abroad for students’ personal, academic, and career goals. 3. Responsible parties shall communicate the importance of understanding the social, historical, political, economic, linguistic, cultural, and environmental context(s) for each program and location. Student Learning Objectives 1. Responsible parties shall evaluate student competencies and place students in language and other courses at their level. Responsible parties shall prepare participants to navigate the cultural transition and to engage in culturally relevant, ethical, and reciprocally beneficial activities in relation to the local context. 2. Responsible parties should encourage students to consider the social, cultural
learning introductory programming in higher education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 77–90, May 2019. [3] K. Quille and S. Bergin, “CS1: How will they do? How can we help? A decade of research and practice,” Computer Science Education, vol. 29, no. 2-3, pp. 254–282, May 2019. [4] M. Hertz, “What do “CS1” and “CS2” mean? investigating differences in the early courses,” in ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), Mar. 2010. [5] M. C. Parker, M. Guzdial, and S. Engleman, “Replication, validation, and use of a language independent CS1 knowledge assessment,” in ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER), Aug. 2016, pp. 93–101. [6] M. S. Kirkpatrick and C
international perspective,” J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 21, no. 11, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11051-019-4638-7.[2] L. Wright, S. D. Eigenbrode, and T. A. Martin, “Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects,” vol. 20, no. 4, 2015.[3] B. Akbar, J. Brummet, S. Flores, A. Gordon, B. Gray, and J. Murday, “Global perspectives in convergence education,” J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 21, p. 229, 2019.[4] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, and A. Kardgar, “A systematic review of studies on educational robotics,” J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 19–42, 2019, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1223.[5] I. M. Verner, D. Cuperman, and M. Reitman, “Exploring robot connectivity and
inclusive and diverse STEM community.7. References[1] M. Riojas, S. Lysecky, and J. Rozenblit, “Educational Technologies for Precollege Engineering Education,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2011.16.[2] N. Kerimbayev, N. Beisov, А. Kovtun, N. Nurym, and A. Akramova, “Robotics in the international educational space: Integration and the experience,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5835–5851, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10257-6.[3] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, and A. Kardgar, “A systematic review of studies on educational robotics,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 9, no. 2. Purdue University Press
Conference, 2008.[10] A. L. Campbell, I. Direito and M. Mokhithi, “Developing growth mindsets in engineering students: a systematic literature review of interventions”, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 503-527, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835[11] A.J. Elliot, H.A. McGregor, and S. Gable, “Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 91, no. 3), pp. 549-563, 1999.[12] P. Hsieh, , J.R. Sullivan, and N.S. Guerra, “A closer look at college students:Self-efficacy and goal orientation,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 454–476, 2007, DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549[13] A. Vrugt
introducing a smalllottery-based compensation for survey participation. (These amendments to the survey protocolare subject to IRB approval.) Additionally, the 360 Coaching program will continue to seekfeedback from the 360 Coaches throughout the year and respond to these by considering andimplementing improvements.References[1] S. Tantum, S. T. Santillan, L. Temiquel-McMillian, and J. Ganley, “Work-in-Progress: 360 Coaching to support whole-student advising in the first-year,” presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, June 26–29, 2022.[2] K. Bartimote-Aufflick, A. Bridgeman, R. Walker, M. Sharma, and L. Smith, “The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy,” Studies in Higher
-divided into specialty groups such as structural, electrical, fabrication, procurement, etc. Thestudents were fully engaged in every aspect of the project. Those with construction experiencetook on more of the installation tasks but still participated in student teams involving structuralanalysis and solar design optimization. Advanced tools were used such as ANSYSc (forstructural) and National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)’s open-source solar optimizationtools such as HOMER, along with analytical methodologies.The final system design was a 30,720-Watt grid-tie PV system with 96 solar panels, eachgenerating 320-watts arranged in 4 sub-arrays of 24 panels each, connected to 6 invertersconverting DC (Direct Current) solar power to 3-phase 208
