refers to. For this reason, Sapir [26] described metonymy as “the logical inverse of metaphor… [with] two terms that occupy a common domain but do not share common features.”• Synecdoche is a specific type of metonymy, in which one part of an entity represents the entire entity [23]. For example, in the sentence “We need some more hands on the project,” hands refer to people.• Analogy is a broad category encompassing any figure of speech involving a comparison of domains [32], and therefore, metaphor is “a species” of analogy [3]. Readers of this paper who completed the SATs (Scholastic Assessment Test) in the U.S. prior to 2005 are likely familiar with the extended analogy form of one comparison juxtaposed with another
for twenty-five years. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development pro- gram that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. He is also a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryDr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Robin is an Assistant Professor with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the Uni- versity of Toronto where she teaches leadership and positive psychology. She served as Director of the Engineering Leadership Project, which aims to understand how engineers lead in industry.Mr. Mike Klassen, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is the Assistant Director, Community of Practice on Engineering Leadership at the Institute
and the design process of undergraduate students in project-based courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 WIP: High-Achieving Students’ Perceptions of and Approaches to Problem Solving in Introductory Engineering Science CoursesThis work-in-progress paper is grounded in the understanding that undergraduate students’approach to solving assigned engineering problems – a component of their engineeringepistemology – influences the substance and quality of what they learn in the moment and in thefuture [1], [2]. Engineering students need meaningful strategies for approaching multiple types ofproblems in order to develop the knowledge and reasoning necessary for success in
consent forms, whichwere collected by a graduate student who was unaffiliated with the course and sequestered untilafter final grades were submitted. At that time, we found that 15 students had consented to allowtheir data (i.e., their course assignments) to be used for research. Our research project wasapproved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB#17595).Data collectionWe collected both quantitative and qualitative data from the students. For quantitative data, weadministered a pre- and post-survey during the first and last week of the course, respectively.The survey had a total of 42 items. To measure mindsets, we included Dweck’s Implicit Theoryof Intelligence Scale (8 items) [9]. To measure goal orientations, we included the scales
that the wiring would be problematic and potentially delay lab workthe following weeks. However the concerns proved unfounded and the students were able tocomplete the wiring successfully in teams of four within the 2 hour lab time. To help the process,the instructor station was wired ahead of the lab and left as an example for the students.After the first week, the wiring was left in place and modified as needed in following labs. Inthose weeks the students were able to add sensors and actuators to satisfy weekly lab exercises.At the conclusion of the semester students were given more elaborate projects where they neededto connect their station to control a piece of equipment like a conveyor and can crusher.At the time of final submission the
agenda and conversation in the sessions thus far.Next StepsAs this is a work in progress, the next stage of the project involves the tracking of futuredevelopments of the program and individuals. Tracking how useful faculty participants rate theexperience over time and success measures such as self-correcting mechanisms, and reflectionon goal setting and goal achievement will be included in the feedback gathering to assess impact.References[1] R. Wilson, “Why are associate professors so unhappy?” The Chronicle of Higher Education,p. A3-A4, June 3, 2012 [Online]. Available: Chronicle,https://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-Are-Associate-Professors/132071. [Accessed August 9,2016].[2] A. Canale, C. Herdklotz, & L. Wild, “Mid-career faculty
Paper ID #22007Work in Progress: Institutional Context and the Implementation of the Red-shirt in Engineering Model at Six UniversitiesDr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Research Associate at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United States. Emily earned a
Session CEED 442Cultural Behaviors• A person arrives to meet you 30 minutes after your scheduled meeting time.• A person throws a stone at a dog.• A student helps another student answer a question during a test. • A supervisor raises their voice in front of the team when you did not complete the project to their satisfaction.• A person cuts in front of you in a line. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education
alternating semester hire, with repeated opportunities for theindustry to evaluate the particular student involved. It also provides the student an experience tothe particular facets of an industry, or multiple industries, if they have not yet decided on wherethey wish to begin their career.It is important both to the student and the industry involved that the internship provide “realworld” work, not drawing filing or other paperwork projects which do not apply to the programthe student is following. That is not to say that the student must be given original design work tocomplete, but rather some small segment of design, drawing modification, subroutine algorithmdevelopment, and so forth. The effort must be applicable, but able to be completed in
butrequires some study and practice to acquire proficiency.There are three vector operations which we will find useful in our study. One operation, calledthe dot product, is written as 𝐀⃗ ⃘⃗𝐁 and yields a scalar (that is, a number and not a vector). Thenext operation, called the cross product, is written as 𝐀 ⃗ × ⃗𝐁 and yields a vector which isperpendicular to the plane spanned by the vectors 𝐀 ⃗ and ⃗𝐁 and the third operation produces ascalar and is called the triple scalar product, and denoted by 𝐀 ⃗ × ⃗𝐁 ⃘𝐂.The dot product provides a means to compute the length of the projection of a line segment onto ⃗ onto thesome intersecting line. In the ordinary
fit as introductory control theory laboratory equipment.Reference [1] R. M. Reck and R. S. Screenivas, (2015), “Developing a new affordable dc motor laboratory kit for an existing undergraduate controls course," in American Control Conference (ACC), (Chicago, IL), pp. 2801-2806. [2] R. M. Reck, (2016), dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, “Experiential learning in control systems laboratories and engineering project management”. [3] S. R. Smith, (2017), Master's thesis, Kansas State University, “Demonstrating introductory control systems concepts on inexpensive hardware”. [4] R. M. Reck, R. S. Screenivas, and M. C. Loui, (2015), “Assessing an affordable and portable laboratory kit in an
semesters of data are collected. Individual performance on learning objective achievement,and performance in downstream courses may be investigated to understand the impact of thischange on student learning.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by th National Science Foundation under GrantNumber DUE1525775. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.ReferencesBeichner, R. (2008). "The SCALE-UP Project: a student-centered active learning environmentfor undergraduate programs." Invited paper for the National Academy of Sciences. Retrievedfrom http://www7. nationalacademies. org/bose
Technology Engineering and Mathematics) education. Inaddition, mechanistic reasoning is one of the core competencies listed in the Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS) Engineering Concepts and Practices (NGSS Lead States, 2013). Mechanisticexplanations focus on the processes that underlie cause-effect relationships and take into account howthe activities of system components affect one another.While some assessment work has been accomplished in engineering education, to date mechanisticreasoning is an area where limited assessment development has been accomplished for pre-collegepopulations. The data in this study come from the calibration of the Assessment of MechanisticReasoning Project (AMRP) (Weinberg, 2012), designed to diagnose individuals
integration, testing, and the use of developmentand verification tools.Lecture courses should be accompanied with a series of laboratory exercises and a semester longproject. Theses laboratory exercise will help student learn the basic concepts of designingembedded systems and mastering the lectured materials. Laboratory exercises and projects canutilize popular kits such as the ARM-based Rapid Embedded Systems Design Education Kit orlow-cost FPGA embedded systems development boards. Laboratory exercises and projectsshould leverage proficiency gained from other core engineering courses such as C/C++programming language, assembly language, and computer organization courses in designingreal-world embedded applications.c. Cyber Physical Systems Design
. “Project Offers Path to College for Intellectually Disabled.” AZ Public Media. Mar. 5,2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.azpm.org/s/14077-project-focus-offers-path-to-college-for-intellectually-disabled-students/ [Accessed on Jan. 2, 2018][55] J. Yu. “Unique Program at UA helps students with intellectual disabilities.” Tucson News Now.Jan. 6, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/30980023/unique-program-at-ua-helps-students-with-intellectual-disabilities [Accessed on Jan. 2, 2018][56] University of Arizona, “ECE 503 Fall 2016 Sylabus.” [Online]. Available:http://www2.engr.arizona.edu/~tandonr/teaching/Syllabus-ECE-503-Fall-2016.pdf [Accessed on Mar. 1,2018][57] University of Washington DO-IT, “Universal
, the findings are limitedinspiration, personal and professional impact, and commitment. to undergraduate students who are directly involved in research projects. I. I NTRODUCTION AND R ELATED W ORK In addition to an improvement in intrapersonal skills, relevant CADEMICS and educators are constantly searching for studies also exhibit professional development opportunities forA new strategies to excite, inform, and retain students in students who attend conferences. Multiple studies noted thatscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students benefited from
Identity Guide: Love, Race, and Liberation. “Who Am I? The Question of Identity”, by Tanesha BarnesLeadership/Grp Work [14] Activity 3.1: Aerospace team activity: Survival on the MoonImplicit Bias Resume review (name bias activity) [15] Project Implicit (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html) [16] Rate my professor’s gender (theconversation.com/rate-my-professors- gender-37370) [17] Ben Schmidt’s Gender and Teacher Reviews interactive website (benschmidt.org/profGender/#)Currently an on-line survey is open for the first-year students, which they have
working on a project to improve mathematics education for visually impaired students.Mr. Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University Ben Lutz is a Postdoctoral Scholar in Engineering Education at Oregon State University. His research in- terests include innovative pedagogies in engineering design, conceptual change and development, school- to-work transitions for new engineers, and efforts for inclusion and diversity within engineering. His current work explores how students describe their own learning in engineering design and how that learn- ing supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Dr
Paper ID #242252018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Women in Computing & Engineering: Differences between Persisters andNon-persistersTim John Weston, University of Colorado, Boulder Tim Weston is a research associate for the University of Colorado’s Alliance for Technology, Learning and Society (ATLAS) where he has conducted evaluation and research on NSF, Department of Educa- tion, NASA and private foundation funded projects for 19 years. Weston specializes in the evaluation of programs with educational technology interventions, assessing new
