Paper ID #17176Towards a Sustainable Engineering Entrepreneurship EducationDr. Benedict M. Uzochukwu, Virginia State University Benedict M. Uzochukwu is an Associate Professor of Technology at the Virginia State University. His research interests include Human Factors and Ergonomics, Sustainment, Logistics, Supply Chain Man- agement, Life cycle Systems, Systems Integration and Management of technology systems. He has a Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering from the North Carolina A & T State University, Greensboro and has several peer reviewed publications to his credit. He belongs to a number of professional
Paper ID #26387Resources and Partnerships for Community College Engineering and Tech-nology ProgramsProf. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, CT College of Technology/Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch is the Executive Director and Principal Investigator of the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing, an National Science Foundation Center of Excellence. She is the State Director for the College of Technology, a seamless pathway in technology and engineering from all 12 public community colleges to 8 public and private universities. Dr. Wosczyna-Birch has expertise with both the recruitment
andeffort, this type of collaboration blurs the line between industry and university and offers a morecomprehensive integration. With administrative assistance, courses can often be adapted to bestfit the advisory board member’s schedule, such as being offered in evenings or in a shortenedtime (single credit hour versus standard three credits, five weeks versus full semester, etc.).Although the subjects were not described as IAB members, Varma5 offered several case studiesof how industry professionals can be successful as part-time, “clinical” instructors. An advisoryboard member from the author’s program also was on the board of a neighboring institution, andtaught a class on leadership there that was very successful and enrollment had to be
Teaching Non-Engineers the Engineering Thought Process with Environmental Engineering as the Instrument Jason C. Lynch, Michael A. Butkus, and Marie C. Johnson Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996Abstract Environmental engineering is a broad discipline with seven areas of specialty asidentified by the American Academy of Environmental Engineers. Based on application of theenvironmental engineering program criteria, an ABET accredited program’s curriculum requiresstudents to have familiarity with each of these specialty areas. The challenge in anundergraduate program is to provide this
the lab. This will givestudents more advantages in learning and practicing system integration using innovativetechnology. This type of system is currently not available in our engineering technology labs andwill add another avenue to our students and our curriculum. This system has many technicaladvantages over the conventional ones currently in use. These advantages include beingpositioned freely, extremely dynamic, long service life, adjustable speed, monitored motions,adjustable acceleration, gentle motions, programmable force, and synchronization to othermotors.Project TasksDuring the summer of 2020, the following objectives will be accomplished for new equipmentintegration for the fall 2023 semester: - System assembly The
way to facilitate student veterans’ socialintegration and academic success is offering them a chance to link their prior military experienceand experiential knowledge to what they learn in academic courses. However, despite thesignificant number of student veterans on college campuses, very little effort has been made todevelop a specific curriculum or academic course that integrates military veterans’ priorexperiences and knowledge in higher education.The University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNCC) is a large urban public research institutionwith over 29,500 students [1], 7,400 of which are considered non-traditional or adult students.The university has shown a 21.5% growth in military (veteran, active, reserve and familymember
to develop a curriculum that achieves the goal of producing a graduate with vision andflexibility, faculty need to incorporate hands on learning, develop communication skills, andinstill a sense of creativity and innovation which the students will need throughout theirengineering careers (7). To these ends, we have developed an approach to curriculum deliverycomposed of what we call Contextual Learning Modules (CLM).Goals of the Contextual Learning Module ApproachThe goals of the CLM approach are:1) To integrate physical science, life science, and engineering in each module.2) To provide at least one "hands on" experience each day.3) To use the module itself as an implicit model of how to tackle complex problems (i.e. break them down into
. Page 9.1248.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThe new Biomedical Engineering Department will provide a complete, in-depth BiomedicalEngineering curriculum to students already well grounded in the core undergraduate engineeringcurriculum. The program highlights an immediate introduction to the major, strong personalinteraction with faculty, strong partnerships with industrial participants and a signature laboratoryemphasis. It is rooted in the College’s historical emphasis on applied research, and in theCollege’s tradition of industrial interaction. Faculty will provide a curriculum that will
renamed the Engineer of2020 committee. That committee has been charged with developing mechanisms to achievecurriculum innovations that enhance these attributes among engineering students. Two primarymechanisms are currently in place: the Engineer of 2020 Annual Workshop, and the Engineer of2020 Seed Grant Program.The College of Engineering has hosted an annual Engineer of 2020 workshop since fall of 2007.The first workshop was held on Aug. 28, 2007, and focused on three of the target attributes:innovation, multi-disciplinarity, and continuous learning. Outside experts from industry andacademia were invited to present their thoughts on the importance of each of these attributes andon suggestions for how best to include it in the curriculum
Administration from Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton): Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension and Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study.Dr. Philip Michael Sadler, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Philip Sadler holds a B.S. in Physics from MIT and an Ed.D. from Harvard. He co-authored the first integrated computer and laboratory introductory calculus course in 1975. He has taught middle school mathematics, engineering, and science and both undergraduate science and graduate teaching courses at Harvard. His research
help solve engineering problems. Applying knowledge from other fields to solve an engineering problem. Understanding how an engineering solution can shape and be shaped by environmental, social, cultural, political, legal, economic, and other considerations. Making explicit connections to knowledge and skills from other fields. Integrating knowledge from engineering and other fields to solve engineering problems. Faculty and Program Chairs – Design Skills (alpha=.85 and alpha=.78, respectively) Faculty: In this course, how much do you emphasizeA: Program Chairs: How much does your program curriculum emphasizeA: Generating and evaluating a variety of ideas about how to solve a
study the academic development of students enrolled inundergraduate engineering programs.Mathematical Test Items: Examples M1 and M2 The use of mathematics in solving and communicating engineering analysis can be an obstacle forsome students. In describing the use of mathematics in engineering, we have distinguishedbetween two different constructs, listed above as: (M1) compare and contrast mathematical applications relevant to solving varied problems in Page 15.313.3 engineering; (M2) understand how the engineering quantities (e.g. force, work, power, and flow rate) are described by the mathematical representations (e.g. integration
different set of learning activities.Students on-site do not have lectures but are supported by access to lecture and other learningresources through a combination of paper-based and web-based delivery. As this is their finalyear, many of their courses are integrative and applied in nature, including an individual thesisproject worth one quarter of the grade for the year.A typical study program for the semester on-site includes thesis, professional development, oneapplied technical course and one other project or technical course. Each engineering disciplinehas a slightly different variant on this pattern. Being on-site has distinct advantages for thelearner, including being able to see how theory-based content from courses in earlier years fits
sequence are being tested via “gateway exams”. These assessments will providean indication of critical background knowledge deficiencies prior to the sequence andidentifiable subject matter that is not being assimilated by students during the sequence. Thedata can be used by faculty and Peer Master Teachers [PMTs] to provide the foundationnecessary to succeed in the BE curriculum and an indication of where improvements are neededin the subject matter and in the presentation of subject matter. The assessment also identifiesstudents that may need assistance in the transition to the Upper Division. These students arebeing offered a series of tutoring workshops, led by peer master teachers. These mentors arechosen for their ability to impart knowledge
program's model of providing curriculum and equipment through STEP and students'work in a technology, engineering, and design education program integrating a pilot electric dragster (e-dragster)project as a work-in-progress. Furthermore, the paper will communicate initial challenges and successes withinformation on how the program can share resources with the pre-college engineering education community toenhance learner technological and engineering literacy.STEM Partnership Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) partnerships demonstrate STEM concepts andprovide pre-college engineering education experiences unavailable in several schools (1). Partnerships, such as thesupporters of STEP, model a collaborative effort to solve
analyze student success, so weaknesses or problems in specific courses can beidentified and addressed throughout the curriculum. Further, an assessment can be made to gaugehow well the high schools are preparing students, how well the prerequisites are preparingstudents, and how well the community colleges are preparing students for junior- andsenior-level work, and appropriate corrective action can be taken.Introduction to Engineering CourseThe IssueThe course typically entitled ―Introduction to Engineering‖ appears to be a major stumblingblock in the development of a coherent statewide transfer and articulation agreement betweentwo-year and four-year institutions for mechanical engineering or, for that matter, anyengineering discipline. This
rewardingexperience for the engineering librarian. Librarians must be careful not to rely too much on thelecture as an educational technique. This paper describes creative efforts to introduce activelearning techniques to the typical one-hour workshop. Following a shorter lecture, workshopattendees will be given topics to tackle in small groups. The lecture will include ideas fordiscovering standards of possible interest such as literature searching (databases such asCompendex, which indexes standards or full-text databases like IEEE Xplore and ASTMCompass), references in handbooks or specialized encyclopedia entries (or other monographs),articles on the design of artifacts (products), discussions with colleagues/bosses, productdescriptions when sourcing
. (1997, Spring). Identification of Curriculum Content for the Master of IT: A National Survey.Journal of Industrial Technology, 13(2), 42-45.2. Drucker, P. F. (1992). Managing for the Future. New York: Truman Talley Books.3. Curtis, K. & Latif, N. (1999, Spring). Design, Development, and Implementation of a Graduate Program inTechnology. Journal of Engineering Technology, 16(1), 18-22.4. Qazi, S. & Ishaq, N. (1998). Impact of Applied Research in Engineering Technology. ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.5. Coppula, D. (1997, December). Integrating Teaching and Research. ASEE Prism, 7(4), 18-226. Depew, D. R. & Herrick, R. J. (1997). The Future of Graduate Education in The
complete the program course requirements including at leastthree of the following six activities:1. Undergraduate Research2. Cooperative Education or Internship3. Global Learning or Study Abroad4. Service Learning5. Leadership6. Multidisciplinary EducationThree of the above are required to provide flexibility for the student to tailor the program to theirindividual needs. The three requirements can be integrated into current curriculum choices andnot create an undue burden for students. One of the three requirements the student chooses couldbe the Global Learning or Study Abroad criterion. To complete this requirement, the studentmust complete one or more of the following: 1. Successfully participate in a global
like theEngineering Integration Pedagogical Content Knowledge (EIPCK) conceptual framework focuson the need for PCK and its subcomponents, namely, 1- Knowledge of Orientation to TeachingEngineering, 2- Knowledge of Engineering Integration Curriculum, 3- Knowledge of Students'Understanding of Engineering, 4- Knowledge of Engineering Teaching Strategy, and 5-Knowledge of Assessment in Engineering [29]. The close relation of this work to the EIPCKframework is evident in the attempt to operationalize its components for practical application andassessment. By tailoring the survey instrument to measure the specific elements of PK and PCKin the GTA training course, which adheres to the outlined knowledge framework in EIPCK, theresearch team seeks to
writers [9].Approaches to teaching writing to engineers vary widely across colleges and universities.Technical writing can be introduced in the Introduction to Engineering courses in the first year[10], in the Capstone courses in the senior years [11], or in courses students take in theirsophomore or junior year [12]. Another approach is integrating or embedding the writing skillsin major courses across their engineering curriculum [13] [14]. This scaffolding approach hasbeen utilized in several schools and has contributed to more successful engineering education,especially with attention to writing and communication [15] [16].In a conference panel discussion, Corneal et al. said that students could be trained in writing byworking with
week) Analytical and numerical solutions of partial differential equations (4 weeks) Vector calculus and Vector Integral Theorems (3 weeks) Statistics and Probability (4 weeks) Introduction to optimization (1 week)The rationale for choosing these topics is discussed here. The first two topics arediscussed in the course because they are prerequisite to the major topic of the course,partial differential equations. However, their coverage is limited to four lecture sessionsas it is intended to be an overview rather than an in-depth discussion of the differentialequations (DEs). Laplace Transform method of solving DEs is not covered as it iscovered in details in the other core course, Control of Mechanical Systems. Fourier
engineering education. This report provides a step-by-step guide onintegrating an Industry 4.0 curriculum into two and four-year institutions alongside outlining theexact content that could be taught in mechanical and manufacturing engineering programs. TheAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and Autodesk suggest a modular approachinvolving core themes and concepts, case studies, real-world examples, self-assessments, videos,and hands-on exercises for the six modules covering design for sustainability to advanced AI/MLand automation. By providing projects based in the real world and up-to-date content, professorshave an easier time integrating this curriculum into their classrooms while inspiring the nextgeneration of
Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. My research is using computational modeling to integrate the systems in the food- energy-water (FEW) nexus. My current work involves connecting corn, water, ethanol, and beef systems to develop a comprehensive understanding of how these systems work together and affect each other. This will be a simplified model that will support the framework of an educational videogame that teaches the importance of systems-thinking in these fields.Dr. Jennifer Keshwani, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Jenny Keshwani is an Assistant Professor of Biological Systems Engineering and Science Literacy Spe- cialist in the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at
modelled and experimental results as a means to validate the current researchapproach. The process of integrating a summer internship along with an independent studyexperience has strengthened the resolve of the authors that engineering is for everyone. Thestudent authors participated in the internship at various time in their undergraduate experience(two prior to Junior year and one prior to Senior year). Through researching methods to improveRO feed spacer design, the student authors were able to more completely appreciate the toolsobtained throughout their environmental engineering curriculum that supports their ability todevelop innovative solutions to ill-defined problems as well as to further attain the ABET EACCriteria – especially
practice in an integrated, real worldenvironment that a systems engineer can develop the necessary insights and wisdom to becomeproficient. Systems engineering educators are struggling to meet the growing educationaldemands for a workforce able to solve problems driven by accelerating technology, rapidlyevolving needs, and increasing systems complexity [1-3]. At the same time, there is a wideninggap in industry between the need and the availability of systems engineering practitioners withthe necessary experience to address these challenges [4].The Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator (SEEA) project was designed as a response tothese critical needs and challenges [5]. The project goals are to: assess the feasibility of an immersive
-Riddle Aeronautical University.Dr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from V ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Role of Feedback within Scrum for Engineering Department OperationAbstractOver the past 50 years, there has been little change in how most academic departments in U.S.universities conduct their day-to-day affairs. Many reasons contribute to the
Session 2525 Transformations: Ethics and Design Richard Devon, Andrew Lau, Philip McReynolds, and Andras Gordon Engineering Design & Graphics, Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractThis paper will focus on an ethics curriculum that has been developed for design projects. Therationale behind it is discussed and some preliminary feedback from students is reviewed. Thecurriculum for the design projects is distinctive in several fundamental ways. These departuresfrom more traditional views of “engineering ethics” were not come by easily and they have takenmany years to develop. 1) We view all design
Bio-inspired Design Using C-K TheoryIntroductionThe engineer of 2020 is expected to not only offer technical ingenuity but also adapt to acontinuously evolving environment. The ability to operate outside the narrow limits of onediscipline and be ethically grounded in solving the complex problems of the future will also beneeded. To address the competencies of the future engineer, undergraduate education must trainstudents to not only solve engineering challenges that transcend disciplinary boundaries, but alsocommunicate, transfer knowledge, and collaborate across technical and non-technical boundaries.One approach to train engineers in these competencies is teaching biomimicry or bio-inspireddesign in an engineering curriculum, which offers
into engineering technology programs. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, Session 1348.15. Alford, E. and T. Ward. 1999. Integrating ethics into the freshman curriculum: an interdisciplinary approach. Proceedings of the 1999 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. Session 2561.16. Marshall, J. and J. Marshall. 2003. Integrating ethics education into the engineering curriculum. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. Session 1675.17. Davis, M. 1992. Integrating ethics into technical courses: IIT’s experiment in its second year. 1992 ASEE Frontiers in Education