and satisfaction. The formative evaluation helps determinewhether project goals were met and what hampered their implementation. A summative reviewassessed this program's impact on student's professional abilities for global employment. TheGlobal Perspective Inventory [20] and Engineering Global Preparedness Index were used tocreate a survey (e.g., the belief that one can make a difference through engineering problem-solving). The evaluator used a Likert scale to poll students before and after IRES. The surveytool examined research skills and global perspective inventory professional skills. Research Skill Development - Pre v/s Post Survey Peer review and publication process Report writing and poster presentation Result
&M University Victor Ugaz is the Carolyn S. & Tommie E. Lohman ’59 Professor in Engineering Education in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas A&M University. He joined the faculty in Jan- uary 2003. His research focuses broadly on harnessing the unique characteristics of transport and flow at the microscale, with specific interests in microfluidic flows (both single-phase and nanoparticle suspen- sions), microchip gel electrophoresis, PCR thermocycling in novel convective flow devices, and construc- tion of 3D vascular flow networks for biomedical applications. Ugaz earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin, and a Ph.D. in
Vanderbilt University.Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University KEN VAN TREUREN is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his military retirement. At Baylor University since 1998, he teaches courses in fluid mechanics, energy systems, propulsion sys- tems, heat transfer, and aeronautics. Research interests include
graduate students to a flipped online format found that, whileaverage performance levels remained the same, there was an increase in performance dispersionover time.These studies show that the results of implementing a flipped classroom are varied. Whileperceptions tend to be positive, the change in learning levels varies from no effect toimprovement. In this regard, it is essential to consider the impact of various factors, includingstudent education levels (secondary, undergraduate, postgraduate), the number of studentsinvolved (a small group or a large course), and the design and appropriateness of the material(s),among others. Consequently, the results largely depend on the particularities of each situation.MethodologyThe methodology applied
%] 4 4.00 100.00%In this course, I engaged in critical thinking and/or problem solving.[1 = Never…4 = Frequently] 4 3.64 91.09%Based on what the instructor(s) communicated, and the informationprovided in the course syllabus, I understood what was expected of me.[1 = No…3 = Yes] 3 2.72 90.50%This course helped me learn concepts or skills as stated in courseobjectives/outcomes.[1 = Did not help… 4 = Definitely helped] 4 3.50 87.52%Please rate the organization of this course.[1 = Not at all organized 4 = Very well organized] 4 3.36 83.91
- © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Synchronous Overlap-Add (FESOLA) ”, the proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), pp. 31-34, New Paltz, NY, USA, 2019. doi: 10.1109/WASPAA.2019.8937258.[8] E. Moulines and F. Charpentier, “Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones”, Speech Communication, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 453 – 467, 1990.[9] J. Allen, “Short-term spectral analysis, synthesis, and modification by discrete Fourier transform,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 235–238, 1977.[10] S. Roucos
contexts, and perceived future outcomes. Withthat, and in relation to whether one identifies HC as active or passive, People of Color (POC) andmarginalized identities have operated in a world that is curtailed to and normalized/s theexperience of whiteness. Because of this, a POC woman might feel a HC that perpetuates andnormalizes the status quo of cisgender-heterosexual white male engineers as active whereas awhite male might identify a professor including nontraditional engineers of color into theircurriculum as active. HC can be identified as active or passive for different reasons based ondifferent identities. Through the lens of sociology and symbolic interactionism theory, passive is defined asindividuals who “receive society in a
