differentialequations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, and general chemistry; proficiency in a minimum offour (4) recognized major civil engineering areas; the ability to conduct laboratory experiments and to criticallyanalyze and interpret data in more than one of the recognized major civil engineering areas; the ability to performcivil engineering design by means of design experiences integrated throughout the professional component of thecurriculum; and an understanding of professional practice issues such as: procurement of work, bidding versusquality-based selection processes, how the design professionals and the construction professions interact to constructa project, the importance of professional licensure and continuing education
AC 2011-837: IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF A CAPSTONECOURSE DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE PROGRAM LEARNING OBJECTIVESMohamed E. El-Sayed, Kettering University Dr. Mohamed El-Sayed is a professor of Mechanical engineering and director of the Hybrid Electric Vehicle Integration and Durability Laboratory, Kettering University. He is the current Editor-in-Chief of the SAE journal of Materials and Manufacturing. Dr. El-Sayed has over thirty years of teaching experience in the area of design, design simulation, design optimization, and automotive design. Dr. El-Sayed has over twenty years of Automotive Design, Development, and Validation experience. Dr. El-Sayed was the lead engineer on the design optimization and quality
how to draw a plan,section, elevation and axonometric. Page 22.823.2In this paper, quantitative spatial reasoning test results and qualitative data of students‘perception of a model project will be presented. This study is a follow-up to the author‘s studyof the use of visual aids in classrooms that are not supplemented with a laboratory component forhands-on learning.Background:Spatial reasoning is ―the mental manipulation of objects and their parts in 2D and 3D space.‖1 Ithas also been defined as concerning the locations of objects, their shapers, their relations to eachother, and the paths they take as they move.2 Research has shown
for advice and support.113. To improve 3rd year retention, the college has created a task force to improve learning in engineering sciences courses required by multiple college programs. Pilot programs in Statics, implemented in Fall 2008, and in Mechanics of Materials, implemented in Spring 2009, focus on student learning and include laboratory and computer software to help students visualize and understand difficult concepts.4. Western Michigan University has become a partner in a multi-institutional NSF-CCLI Phase 3 project to improve engineering mathematics education. Since 50% of first-time, first-year STEM students are not Calculus ready in the first semester, this project addresses a barrier to further improvement in
, R.C., & Kuo, L. (2007). Teaching and learning argumentation, The Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449-472. 7. Caspersz, D.M., Wu, M., Skene, J. “Factors Influencing Effective Performance of University Student Teams,” in Proc. 26th Annual International HERDSA Conference, Christchurch, NZ, pp. N/A CD Rom. 8. Buckenmeyer, J.A. “Using teams for class activities: Making course/classroom teams work,” Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 76, No. 2, Nov. 2000, pp. 98-108. 9. E. Greco and J. Reasoner. (2010) Student Laboratory Skills and Knowledge Improved through Individual Lab Participation, Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, Lousiville, KY, June 2010. 10. R. Stout, J.A. Cannon-Bowers, and E
, 2009.5. S. Averitt, M. Bugaev, A. Peeler, H. Shaffer, E. Sills, S. Stein, J. Thompson and M. Vouk, “Virtual Computing Laboratory (VCL)”, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Virtual Computing Initiative, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, 2007.6. P. Li, L. Toderick, & J. Noles, “Provisioning virtualized datacenters through Virtual Computing Lab”, Proceedings of 2010 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2010.7. X. Wang, G. C. Hembroff, and R. Yedica, “Using VMware VCenter lab manager in undergraduate education for system administration and network security”, Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGITE Conference, 43-52, Midland, Michigan, USA. 2010
majoring in engineering Live, learn and work in a culture at the base of the economic pyramid. Page 22.947.3 3. Provide an opportunity for students majoring in engineering to design products for people living at the base of the economic pyramid. Pre-departure Activities and Orientations To prepare students to work safely in Nicaragua, each student will complete a machine shop qualificationbefore departure. Every student in the engineering school is required to take this short safety and machine operationcourse before they are allowed to work in The University’s shops. The Engineering Laboratories
