the STEM classroom: How do STEM instructors relate to the impact of their engineering work before and after a critical pedagogy intervention?IntroductionDue to the impacts of the engineering profession, social and environmental justice are growingconcerns within current engineering practice and education. The engineering profession,although considered neutral by many, is closely associated with impacts on society and theenvironment due to its strong ties with the corporate world [1]. Leydens and Lucena [2] arguethat social justice dimensions are inherent to engineering but are made invisible by the status quoof the profession. The social impacts relate to the dislocation of local communities, landdispossession, the
features of the programthat influenced students’ build-up of social capital, and that the resulting persistence was realizedthrough students’ progress towards internships in CS and goals for paying-it-forward in CS.These findings inform our recommendations that future CS support programs and educationalsettings consider mentorship centered on socioemotional support, opportunities for collaboration,and time for fun social activities. Additional suggestions center on engaging socially-orientedindividuals with CS support programs. These insights inform facilitators and educators in CS ondesign choices that can encourage the persistence of underrepresented students in CS.IntroductionThe growing digital economy [1] and the widening gap in organizations
educational ideasand practices” [1]. By extension, social foundations of engineering—a field that does not yetexist, but should—would seek to understand the institutions, processes, practices, beliefs, values,and ways of knowing that underlie engineering education and practice. The fundamentals of thesefoundations have emerged in critiques of engineering grounded in several different perspectivesincluding science, technology, and society (STS), engineering ethics, and engineering and socialjustice. Thus far, however, these perspectives have not coalesced into a coherent intellectualframework. In this paper, we draw parallels between engineering and social foundations ofeducation as the field has evolved over time and argue that social foundations of
buttons beneath the mouthpiececontrol power and Bluetooth pairing, facilitating seamless connectivity to the app for data storageand display. Additionally, the device includes a USB charging port and three LEDs on the leftside. When powered on, the LEDs illuminate to indicate battery life, providing a visual cue inaddition to viewing the battery life accessible through the mobile app. The design of this compactspirometer device integrates various physics principles, including material science, fluiddynamics, electronics, optics, and wireless communication, to create a functional and user-friendlyproduct. Figure 1: Final design AutoCAD sketch and paper prototypeGraphical Model Figure 2: Graphical
conceptualization of smart systems [1]. In asystematic literature review done by Romero and others to characterize smart systems, theyreviewed papers that contained definition of smart systems and smartness [1]. They summarizedthe characteristics of smart systems as follows [1]: Communication Capability Embedded Knowledge Learning Capability Reasoning Capability Perception Capability Control Capability Self-Organization Context AwarenessIn the engineering domain, smart systems typically consist of diverse components such as: “Sensors for signal acquisition. Elements transmitting the information to the command-and-control unit. Command-and-control units that take
wide range of transportation and environmental demands, that can include a reduction invehicular delays and traffic congestion. Figure 1. Drone View from HWY120 and HWY Figure 2. Model of 2 Road IntersectionsCurrent traffic lights in the United States are arbitrary. While systems which sense the presence ofautomobiles exist, they are based on samples of roads and the greatest traffic through the sensorsreceives priority. Most sensing roads have a 3 car per lane measurement capacity which means thata 2-lane road intersecting another like road could have 3 cars while the other has 100, though theywill receive the fixed amount of time regardless. This can lead to grid lock in high traffic cityintersections, increasing travel time of each
undergraduates from Illinois State University havedesigned informal, after-school engineering-related activitiesfocusing on robotics, green energy, and automation. An emphasisis placed on activities and partnerships that promote knowledge,engagement, and interest in STEM fields in underserved schoolsand communities. To learn more about SUPERCHARGE, pleasevisit: https://about.illinoisstate.edu/supercharge/.This resource exchange presents activities from the final unit of theprogram's first year. In this project, high school students will buildand experiment with a smart wireless weather station (Figure 1)and indoor climate console (Figure 3) with the goal of collectingand analyzing data to learn about the climate in their community
of Technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Socio-technical and culture-inspired projects in freshman engineering design course bring context and emotion to learningAbstractLearning is not an unemotional consideration of facts but emotion is integrally woven into theexperience of learning [1]. Situated cognition model [2] is a theoretical approach to learning thatsupports the idea that learning takes place when an individual is interactively doing somethingthrough situated activity that has social, cultural, and physical contexts. This paper presents post-activity reflections in student design projects with socio-technical and socio-culturalinterventions in a freshman design