] S. von Stumm, B. Hell, and T. Chamorro-Premuzic, “The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 6, pp. 574–588, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1745691611421204. [6] C. A. Berg and R. J. Sternberg, “Response to novelty: continuity versus discontinuity in the developmental course of intelligence,” Adv Child Dev Behav, vol. 19, pp. 1–47, 1985, doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60387-0. [7] P. J. Silvia, “Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 94–113, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02699930701298481. [8] W. F. Massy, T.A. Sullivan, and C. Mackie, “Improving measurement
Skills Course Number Name SA Learning Objectives/Methods Analysis Tool(s) Used EMSE 2705 Mathematics of • Linear equations/models Excel® Operations Research • Matrix algebra • Least squared methods EMSE 3740 System Thinking and • Introduction to systems thinking Vensim® Policy Making • Introduction to systems dynamics (Causal Loops, Stocks and
, the students noticed: “[Instructor’s firstname]’s lectures about inclusivity and adapting to new people made me feel really comfortablein the class"Students that reported dissatisfaction with the Engineering+ coursework also reported highbelonging in the engineering community. Some transfer students, for example, wrote thatprevious life experience had prepared them for engineering careers and that the Engineering+program was therefore not relevant or helpful for them. Similarly, some students who stronglyidentified with a specific career or discipline felt that the time spent exploring and buildingconnections to broad engineering careers was wasted for them. For example, “The engineering100 series I felt were a waste of my time. As an older
Underrepresented Minorities in Aerospace EngineeringAbstractTraditionally, aerospace engineering disciplines are substantially underrepresented by AfricanAmerican, Hispanic, and female students. For example, Black and Hispanic American studentscollectively earn only 10.6%, 8.4%, and 6.4% of the BS, MS, and Ph.D.’s in aerospaceengineering, respectively. They are among the lowest percentages of all major engineeringdisciplines, leading to underutilization of the talent pool in the aerospace industry. 1 To tackle thisconcern, a multi-institution coalition sponsored by NASA is established to engageunderrepresented minorities in coordinated educational and professional development activities,including senior design projects, undergraduate research experiences
it caters to language learners. We shouldbe open to the idea that there are other avenues for learning that align with machine learning.Centieiro [47] describes that machine learning can be either supervised or unsupervised. Thedemarcation point is whether the outcome is known in advance.References[1] Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.[2] L. Tolstoy, What is art? Trans. M. Aylmer. New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1904.[3] S. Wilson and J. Lack, The Tate Guide to Modern Art Terms, London: Tate Publishing, 2016.[4] A. Searle, “Elaine Sturtevant: Queen of Copycats, The Guardian, July 1, 2013 [online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/jul/01/elaine-sturtevant-queen
subject. The next subject offering will address this latter point bymore heavily guiding students through a short design cycle iteration early in semester. Studentswill then be able to use this design cycle as a model on which to base their subsequent designiterations.References [1] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering education: is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, n.2003-3, 20 Dec. 2003. [2] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, and K. Edstrom, Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach. Springer, 2014. [3] T. F. Collins, R. Getz, D. Pu, and A. M. Wyglinski, Software-Defined Radio for Engineers. Artech House, 2018. https
improve the preparation of thestudents for doing future QC research.AcknowledgmentsWe wish to thank Peter Kutt, students Maggie Sullivan, Kevin Wang, Mike Murphy, and KyleGeary, and support from the Loyola Hauber Fellowship fund.References1. S. Laursen, A.-B. Hunter, E. Seymour, H. Thiry, and G. Melton, Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.2. D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate Research as a High-Impact Student Experience,” Association of American Colleges and Universities, Spring 2010, vol. 12, no. 2.3. J. Parker, “Undergraduate research, learning gain and equity: the impact of final year research projects,” Higher Education Pedagogies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp.145-157, 2018.4. K
that completion of one phaseinforms and influences the next phase(s), and reverting back to a previous phase is possible [16].Viewing self-regulation in this fashion exposes a process of planning and adapting performancebased on self-generated behaviors and cognitions in an effort to reach self-set goals [14]. Clearyand Zimmerman [16] posited that self-regulated learners are generally those that proactivelyincorporate self-regulation processes (e.g., goal setting, self-evaluation), along with taskstrategies (e.g., time management, studying), and self-motivational expectations (e.g., intrinsicinterest). In problem-centered learning environments, self-regulation is especially important aslearners with limited self-regulative skills have