2002 American Society for Engineering Education Zone 1 Conference &Exposition[3] Sobinski-Smith, Mary Jane, D’Amour Library, www.wnec.edu webpage[4] Katherine Chen, etal., Travelogue from the Materials World: A first week laboratory activity,Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 22.873.11
Issue: Addressing the Literacy Needs of Emergent and Early Readers” North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). Full text available: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/reading/li100.htm.16. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Dugid, P. (1989) “Situated cognition and the culture of learning,” Educational Researcher 18(1), pp 32-42.17. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York: Cambridge University Press.18. Hunt, E.M., Pantoya, M.L. (2010) Engineering Elephants, Authorhouse Publishing, ISBN: 978-1-4490-5816-6.19. Award information can be found at http://www.usabooknews.com/bestbooks2010.html20. Kress, G. 1997. Before writing: Rethinking
. Medical implant analysis for structure- function-performance is performed to optimize device design. Biomechanical characterization of tissues is performed to assess clinical treatments and to develop constitutive relationships. Laboratory techniques for structural characterization include SEM, TEM, FEM, SAXS, USAXS, XPS, DSC, GPC, FTIR, AFM, confocal microscopy, wear testing, fatigue testing, fracture mechanics analysis, and nanoindentation. Re- search supported by NIH, NSF, ONR, DARPA, OREF and the medical device industry. Pedagogical experience includes curriculum development in mechanical engineering and bioengineering. Teaching experience includes undergraduate courses on Mechanical Behavior and Processing of
AC 2011-1031: INTRODUCTORY LEVEL TEXTBOOK PROBLEMS IL-LUSTRATING CONCEPTS IN PHARMACEUTICAL ENGINEERINGStephanie Farrell, Rowan University Stephanie Farrell is an Associate Professor in Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Prior to joining Rowan in 1998, she was an assistant professor in Chemical Engineering and adjunct professor in Biomed- ical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. She received her Bachelor’s, MS, and PhD degrees in Chemical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, Stevens Institute of Technology, and New Jersey Institute of Technology, respectively. Stephanie’s educational interests are in laboratory develop- ment and experiential learning, particularly in the areas of biomedical
videowas the thermodynamics of elastomers and the video for this stage is yet in production. The coreelement of this material is the recording of a laboratory experiment that produces a³FRXQWHULQWXLWLYH´RXWSXW. For the first task, the video of the experiment stops short of showingthe result and students have to predict that result and provide an explanation associated with theirprediction. Then the video shows the actual results and students move to an application of thedescribed phenomenon and asked to solve it with a minimal support from the instructor. Page 22.891.6Instructional Materials for the Raw VideoWith the purpose of the video
benefit from usingsystems biology approaches to complex problems. Consequently, multiple science departmentsat NCA&T have recently have acquired significant cutting-edge laboratory resources. Newsynergistic research partnerships are emerging across traditional departmental infrastructures.Because the science department’s past work has actively promoted, presented, and publishedgenuine undergraduate cross discipline-related research, the departments have gained significantfavor across the university1. We have strong administrative leadership support for rigorousundergraduate research activities. We gained buy-in from stakeholders by: (1) working from theground-up with administration to promote campus-wide bioengineering research and training
Polytechnic State University Brian Self is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity in San Luis Obispo. Prior to joining the faculty at Cal Poly in 2006, he taught for seven years at the United States Air Force Academy and worked for four years in the Air Force Research Laboratories. Research interests include active learning and engineering education, spatial disorientation, rehabilitation engineering, sports biomechanics, and aerospace physiology. He worked on a team that developed the Dynamics Concept Inventory and is currently collaborating on a grant to develop and assess Model Elic- iting Activities in engineering. Brian was the 2008-2010 ASEE Zone IV
loads while maintaining reasonable thermal comfort conditions. 3. Case studies:Design of Argonne National Laboratories:As an example, the Argonne National Laboratories, designed by OWP/P (architectureand MEP design and consulting company), includes a passive ventilation system createdby using wind towers all along the building to the top. The wind tower works by creatinga pressure differential. The wind blowing over the top of the tower creates a lowerpressure than the atmospheric pressure inside the building. This difference in pressurecauses the air to flow naturally up and out of the top of the building. Stack effects createdwith wind towers is an old concept that has improved over the years with bettertechnology and electronic controls
