). Successful groups are advantageous for students in different ways: 1) groups enhancestudent’s reasoning and higher thinking; 2) groups help students learn to accommodate otherstudents’ perspectives about problems; 3) groups help students develop cognitive processing andintegrating information; and 4) groups help students learn how to give and receiveencouragement and foster acceptance among their team members (Bossert, 1988). Other authorshave similar articulated that benefits of group work include learning teamwork skills, improvingdeeper learning, and fostering engagement if students find themselves valuable members of thegroup (Sage, Vandagriff, & Schmidt, 2018). However, placing children in a group does not meanthat they will cooperate (D. W
student responses andexamine how they make connections between their personal values and the ways those valuesmight contribute to their success in the classroom. Three dominant themes emerged from studentresponses: 1) Self-improvement; 2) Empathy/Kindness and 3) Helping. These themes provide abetter understanding of the kinds of values that are important to students and offer insight into theirinterest and motivation as it relates to learning in engineering mechanics. Given the abstract,decontextualized mode in which engineering sciences are typically taught, instructors can work toidentify and develop these personal connections and enhance student motivation and expectancyfor success in what are foundational areas of an engineering curriculum
engineering education is to equip students with appropriate technicalknowledge and skills that are useful for effectively creating solutions to complex real-worldproblems [1], [2]. Students have perceived the introduction of abstract scientific concepts inundergraduate engineering courses such as those that are used in electrical circuit analysis to bedifficult due to their inability to verbalize their knowledge [3], [4]. Apart from the formalinstruction widely used in undergraduate engineering education, instruction calls for innovativeapproaches to teaching electrical circuit courses [5], [6]. The students’ use of fundamentalmathematics to prove key circuit concepts is becoming a helpful tool for them, especially inbridging understanding of circuit
students who submit-ted the quizzes and homeworks 24 hours prior to the submission deadline had significantly higherexam scores as compared to students who submitted during the last 24 hours. Additionally, we alsofound that this difference was only significant for students who did not have prior programmingexperience. This indicates that early submission of assignments can help students who do not haveprior programming experience in improving their overall course performance. By understandingthe major student interaction patterns, we believe that instructors and educators can better designlearning experiences for students in CS1 courses.1 Introduction Computer programming has historically been difficult for students to learn [1, 2]. As
semester or two of preparatory mathematics before they are able to take partin the fundamentals of engineering course that is a first-year, first-semester course for studentswho are enrolled in mathematics course of pre-calculus or higher. These populations of studentsare likely to have low social capital or pre-existing networks in areas that would support theircollege experience [1]. Therefore, the peer and faculty mentoring and cross-cohort socializationhave been integrated into the program as ways to help expand the social capital of students whomay need it.Social Capital is the availability, accessibility, and activation of resources via social relationshipsaccording to Lin [1]. While overarching societal structures encompassing
implementing a curriculum focused on cohort formation, career exploration, andprofessional development. The AcES, consisting of a weeklong pre-fall bridge experience, twocommon courses, and a variety of co-curricular activities, has been operating for eight years.Students who receive S-STEM funded scholarships participate in three focus groups and twoone-on-one interviews each semester throughout their undergraduate studies.Student responses from the one-on-one interviews and focus groups conducted from 2017-2020were examined with qualitative coding methods. Questions examined in this work include: 1)Did the engineering in history course help make you feel like you belong in engineering at WVUand that you are included in engineering at WVU?, 2) Do you
of Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering at The University of Texas at Arlington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Washington. Her research is focused on the development of quantitative methodologies for the anal- ysis and sustainable management of sociotechnical systems, including supply networks and production systems. Her email address is caroline.krejci@uta.edu. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Session XXXX Simulation of Production and Inventory Control
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 STEM Enhancement in Earth Science (SEES): A Reimagining of an Onsite NASA/TSGC/UTCSR High School Internship Program Celena Miller, Margaret Baguio Texas Space Grant Consortium, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at AustinAbstractNASA, the Texas Space Grant Consortium, and The University of Texas at Austin Center for Space Researchsupport the STEM Enhancement in Earth Science (SEES) program which provides selected high school studentswith exposure to Earth and space research. Interns learn how
areas that thecapstone team and their peers had faced when taking the control systems course; namelyabstractness and continuity. As mentioned before, the architecture of the education tool features anoverarching real-world example of a system the student user is hoping to control. The real-worldexamples ultimately used in the tool are reflective of the engineering concentrations of the capstoneteam. The biomedical track used an example of controlling the glucose level within a human body;and the mechanical track used an example of controlling car speed. Figure 1. Screen capture of the track selection page Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
relations, strengthens student-instructor communication, increases studentcollaboration, and fosters an active learning environment that enhances student engagement andlearning [14].The effectiveness of these instructional practices, however, have depended on two principalconditions: 1) undergraduate students residing or traveling from off-campus housing, which allowsfor the utilization of campus resources such as study spaces, books, outdoor recreation programs,computer labs, internet service, advising programs, etc., and 2) established campus practicesadopted by students, which involve the formation of study groups, attending office hours,communicating after lecture hours, etc. These two conditions have factored towards theimplementation of
- ing and support in educational technology applications. She developed an online certification program to help faculty transition from classroom to online teaching. During the 2020 pandemic she designed and coordinated a University-wide training effort to help faculty teach remotely. She has worked with subject matter experts across disciplines to develop academic courses, certification programs, and open-source learning materials. Her background is in instructional design, LMS administration, multimedia produc- tion, and student engagement systems. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1
: AnIntegrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach (pp. 1-5). SensePublishers.Clark, A. C., & Ernst, J. V. (2006). A model for the integration of science, technology, engineering,and mathematics. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 66(4), 24–26.Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record. 19, 319–335.
Assistant at Texas A&M University. He received a bachelor’s degree in Technical and Scientific Communication from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2009, and in 2011 he received a master’s degree in Asian Studies, with a focus on East-Asian security and technology issues, from Florida State University. Drew is currently working on a Master’s of Public Service & Administration.Dr. Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Session XXXXThe Development of a Texas A&M
Education Endowed Professorship in Engineering #1 at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Pro- fessor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Markey is a 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. She has a B.S. in computational biology (Carnegie Mellon, 1998). Dr. Markey earned her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a certificate in bioinformatics, from Duke University. Dr. Markey has been recognized for excellence in research and teaching with awards from organizations such as the American Medical Informatics Asso- ciation, the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Cancer Society, and the Society for Women’s
UDP UAV Dynamics Control Commands Figure 1. X-Plane – Mission Planner SIL Architecture (Bittar, Figuereido, Guimaraes, & Mendez, 2014)Figure 1 illustrates the architecture of the SIL generated between X-Plane and Mission Planner.Data packages between X-Plane and Mission Planner are sent via User Datagram Protocol (UDP).Mission Planner evaluates and assigns control commands for the guidance of the aircraft. X-Planereceives commands from Mission Planner and performs the requested control surfaces deflections.Then, X-Plane runs the model physics and sends the generated navigation data to Mission Planner.The data is then
Paper ID #35083Using MUTISIM software to reinforce use and application of Norton’stheory in electrical circuitsDr. Cyrus K Hagigat, The University of Toledo Dr. Hagigat is an associate professor in the Engineering Technology department of the College of Engi- neering of the University of Toledo. Dr. Hagigat has an extensive industrial background, and his teaching technique is based on practical aspects of engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1
Journal. He has generated $8.9M in external research funding, over 70 technical publications that has been cited over 1000+ times. He received ”Best Paper Award” in the ASME conference, 1st Place Award in 2012/13 ASHRAE project, 14 research awards from Purdue Northwest, and 4 US Patents. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Virtual Engineering Summer Camp in the age of COVID-19 Pandemic 1 Virtual Engineering Summer Camp in the age of COVID-19 Pandemic Anveeksh Koneru, George Nnanna Department of Mechanical Engineering
Education, 2021ABSTRACTBiomedical engineering seniors at Texas &M University enroll in Mass & Energy Transport inBiosystems that traditionally is taught face-to-face using a blended approach of lectures and collaborativeproblem-based learning sessions. The three learning objectives are to (1) mathematically define anddescribe general biotransport problems, including deriving governing equations and defining appropriateboundary and initial conditions (2) solve and analyze a variety of basic biotransport problems, and (3)develop transport models and approaches to biomedical problems and critically evaluate the solutions.Class activities span lower to higher order levels of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy and require application ofmultivariable
analysisis grounded in the views of the universities on taking on the pandemic, as expressed throughtheir content in the COVID-19 related web pages.Grounded Theory MethodologyGrounded theory is a systematic qualitative research methodology initially developed as a way tomerge qualitative and quantitative approaches in social science research [1], [2] and isconsidered as an emerging methodology in engineering education research [3]. Thismethodology enables researchers to build theory from data through constant comparison,identifying analytical codes and categories from data, and then using these categories to generatetheories and theoretical models [4]. Our approach thus takes advantage of features of theconstructivist approach of Charmaz [4], as
in collaborative research between engineering education scholars and social scientists that focuses on the processes through which inequalities are enacted, reproduced, and/or challenged in various educational contexts. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021An Analysis of Gendered Outreach Messages on the Engineer Girl Website:How Female Engineers Promote Engineering to Young WomenIntroductionWomen’s underrepresentation in engineering in the United States has been an ongoing area ofconcern to engineering educators and administrators [1], [2]. Despite the fact that women nowearn more undergraduate degrees than men, and girls now perform as well as boys in
forengineering and pre-engineering students was 10% lower than for students in other disciplines atthe same university. This trend appears to be, unfortunately, present at a majority of U.S.institutions of higher education [1]. In order to address this critical issue, engineering facultymembers at this university developed a program for a subset of incoming first-year engineeringstudents, called the Engineering Learning Community (ELC). The ELC was first implemented inthe Fall 2016 semester, and since then has been iterated each academic year based on studentfeedback, best practices, and, beginning in the Fall 2019 semester, support from the NationalScience Foundation (NSF) in the form of S-STEM scholarships for financially qualified students.The
feeling a sense ofbelonging. Finally, survey findings provide evidence that cognitive diversity, opportunity towork with people who have different styles of problem-solving, is among trainees’ favoriteaspects of the program. In addition, we discuss the structure of our NRT and recruitmentstrategies we have used to advance more diverse participation.1. IntroductionWomen have been underrepresented in STEM at four-year institutions and the workforce. Thenumber of advanced degrees earned by women have increased, with women earning larger shareof graduate degrees [1] [2] yet national data show a large STEM gender gap: in 2018, 29% ofmaster’s degrees in engineering and computer information science were awarded to women and24% of doctoral degrees were
increasing the creativity and effectiveness of engineeringteams [1], yet can have an adverse effect when these viewpoints result in negatively imposedbiases. Unconscious bias (or implicit bias) can be defined as “a prejudice in favor of or againstone thing, person, or group compared with another usually in a way that’s considered to beunfair. Biases may be held by an individual, group, or institution and can have negative orpositive consequences” [2]. Unconscious bias is pervasive and affects our decisions, even whenwe think we are operating objectively. Yet because of identity-protective cognition, engineerswho are immersed in a culture of objectivity often pride themselves on only looking at facts, andcan have strong emotional reactions and
, Alexandra received a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from MIT and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia. Alexandra comes to FIU af- ter completing a postdoctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical
Professor, School of Engineering Technology Purdue University mshehadi@purdue.eduAbstractFormula-1 (F1) racing cars aerodynamic effects are mainly controlled by the body contours andother aerodynamic elements such as over-body wings. Over-body wings tend to force the cardownwards but would increase the drag force on the car. This capstone project investigated theground effects on a scaled F1 car by testing the down force and drag force with and withoutground effects. To meet the objectives, an 8.8 feet-long (2.93 m) wind tunnel was built by theteam having a 6 × 6 sq.in (3.34 m2) cross-section testing chamber running air at an approximatespeed of 34 miles per hour (mph
increasing nationally [1] - [2]. A recent effort by theHealthy Minds Network and ACHA-NCHA collected data during the COVID-19 pandemic(between March and May 2020) from 14 U.S. colleges and universities (the specific breakdownof sites and participants can be seen in [3]. Findings showed decreases in psychologicalwellbeing and an increased difficulty in accessing mental health care [3]. Accessibility of mentalhealth resources is a critical concern as college and university campus counseling centers areunable to keep pace with students’ counseling needs with students’ academic progress being tiedto their mental health state [4]. Undiagnosed and untreated mental health problems can affectstudents’ satisfaction, academic performance, research
persistence among diverse students.Placing STEM history and cultures directly in the critical frameworks of WGS may help providethese populations with epistemological and personal insights that boost a sense of belonging inengineering and support their persistence.Numerous studies have addressed aspects of the complex question of student under-representation. The National Academies’ Beyond Bias investigated the factors contributing tounderrepresentation, and determined that biases and structural disadvantages overwhelm talentedwomen and other would-be engineering students. “Women who are interested in science andengineering careers are lost at every education transition,” and “the problem is not simply thepipeline” [1].Concern over the proper
,environmental pollution, food, education, and so on. These obstacles require the attention ofprofessionals who know what technology can do, can work as or with engineers, and who havethe necessary socio-political inclinations and capabilities.” This program was both a naturaloutgrowth of Lafayette College’s founding principles of liberal education and consistent with thetrends in engineering education in the 1960s, which also impacted other institutions [1].Our campus newspaper greeted the new program with enthusiasm: “It will explore the nature androles of engineering, the problem solving skills employed by engineers, and the socio-politicalissues involved in the direction and control of technology,” student journalists wrote in 1970 [2].Since its