digital inputs, 4 digital relay outputs, 2 analog inputs and 2 analog outputs). 1 24 Volt Power Supply 2 I/O Expansion Modules (3 digital inputs and 4 digital relay outputs) 2 2 amp circuit breakers 10 Terminal Wiring Blocks 2 Screw drivers 1 Ferrule crimper with 2 small bags of ferrules. 1 Copy of Nanonavigator software (Free Web download) 1 $200 gift card for help in purchasing project items.The materials in the toolkit are valued at around $500.00. Additionally, they receive a $200 giftcard to purchase related materials for their planned project, such as
further insight.&V. ConclusionIn this study, we implemented a series of lesson plans designed to provide students with hands-on programming and circuitry, while simultaneously teaching students about the growing field ofcybersecurity. This study makes a strong case for the use of Arduino-based lesson plans in thehigh school setting to teach cybersecurity concepts and generate interest in STEM andcybersecurity career paths. The authors found that the project discussed previously could befeasibly executed in the high school classroom, and yielded non-significant increases in STEMinterest as assessed by pre and post-survey in a group of 12th grade students already largelycommitted to pursuing careers in STEM-related fields. Despite this non
Alaska Native Science & Engineering Program (ANSEP) Deputy Direc- tor and managed its Summer Bridge, Academies of Engineering, and University Success components. I earned a BS in Civil Engineering from University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA) in 2005 and a MS in En- gineering Management from UAA in 2009. I have taught the Introduction to Engineering course at UAA 5 times. I have more than five years of construction and engineering professional experience in Alaska. I specialized in water and sewer projects in remote Alaskan villages. My responsibilities have included design assistance, technical report and permit writing, feasibility studies, and business plan preparations. Previous work includes conceptual design of
development ofthese skills.We saw several themes emerge in the data. Although students identified a range of learningopportunities, the most common milestones originated from students’ courses, extracurricularactivities, mentorship opportunities, and team projects. From these milestones, we found avariety of professional skills and competencies identified as significant by the students:communication skills, navigating group dynamics, and planning/organization abilities are mostprominent. Finally, we noticed differences in the proportions of milestones and skills whenanalyzing other factors such as: sex, grade point average, citizenship status, minority identity
: 1. What did you know about STEM (in general, engineering in particular) research or advocacy before participating in the PROMISE AGEP? 2. Do you do any work, formal or informal with STEM research or advocacy? 3. How has the PROMISE AGEP influenced your participation in STEM research or advocacy? 4. Are you working in an area of STEM research of advocacy now? 5. Do you have any plans to do any work in STEM research or advocacy in the future?Representative informants were chosen by using homogeneous sampling, which is a purposivesampling technique,14 which according to Welman and Kruger10 is the most important kind ofnon-probability sampling. The selection of the representative informants being
sessions, created engineering graphics tutorials, and recorded solutions for homework and example problems. Students have recorded final presentations for classes, design competition entries, and promotional videos for philanthropic and extra-‐curricular organizations. Numerous other schools have constructed Lightboards from our plans and specifications, which we have offered as open-‐source hardware ( http://lightboard.info ). Neither we nor the other schools have yet completed assessments of effectiveness of Lightboard videos as a learning tool, as compared to other methods of video creation. At the present time, we and other early adopters of the
that purpose. A third component is beliefs – knowledge and conceptions that arestated as being true about the world or about a domain, such as engineering. The fourthcomponent is action possibilities – plans, intentions, strategies, and behaviors that the individualfeels are possible or impossible in the role. These four components emerge continuously throughsocial interactions in different contexts, and interact in a dynamic fashion among themselves, andwith analogous components that belong to other important roles of the person. The four components interact dynamically to form the basis for motivated decisionmaking and action in the role. For example, a student might have a particular set of beliefs aboutthe field of engineering such
to engineering materials which include metals, ceramics,plastics, and composites in two 100-level courses. Primarily, the contents of these coursesconsisted of topics such as the nature of materials, structure-property relationships,manufacturing methods, and techniques of determining engineering materials’ propertiesaccording to industrial procedures described in the standards such as those of the AmericanSociety for Testing and Materials. These same students, according to their academic plans, wererequired to take a freshman technical design graphics course, where they are introduced to 3Dprinting. Thus, it seemed reasonable to synergistically utilize the skills acquired from two tothree freshman courses in a project-based learning