Physical Experiments: Application within A Laboratory Course,” AmericanSociety for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.[2] King, B., McCausland, H. and Nunan, T. (2001) “Converting To Online Course And Program Delivery: The UniversityOf South Australia Case Study,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning: 1, 2.http://www.icaap.org/iuicode?149.1.2.7[3] Mehrabian, A., Alvarado, K., and Nahmens, I., (2007). “Application of Technology in Project-based DistanceLearning,” EISTA 2007, Orlando, FL.[4] Nunan, T. (2000). “Exploring the concept of flexibility,” In V. Jakupec & J. Garrick, J. (Eds.), Flexible learning, andhuman resource development (pp. 47-66). London: Routledge.[5] Bates, A.W., & Poole
more girls in engineering?What are your advantages as a girl in engineering?Did you take middle/high school classes in science/engineering?Are you treated differently or equally? Page 22.1199.7Do you like welding, machining or fabricating things?Have you ever wanted to solve the world’s problems?Do you like solving complicated analytical problems?Do you always come up with new ideas on everything?Do you like doing experiments or working in a laboratory?Would you like a career that is a lifelong learning experience?How would you like to be the engineer that designs and develops technology for commercial aviation
International Conference on Multimedia in Physics Teaching and Learning,Wroclaw, Poland, Sept. 2007.13. Escalada, L., Grabhorn, R., and Zollman, D., “Applications of Interactive Digital Video in a Physics Classroom.” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(1), 1996, 73-97.14. Palazzo, D., and Schools, C., “Video Analysis: The Next Physics Laboratory?”ASEE Mid-Atlantic, West Point, March 2008.15. Beichner, R. “Impact of Video Motion Analysis on Kinematics Graph Interpretation Skills.” American Journal of Physics, 1996. Page 22.1117.13
program curricula to determine if and what kinds ofchanges are needed.1The current outcome assessment process for E and ET programs is primarily designed to meetthe requisite ABET Criteria 3 (a-k) requirements. Evaluation is concentrated on 3rd and 4th yearcourses and measures performance in specific embedded assignments within the core area, i.e.those most relevant to the major and taught within the College. Core courses may be classified asone of the following 5 types: • Theoretical – 3 or 4 semester credits, largely lecture-based, and devoted to an advanced topic within a specific discipline such as thermodynamics or wireless communications. • Experiential – Laboratory-oriented course equivalent to 1 to 3 semester credit
Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado alsoprovide different insights and recent developments in the field. Engineering thermodynamics isa prerequisite, fluid mechanics is a co-requisite, and while an introduction to the basic modes ofheat transfer are covered in the engineering thermodynamics course, it is recommended thatenrolled students have satisfactorily completed a dedicated heat transfer course.While the course covers a variety of topics (solar, wind, ocean, hydro, geothermal, combinedheat and power, biomass, nuclear, etc.), a substantial portion of the course is devoted to solarenergy (active, passive, and photovoltaic), and would benefit greatly from the incorporation of a
United States and Europe. Teresa earned her doctorate at the MIT Media Laboratory with Tod Machover and Rosalind Picard. Her doctoral project, the Conductor’s Jacket, was selected by MIT alumni for inclusion in the exhibition celebrating 150 years of the institute’s founding.Andrea Salgian, The College of New JerseyMeredith K. Stone, Independent Evaluator Page 22.1484.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Course Involving Engineering, Science and ArtsAbstractAn interdisciplinary undergraduate course that
. Asenrollment in engineering programs has increased, some institutions believe they need to limitenrollment so that the existing infrastructure, especially laboratory classes, are not overwhelmed.Many programs have a minimal GPA requirement in key foundational courses to limit Page 22.1198.2continuation into a major program of study. If students fail to achieve a sufficient GPA,although they have passed all of the prerequisite classes, they can’t continue in the engineeringprogram. Overall, GPA is a very important measure of a student’s academic progress and moreattention should be given to ensure that it is a robust metric with which to compare