time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2158244018824506, 2019. [6] E. K. Marler, M. J. Bruce, A. Abaoud, C. Henrichsen, W. Suksatan, S. Homvisetvongsa, and H. Matsuo, “The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2021. [7] L. A. Gelles and A. Walker, “Return to in-person learning and undergraduate student sense of belonging during the fall 2021 semester,” in 2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference, 2022. [8] D. A. Copp and A. J. Headley, “Test anxiety and its impact on diverse undergraduate engineering students during remote
availability of broccoli microgreens. Consumerswill complete an anonymous five-question Qualtrics survey on their knowledge, consumption ofmicrogreens, and zip code. A visual assessment of the grocery stores using the NutritionEnvironment Measures Survey in Stores (NEMS-S) will rate the nutrition environments of thecommunities. Using Qualtrics, the student proposed to distribute a short survey with thefollowing questions to the university campus: 1) What are broccoli microgreens? 2) How oftendo you consume them? 3) Are you aware of their health benefits? 4) Are they accessible at yourlocal grocery store? and 5) What is your zip code? This student acknowledged the importance ofobtaining institutional approval to conduct research before collecting human
College Bridge. Available: TexasCollegeBridge.org.[4] UTSA Summer Bridge Program. Available: https://ceid.utsa.edu/ceid-summer-bridge-program/.[5] L. M. Yingling. “Evaluating an academic bridge program using a mixed methods approach,”.Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Available: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2739.[6] R. Brooks, R. Lightfoot, and S. Thomas. “The power of the pre-course survey for courselaunch, addressing concerns, and developing community,” in proceedings of the 2022 ASEEGulf-Southwest Conference, Prairie View, Texas, March 16-18, 2022.[7] Texas Developmental Summer Bridge Study. Available: https://www.mdrc.org/project/texas-developmental-summer-bridge-study#overview retrieved 1/7/2023.[8] B. Grace-Odeleye, and J. Santiago
skills which are important andneeded in the industry setting.Individual contribution assessment is still an ongoing challenge to effectively identify studentswho are not participating equally. Student self-assessment is not 100% accurate as some studentsunder- or over-rate themselves and/or their teammates.References:[1] ABET Criteria for Accreditation of Engineering Technology Programs 2022-2023, ABETStandard 2021[2] R. I. Mott, E. M. Vavrek and J. Wang, Machine Elements in Mechanical Design, 6th ed.,Pearson, 2018[3] R. G. Budynas and J.K. Nisbett, Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design 11th ed.,McGraw-Hill, 2020.[4] A. A. Yusof, M. K. M. Nor, S. A. Shamsudin, M. R. Alkahari, M. S. Aras and M. R. Nawai,Facing the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
. concise background. States Includes background. States States purpose of vague. No statement of reason(s) for project (or RQ) purpose of project. project. purpose only what will & Conclusion Introduction followed by expectation. Conclusion has no be described. summary. Summary is concise and Summary is complete Conclusion is lengthy
, 2016/06/26. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/27060.[5] J. D. FORD and L. A. RILEY, "Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: A Look at Curricula, Courses, and Support Systems," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 325-328, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x.[6] B. Gunnink and K. L. S. Bernhardt, "Writing, critical thinking, and engineering curricula," in 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, 6-9 Nov. 2002 2002, vol. 2, pp. F3H-F3H, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1158211.[7] D. Missingham, "The Integration of Professional Communication Skills into Engineering Education," 2006.[8] A. Nylén and A. Pears, "Professional communication skills for
exercise.The recommendation for instructors is for future deployments to consider the deployment offollow up quizzes immediately following the reflection quizzes to further assess results.ReferencesDickerson, S & Clark, R . 2021. Use of SPICE Circuit Simulation to Guide Written Reflections.IEEE Transactions on Education .Benson, D & Zhu, H . 2015. Student Reflection, Self-Assessment, and Categorization of Errorson Exam Questions as a Tool to Guide Self-Repair and Profile Student Strengths andWeaknesses in a Course. In: Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference.