress andmake instructional adjustments whenever necessary. By meeting to reflect on the students’progress, professors shared the underlying beliefs that graduate students overwhelmingly held.So, a closer look at the survey data and reflections merited further analysis. The data in theseresults point to some of these deficit ideologies in greater detail.Study LimitationsDue to the nature of the case study design [43] (rather than a case-control design), an appropriatecontrol or comparison group that included funded teaching assistants across the engineeringdisciplines that was not required to take the engineering education course was not identified.This study does not aim
theirdemonstrated success in effecting academic change; we are particularly interested in learningfrom their experiences with and suggestions for creating DEIJ-focused changes. This papersynthesizes what we learned in a series of semi-structured interviews in which we asked about 1)their perspectives on community of practice as a theory of change and whether it is appropriatefor this work, and 2) their reflections on and examples of effective DEIJ efforts as well asbarriers to operationalizing change theories in practice.The following section introduces the CIT-E CoP in the context of the literature on communitiesof practice as a theory of change. Then, we describe our methods and results; this is followed bya discussion of what we have learned so far
were recruited to do a reading andreflection about the findings connected to the 2-day conference for the contingent faculty. Fromthe dean’s responses, the authors paint a picture on the challenges that also impact deans frommaking changes for contingent faculty.Literature Review The focus of this paper are deans and their reflective responses to the data collected fromthe contingent faculty participants who participated in the 2-day conference [2]. We will discussthe roles and responsibilities of deans before discussing and contextualizing contingent facultyand their perilous positions. Deans are faced with the tall task of managing both up to theirbosses which are often vice/provosts or higher, and managing down to faculty, both
for him that throughout his definition and defining engineering, we never see him falterin his belief that he may not be able to live up to what he sees an engineer as. In fact, as hedescribes engineering as full of those with “intelligent minds,” we see that he counts himselfamong those with the potential to join them. Demonstrating that on a subconscious level, hecounts himself among those that fit the mold, and because of that, we see an immense boost tobelonging and confidence that he can become an engineer. This is directly contrasted with howour female participant Chad feels about the mold. When prompted to reflect on what she wouldchange in engineering to make herself feel like she was more welcome in engineering, this washer response
mindfulness(see [6] for a detailed review). The first author's (instructor's) experience through end-of-semester student reflections in her other classes and classroom observations strongly supportsstudents' receptiveness to practice mindfulness in the classroom. It is worth noting that theinstructor has been utilizing mindfulness activities in sophomore to senior-level civil engineeringand fundamental mechanics courses for the past four years.Mindfulness practices, innovation, and creativity: Cognition is all forms of knowing andawareness, such as perceiving, conceiving, remembering, reasoning, judging, imagining, andproblem-solving [7]. A research study [18] in psychology revealed that brief mindfulnessinterventions in novices could improve mood
plan to carry out study abroad opportunities, having community partners in eachlocation also allows for justification for travel for students in both the U.S. and India.Actionable changes for leveraging strengths - within or between teams, or in curricula:In addition to questioning short-term interactions and dynamics, and with the intent of challengingunjust systems toward “critical service learning,” [11] it may be helpful to establish social justiceand global relationship-based reflections [6], [7] toward systemic change. It is well establishedthat students cultivate empathy through partner interaction in service-learning projects, which isassessed by regular reflections [12]. Currently, students on the U.S. team are asked to reflect
students through examples and reflection on how the content applies to real-worldapplications (21). Active learning modules contained course content information, video tutorials,sample exercises, and self-check features that enabled students to apply elements of self-regulated learning. Technical content knowledge from the course was covered in the modules and reinforcedthrough real-world examples, such as demonstrating how engineers use section views of modelsto show function (figure 1) and using everyday objects to help define technical terms, such asvarious section views cut out of vegetables (figure 2). Video tutorials guided students on how toapply content knowledge in software and technical practice, such as in a video demonstration