in 3 or fewer grammatically correct sentences.5. What do you like about the professor’s field of engineering? (A bullet point list is acceptable.)6. What do you dislike or what concerns you about the professor’s field of engineering? (Abullet point list is acceptable.)7. Please print out the flowchart for the major (and concentration, if applicable) you’re interestedin pursuing. Circle a 300 level or higher course (excluding senior project) that you’re interestedin taking (you may need to write in the course if it’s an elective). Write your name and sectionnumber on the printout and staple it to the rest of this assignment.8. For the 300 level or higher course you circled in question 7, please fill out the table belowshowing when you plan to
educational research in engineering and science HE-programmes. From 2012 until now she’s the vice dean of the Faculty of Engineering Technology (KU Leuven, Bel- gium). In her research she’s focusing on the transition from secondary to university within the STEM- field. She’s the project coordinator of the two following Erasmus+ projects: (1) readySTEMgo, in which she focuses on early identification of STEM readiness and on targeted academic interventions (see http://iiw.kuleuven.be/english/readystemgo) and (2) PREFER, in which she studies professional roles and employability of future engineers (see http://preferproject.eu/). Greet Langie is committee chair capacity building within SEFI, she’s a member of the SEFI Physics
control with applications to engine exhaust aftertreatment.Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and
2011, Dr. Barankin was a lecturer at the Hanze University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado
groups) existing model, lab groups) Column Buckling (lecture with Deflection of simply supported and demonstration, lab groups) cantilever supported beams (short introduction, full lab with small groups) Application of strain gauges to a steel beam (lecture with hands-on activity, lab groups) Capstone final project (short introduction, Deflection of a beam (lecture with manual full lab with small groups, final presentation calculations and verification with single pre- and report) existing model, lab groups) Written Final Exam Written Final Examparticipate in each lab activity. Documentation of participation was
Paper ID #21187Using Mobile Learning to Improve Low Success Rate in Engineering CoursesDr. Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University Zhaoshuo Jiang graduated from the University of Connecticut with a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering. Before joining San Francisco State University as an assistant professor, he worked as a structural engi- neering professional at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) LLP. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low- rise and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly
run a marathon; the behavioral intentions involved indoing so may be “follow a daily training plan”,”find a local running club to train with”, “registerfor the marathon” and so on. Behavioral intentions are particularly useful when a goal is eithercomplex and needs to be broken into component steps to achieve or when a goal is simple butrequires self regulation. For instance, a student in a course with a major final project will bemore successful if they form intentions for each of the component steps, rather than simplyhaving a goal to “do well on the project” without more specific plans [9]; a student in a coursewith a heavy reading load may need to form the intention to do a little reading every day, ratherthan trying to push through
immersive virtual learning environments for educational training purposes. Furthermore, Dr. Webster has received vari- ous professional certifications from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, SOLIDWORKS, the Project Management Institute, and NACE International. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 CADcompare™: A Web-based Application that Compares PDF CAD DrawingsAbstractThis work in progress describes the development of a web application titled CADcompare™,which automatically compares, displays, and highlights differences in Portable Document Format(PDF) files of computer-aided design (CAD) drawings and is specifically designed to
subject ofsustainability may be one message that provides an engineering focus that may be moreattractive to engineering, especially a focus on resource availability and social inequity. Thisfinding is consistent with results from the “Academic Pathways Study” (NSF ESI #0227558),which showed that female undergraduates saw projects in the broader context of social andenvironmental impact while males typically focused on more technical details [24]. In order todevelop engineering students prepared to address particular sustainability challenges, it isnecessary to diversify the types of outcome expectations of students in engineering. If studentswho choose engineering are not interested in solving these types of problems, the futuresolutions
among structural engineeringsoftware and offers an opportunity for students to develop an appreciation for having a workingknowledge of a variety of software programs to use in the engineering design process.As part of a course culmination engineering design project (EDP), students were required todesign a floor truss, build it, and test it to failure. The students were limited to 8-ft long 2x4s,plywood, and common nails. Therefore, connections would require plywood gusset plates nailedto the 2x4 structural components. Part of the design process required RSA simulations toquantify internal forces throughout the structure and required the students to decide if modelingthe connections as perfect pins was a reasonable assumption. Figure 9 provides
work/project. It includes completing your portion of the work in a timely fashion. • Interacting (I) with teammates refers to the various ways individuals communicate with and show respect for their teammates. Encouraging every team member to give their opinion and ensuring their voice is heard are part of this. • Keeping (K) refers to alerting the team to conditions that could affect the team’s success. • Expecting (E) quality is about both expressing the belief that the team can do a good job and encouraging the team to do its best.Since each of these five dimensions is equally important to the success of the team, these formthe basis for the peer reviews [16].This paper is meant to address how much