for human use B 5 Nanostructure synthesis and characterization C 3 Development of SPASER technologyFor this study, we employed a mixed methods research plan which included survey data andcontent analysis methods. The surveys employed are evaluative rather than predictive, andrequired trainees to rate their performance and their team’s performance in a number of differentcategories. The surveys were compiled from important elements of teamwork as found inliterature. The same survey was sent to participants each week for four weeks, so short-termlongitudinal data on the same criteria is collected. The survey protocol is given in Appendix A.As a
simplifies the designprocess, so pre-planning a modeling strategy is not necessary as compared to history-basedmodeling. Users working on existing models do not need to understand the modelingstrategy used to create the model, and do not need to search through the feature tree toidentify specific feature parameters in order to make a change to the geometry. The directmodeling approach facilitates quickness and responsiveness-to-change, making it an idealapproach where speed and flexibility are important3. Due to the absence of the history tree, models created using the direct modelingapproach exhibit greater interoperability. Files can be saved in standard formats such asSTEP, Parasolid, or ACIS, and imported into other CAD packages without loss
years. He has 7 US patents, of which 3 have been commercialized by the university. This research work is a collaboration with the Children’s Services Council of Broward county in FL.Dr. Diana Mitsova, Florida Atlantic University Diana Mitsova has a background in research design, statistical and spatial analysis, as well as environ- mental planning and modeling using geographic information systems, and interactive computer simula- tion. Her primary area of research involves the impact of urban development on ecosystems and other environmentally sensitive areas.Her recent publications focus on the impact of climate-related stressors on coastal communities and the implementation of planning approaches related to
, with 29 participants (47%) identifying as female. Weekly surveys were used to collectquantitative data on what types of workplace activities participants engaged in (e.g., teammeetings, project budgeting, CAD modeling, engineering calculations) and qualitative data onwhat challenges they experience in their early work experience.In this paper, we present a descriptive analysis of the data to identify patterns across participants.Preliminary analysis of the quantitative data suggests that the most common activities for ourparticipants were team meetings and project planning (mentioned by >70% of participants)compared to formal presentations and project budgeting (mentioned by <30% of participants).Preliminary analysis of the qualitative
remain enrolled in the engineering college and maintain a cumulative GPA of 3.0 orhigher have their scholarships renewed. Students who fail to meet the GPA requirement are given aone semester probation prior to the removal of their scholarship.The summer bridge component consists of a one week program, which requires students to move intotheir campus housing one week early. The students participate in planned programing from 8:30 am to8:00 pm for the week prior to the start of their first semester in college. The programming consists offacilitated ice-breaker and team building activities, fieldtrips, a team design project, projectpresentations, exposure to campus resources and faculty, hands-on activities facilitated by industrypartners, and
mission, would you approve it? Why or why not? 2. If you were planning this trajectory, would you be worried about the lifetime of the spacecraft? Why or why not? What if the trajectory had the same altitude around Earth? 3. If the goal of the fly-by was to fly in-between Saturn’s rings, would you have the spacecraft perform this fly-by? Why or why not?The questions were evaluated on two dimensions: “correct answer” (yes/no recommendation)and “correct reasoning.” The “correct answer” was marked as no answer, correct, or incorrect. Ifthe student provided the correct “correct answer”, the “correct reasoning” was evaluated ascorrect or incorrect. The three questions spanned the semester and increased in difficulty intandem to the
(IDEs)For this study, an Individual Design Experience (IDE) was developed to mitigate pre-existingdisparities in hands-on prototyping tasks in introductory engineering design courses. The IDEproject required students to create a child’s pull toy manufactured primarily out of wood andcomplied with ASTM toy safety standards. IDE learning objectives were: (1) to develop andexecute a manufacturing plan to create complex shapes from common stock materials, e.g., stocklumber, dowels, and rounds; (2) to identify and use common hardware like screws and springs tocreate a multi-part assembly; and (3) to confidently use hand tools and low precision powertools, e.g., power drill, band saw, and sanders. Evaluation of the IDE was consistent with