including untold stories throughout the history of computing andalgorithms, identity and intersectionality in engineering, designs from engineering that have highsocietal impact, the LGBTQ+ experience in engineering, engineering and mental health, andcultural diversity within engineering. Each module gives a brief overview of the topic, followedby an associated assignment. We made all of these modules available to the students in thecourse and told them to choose one to complete. Each student engaged with their selectedmodule in four specific ways: (1) watching a relevant video; (2) reading and annotating aprovided article; (3) responding in a written reflection to a set of specific prompts relevant to themodule; and (4) conducting an interview
[8,12] and positive mindset [11].Academic coaching was placed centrally into program components. Goal setting and relationshipbuilding are key components of the academic coaching philosophy which aligns with many ofthe common elements seen across the literature that was used to create the Scholars Program.Academic coaching also has similarities with the practice of Reality Therapy [4] which was usedas the framework for the personnel responsibility pillar in the model developed by Kamphoff andcolleagues [2]. Reality Therapy is an ongoing process of creating a trusting environment andusing techniques to help an individual discover and reflect on their true goals. In addition to thegoal of building on social capital, there are positive academic
approved Material Resistance, heat Graphical Choosing ??? Property capacity, melting T... interface is nice right thing IEEExplore Info about Like a regular Scholarly Peer articles/conferences search engine articles reviewedFirst-year students come from very different information environments, typically much smallerthan the university library. The information foraging mental model provides students with thelanguage and concepts so they can be reflective searchers who understand why they are learningabout ‘library resources,’ as well as non-library information sources, and what the reward is forinvesting the time to become
informs the culture, climate, and discourse of engineering education,leading to an exclusionary culture within engineering as reflected by the lack of diversity andlower retention of students and faculty of color, and contributes to systemic barriers negativelyimpacting racial equity. Moving towards racial equity in engineering education requires afundamental shift in thinking in two important ways: 1) we must reframe how we think aboutunderserved populations from minority to minoritized by a dominant discourse, and 2) to beginto dismantle the impacts of Whiteness, we must first make this barrier visible.In the first year of this project, the diverse team of PIs began to explore scripts of Whiteness inengineering education by conducting a
vouchers.OrientationPrior to the start of the program, an orientation meeting introduced the available researchprojects and allowed students, faculty, and the graduate student mentors to meet each other. Anoverview of Research Contracts, which were used to structure the individual summer researchprojects of each student, a brief introduction to the online communications platform (Basecamp),where students turned in materials and engaged in weekly reflections on the program and theirresearch projects, and a Lab and Campus Safety information session were also covered in theorientation meeting.Program Website https://stem.northeastern.edu/summer/reu/pathways/Arduino/SparkFun WorkshopThrough this workshop series and a 10-week long engineering design project, students
implemented in the respective firstyear classes this semester, Spring 2023. The team is piloting several assessments this semester. Toassess the perceived impact on learning and perceived difficulty we will be asking the students tocomplete a simple survey (See Appendix D.) To assess a delta in comprehension of diversity,equity, inclusion, and social justice, we will be giving the same pre- and post-assessment askingstudents to define each of the above. (See Appendix E.) After the hands-on activity students willalso reflect on how they think the activity is related to diversity, equity and inclusion. The teamseeks to investigate if there is any correlation between a student’s learning style and theircomprehension of DEI and justice. Hence, each
experience, teachers benefit professionally through integrateddevelopment activities and cultivate greater self-awareness and understanding of culture.First, this paper will summarize the project to date. Then, we present observations fromparticipants’ reflections, semi-structured interview, and pre/post intercultural assessments. Next,we highlight the collaborative outreach and capacity-building efforts which resulted in a newcommunity partner and immersion site. Finally, we discuss the unique opportunities andchallenges associated with navigating international travel and immersion experiences during theCOVID-19 pandemic.Project SummaryThe Global STEM Research Experience for Teachers (RET) is a collaborative program betweenCentral State University
computing is the reality of the computing education “culture” in the U.S.being primarily one-note (e.g., white-men)—including faculty, students, and professionals—which instigates perpetual curricular and non-curricular hurdles for members of non-majoritygroups to overcome. To attain their fit within computing, students must navigate the computerscience culture by adopting norms and values that are reflective of the majority-group [22]. Notbeing able to adopt these norms and values impacts students’ fit within computing contexts and,ultimately, their retention.Culture is a compelling explanation for underrepresentation in computer science. This identifiedone-note cultural concern in computing contexts where non-majority computing students