Mills, Kingswood, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, England: Author.Rossi, S., Deflorian, F., and Venturini, F., 2004. Improvement of surface finishing and corrosion resistance of prototypes produced by direct metal laser sintering. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 148 (3), 301–309.Sing, S.L., et al., 2016. Laser and electron-beam powder-bed additive manufacturing of metallic implants: A review on processes, materials and designs. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 34 (3), 369–385.Titanium Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5), Annealed. (2017). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=mtp641Wang, X., et al., 2002. Direct selective laser sintering of hard metal powders: experimental
the faculty and the impression(s) arrived at by the author, leads oneto believe that it is highly unlikely that new more effective teaching-learning strategieswould be deployed any time soon, unless drastic measures are undertaken. The author ismore convinced now than ever, that classroom reformation, including deployment of activelearning strategies, would happen only if the institution mandates it!The Pros and Cons of the Lecture FormatWhen asked why he/she lectures, one faculty responded: “It is a tradition. It was part of mytraining, and seems to dwell in me and seems like what I should be doing. I feel guilty when Iam not lecturing” (13). This candid statement suggests one of the great dilemmas faced by allwho teach at the postsecondary
Science and Engineering, (2011): 359-364. 4. Mataric, M.J., Koenig, N.P., and Feil-Seifer, D. “Materials for enabling hands-on robotics and STEM education,” Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Robots and Robot Venues: Resources for AI Education, (2007): 4 pages. 5. Norton, S.J., McRobbie, C.J., and Ginns, I.S. “Problem solving in a middle school robotics design classroom,” Research in Science Education, 37.3 (2007): 261-277. 6. Jamrisko, M., and Lu, W. “The U.S. Drops Out of the Top 10 in Innovation Ranking” 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-22/south-korea-tops-global-innovation-ranking-again-as-u- s-falls.7. Palmer, D., Dixon, J., and Archer, J. “Changes in Science Teaching Self-Efficacy among Primary Teacher
Raton: CNC Press, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=DiFMPmXSsLUC&pg=SA2- PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false [2] R. P. Feynman, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” Science and Engineering, pp. 22–36, 1960. [Online]. Available: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/47/2/1960Bottom.pdf [3] M. Ruivenkamp and A. Rip, “Entanglement of Imaging and Imagining of Nanotechnology,” Nanoethics; Dordrecht, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy.uvu.edu/docview/887465026/3ADDD4C0F5D0457BPQ/1?accountid=14779 [4] A. D. Derjaguin, B. V. and Titijevskaia, A. S. and Abricossova, I. I. and Malkina, “Investigations of the forces of interaction of
increase in the engagementratings for each of the four different presentation formats associated with the percentage of livewebinars a had student participated in. That means an increase in webinar participation wasassociated with an increase in their engagement ratings. Framed in the negative perspective,there was a decrease in the engagement ratings associated with a decrease in the number ofwebinars a student participated in. This study cannot deduce a causative relationship betweenwhether a student was disengaged because they did not (or could not) participate in a livewebinar, or did whether they chose to not participate in a live webinar because they weregenerally a disengaged learner, or if it was due to some other causal factor(s) (Lumgair
sources. Most students were able to identify potential moral or ethicalproblems and were also able to draw appropriate connections between personal morals, the Codeof Ethics for Engineers, and the situations described in the cases. Not surprisingly, studentsoften took strong positions surrounding the central issue(s) in the cases. The main difficultystudents had with was articulating a counter perspective when they perceived a clear ethicalproblem.The papers were evaluated using a scoring rubric in which points were awarded for addressingthe guiding questions (10 points), quality of writing (5 points), and how well they justified theirfinal position on the case (5 points). The summary from Part 1 was evaluated against the guidingquestions and
. Informal language: contractions (I’ve), wording (a lot) or starting a sentence with and or butThe language of engineering writing is more formal than other types of writing such as fiction. For thatreason, using contractions or beginning a sentence with a conjunction is too informal for most engineeringdocuments.References1. R. House, A. Watt, and J. Williams (2007, June), “Assessing The Impact of Pen Based Computing on Students’ Peer Review Strategies Using the Peer Review Comment Inventory,” 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2052.2. C. Nicometo, K. Anderson, T. Nathans-Kelly, S. Courter, and T. McGlamery (2010, June), “More Than Just Engineers―How Engineers Define and Value Communication
✓ Invention disclosuresa multi-year agreement and ✓ Patents ✓ Follow-on internal research ✓ Senior projects sponsoredthrough an engagement mod- ✓ Licenses ✓ Access to facilities, faculty, ✓ Student visits to companyel that involves more than ✓ Breakthrough students site(s)one or two faculty members ✓ Students receive experiential technologies ✓ Potential recruitment of talentwithin a given department. learning