, and tools required for classes are provided. The following are key software and servicesprovided.Software § eBooks in one Platform – Vital Source § Microsoft Office 365 § Educational Apps § Productivity AppsServices § Video Production § Closed Captioning § Mobile Device Management § Help DeskAsynchronous LearningThe entire system is set up to be asynchronous learning. This means students can log-in anytime,plan class deadlines around business travel and office projects. Student peer learning experienceis enhanced through discussion boards and group projects, all of which can be accessedasynchronously. Students can also access the MID's course contents and dedicated student servicesusing the mobile platform. These includes
, 2020Lessons Learned: Teaching and Learning Academy Workshop to Promote an Asset-based Mindset among STEM facultyAbstractThis lessons learned paper describes the strategies in planning, organizing, and delivering aTeaching and Learning Academy Workshop that focused on bridging the cultural and perceptiongap between faculty and students in math and engineering classrooms. Grounded in Yosso’sCommunity Cultural Wealth model, the workshop was designed to engage participants in asequence of reflective and conversational activities that allowed the faculty to connect their owneducational experiences with their expectation towards the students, and recognize the strengthof the students in terms of their cultural wealth in Aspirational
topics course within our university’s engineering department, indicating a weekly averageof 2 hours of in-class time and 4 hours of homework. Through the course activities, students willdevelop a concrete plan for their (new or ongoing) advocacy work, and begin to enact this planwith support from both peers and instructors.Learning ObjectivesWe have developed the following Learning Objectives for the initial offering of the course.By participating, students will: • Identify their individual interests and strengths to integrate advocacy into their practice. • Articulate their scientific and/or engineering identity and how it relates to critical consciousness and their unique potential to shape the world. • Develop critical
ECR: BCSER program is to build a researcher’s capacity and expertise in STEMeducation research [10]. The author’s proposal titled “An Individual InvestigatorDevelopment Plan for Building Capacity to Study Undergraduate Latinas Interest inGraduate School” was selected for funding.Project ApproachThis NSF project incorporates capacity building through the “4 steps to Growth in EngineeringEducation Research” depicted in Figure 1. These steps were designed to strengthen the author’scapacity to carry out fundamental engineering education research (EER). The proposed strategystarts with Step 1: Knowledge Building. The knowledge building step outlined opportunities togain knowledge through both formal and informal learning opportunities. As an
point where we can attempt an answer to the last research question of ourproject which is a question measuring the long-term impacts of computational thinking skilldevelopment. Such a question requires a longitudinal approach that our IRB offices haveapproved.Finally, during our project, we came to the realization that our recruiting mechanism – self-selection – limited our participants by demographic categories, and thus our results seemedincomplete. We have initiated steps towards expanding our research to the DFW audience. Whilewe seek IRB approval to include this audience in this final stage of the project, we have analyzedthe cohort from which we did gain access to their grades (n=296). We plan to interviewindividuals who have struggled
developed throughexposure to, practice of, and socialization in disciplinary expectations and norms, the research questions tobe answered through the course of the evaluation plan include: What are factors governing optimal time tointroduce research to undergraduate students to encourage them to pursue graduate school? Whatcharacteristics of REU experiences are most critical in encouraging students to pursue graduate study?How do these vary given other factors (e.g, gender, race, institutional type, impact of prior researchexperiences?) Educational data were collected through qualitative and quantitative methods. Three surveyswere distributed to participants over the course of the summer and into the fall semester comprising severalestablished and
the program were diverse in their year of undergraduatestudy, discipline of study in STEM, and location in the USA. Participants came into the programwith some awareness of sustainability and climate-change basics and challenges. Still, pre- andpost-program surveys and end-of-program interviews showed a short-term gain in knowledge ofsustainability and climate change among the SRTS-REU participants. These results can be usedto inform similar future programs that aim to engage undergraduate students in sustainabilitytopics. We plan to build upon this study with future cohorts of program participants.References[1] “THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development.” Accessed: Jan. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals[2] “Grand