technological age, the need to study and understand computation and the scholarship andteaching employed to prepare the next generation of engineers has become a priority for currenteducation researchers. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,reported in a 2018 report by stating, “It is a time for institutions to consider their missions andconstituencies they serve and to determine what role computing should play in the experience,knowledge, and skills of its graduates 2025 and beyond,” [1]. Computing has been identified as anecessary skillset for engineers entering the workforce to employ computational solutions tocomplex global issues. Computing educational researchers have embarked on the journey touncover the evidence-based
and evolve withtime; therefore, addressing the changing problems with short- and long-term goals is important. However,many students need scaffolding to assist their goal formulation activities, such as design constraints andguidelines. Engineering educators should consider including in their courses strategies that would trainstudents to gather necessary information and build scaffolding on their own through goal formulationactivities.1. INTRODUCTIONIn systems engineering, goal formulation is a crucial step in the early stages of the system development lifecycle. It involves defining and clarifying the objectives that a system is intended to achieve. The goalformulation process helps establish a clear understanding of the system's purpose
from anonymous evaluations for all the laboratory courses thelead author taught. Moreover, Indiana State University (ISU), where the lead author is currentlyteaching, allows instructors to include their own questions in anonymous evaluations. The leadauthor added two questions related to laboratories. The questions were student rated andappeared in the ISU questionnaires as: 1) Laboratory experiments help to understand theoreticalconcepts and 2) Laboratory experiments are interesting. This paper presents the ISU studentratings on these questions for various courses and also compares their ratings of questions withthe overall student ratings for each specific course.The findings of this paper shows how students perceive the laboratory
Student Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Engineering Design in Work-Integrated Learning Contexts1 IntroductionTo continue enhancing student learning, many institutions are implementing work-integratedlearning programs (WIL) to aid in the development of work-ready graduates [1]. WIL integratesacademic studies with experiences within a workplace or practice setting [2]. These experiencescan take many forms including collaborative research projects, apprenticeships, co-operativeeducation, entrepreneurship, field placements, internships, professional placements, servicelearning, or work experiences. WIL programs are very common in undergraduate engineeringprograms and have more recently expanded to graduate programs
CourseIntroductionAlmost 1/3rd (31%) of U.S. adults will experience an anxiety disorder at some point in theirlives; with females affected more than males (about 1.5:1) [1]. In 2017, 61% of college studentsseeking counseling services listed anxiety as the most frequent issue they were facing, and about23% said it was the problem causing them the most concern (Center for College Mental Health atPenn State [2]). Anxiety can impact physical, cognitive and emotional health, impacting howstudents perform in their classes and consequently in their careers.For college students, anxiety is frequently manifested in relation to exams—it is estimated that10-40% of students are affected by test anxiety. Test anxiety can impact motivation andacademic achievement and lead to
the importance of epistemology as is seen in the 2006document produced by a group of leading educators titled The Research Agenda for the NewDiscipline of Engineering Education where “engineering epistemologies” is one of five researchdirections listed [1]. That document defines epistemology as “research on what constitutesengineering thinking and knowledge within social contexts now and into the future” [1, p. 259].While there is no precise agreement in engineering education literature about what constitutesepistemology as Beddoes found by reviewing literature since the 2006 agenda [2], the concept ofepistemology as a viewpoint toward the nature of engineering knowledge will act as a definitionfor the current work. One framework for coarsely
to focustheir study time on the most important things, i.e., learning how to appropriately use theequations, data, and constants. These equation sheets are made up by the professor at times, atother times students have the option to make up their own, and some instructors use a hybridapproach where they supply some information but allow students to make up their own equationsheets as well.Equation sheets appear as a topic, in passing, in many different papers, although they may not bethe primary focus of those papers, and in fact may be mentioned very briefly (e.g., [1], [2], [3],[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]). One work mentioned them as not being allowed on aspecific assessment [13], and a few mentioned specific lengths or