- team-activity-survival-on-the-moon.html[15] Project Implicit. [Online]. Available: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html. [Accessed Aug. 30, 2017].[16] A. Bartlett, “Rate my professor’s gender,” The Conversation, Feb. 9, 2015. [Online] Available: theconversation.com/rate-my-professors-gender-37370. [Accessed Aug. 30, 2017].[17] Ben Schmidt, “Gender and Teacher Reviews,” Feb. 2015. [Online]. Available: benschmidt.org/profGender/#. [Accessed Aug. 30, 2017]. [18] D. Cohn and A. Caumont, “10 Demographic Trends that are Shaping the U.S. and the World,” Pew Research Center, March 31, 2016. [Online] Available: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact- tank/2016/03/31/10-demographic-trends-that-are-shaping-the-u-s-and-the-world
: Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual StudentsExperiences in Engineering,” AC 2009 –1862, ASEE, 2009.[3] Trenshaw, K. F., Hetrick, A. L., Oswald, R. F., Vostral, S. L., & Loui, M. C. (2013). Lesbian, gay, bisexual,and transgender students in engineering: Climate and perceptions. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, Oklahoma City, OK, 1238-1240. doi:10.1109/FIE.2013.6685028[4] National College Health Assessment (2016), https://www.uhs.umich.edu/files/sa/NCHA-2016-University-of-Michigan.pdf[5] Accelerating Acceptance (2017), GLAD Report, https://www.glaad.org/publications/accelerating-acceptance-2017[6] K.W. Philips, How diversity makes us smarter (2014), Scientific American, October 1, 2014
realized that creating the art installation of Convergence would not only require thecreative direction of an artist, but also the design and build skills of an engineer(s). Not onlywould the final art installation provide a metaphor for the coming together of ideas, it would alsoliterally require the coming together of multiple art and engineering disciplines to realize theproject. Convergence would become a true engineering and arts education project.Science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) education has become a populartopic in last decade as government and industry leaders have realized that in a world with greaterpopulation, global interconnection, and technological advancement, complex problems not onlyrequire the
://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021.2. Rice, J. A., Mechitov, K. A., Sim, S. H., Spencer, B. F. and Agha, G. A. (2011), Enabling framework for structural health monitoring using smart sensors. Struct. Control Health Monit., 18: 574–587. doi:10.1002/stc.3863. Duzgun, A., Jennifer A. R., Justin R. M., and Ivan R., L. “Comparison of Visual Inspection and Structural-Health Monitoring As Bridge Condition Assessment Methods.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 30, no. 3 (June 1, 2016): 04015049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000802.4. ASCE Infrastructure Report Card 2017, American Society of Civil Engineers.5. Quanser. Shake Table II - Quanser. https://www.quanser.com/products/shake-table-ii
-goals/ [Accessed 1December 2017].[9] Hill, J; Nelson, E; Tilman, D.; Polasky, S.; Tiffany, D. ‘Environmental, economic, andenergetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels’ 2 June 2006. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Volume 103 no. 30, 11206-11210. Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/103/30/11206.abstract [Accessed 23 January2018].[10] Sing, S.P; Singh, P. ‘Effect of temperature and light on the growth of algae species: Areview,’ October 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.rowan.edu/science/article/pii/S1364032115004839 [Accessed 26 January 2018].[11] Philanthropy New York. ‘Bringing the Liberal Arts to Engineering Education,’ May 192015. [Online
AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 14-17, 2009, Austin, TX.[7] H. Ibarra, “Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professionaladaptation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, 1999.[8] S. D. Sheppard, Educating Engineers: Design for the future of the field. Stanford, CA: TheCarnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2008.[9] A. Dehing, W. Jochems, and L. Baartman, “The development of engineering studentsprofessional identity during workplace learning in industry: A study in Dutch bacheloreducation,” Engineering Education, vol. 8, pp. 42-64, 2014. [Online]. Available:10.11120/ened.2013.00007.[10] F. Dehing, W. Jochems, and L. Baartman, “Development of an engineering identity in
. in this course. In GNEG 1121, students continue to 8 I have no desire to change to another major (ex. biology, master basic skills needed to be successful in sophomore- English, chemistry, art, history, etc.). 17 My parent(s) are making me study engineering. level engineering courses and gain experience working 24 An engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I on hands-on, group projects. graduate. GNEG 1121H Honors Introduction to Engineering I: 32 Engineers need good communication and writing
., & Solecki, W., Using higher education-community partnerships to promote urban sustainability. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53(1), 18–28, 2010.[6] Little, J. C., Hester, E. T., & Carey, C. C., “Assessing and enhancing environmental sustainability: a conceptual review,” Environmental science & technology, 50(13), 6830- 6845, 2016.[7] Minsker, B., Baldwin, L., Crittenden, J., Kabbes, K., Karamouz, M., Lansey, K., ... & Rivera, S., “Progress and recommendations for advancing performance-based sustainable and resilient infrastructure design,” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 141(12), A4015006, 2015.[8] Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C
demonstration of the prototype to an audience thatincludes the client, users, faculty, staff, students and community at the Fall or Winter DesignExpo. These Expos are part of the Design Institute’s Fall and Winter Expos that showcase thework of students in multiple Graduate and Undergraduate design courses and clubs. The DTC2presentation involves a demonstration of the prototype to a smaller audience including theclient, user(s) and other teams that are working on the same project. Unlike DTC1, DTC2projects are distributed to one team per section and across two to four sections. In both DTC1and 2 presenting is an opportunity for students to develop an appreciation for how much theirtechnological and engineering literacy on a specific topic has changed
Paper ID #21227Enhancing Students’ Learning Outcomes Through Freshman Summer Engi-neering Experience (SEE) ProgramsDr. Hossein Rahemi, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology Dr. Hossein Rahemi is a professor and department chair of Engineering and Technology at Vaughn Col- lege of Aeronautics & Technology. He is the author of two books, Vaughn College Journal of Engineering and Technology (VCJET), numerous conference papers in the areas of solid mechanics, computational mechanics, vibration analysis, fracture mechanics and reliability analysis. He is also a principle investi- gator for the NSF S-STEM grant and
the US and even around the world. This accreditation certainly ensures highquality of the engineering education that is provided to the students. However, with ABET’sapproach of accrediting individual programs, universities (and departments) tend to develop theirengineering programs largely in isolation. There is likely to be a strong overlap between thecollege-level math and basic sciences courses that are required by ABET, but the courses onengineering topics may or may not be common across multiple programs. There could certainlybe overlap based on the history of how these courses were initially designed, the programs theywere initially offered under, the faculty member(s) who designed and/or taught them, scheduling,etc. Universities and
Methods in Engineering Mechanics: Part Three,” 124th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25 – 28, 2017.5. Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C. and Norman, M.K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.6. Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York, NY: Random House.7. McGuire, S.Y., and McGuire, S. (2015). Teach Students How to Learn. Sterling, VA: Stylus.8. Nilson, L.B. (2013). Creating Self-Regulated Learners. Sterling, VA: Stylus.9. Lovett, M.C. (2013). Making Exams Worth More Than the Grade. In M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. LaVaque-Manty and D. Meizlish
themselves come from a demand forinnovation, not just an interest or conventional idea for an encapsulating project. Generally, theprojects come from one of two places. Most commonly, MUSE faculty (along with theconnections they have made in their previous endeavors and continued careers) generatepotential projects that will push students to innovate and create new solutions for real-worldproblems. Alternatively, students have the option of finding their own project to work on bycontacting companies for industry-based projects. As long as the project is approved by thestudents’ advising professor(s), the project can be pursued. The requirement of finding actualvalue in the project, outside of being a grade, is an essential start to creating a real
development program [1], [16]. This paper provided a brief overview of theprogram’s construction and content. We then discussed how our preliminary results showed thecohort’s overall strengths and weaknesses, and also that their professional reputation for somecompetencies varies between subordinates, peers, and advisors. Insights like these will helpparticipants interpret their reports, and design the best development goal for well-roundedgrowth.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumber 1545211.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science
://www.polarisnetworks.net/Riverbed®. (2017). OPNET Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.riverbed.com/products/steelcentral/opnet.htmlTamer Omar, S. H. (2016). Broadband Wireless Networking in the Era of Big Data. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Weldon, M. K. (2015). The Future X Network: A Bell Labs Perspective. CRC Press.
entrepreneurialmindset in engineering education: Project approach. Proceedings - Frontiers in EducationConference. 121-126. 10.1109/FIE.2013.6684799.[6] A. Huang-Saad, "Fostering the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom," 200939th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009, pp. 1-6.doi: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350763.[7] Erdil, N. O., & Harichandran, R. S., & Nocito-Gobel, J., & Carnasciali, M., & Li, C. Q.(2016, June), Integrating e-Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop anEntrepreneurial Mindset in Students. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25800.[8] Mikesell, D. R., & Chen, T., & Ma, J., & Ali, A. (2015, June), Improving
teaching of computer programming," Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, CSCI 2016, pp. 276-281, 2017.[6] L. Williams, R. R. Kessler, W. Cunningham and R. Jeffries, "Strengthening the Case for Pair-Programming," IEEE Software, Vols. July-Augus, no. August, pp. 19-25, 2000.[7] D. Sanders, "Student Perceptions of the Suitability of Extreme and Pair Programming," Extreme Programming Perspectives, pp. p. 168-174, 2002.[8] E. A. Chaparro, A. Yuksel, P. Romero and S. Bryant, "Factors Affecting the Perceived Effectiveness of Pair Programming in Higher Education," 17th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, no. June 2005, pp. 5-18, 2005.[9] J. C. Schlimmer