think this class is goingto be boring”, ”I think this class is going to be enjoyable”, ”I think that I am going to bepretty good at this class”, ”This is a class that I cannot do very well in”.Value was measured in Survey 1. It is a measure based on participants’ intrinsic motivationdesigned based on self-determination theory [1]. It focuses on the aspect of motivation thatcomes from the importance and effort that they attribute to this class. Students respond ona 5 point Likert scale of “Strongly agree” to “Strongly Disagree” to the following questionsand the measure corresponds to the average of the answers. ”I plan to put a lot of effortinto this class”, ”It is important to me to do well in this class”, ”I believe this class couldbe of some
. Through narrative inquiry and a novel,boundary-spanning framework, we explore the career stories of women who have leftengineering after having worked in industry. We make sense of the participants’ career decisionsby considering their career journeys through the lens of the unfolding model of turnover, a theoryfrequently used by organizational psychologists yet not fully applied to the study of women’sengineering career decisions. In this paper, we describe the engineering career journey of Louise,one of three participants from our larger study [1]. We invite you to come alongside us as weexplore Louise’s engineering career story through the shocks (jarring events), scripts (plans ofaction), and image violations (violations of goals and values
attributes of a global engineeremerged. These are:1. Demonstrates an understanding of engineering, science, and mathematics fundamentals2. Demonstrates an understanding of political, social, and economic perspectives3. Demonstrates an understanding of information technology, digital competency, and information literacy4. Demonstrates an understanding of stages/phases of product lifecycle (design, prototyping, testing, production, distribution channels, supplier management, etc.)5. Demonstrates an understanding of project planning, management, and the impacts of projects on various stakeholder groups (project team members, project sponsor, project client, end- users, etc.)6. Demonstrates an understanding of the ethical and business norms
people who are part of managedretreat plans. As discussed by Ahmed, “such programs often deepen existing social inequalities. In2021, Elliot [a researcher at Rice University] and a team of researchers found that wealthier, whiter Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 5neighborhoods were able to maintain social ties and social capital after a buyout”13. For instance,“residents moving from a neighborhood where buyout prices average $80,000 end up three timesfarther from their original home than those
andEngineering of Toronto University [18], and Faculty of Engineering at Alberta University [19])state their commitment to EDI within their strategic plans as a broader and transversal vision.They sometimes integrate specific objectives in this regard. These objectives generally pertain torecruitment practices and the development of an inclusive culture through community awarenesson EDI.Secondly, other faculties have adopted specific EDI policies and action plans coveringrecruitment practices, community awareness of EDI issues, improvement of the studentexperience, communication strategies, and fundraising to support initiatives. For example, theFaculty of Engineering at McGill University has identified EDI priorities [20] – RecruitmentLife Cycle
and work engineering through the following lenses: individually or in teams, planning, designing, fabricating, and testing in various group and individual projects.• Building - learn and practice the engineering design process through hands-on projects • You will have plenty of formal and informal learning opportunities about life and physical sciences as we• Leaders - develop and practice oral and written explore leadership, innovation, and the engineering communication skills to become prepared as future design process through hands-on activities within
through meaningful interactions; and (3) buildingtheir tool-kits by delivering strategies for success. These goals are achieved throughMonthly Meetings, monthly Socials, optional paired mentoring, and alum engagementevents.Program Structure:Monthly Meetings: Fall 2023 focused on the topics of mentoring, networking, and thetransition from college to workplace. Spring 2024 will focus on the growth mindset,goal planning and intentional next steps, and creativity in engineering. These topicsguide the LT in the planning and implementation of the Monthly Meetings whichinclude dinner & icebreaker discussions, guest speaker, a mentoring minute activity,and a networking activity.Social activities: events for 2023-24 included a scavenger hunt
Drexel’s Office of Equality and Diversity to ensure the planning and implementation of relevant DEI training and educational opportunities for college faculty and staff, as well as with HR and the college leadership on initiatives to improve the recruitment and retention of diverse faculty and staff. Harris also coordinates with affinity student organizations and programs across the college including, NSBE, SHPE, and SWE to name a few, acting as secondary advisor as well as primary college contact for external affinity-based organizations. Prior to joining Drexel Engineering, Harris served six years as the Director of the Lonnie B. Harris Black Cultural Center at Oregon State University. As Director of the BCC, Harris