AC 2011-531: THE MONTANA MULE: A CASE STUDY IN INTERDISCI-PLINARY CAPSTONE DESIGNBrock J. LaMeres, Montana State University Dr. Brock J. LaMeres is an Assistant Professor in the electrical and computer engineering department at Montana State University (MSU). LaMeres teaches and conducts research in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres is currently studying the effectiveness of online delivery of engi- neering education including the impact of remote laboratory experiences. LaMeres is also studying the pedagogical impact of interdisciplinary capstone projects compared to traditional discipline-specific de- sign projects. LaMeres’ research group is also studying the effective hardware
training was part of the TAs employment contract for all new TAs and isoffered during the first months of the fall and winter term.Program Development and Core ModulesThe program was developed iteratively with several meetings between faculty members,academic growth professionals, and graduate students. The diverse group from variousdisciplines helped identify core areas specific to APSC that needed to be addressed. These corecompetencies have come to include: 1. Understanding of the TA instructor relationship. 2. Understanding of the TA student relationship. 3. Fair, efficient and effective marking strategies. 4. Effective Laboratory\Tutorial development, presentations and time management skills. 5. Professional expectations and
: Singapore.8. NAE, Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. 2008, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.9. Reed-Rhoads, T., et al., Creating the Ideas to Innovation Learning Laboratory: A First- Year Experience Based on Research. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 5.10. Hunter, M.S., et al., Helping Sophomores Succeed: Understanding and Improving the Second-Year Experience. 2010, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Page 22.1696.10
, and retention in engineering education, expanding the use of cooperative and active learning in engineering laboratories, data analysis and visualization for investigating and presenting quantitative data, and mod- eling and simulation of dynamic systems. He is a guitarist and songwriter with the rock band ”Whisper Down”.Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Undergraduate Engineers Engaging and Reflecting in a Professional Practice Simulation Funded by a grant from the NSF Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI)program (DUE-0919347), we have developed Nephrotex, a virtual simulation of authenticengineering practice designed to increase the persistence of engineering undergraduates inpursuit of degree attainment. In this simulation game, students take on the role of an intern in afictitious company and design new ultrafiltration membranes for kidney dialysis machines. Nephrotex supplies first-year engineering undergraduates with a more complete and accurateunderstanding of the
Laboratory and Professor of Practice of in the Electrical, Computer, and Sys- tems Engineering Department. His responsibilities include managing the operation of the design lab and optimizing the experience for students working on engineering design projects.Dr. R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida R. Keith Stanfill holds the academic rank of Engineer and serves as the Director of the Integrated Prod- uct and Process Design (IPPD) Program for the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at the University of Florida (UF). He received his B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from UF in 1985, 1991, and 1995, respectively. He joined the UF faculty in 1999 as the IPPD Asso- ciate Director and
two criteria: 1) importance ofthe area in the environment and 2) applicability of technology in the area.Six assignments were given to the students, one on each area. Each assignment consisted of acritical thinking issue and several questions demanding: (1) an understanding of the nature andhistory of technology, and (2) the ability to think critically about technological development15.Inaddition students conducted three hands on laboratory experiments that addressed technologicalissues regarding sound pollution, acid water, and energy use. Each assignment (the issue and thestudent answers) and experiment was loaded with additional technological literacy detailsconsisting of charts, tables, graphs, equations and/or number crunching exercises
academic’s duties. However the resources, encouragement, andmotivations can vary significantly between faculty and institutions. The recommendations in Table 3 aredirected to helping these faculty set personal priorities when developing new courses, revising programs,adding new programs, developing new laboratories, adopting new teaching methods, and adding newtopics. Table 3 – Curriculum Revision C2015 Category C2015 RecommendationsCurriculum Revision and 3. Develop stronger ties between research and the classroomDevelopment 4. Identify and teach new technologies 7. Encourage