results indicate shifting needs for physical space, social interactions withmentors and peers, and have implications for evolving how engineering departments andprograms support low-income students to meet their changing needs for persisting inengineering.Background and MotivationEngineering fields historically have had challenges retaining low-income students, going beyondthe need for financial support. Research consistently points out that though insufficient funds areone of the most common reasons why low-income students drop out of college or transfer out ofSTEM fields, financial support alone is usually not enough to keep retention rates high [1], [2].In fact, it has been found that low-income students lose out on opportunities that would
strengths as well as bestpractices for supporting them. There is very little research that focuses specifically on studentcaregivers who are studying engineering, a field that may require extra lab time and other subjectrequirements that contribute to the unique needs in the field.Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to answer the questions (1) What does previousresearch indicate about the experiences of student caregivers? and (2) How does that knowledgeapply to recruiting and retaining undergraduate engineering students?Methods: This paper uses the Khan et al. [1] methodology for conducting a systematic literaturereview, applied to research on student caregivers, focused on (1) identifying what is known aboutthem, including their
) Sustainability in Engineering Graphics and Bicycle-Powered BlendersBackgroundThe purpose of this work-in-progress paper is to share developments related to an ASEEEngineering for One Planet (EOP) Mini-Grant Program Cohort 2 Award to the autho that beganin the summer of 2023 and ran through January 2024. The project has two objectives: 1) Use theEOP Framework (Figure 1) to modify learning outcomes in MEAM 1010 Introduction toMechanical Design, a course that is already taught every semester to classes of ~80 students, and2) Leverage the EOP Framework to create MEAM 2300, a new course on bicycle engineeringand culture. The students have identified that outside MEAM 1010, there are no othermechanical engineering courses they can
conversationssurrounding sustainability and environmental justice in engineering, and recognize the need for this to bea key feature in curricula. At the same time, active learning and notions of learner agency, informed bytheir lived experiences, are shaping classroom pedagogy. At our university, we conducted a pilot study ina graduate level engineering course: Fundamentals of Renewable Energy Processes and ElectrochemicalStorage, which involved introducing collaborative and individual case-based writing as the finalassignment instead of a traditional term-paper. We analyzed the deliverables and conducted interviewswith a sample of the learners from the class to explore how the shift impacted student learning onsustainability. More specifically, we asked: 1
-learning environment. Preliminary results from the initial offering of this course are presentedalong with the logistics involved in establishing and running the course.1. IntroductionOne of the benefits to having a Study Abroad program is contacts with faculty and instructors atinternational universities that can be leveraged in times of opportunity and need. During theCOVID-19 crisis, travel abroad by university students for study or research was not possible.However, in such cases, is an impactful “international” experience still possible for students?Perhaps if you can get creative and be flexible, it is!During the middle phase of the remote instructional period due to COVID (i.e., fall 2020), itbecame clear that travel abroad for coursework
the program [1]. Additionally, female and Black studentswho participated in the peer mentorship program had significantly stronger retention than whitemales. This study analyzes data over a three-year period. The retention of three first-year cohortswho joined the university in the fall of 2020, 2021 and 2022 is analyzed for students who did anddid not opt-in to the peer mentorship program. The career mentorship program was initiated to support career readiness. However, unlikethe peer mentorship program, the career mentorship program did not reach expected participationrates after the first year. Participation in the career mentorship program declined significantlyfrom 123 students in 2020-21 to just 27 students in 2022-23. An online
theirstudies, usually from high school to college. Summer bridge programs can vary dramatically interms of time commitment, content, goals, and program evaluation methods.Objective: The main purpose of this study is to explore the question, What does previousresearch indicate about engineering summer bridge programs?Methods: Research studies involving engineering summer bridge programs (n = 72) wereanalyzed in this systematic literature review.Results: Our findings indicate that summer bridge programs for engineering students often (1)focus on calculus skills, (2) have the goal of encouraging retention of minoritized students, and(3) occur in tandem with other interventions. While some studies use rigorous methods to assessprogram outcomes, other
used to enhance studentlearning for the retention of students [1]. This cooperative model is implemented with after classstudy sessions associated with high-risk courses. The authors define a High-Risk Course as acourse with one or more of the following characteristics: (1) a 30% or higher failure rate, (2)taken within the first two years of a traditional student study program, (3) infrequent exams, (4)large amounts of reading, (5) large class sizes, and (6) voluntary/unrecorded class attendance.These classes are commonly referred to as “gatekeeper” or “weed out” courses [2]. The SI modelwas first introduced to help the retention of a 6-year medical school program in 1973 byUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC) as Peer Assisted Learning
educational and community organizations across the country to support learning for diverse communities.Smirla Ramos-Montanez˜Viviana L´opez BurgosAmy R CorbettMaria D. QuijanoDiana Contreras ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Supporting early childhood educators in implementing and adaptingresearch-based engineering activities designed for families (Fundamental,Diversity)IntroductionExploring engineering thinking and learning with young children has been an area of increasingfocus for engineering educators over the past decade [1], [2]. The growing body of literature onearly childhood engineering has focused on a number of key areas, such as young children’sengineering thinking [3], [4], children’s
where I'm like, wow I... like really hate. ” [Ross, 4th-year Mechanical Engineering student]Undergraduate engineering schools aim to prepare their students to join the engineeringworkforce and to see themselves as engineers [1], [2], [3]. In engineering schools, students notonly acquire the knowledge and skills necessary for the workforce but they also beginparticipating in the engineering culture [4], [5], [6]. Students do “identity work” to position andreposition themselves as a certain kind of person in engineering by taking action and formingrelationships [7]. Figuring out what kind of career trajectories they want to pursue afteruniversity is an important part of their identity work as future engineers. Career considerationsrequire
freshman a more robust preparation for the challenging secondyear course: Statics. The results show an improvement in student retention, with 92% of studentspassing the introductory course in the experimental years compared to 80% in the control years.Furthermore, the percentage of students passing Statics with a C or better increased from 47% inthe control years to 54% in the experimental years. However, there was a slight increase in therate of non-passing grades in Statics for the experimental years. Analysis revealed that students’strength in math significantly influenced their success in the introductory course and Statics,highlighting the importance of sufficiently preparing students in lower-division courses forstudent retention.1
TeamsIntroduction he undergraduate engineering curriculum is made up of mostly engineering science classes, which areTclasses heavy in mathematical content with little to no application. As a result, students rarely get to improve theirengineering judgmentskills, which we define as the ability to develop and use mathematical models for analysis and design. Our research team’s focus has been on implementing open-ended modeling problems (OEMPs) into the engineering science curriculum in efforts to elicit engineering judgment. OEMPs bring real-world engineering examples into courses and leverage the use of active learning that has shown to be so beneficial to students in STEM [1]. McNeill et. al found that undergraduate
Engineering Education, 2024 Study of Thermodynamics Syllabi as A Step Toward Improving Second- and Third-Year RetentionMechanical engineering is one of the largest and most versatile engineering disciplines, whichoffers graduates opportunities to work in fields that require basic engineering, energy conversion,energy resources, engineering and technology management, environment and transportation,manufacturing, materials and structures, and systems and design [1]. Retaining students tosuccessful completion of their degree programs to support workforce development in thesevarious fields is a priority for mechanical engineering programs.An ASEE survey measured average persistence from the first to the second year of first
identified by the other model. The GPT-4 model tended to identifymore basic relationships, while manual analysis identified more nuanced relationships.Our results do not currently support using GPT-4 to automatically generate graphicalrepresentations of faculty’s mental models of assessments. However, using a human-in-the-loopprocess could help offset GPT-4’s limitations. In this paper, we will discuss plans for our futurework to improve upon GPT-4’s current performance.IntroductionAssessments are found in every engineering classroom and are an important part of our educationsystem [1]-[3]. Assessments play many different roles, including understanding studentimprovements in learning [4], acting as a tool to assist students with learning [5], [6
Paper ID #41148The Conception of Epistemic Practices of Engineering in the Home Environment(Fundamental)Amber Simpson, Binghamton University Amber Simpson is an Associate Professor of Mathematics Education in the Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership Department at Binghamton University. Her research interests include (1) examining individual’s identity(ies) in one or more STEM disciplines and (2) investigating family engagement in and interactions around STEM-related activities.Ms. Sawsan Werfelli, State University of New York at Binghamton Sawsan Werfelli received her undergraduate degree in English from Tripoli